@pc_rocks said:
Nvidia doesn't have x86 license nor do they make desktop CPUs. That's like saying MS is crap because they don't make airplanes. Come back with a better excuse. Nvidia make APUs or more like SoCs for IoT, self driving cars etc. and again a market leader in that. Did AMD even made any ARM CPU after acquiring its license for more than 5 years?
The rest of the post isn't worth reading because that sounds like DC and butthurt. I'll go with what Nvidia publicly stated, they decided to focus their investment and time on other ventures and knowing their balance sheet, they were right.
AMD, don't have better GPUs aginst Nvidia nor better CPUs against Intel. Premium products cope with a premium price, deal with it.
Which is why i claim it would be ARM based.
Fact is they can't compete with AMD for consoles APU because they lack the hardware to do so period,the SOC on switch is patheticly weak compare to what AMD has for some time now,they have lower power SOC which can't compete in this market with AMD ones.
There is no excuse Nvidia simply can't deliver period.
https://www.techpowerup.com/review/nvidia-geforce-rtx-2080-ti-founders-edition/
Thats funny i see Ryzen kicking the crap out of intel on those test,even with CPU that are considerably cheaper.
But that is the beauty of it there is 1 part were AMD is kicking both intel and Nvidia.
SOC.
GPU wise they destroy intel best offerings and CPU wise they destroy Nvidias best offerings as well ARM just doesn't cut it.
Now what are consoles using since the 360 changed its dedicated GPU and CPU to an APU latter on and since the PS3 came with Cell again which was an early day APU.
Oh yeah SOC,the APU's on AMD side are ahead performance wise to those intel and Nvidia has,so much is that truth that even Intel bundle AMD GPU with their CPU..lol
Intel Launches AMD Radeon-Powered CPUs
Intel took the wraps off its 8th Generation CPU core with AMD Radeon integrated graphics today. It’s a historical event for more than one reason. First, the new CPUs are likely to set a new high water mark for integrated graphics performance. Second, the new chips represent the first time AMD and Intel have ever collaborated in this type initiative. It’s a testament to how much the market has changed that this happened in the first place — even 10 years ago, the idea of an AMD-Intel alliance would’ve been unthinkable.
https://www.extremetech.com/computing/261646-intel-launches-radeon-powered-cpus-hp-dell-announce-upcoming-systems
But one thing AMD have is better APU than both,so save your tears and bitterness fact is neither does intel or Nvidia can beat AMD on the APU market so yeah they are not an option,and like i already told you unless you are using Nvidia's very best GPU which a super ultra mega tiny portion of the market use chances are you are paying more for less performance on Nvidia side.
What do i care if Nvidia has a 2080ti if the GPU i want on my PC is a RX580 and for the performance it offer Nvidia doesn't have anything cheaper.
Unless sony or MS are interested in packing a $1,200 RTX 2080TI performance like GPU i don't see any reason why sony or MS should look at them,hell Nintendo went Nvidia i am sure because of the low watt consumption and how it was vital for their portable other wise they would have been better off with AMD as well.
Log in to comment