Why PC is better then a console, CHOICE!!

We have the option of CHOICE.....

We as hermits spend on hardware what we want to, we can pick from thousands of hardware configuations and can buy the hardware that suits any budget.

If you want to spend £200 on a PC then go and spend £200 on a PC, if you have a £1000 to drop on one then go for it..

But if you consolites want a next generation console you guys HAVE to pay whatever Sony and Microsoft charge...

You want a PS4 next year and Sony release it at £400-500? Guess what, if you want it, if you have your heart set on it hen you HAVE to pay it....

Not a problem for us Hermits :D

That is all....

pound sterling .... :lol: u overspend it

We have the option of CHOICE.....

We as hermits spend on hardware what we want to, we can pick from thousands of hardware configuations and can buy the hardware that suits any budget.

If you want to spend £200 on a PC then go and spend £200 on a PC, if you have a £1000 to drop on one then go for it..

But if you consolites want a next generation console you guys HAVE to pay whatever Sony and Microsoft charge...

You want a PS4 next year and Sony release it at £400-500? Guess what, if you want it, if you have your heart set on it hen you HAVE to pay it....

Not a problem for us Hermits :D

That is all....

mrfrosty151986

pound sterling .... :lol: u overspend it

hippiesanta

I shove pancakes up my ass.

I shove pancakes up my ass.

Jebus213

Meh, I mainly use my PC to play free to play games. The last PC game I bought was Starcraft 2. Its just my personal taste that I prefer consoles, but its just my opinion.

Not this crap again.

[QUOTE="hippiesanta"]

pound sterling .... :lol: u overspend it

mrfrosty151986

The way the tory's are going, we'll be even worse off than the US.

Thank feck for the Scottish Indepence referendum.

Stating the obvious and a bad troll attempt.

I choose console. I just don't care to spend $26,000 on a game machine.Heirren

Why you so poor!

[QUOTE="Heirren"]I choose console. I just don't care to spend $26,000 on a game machine.Bebi_vegeta

Why you so poor!

[QUOTE="mrfrosty151986"][QUOTE="hippiesanta"]

pound sterling .... :lol: u overspend it

razgriz_101

The way the tory's are going, we'll be even worse off than the US.

Thank feck for the Scottish Indepence referendum.

PCs are also much more reliable; I never had a problem with the hardware apart from consoles. I'm on my 3rd PS3 now. The number of hours that my PC was running must be sitting at hundreds of thousands, used it for all sorts of things; Internet browsing, gaming, work, editing, etc and the PC still works.

With consoles, you have 2 years and that's it, you'll have to buy another console. That makes PC gaming much cheaper and hassle-free.

[QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"]

[QUOTE="Heirren"]I choose console. I just don't care to spend $26,000 on a game machine.Heirren

Why you so poor!

Obviously, since you're poor.

[QUOTE="razgriz_101"]

[QUOTE="mrfrosty151986"] Yes, GBP... you know, real currency and not that worthless paper they call the dollar :lol:gameofthering

The way the tory's are going, we'll be even worse off than the US.

Thank feck for the Scottish Indepence referendum.

hell yes, least our First Minister has a bit of a brain.

Not to mention my whole family's SNP supporters and my general hate for tories (considering Bo'ness had massive amounts of industry until Thatcher came along) its fair to say im voting yes in 2014.

A lot of people disagree with me, but i've done my research and i think it can work considering out petrochem industries,IT/Banking sector and tourism economicaly we're pretty sound if they make the right chocies.

I choose console. I just don't care to spend $26,000 on a game machine.Heirren

$26,000?

PCs are also much more reliable; I never had a problem with the hardware apart from consoles. I'm on my 3rd PS3 now. The number of hours that my PC was running must be sitting at hundreds of thousands, used it for all sorts of things; Internet browsing, gaming, work, editing, etc and the PC still works.

With consoles, you have 2 years and that's it, you'll have to buy another console. That makes PC gaming much cheaper and hassle-free.

GamerwillzPS

do you store your consoles in a fish tank or something?

Okay.

[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

PCs are also much more reliable; I never had a problem with the hardware apart from consoles. I'm on my 3rd PS3 now. The number of hours that my PC was running must be sitting at hundreds of thousands, used it for all sorts of things; Internet browsing, gaming, work, editing, etc and the PC still works.

With consoles, you have 2 years and that's it, you'll have to buy another console. That makes PC gaming much cheaper and hassle-free.

CaseyWegner

do you store your consoles in a fish tank or something?

Nope.

Admit it, consoles are very unreliable. Over the years of experience since the PS1, they're awfully unreliable unlike PCs.

[QUOTE="Heirren"][QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"]

Why you so poor!

Bebi_vegeta

Obviously, since you're poor.

[QUOTE="gameofthering"]

[QUOTE="razgriz_101"]

The way the tory's are going, we'll be even worse off than the US.

Thank feck for the Scottish Indepence referendum.

razgriz_101

hell yes, least our First Minister has a bit of a brain.

Not to mention my whole family's SNP supporters and my general hate for tories (considering Bo'ness had massive amounts of industry until Thatcher came along) its fair to say im voting yes in 2014.

A lot of people disagree with me, but i've done my research and i think it can work considering out petrochem industries,IT/Banking sector and tourism economicaly we're pretty sound if they make the right chocies.

£200 PC is not a PC built for the future, or even for the present in many circumstances.

SaltyMeatballs

I'm pretty sure that a £200 PC can run games at low settings with 30-35fps and would still look better than consoles.

So consolites, care to explain why you think consoles are cheaper?

SaltyMonkeyballs_signature

I'm going to say that gamerwillz is butthurt again.

[QUOTE="SaltyMeatballs"]£200 PC is not a PC built for the future, or even for the present in many circumstances.

GamerwillzPS

I'm pretty sure that a £200 PC can run games at low settings with 30-35fps and would still look better than consoles.

So consolites, care to explain why you think consoles are cheaper?

Maybe it would look better, but not by a whole lot. 1080p would be a good thing but that isn't factored into the price of £200. Honestly a £200 PC is NOT worth the money as it would be quickly outdated.

PC gaming IS expensive and I hate when people downplay that. It's more hardware expensive than consoles by far, but the thing is I don't find it a waste of money. If you do then that would explian why some people don't game on PC. it's not for them. But PC gaming IS for me and I don't need to justify the prices, it's well worth it IMO.

[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

[QUOTE="SaltyMeatballs"]£200 PC is not a PC built for the future, or even for the present in many circumstances.

seanmcloughlin

I'm pretty sure that a £200 PC can run games at low settings with 30-35fps and would still look better than consoles.

So consolites, care to explain why you think consoles are cheaper?

Maybe it would look better, but not by a whole lot. 1080p would be a good thing but that isn't factored into the price of £200. Honestly a £200 PC is NOT worth the money as it would be quickly outdated.

PC gaming IS expensive and I hate when people downplay that. It's more hardware expensive than consoles by far, but the thing is I don't find it a waste of money. If you do then that would explian why some people don't game on PC. it's not for them. But PC gaming IS for me and I don't need to justify the prices, it's well worth it IMO.

PC gaming is not more expensive than console gaming.

A couple of reasons:-

• Console games are priced higher.
• Console hardware are usually unreliable, so you'd be spending money on replacement consoles every 2 years.

Therefore, if you look at it for the long run, PC gaming is nicer for your wallet.

[QUOTE="SaltyMeatballs"]£200 PC is not a PC built for the future, or even for the present in many circumstances.

GamerwillzPS

I'm pretty sure that a £200 PC can run games at low settings with 30-35fps and would still look better than consoles.

So consolites, care to explain why you think consoles are cheaper?

I don't know if you can get a decent gaming PC at that price if you take used part out of the disscusion, but for roughly 563$ (349£) you can get adecent one.

Nope.

Admit it, consoles are very unreliable. Over the years of experience since the PS1, they're awfully unreliable unlike PCs.

GamerwillzPS

I've had my 60gb PS3 since launch.

[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

[QUOTE="SaltyMeatballs"]£200 PC is not a PC built for the future, or even for the present in many circumstances.

Lucianu

I'm pretty sure that a £200 PC can run games at low settings with 30-35fps and would still look better than consoles.

So consolites, care to explain why you think consoles are cheaper?

I don't know if you can get a decent gaming PC at that price if you take used part out of the disscusion, but for roughly 563$ (349£) you can get adecent one.

That's £349 and the PS3 is currently £200. Isn't it crazy? It goes to show that console gaming is a much more expensive hobby.

PS3 barely run games at steady 30fps and the graphics isn't on par with PC, and you have to pay £200 for that piece of hardware that will break down after 2 years?

Insane.

Yes, we know. Now shut up

[QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"]

[QUOTE="Heirren"] There's far more important things to spend money on.GioVela2010

Obviously, since you're poor.

[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

I'm pretty sure that a £200 PC can run games at low settings with 30-35fps and would still look better than consoles.

So consolites, care to explain why you think consoles are cheaper?

GamerwillzPS

Maybe it would look better, but not by a whole lot. 1080p would be a good thing but that isn't factored into the price of £200. Honestly a £200 PC is NOT worth the money as it would be quickly outdated.

PC gaming IS expensive and I hate when people downplay that. It's more hardware expensive than consoles by far, but the thing is I don't find it a waste of money. If you do then that would explian why some people don't game on PC. it's not for them. But PC gaming IS for me and I don't need to justify the prices, it's well worth it IMO.

PC gaming is not more expensive than console gaming.

A couple of reasons:-

• Console games are priced higher.
• Console hardware are usually unreliable, so you'd be spending money on replacement consoles every 2 years.

Therefore, if you look at it for the long run, PC gaming is nicer for your wallet.

What a stupid argument

[QUOTE="SaltyMeatballs"][QUOTE="freedomfreak"]Every 2 years? Good grief...freedomfreak

.....

[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

Nope.

Admit it, consoles are very unreliable. Over the years of experience since the PS1, they're awfully unreliable unlike PCs.

lundy86_4

I've had my 60gb PS3 since launch.

I would question how often you use it. I used mine A LOT (before I started PC gaming), and my PS3s just kept breaking down.

My PC surely clocked much more hours than my PS3s because of different purposes such as Internet browsing, gaming, work and editing, my hardware is basically switched on 24/7 and it still works.

[QUOTE="SaltyMeatballs"][QUOTE="freedomfreak"]Every 2 years? Good grief...freedomfreak

You gotta shake things up, and bounce back in place with beautiful female sigs, otherwise Salty's female ass signature is gonna steal your place.

But, then I'd have to play games on a PC. Not going to happen.

Every 2 years? Good grief...freedomfreak

I still have my first 360 up and running for more than two years from 2010. Still have no problems with it other than the disk tray.

[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

Maybe it would look better, but not by a whole lot. 1080p would be a good thing but that isn't factored into the price of £200. Honestly a £200 PC is NOT worth the money as it would be quickly outdated.

PC gaming IS expensive and I hate when people downplay that. It's more hardware expensive than consoles by far, but the thing is I don't find it a waste of money. If you do then that would explian why some people don't game on PC. it's not for them. But PC gaming IS for me and I don't need to justify the prices, it's well worth it IMO.

lostrib

PC gaming is not more expensive than console gaming.

A couple of reasons:-

• Console games are priced higher.
• Console hardware are usually unreliable, so you'd be spending money on replacement consoles every 2 years.

Therefore, if you look at it for the long run, PC gaming is nicer for your wallet.

What a stupid argument

Not really.

I choose console. I just don't care to spend $26,000 on a game machine.Heirren

I can max any game that comes out and my PC costs £400. I will be able to play games that looke better than consoles for years to come.

[QUOTE="freedomfreak"][QUOTE="SaltyMeatballs"] Dat GamerwillzLucianu

You gotta shake things up, and bounce back in place with beautiful female sigs, otherwise Salty's female ass signature is gonna steal your place.

[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

I'm pretty sure that a £200 PC can run games at low settings with 30-35fps and would still look better than consoles.

So consolites, care to explain why you think consoles are cheaper?

GamerwillzPS

Maybe it would look better, but not by a whole lot. 1080p would be a good thing but that isn't factored into the price of £200. Honestly a £200 PC is NOT worth the money as it would be quickly outdated.

PC gaming IS expensive and I hate when people downplay that. It's more hardware expensive than consoles by far, but the thing is I don't find it a waste of money. If you do then that would explian why some people don't game on PC. it's not for them. But PC gaming IS for me and I don't need to justify the prices, it's well worth it IMO.

PC gaming is not more expensive than console gaming.

A couple of reasons:-

• Console games are priced higher.
• Console hardware are usually unreliable, so you'd be spending money on replacement consoles every 2 years.

Therefore, if you look at it for the long run, PC gaming is nicer for your wallet.

No, PC gaming IS more expensive if you have even a half decent setup. There is no two ways about it. It does cost quite a bit of money to game on PC properly and the only reason you would think it's too much is if you can't justify the purchase. I can however so it's not a waste of money to me. PC gaming is better suited to me than consoles.

Also PC hardware can be just as unreliable, except buying separate parts gives better warranties. Every PC gamer knows how expensive it is and I don't know why people keep trying to say otherwise. However console gamers saying it costs 2000 every 2 years are also exaggerating a great deal.

[QUOTE="freedomfreak"]Every 2 years? Good grief...sonic1564

I still have my first 360 up and running for more than two years from 2010. Still have no problems with it other than the disk tray.

Disc tray? On PC, just take it out and spend £18 for a new one. On 360, buy a whole new console for £180 just for the sake of a disc tray!

See what I mean?

[QUOTE="freedomfreak"][QUOTE="SaltyMeatballs"] Dat GamerwillzLucianu

You gotta shake things up, and bounce back in place with beautiful female sigs, otherwise Salty's female ass signature is gonna steal your place.

Nah, freedomfreak has more class than that. His sigs are tasteful and not only about the girl but the composition of the shots and the style of the shots are much more elegant. MOst guys here have lame female sigs that just show T&A without trying. We could all do that if we wanted. But it's tacky.

Freedomfreak will always have the best female sigs to me because they leave more to the imagination and aren't in your face nudity