So i was researching about some metacritic that many sony fans and even console gamers use to justify game good or bad. I observe something and metacritic score for sony games have lower score than similar games. I mean lets take a look at this
Sony's Spiderman is 87 on meta on other hand
Arkham city is 96 on meta, even go further
Arkham knight is consider worst in main trilogy and disappointing one still have better metacritic than sony spiderman.
lets take another one
Ghost score 83 on meta but a game its inspired by is
AC2 score 91 on meta, and Ghost is just sony's Assasins creed with shiny graphics.
and last but not least
A game 10000 awards score 93 and dont get me on user score lol.
A similar game RE4 got 96%. a higher on meta.
My friend, my point is not to hurt any gamer or fans as they are all respected but the point is why do they use metacritic when thier games score lower than thier alternate multiplat titles that released years before?
that is just my research friends. what do you think? is it accurate? lets discuss.