[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]
[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]
I'm pretty sure that a £200 PC can run games at low settings with 30-35fps and would still look better than consoles.
So consolites, care to explain why you think consoles are cheaper?
GamerwillzPS
Maybe it would look better, but not by a whole lot. 1080p would be a good thing but that isn't factored into the price of £200. Honestly a £200 PC is NOT worth the money as it would be quickly outdated.
PC gaming IS expensive and I hate when people downplay that. It's more hardware expensive than consoles by far, but the thing is I don't find it a waste of money. If you do then that would explian why some people don't game on PC. it's not for them. But PC gaming IS for me and I don't need to justify the prices, it's well worth it IMO.
PC gaming is not more expensive than console gaming.
A couple of reasons:-
- Console games are priced higher.
- Console hardware are usually unreliable, so you'd be spending money on replacement consoles every 2 years.
Therefore, if you look at it for the long run, PC gaming is nicer for your wallet.
No, PC gaming IS more expensive if you have even a half decent setup. There is no two ways about it. It does cost quite a bit of money to game on PC properly and the only reason you would think it's too much is if you can't justify the purchase. I can however so it's not a waste of money to me. PC gaming is better suited to me than consoles.
Also PC hardware can be just as unreliable, except buying separate parts gives better warranties. Every PC gamer knows how expensive it is and I don't know why people keep trying to say otherwise. However console gamers saying it costs 2000 every 2 years are also exaggerating a great deal.
Log in to comment