Mine arrives tomorrow. For a system that had "no games" I've got 200+ games on my s installed right now. The vast majority are multiplatform. If I had a ps4 the vast majority would be multiplatform. The only issue I have with cows are the dumb no games and no reason to buy an xbox one crowd.
Man you should have been here last gen. Roles completely reversed.
Well, I was here last gen, I remember well. The PS3 was arguably weaker on multiplats and more expensive. This gen the xbox started out weaker and more expensive so that makes sense. If sony would release a first party dual shock with the dpad and left stick flipped(at least as an option)I'd have gotten a PS4 instead of a one. I have since gotten a 4kTV so an X fits perfectly
I meant in terms of which platform had games according to each faction. Lems were the ones claiming the PS3 had now games because of how slowly games were developed. Of course, PS3 had plenty of games, especially later in the gen and that's how they managed to close the gap in sales, despite starting a year later and much more expensive.
Nah, massive price drops, cheapest BR player and name brand is how they closed the gap.
See @Steppy_76. Some of them are still around. The PS3 was more expensive than the Xbox for the majority of the generation. The bluray player thing was only good up to about two or three years after the PS3 released. Once bluray won over HD-DVD, prices went down. Brand name only seemed to be a thing in Japan, where Xbox is pretty much dead there.