Who understands gamers better?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Salt_The_Fries
Edited 3 years, 9 months ago

Poll: Who understands gamers better? (51 votes)

Satoru Iwata (Nintendo) 22%
Shuhei Yoshida (Sony) 47%
Phil Spencer (Microsoft) 29%

Who do you think understand the needs of gamers better out of these three executives? Who do you think is a gamer first who happens to be making living as a businessman? Who do you think cares more about games themselves instead of just making positive PR spins?

Avatar image for freedomfreak
#1 Posted by freedomfreak (50220 posts) -

Team Ninja.

Avatar image for sukraj
#2 Posted by sukraj (27517 posts) -

me

Avatar image for j_assassin
#3 Edited by j_assassin (1010 posts) -

I dunno, but sony's always been "what games should we have to sell our console" while m$ is " what new features should we add to sell our console"

Avatar image for Lulu_Lulu
#4 Posted by Lulu_Lulu (19564 posts) -

Wheres the CEO's of the 3rd Party Companies ? :(

Avatar image for blamix99
#7 Posted by blamix99 (2685 posts) -

iwata and yoshida

Avatar image for MirkoS77
#9 Posted by MirkoS77 (12928 posts) -

I don't really know all that much of Yoshida or Spencer, but I know Iwata started his career as a programmer (often referred to as a genius one, which I don't doubt) so I'd say he knows most of what constitutes what goes into a game's creation and is better than most at doing it. But I don't know if I'd go so far as to say he understands the needs of gamers. I find he's actually a bit out of touch with the desires of what many want today.

He said people don't want online games, and he refuses to acknowledge a broader range of more Western tastes. If I had to select one out of these three, from what I know I suppose it'd be Iwata that knows games. Which is why he should be making them, not managing over them.

Avatar image for Salt_The_Fries
#10 Posted by Salt_The_Fries (12480 posts) -

I should've included Gaben :'( Oh wait, Valve doesn't make games anymore, they just sell 'em :D

Avatar image for R4gn4r0k
#11 Posted by R4gn4r0k (27741 posts) -
@Salt_The_Fries said:

I should've included Gaben :'( Oh wait, Valve doesn't make games anymore, they just sell 'em :D

Valve doesn't understand gamers I think:

"We want episode 3"

"Here is L4D2 !!!"

"We want episode 3"

"Here is Portal 2 !!!"

"We want episode 3"

"Here is CS:GO !!!"

"We want episode 3"

"Here is Dota 2 !!!"

"Sigh, never mind"

Avatar image for Cloud_imperium
#12 Posted by Cloud_imperium (14406 posts) -

@jeager_titan said:

No one. gamers are whiners and no one can satisfy them.

This .

Voted for Phil Spencer though .

Avatar image for Heil68
#13 Posted by Heil68 (57942 posts) -

Obvious that this gen is Shu.

Avatar image for speedfreak48t5p
#14 Posted by speedfreak48t5p (12866 posts) -

Me. I know what everyone wants.

Avatar image for princessgomez92
#15 Posted by PrincessGomez92 (5229 posts) -

Definitely not Sony, that's for sure.

Avatar image for deactivated-5acbb9993d0bd
#16 Edited by deactivated-5acbb9993d0bd (12449 posts) -

@R4gn4r0k said:
@Salt_The_Fries said:

I should've included Gaben :'( Oh wait, Valve doesn't make games anymore, they just sell 'em :D

Valve doesn't understand gamers I think:

"We want episode 3"

"Here is L4D2 !!!"

"We want episode 3"

"Here is Portal 2 !!!"

"We want episode 3"

"Here is CS:GO !!!"

"We want episode 3"

"Here is Dota 2 !!!"

"Sigh, never mind"

its funny you say that.... when the last 2 games on their list will have more people over years than half-life 3 ever will.

The fact that they went and developed DoTA 2 instead of yet another FPS game that wouldn't stand out shows that they know more about PC gamer's trends than you for example.

Avatar image for GreySeal9
#17 Posted by GreySeal9 (28247 posts) -

@jeager_titan said:

No one. gamers are whiners and no one can satisfy them.

Avatar image for system-reboot
#18 Posted by SYSTEM-REBOOT (658 posts) -

Valve. greatest developer in history known to mankind,

Avatar image for BPoole96
#19 Posted by BPoole96 (22817 posts) -

Is there any evidence that Phil Spencer or Iwata even plays games? I'd imagine Iwata plays Nintendo games, but is there anything else he plays?

Judging by that, I know for a fact Yoshida plays a lot of different games so I would go with him.

Avatar image for Boddicker
#20 Edited by Boddicker (4347 posts) -

Phil Spencer is still an unproven wild card. Though I really like his comment that consoles are in sore need of more RTS.

Yoshida.........I think understands Western tastes better than most Japanese, but only out of necessity as he watches consoles dying in his native country.

Iwata..........is learning a hard lesson with the Wii-U and I'm getting tired of his "please understand". Let's just say unless their next console touts a "back to basics" approach and not more gimmicky shit it could be the death knell for what was once my most beloved of gaming companies. They also need to time their release with the big 3 if they want to have any chance.

Avatar image for R4gn4r0k
#21 Edited by R4gn4r0k (27741 posts) -

@MBirdy88 said:

its funny you say that.... when the last 2 games on their list will have more people over years than half-life 3 ever will.

The fact that they went and developed DoTA 2 instead of yet another FPS game that wouldn't stand out shows that they know more about PC gamer's trends than you for example.

I think you took my post a bit too serious :/

Avatar image for Pikminmaniac
#22 Posted by Pikminmaniac (11233 posts) -

I really don't know, but Phil Spencer definitely appears to care about playing video games the most, however, Nintendo consistently produces the exact kind of experiences I care about most as a gamer. I can't speak for the masses on that one.

Avatar image for Flubbbs
#23 Posted by Flubbbs (4948 posts) -

Shuhei

Avatar image for AzatiS
#24 Edited by AzatiS (14241 posts) -

The answer is easy...

Who keeps delivering awesome exclusives despite if its first by far in console sales or dead last and who is delivering massive exclusives while being in multibillion losses each year even in next-gen when others ..let their systems Die prematurely despite with zero support ?

Sony does. And for that alone mr Yoshida is the clear winner here imho.

Avatar image for jsmoke03
#25 Posted by jsmoke03 (13696 posts) -

i dont think any of them. they have all made really big mistakes that makes me smh

Avatar image for misterpmedia
#26 Posted by misterpmedia (6209 posts) -

@jeager_titan said:

No one. gamers are whiners and no one can satisfy them.

On point.

Avatar image for Shewgenja
#27 Posted by Shewgenja (19557 posts) -

Spencer and team led the development of brand new entertainment offerings including a landmark partnership with the NFL and collaborating with industry luminary Steven Spielberg to bring a new Halo live action TV series to life. A 25-year veteran of Microsoft, Spencer has held a variety of technical roles including development lead for Microsoft's first CD-ROM-based titles including Encarta, development manager for Microsoft Money, and general manager of Microsoft's online and offline consumer productivity products including Microsoft Works and Microsoft Picture It!

A little something for the dinglenuts that voted for Spencer.

Avatar image for cainetao11
#28 Posted by cainetao11 (33565 posts) -

@j_assassin said:

I dunno, but sony's always been "what games should we have to sell our console" while m$ is " what new features should we add to sell our console"

Always? So the PS3 wasn't marketed on its blu ray player for the first year or so? "It only does everything" didn't sound like it was just about games to me.

My answer is none. Games are fun, so I bet they all play them from time to time, but I don't believe any are all that into them.

Avatar image for cainetao11
#29 Posted by cainetao11 (33565 posts) -

@jeager_titan said:

No one. gamers are whiners and no one can satisfy them.

Well said. Have ever looked at the things that are complained about graphically here?

Avatar image for heretrix
#30 Edited by heretrix (37792 posts) -

None of them. They understand gaming business well enough. I doubt any of them give a shit what attention starved forum brats want, since they don't know themselves. They care about what sells.

Avatar image for Shewgenja
#31 Posted by Shewgenja (19557 posts) -

Almost twice as many people voting for Spencer over Iwata? What the actual?

Avatar image for GrenadeLauncher
#32 Posted by GrenadeLauncher (6843 posts) -

@Shewgenja said:

Almost twice as many people voting for Spencer over Iwata? What the actual?

Lemmings kissing Phil Spencer's feet because he's letting them buy Halo again.

Avatar image for clone01
#33 Posted by clone01 (27119 posts) -

@GrenadeLauncher said:

@Shewgenja said:

Almost twice as many people voting for Spencer over Iwata? What the actual?

Lemmings kissing Phil Spencer's feet because he's letting them buy Halo again.

Do you do anything different for all things Sony?

Avatar image for hiphops_savior
#34 Posted by hiphops_savior (8444 posts) -

None of the three companies care about gamers. They care about making money off of you. One of the best ways to do that is through good PR. Sony is exceptional in that area, creating the myth of Gamers first through games with vague release dates such as FF15 and KH3.

Iwata, as a former game developer, understands the process developing games the most. Reggie Fils-Aime enjoys playing games, and the games Nintendo produces shows attention to detail and a product of love. Their PR, however, is shit ever since Yamauchi told third party studios to go to hell.

Don't pretend the corporations are your friends, the relationship starts and ends with the product you buy with your money. I just happen to fork my hard earned money on products that will be a good investment.

Avatar image for Douevenlift_bro
#35 Posted by Douevenlift_bro (6804 posts) -

Sony.

Provides a full spectrum

Nintendo:

Stuck in an alternate reality

Microsoft:

Just wants to put Windows into your living room

Avatar image for edwardecl
#36 Posted by edwardecl (2240 posts) -

None of those people care about gamers, all they care about it turning a profit and expanding their influence, if that just happens to align with making the gamers happy that's a coincidence.

Avatar image for R4gn4r0k
#37 Posted by R4gn4r0k (27741 posts) -

@cainetao11 said:

@jeager_titan said:

No one. gamers are whiners and no one can satisfy them.

Well said. Have ever looked at the things that are complained about graphically here?

Lol, have you noticed the fact that games can look either: "amazing" or "beyond terrible". There is no in between. Either it looks top of the line or it looks horrible as shit.

I think that's hilarious XD

Avatar image for Shielder7
#38 Posted by Shielder7 (5191 posts) -

Answer: Gamers.