Why is nobody talking about Command & Conquer 4? *56k no*

This game is gonna be good/great, I love C&C series and this one is more awesomer than C&C3. Can't believe no one is hyping it.

Behold the awesomeness!!!!

You see this awesome laser? Awesome game + awesome laser + awesome units + awesome graphics = Awesome GAME!!!!!!

This game is at least AA!!!!

the hate for this game is going to be overwhelming when people see how strict the DRM is. i believe you need to be signed in to the EA server to play it

TO me it diddnt blip that much, because the C&C 3 (and red alert 3) came out not long ago, so for me it is too soon...

It does look like the better game tho. (compared to the 3's)

Because while most RTS and the previous CNC games emphasized a briskly paced but intimate tactical style of gameplay that was just a little slow but still quite intense, CnC3 turned the series into an ADHD rush-fest where a few basic tactics were only needed to overproduce the most obsene number of units possible and win 99% of the games by sheer numbers alone, making micromanagement and proper economy take a back seat to who can click the "build tank" button the fastest.

Because while most RTS and the previous CNC games emphasized a briskly paced but intimate tactical style of gameplay that was just a little slow but still quite intense, CnC3 turned the series into an ADHD rush-fest where a few basic tactics were only needed to overproduce the most obsene number of units possible and win 99% of the games by sheer numbers alone, making micromanagement and proper economy take a back seat to who can click the "build tank" button the fastest.

Big_Red_Button

B-B-But I love steamrolling my enemies. Just imagine 50 Kirov airship in attack mode flying pass your base, or 50 Mammoth tanks crushing you.

This thread must live on, for Kane! and the awesomeness the many PC gamers ignored.

I actually didn't know this was coming out so soon. Really I've had my eyes set on SupCom 2. I don't play PC but the first SupCom on 360 made me rethink that a RTS CAN be on console. The images of SupCom2 have me moe excited.

I really enjoy these types of games,but I'm just not good at them.Big shame.

I actually didn't know this was coming out so soon. Really I've had my eyes set on SupCom 2. I don't play PC but the first SupCom on 360 made me rethink that a RTS CAN be on console. The images of SupCom2 have me moe excited.

player_leo

So that's how cool SC is...

Anyway I think it's nice of C&C to change it's pace for the Tiberium series.

I'm not talking about it because the units look like a bunch of ********, oversized toys.

Because while most RTS and the previous CNC games emphasized a briskly paced but intimate tactical style of gameplay that was just a little slow but still quite intense, CnC3 turned the series into an ADHD rush-fest where a few basic tactics were only needed to overproduce the most obsene number of units possible and win 99% of the games by sheer numbers alone, making micromanagement and proper economy take a back seat to who can click the "build tank" button the fastest.

Big_Red_Button

I can click build tank faster than you can!

No tiberium harvesters = fail.nethernova

No base-building = FAIL!

Take a look at Warhammer 40k Dawn of War I and II. Dawn of War II can be a good game, but most of the Warhammer 40k fans prefered the old Dawn of War gameplay.

Better savemoney for Starcraft II.

Because its a pc exclusive, you know? the superior almighty gaming platform

When its on the shelves iall buy it, but till then i can't say i care that much.

The past few years have had alot of C&C, with C&C3, Kane's Wrath, Red Alert 3 and Uprising, iam all C&C'd out tbh. But it does look good.

the hate for this game is going to be overwhelming when people see how strict the DRM is. i believe you need to be signed in to the EA server to play it

wayne_kar

No base-building = FAIL!

Take a look at Warhammer 40k Dawn of War I and II. Dawn of War II can be a good game, but most of the Warhammer 40k fans prefered the old Dawn of War gameplay.

Better savemoney for Starcraft II.

RyuRanVII

The way I see it C&C4 will be one of those games that score high but in a couple of years people will hardly remember. My guess is that in like five years people will more easily remember C&C or C&C:RA2, than C&C4(unless those people are noobs);)

Hope something happans... Tho the infantry bigger then tanks style is so 1990s...

No base-building = FAIL!

Take a look at Warhammer 40k Dawn of War I and II. Dawn of War II can be a good game, but most of the Warhammer 40k fans prefered the old Dawn of War gameplay.

Better savemoney for Starcraft II.

RyuRanVII

Wait, what?

It will be a RTT now? I didn't knew that.

Hope something happans... Tho the infantry bigger then tanks style is so 1990s...

chaplainDMK

Didn't Generals still had that like in 2002 or something?

No base-building = FAIL!

Take a look at Warhammer 40k Dawn of War I and II. Dawn of War II can be a good game, but most of the Warhammer 40k fans prefered the old Dawn of War gameplay.

Better savemoney for Starcraft II.

[QUOTE="mo0ksi"][QUOTE="RyuRanVII"]

No base-building = FAIL!

Take a look at Warhammer 40k Dawn of War I and II. Dawn of War II can be a good game, but most of the Warhammer 40k fans prefered the old Dawn of War gameplay.

Better savemoney for Starcraft II.

RyuRanVII

Because while most RTS and the previous CNC games emphasized a briskly paced but intimate tactical style of gameplay that was just a little slow but still quite intense, CnC3 turned the series into an ADHD rush-fest where a few basic tactics were only needed to overproduce the most obsene number of units possible and win 99% of the games by sheer numbers alone, making micromanagement and proper economy take a back seat to who can click the "build tank" button the fastest.

Big_Red_Button

Totally agree, i didn't like Tiberium Wars, i was pretty dissapointed with that game, actually with StarCraft 2 in this year, i hardly gonna check C&C4, if any, i'll check Napoleon Total War.

the hate for this game is going to be overwhelming when people see how strict the DRM is. i believe you need to be signed in to the EA server to play it

wayne_kar

cuz C&C series sucks after red alert 1...

Looking forward to it ever since it was going to be optimized with PC exclusivity in mind. Hasn't happened too much this gen, but now we can get the whole package until SC II

All right. Look at the guy's face. Towards the middle, right at the bottom in green.

That doesn't say EA, it's Westwood, the company behind it and then ruined by the other.

I'll respect your opinion, but I bought some C&C games after they liquidated Westwood, they're terrible. But that's my own opinion. I'm glad that CnC is still keeping a fanbase, but I'll stick to Westwood's label.

I was excited for a game called Tiberium though, but EA cans the good stuff, as usual. Renegade 2 was killed and an MMO was killed.

Tiberian Sun is still the best

they could just copy/paste that whole game and update its graphics. that would be a win in my book

The game is going to suck hard. EA finally finished ruining Command and Conquer. I am probably going to buy it though, I need to know how the Tiberium Series ends. But based on my time playing the beta, the game is terrible, absolute garbage.

no bases, no tiberium fields, no tactics, rushfest, unlocking units and upgrades. = Fail. Why EA? why?

It's a PC exclusive, they took out base-building(are you ******* kidding me!!! ), and Supreme Commander 2, StarCraft 2(as overrated as it'll be), and Napoleon: Total War will all trump this game. Well, maybe not Napoleon if they don't improve on the Empire formula.