It is time for the WWE to go back to having 1 roster

You know, it is very obvious right now, that the WWE needs to go back to 1 roster, have everybody on Raw and Smackdown, and forget trying to operate 2 seperate brands as it has been a disaster.

Neither Raw or Smackdown has a healthy or deep enough roster to support having seperate rosters anymore. There is too much saturation trying to keep 2 different brands with 2 different rosters and having more then 1 PPV a month is not good.

Both rosters, are simply littered with horrible gimmicks and storylines and they have clearly ran out of ideas for wrestlers.

Both rosters, when they go on the road are going to half empty arenas.

The wrestling and the storylines on both rosters are way too predictable.

If they are going to restart ECW, they will lose some of their roster, another reason to scrap both brands.

In closing, the 2 seperate brand idea has went on for too long and it simply is out of gas and it is time to get rid of it.

but even if they merge back together, it dosnt meen better storylines. you can have the best roster imaginable, and still have crappy storylines. sure the action might be good, but everything else will suck.Invisible_Kid2

[QUOTE="Invisible_Kid2"]but even if they merge back together, it dosnt meen better storylines. you can have the best roster imaginable, and still have crappy storylines. sure the action might be good, but everything else will suck.Demonic_Jin

[QUOTE="Demonic_Jin"][QUOTE="Invisible_Kid2"]but even if they merge back together, it dosnt meen better storylines. you can have the best roster imaginable, and still have crappy storylines. sure the action might be good, but everything else will suck.Mu5uk0

Melina's teh secks (as previously mentioned in another thread).

I am a fan of 2 rosters but they need more depth

If they want Smackdown to improve, rating wise, bring back the Hardcore Championship to them. Or have it on both brands, one title, defended on both shows.mrgab

Thats a really good idea

& Seen as the WWE creative team's storylines are rubbish. I think 8 shows per PPV would lose ratings

[QUOTE="mrgab"]If they want Smackdown to improve, rating wise, bring back the Hardcore Championship to them. Or have it on both brands, one title, defended on both shows.appaloosa582002

Thats a really good idea

:roll:

[QUOTE="appaloosa582002"]

[QUOTE="mrgab"]If they want Smackdown to improve, rating wise, bring back the Hardcore Championship to them. Or have it on both brands, one title, defended on both shows.Chicago_Nut

Thats a really good idea

:roll:

24/7 rules sucked to, I remember one guy got pinned in his hotel room or something like that.

[QUOTE="Chicago_Nut"][QUOTE="appaloosa582002"]

[QUOTE="mrgab"]If they want Smackdown to improve, rating wise, bring back the Hardcore Championship to them. Or have it on both brands, one title, defended on both shows.trick_man01

Thats a really good idea

:roll:

24/7 rules sucked to, I remember one guy got pinned in his hotel room or something like that.

I liked it till the 24/7 rule thanks to Crash Holly. It was great with Steve Blackman and RVD as champs.

I liked it till the 24/7 rule thanks to Crash Holly. It was great with Steve Blackman and RVD as champs.mrgab

I can tell you one thing, Snitzky and Viscera smacking each other with Cookie Sheets is not going to be the answer to any of the WWE's problems.

Let's make the CW belt, the Hardcore CW belt then. That solves all problemsKotenks

Let's make the CW belt, the Hardcore CW belt then. That solves all problemsKotenks

I am guessing there is note of sarcasm in there, however, if not...

Lackluster, under-used, CWD is still 5x times much better than having "hardcore" division/title, easily.

Honestly, what is so great about having every jobber in the land having title run... how are cookie sheets and shopping carts hardcore?

Simply put, Hardcore title was (and still is) prime example of having title loose all meaning and credibility... prime example of what you should not do, when booking title belt.

Also, WWE has more problems than they can obviously handle, with the belts that are already there in the company... adding more belts to the booking is not the solution... Besides, there is valid reason, with it being very good one, why the hardcore title is no longer around... did you every think about it, in those terms?

[QUOTE="Kotenks"]Let's make the CW belt, the Hardcore CW belt then. That solves all problemsLink256

I am guessing there is note of sarcasm in there, however, if not...

Lackluster, under-used, CWD is still 5x times much better than having "hardcore" division/title, easily.

Honestly, what is so great about having every jobber in the land having title run... how are cookie sheets and shopping carts hardcore?

Simply put, Hardcore title was (and still is) prime example of having title loose all meaning and credibility... prime example of what you should not do, when booking title belt.

Also, WWE has more problems than they can obviously handle, with the belts that are already there in the company... adding more belts to the booking is not the solution... Besides, there is valid reason, with it being very good one, why the hardcore title is no longer around... did you every think about it, in those terms?

if you ever go on wwe.com and read abotu the history on the titles, it seems there is a lame excuse for them to get rid of them. how many people really mis the european title? or the light heavyweight title. maybe hardcore but hell give that one to ECW

[QUOTE="Link256"]

[QUOTE="Kotenks"]Let's make the CW belt, the Hardcore CW belt then. That solves all problemsmud12345

I am guessing there is note of sarcasm in there, however, if not...

Lackluster, under-used, CWD is still 5x times much better than having "hardcore" division/title, easily.

Honestly, what is so great about having every jobber in the land having title run... how are cookie sheets and shopping carts hardcore?

Simply put, Hardcore title was (and still is) prime example of having title loose all meaning and credibility... prime example of what you should not do, when booking title belt.

Also, WWE has more problems than they can obviously handle, with the belts that are already there in the company... adding more belts to the booking is not the solution... Besides, there is valid reason, with it being very good one, why the hardcore title is no longer around... did you every think about it, in those terms?

Ending the brand extension wouldn't hurt the product nor help it. You'd simply get more Hunter, more Taker, more Angle, more Mark Henry, and more HBK, and less Paul London, less Chris Benoit, less Carlito, and less Rey Mysterio. I find it very irritating that people offer this solution like it's some cure-all without considering the consequences. Bad writing and booking is bad writing and booking, no matter how you slice it or dice it. Downsizing it won't make it any better or worse. You'll just have less of an opportunity to enjoy the product as a fan.

Do you think they should add another mens title to raw? Because they have the cruiser on sd?The_Last_Ride

Back on-topic...

Bad writing and booking is bad writing and booking, no matter how you slice it or dice it._Muta