Which, in my opinion, is technically solid (sound) experience, but rather uninspiring and failing to make any meaningful and significant improvements over the original
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Which, in my opinion, is technically solid (sound) experience, but rather uninspiring and failing to make any meaningful and significant improvements over the original
Even if they did a great job it wouldn't be as good. I've already explored rapture, give me a new setting.
Nah, BioShock 2 will be AAA.
F.E.A.R. always sucked. This is coming from a guy who bought F.E.A.R. on PC the day it released. The mashup of Japanese horror cliches in a horribly made atmospheric setting of offices, was utter fail.
Every little piece of gameplay and story looks even better in #2. The turn to altruism with Sophia Lamb will be interesting. Again, very political, but also very religious.
Nah, BioShock 2 will be AAA.
F.E.A.R. always sucked. This is coming from a guy who bought F.E.A.R. on PC the day it released. The mashup of Japanese horror cliches in a horribly made atmospheric setting of offices, was utter fail.
Every little piece of gameplay and story looks even better in #2. The turn to altruism with Sophia Lamb will be interesting. Again, very political, but also very religious.
BioShockOwnz
What ? Original FEAR for PC was AAA there was nothing on the market like that game. The graphics , story, gameplay was off the hook. So i disagree.
I'm pretty sketchy about this.
I just don't think the game needed a sequel. What's wrong with a new IP? Even if it's another "Shock" game.
It's interesing that you bring up F.E.A.R. The original was absolutely incredible in every way. It, to me, is everything a corridor shooter should be, and then some. It scared the living crap out of me for days, and even now it looks great when it's maxed out.
Then F.E.A.R. 2 comes along and it's a consolized, arcadey mess with mechs and... ugh don't get me started.
The only other shooter I have seen fall from grace like that is Far Cry. Far Cry 2 is an abomination that never should have been released, and certainly should not have been called Far Cry.
Even Battlefield, though they slipped with that awful console release on PS2/Xbox, has regained a strong presence with Bad Company, 1943, and soon BFBC2.
Half Life seems to be one of the only shooters from 2000-2005 that hasn't shown a significant dip in quality, and that's probably because they haven't released a real installment in the franchise since 2004.
I am on the fence about MW, since MW2 is a good game, but I think it could have been so much more. Killzone 2 is obviously a huge improvement over the original, but it's too young and unproven as a franchise to be mentioned along the big dogs, even though I liked KZ2 almost as much as any of them.
[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]
Nah, BioShock 2 will be AAA.
F.E.A.R. always sucked. This is coming from a guy who bought F.E.A.R. on PC the day it released. The mashup of Japanese horror cliches in a horribly made atmospheric setting of offices, was utter fail.
Every little piece of gameplay and story looks even better in #2. The turn to altruism with Sophia Lamb will be interesting. Again, very political, but also very religious.
telefanatic
What ? Original FEAR for PC was AAA there was nothing on the market like that game. The graphics , story, gameplay was off the hook. So i disagree.
I agree with you. The original F.E.A.R. was incredible, and the sequel was a cash-in designed for consoles.[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]
Nah, BioShock 2 will be AAA.
F.E.A.R. always sucked. This is coming from a guy who bought F.E.A.R. on PC the day it released. The mashup of Japanese horror cliches in a horribly made atmospheric setting of offices, was utter fail.
Every little piece of gameplay and story looks even better in #2. The turn to altruism with Sophia Lamb will be interesting. Again, very political, but also very religious.
telefanatic
What ? Original FEAR for PC was AAA there was nothing on the market like that game. The graphics , story, gameplay was off the hook. So i disagree.
It was overrated trash. The environments and gameplay were both repetitive and dull. Slow motion was done before. The only thing it did good was AI.
I disagree on the gameplay of Fear, the shooting was satisfying, and the AI was great. But the japanese horror cliches really did ruin the experience for me. "Ooohhh a creepy girl flickers onto my screen. And she was abused or something right?" Keep it in the movies, it was already stale in that format.Nah, BioShock 2 will be AAA.
F.E.A.R. always sucked. This is coming from a guy who bought F.E.A.R. on PC the day it released. The mashup of Japanese horror cliches in a horribly made atmospheric setting of offices, was utter fail.
Every little piece of gameplay and story looks even better in #2. The turn to altruism with Sophia Lamb will be interesting. Again, very political, but also very religious.
BioShockOwnz
I think we just have to resign to the fact that its not likely to be as good as the first.
BioShock was special because of its unique setting and concept... No-way can it have the same effect twice.
I'm sure it will be a great game though, with improvements aplenty... It's a day 1 buy for me.
There were moments of F.E.A.R. 2 that were jaw-dropping, but overall it felt like it was just trying to outdo its predecessor in every way, which made it feel a little silly and overdone. It lost a lot of its atmosphere and story but had great set-pieces and genuine scary moments.I think Bioshock 2 will follow the exact same pattern.
The problem with FEAR2 was that it was short and had no memorable set pieces. It had some great stuff in there and the combat was more than capable but it lacked somethingThere were moments of F.E.A.R. 2 that were jaw-dropping, but overall it felt like it was just trying to outdo its predecessor in every way, which made it feel a little silly and overdone. It lost a lot of its atmosphere and story but had great set-pieces and genuine scary moments.I think Bioshock 2 will follow the exact same pattern.
skinny_man_69
There were moments of F.E.A.R. 2 that were jaw-dropping, but overall it felt like it was just trying to outdo its predecessor in every way, which made it feel a little silly and overdone. It lost a lot of its atmosphere and story but had great set-pieces and genuine scary moments.I think Bioshock 2 will follow the exact same pattern.
The problem with FEAR2 was that it was short and had no memorable set pieces. It had some great stuff in there and the combat was more than capable but it lacked something I do admit that it lacked soul, but I would argue it had some very memorable moments. Unfortunately, those are spoilers and I cannot go into detail. I will just limit it to "some of the street battles and the ending" :PIf you mean better gameplay with a worse story, maybe.
I liked FEAR 2. Not great or anything, but worth the 20 bucks I paid for it.
I am very worried about Bioshock 2 however. The development has been... ugly.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment