PC Gaming is not dead.

Avatar image for gbarules2999
gbarules2999

390

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#1 gbarules2999
Member since 2006 • 390 Posts

Hey, I'd like you to say "hi," to all these people. Ten million, to be exact. They play a little game - you might have heard of it - called "World of WarCraft." And every one here paid for it, too.

I'm so sick and tired of developers talking about how PC gaming is dying or dead; it's not. Stop. You're insulting your own userbase.

The perception that it is dying has mostly come from the idea that gaming sales have not gone up on the PC. That's true. They haven't. In fact, despite piracy, draconian DRM, and a buttload of shoehorned console ports not worth a DVD they were printed on, PC gaming has been getting largely the same amount of revenue it has since the early 90's. Despite publishers and developers trying to drive us away from our system of choice, PC gamers still go ahead and give good games their money.

Good games. You see that? Good games.

Assassin's Creed was not a good game. It required a computer that required continuous power from the sun (a constant stream of gas and pure energy will suffice; roughly several tons of gas per second), and not only that, but also was a lame attempt to bring what was very much a controller based game onto keyboard and mouse. Are you surprised at all that it did not sell much? No, me neither.

Publishers like to cry piracy at this point, when in fact it's something else. The PC demographic, with my sweeping generalizations, really want quality in their games. Why do you think StarCraft has made 8 million sales? What do you think made Galactic Civilizations II hit the top of the charts? Where on earth did the success of Half-Life 2 appear? None of those games had much for DRM, and all of them were easily pirated. And yet they sold, and still do.

Because they're good games, that's why. I paid $20 for StarCraft and its expansion pack, and boy was that a great deal. Awesome game. Halo 2 for Windows Vista? You know, maybe on that one I'll pass. Why? Because PC gaming is dead? No. Because of the following:

-I don't have a computer that can run it. Windows Vista, say hello, but also say hello to specifications that are beyond what a normal PC owner has. Original Xbox should not require a gigaton of computer to play.

-If I did possibly have one, there's no demo for it, so I wouldn't know for sure. My $50 purchase would be a very large gamble.

-If I did purchase it, the Windows Vista thing almost directly places me into a category where I can epxect a heck of a tech support ride. And not the good kind.

-It's a console game. A console FPS. No thanks.

My friend bought Supreme Commander: Forged Alliance a few days ago. Not only was there no CD Key, not only did this Games for Windows game not load properly on his Vista machine, not only was the support site dead in the water, but after all that it still would not run on his very capable machine. He bought that laptop two months ago, might I add, and it's a very nice purchase.

This is not a very good argument for why I should go and buy the next game the Supreme Commander developers put out. It might be an isolated case, but galldarnit, it's what I hate most about PC games. Make it work, please. That's all around the whole point that, once we did get it playable and working, Supreme Commander was actually a pretty fun game. But we also had to use an other CD Key from another friend who had bought it at launch. No online for either of them, pretty much.

PC gaming is not dying. It's actually pretty healthy, and will always be. Do I need to show you guys WoW again? No?

Here's the successful way to make a game on PC:

1) Make it work. We could care less if it looks a little bad (at least give us the options of turning stuff down); just make it work. Patches are okay, as long as they come within the first month.

2) Make a demo. I want to know if it runs on my desktop. I've actually purchased games I wouldn't have considered because of the demo.

3) Make the game easy to install. It should be easier to install your game than it would be to pirate it, anyway. Any other method and you're just asking us to hate you.

4) Make it worth our while. Delay it for a year; Blizzard gets away with it, for one reason only: They always deliver. Every time. Publishers will be surprised how forgiving PC gamers will be if they say they'll actually make a console game worth playing on the PC, or bother with exlcusive stuff that's worth paying money for.

There's so many people who don't buy many PC games, because, honestly, there's so much junk out there that it's not worth it. I choose not to buy games much any more; I stick with my free, open-source alternatives. At least I know I'm getting a fair deal there.

Some gamers like consoles. I don't. I find them insulting and annoying. I shouldn't have to pay a large sum of money to have an underpowered machine that can't do anything unless the company behind it tells me I can (DRM, mostly). PC gaming wins, for my book. There are people who agree withme, and if you fail to cater to these uers you are losing out on money. The only catch? Make the game good, or else we won't buy it.

PC gaming will never go away. Those who get this will make money; plain and simple. Stop starting the funeral when no one has died yet. Please.

Comments and original here.

Avatar image for Foolz3h
Foolz3h

23739

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#2 Foolz3h
Member since 2006 • 23739 Posts

You know the PC had a whopping 17% of TGS. The 360 had something like 7% the wii 6% and PS3 3%, so it can't be doing too badly if it has the same time/floorspace as all consoles combined. Of course the DSD raped everyone. :D

DRM has put me off getting a gaming PC, despite PC parts getting to more affordable levels. I remember when a $3000 computer was pretty much medium range, now you can make a top of the range computer for HALF that! DRM needs to piss off, and Valve shouldn't be getting much credit for avoding it. Not letting people who don't have the internet play their game isn't much better in my books, and let's just say the less said about how **** Steam is the better. Oh, and Half Life's story is crap. :)

Anyway, good blog. There were a couple of typos though, and it ended a little abrubtly IMO. I'm not sure it should have been longer, but perhaps more in-depth.

Avatar image for sandyqbg
sandyqbg

7090

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 0

#3 sandyqbg
Member since 2007 • 7090 Posts
I agree with Foolz, on all accounts except for the fact that HL's story is crap. I ain't any worse than a lot of other games.
Avatar image for Foolz3h
Foolz3h

23739

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#4 Foolz3h
Member since 2006 • 23739 Posts

I agree with Foolz, on all accounts except for the fact that HL's story is crap. I ain't any worse than a lot of other games.sandyqbg

I'm exageratting a bit, it's just that people say it's great, but IMO the storytelling is great, but not the story itself.

Avatar image for gbarules2999
gbarules2999

390

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#5 gbarules2999
Member since 2006 • 390 Posts

[QUOTE="sandyqbg"]I agree with Foolz, on all accounts except for the fact that HL's story is crap. I ain't any worse than a lot of other games.Foolz3h

I'm exageratting a bit, it's just that people say it's great, but IMO the storytelling is great, but not the story itself.

Have you played the Episodes?

In all fairness, I have rallied against DRM multiple times in my blog, but I wanted to stay on topic here. And I'm no fan of Steam (no internet kills it) but if that's what we need to do to keep publishers making PC stuff, I'll go with it. Impulse is more of a step in the right direction, though; take a look at that rising star.

Avatar image for Foolz3h
Foolz3h

23739

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#6 Foolz3h
Member since 2006 • 23739 Posts
Nope, but people said the story was fantastic long before Episode I was released. ;)
Avatar image for gbarules2999
gbarules2999

390

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#7 gbarules2999
Member since 2006 • 390 Posts

Nope, but people said the story was fantastic long before Episode I was released. ;)Foolz3h

The first game has some great plot twists, I think, anyway. It's beyond anything anyone's ever seen a video game do, and the writing is fantastic. The last hour, especially, is filled with all kinds of great scenes.

The episodes get better, as well. Especially the second one. The end of the second one made pretty much anybody playing crap their pants.

Avatar image for sandyqbg
sandyqbg

7090

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 0

#8 sandyqbg
Member since 2007 • 7090 Posts

[QUOTE="sandyqbg"]I agree with Foolz, on all accounts except for the fact that HL's story is crap. I ain't any worse than a lot of other games.Foolz3h

I'm exageratting a bit, it's just that people say it's great, but IMO the storytelling is great, but not the story itself.

How's the story differebt from a storyline?

[QUOTE="Foolz3h"]

[QUOTE="sandyqbg"]I agree with Foolz, on all accounts except for the fact that HL's story is crap. I ain't any worse than a lot of other games.gbarules2999

I'm exageratting a bit, it's just that people say it's great, but IMO the storytelling is great, but not the story itself.

Have you played the Episodes?

In all fairness, I have rallied against DRM multiple times in my blog, but I wanted to stay on topic here. And I'm no fan of Steam (no internet kills it) but if that's what we need to do to keep publishers making PC stuff, I'll go with it. Impulse is more of a step in the right direction, though; take a look at that rising star.

Impulse?

Avatar image for iloveflash
iloveflash

4760

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 iloveflash
Member since 2005 • 4760 Posts
[QUOTE="Foolz3h"]

[QUOTE="sandyqbg"]I agree with Foolz, on all accounts except for the fact that HL's story is crap. I ain't any worse than a lot of other games.sandyqbg

I'm exageratting a bit, it's just that people say it's great, but IMO the storytelling is great, but not the story itself.

How's the story differebt from a storyline?

It's not the story and the storyline that are different--those are basically the same thing with different relations.

What Foolz3h is saying is that the story, ie what actually happens, is different from the storytelling, or how this story is actually being relayed to the audience. There is a big difference there. Some of the worst stories recieve the best praise because of how well they are told, and likewise some of the best stories get bashed because of poor writing, etc. You gotta have a balance of both; that's what makes a good writer.

Now you know the secret. 8)

Avatar image for gbarules2999
gbarules2999

390

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#10 gbarules2999
Member since 2006 • 390 Posts

I'm a huge sucker for storyteling. That's why I liked Cloverfield, despite the fact that nothing really "happens" in the entire movie. But the first person camera angles made it for me. Same with Half-Life 2. It "put you into" the thing better than any other media I've seen yet. I like to call it the "actor without any lines" ploy, where the viewer of the media is, as said, the actor without any lines.

Impulse is Stardock's answer to Steam. Stardock is the developer of Galactic Civilizations and the publisher of Sins of a Solar Empire.

Avatar image for Foolz3h
Foolz3h

23739

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#11 Foolz3h
Member since 2006 • 23739 Posts
They also have a thing that it seems most publishers these days are lacking---common sense.