What GPU will Xbox 720 have?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for starjet905
starjet905

2071

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 starjet905
Member since 2005 • 2071 Posts
6670 :lol:
Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23623

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#52 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23623 Posts

6670 :lol:starjet905
I think some like reach 3 aka loosingends just cant fathom the thought that the next xbox will not even surpass pc hardware(ie 5870/5850) that will be 4 years old by the time it comes out. Personally I wish they would use at least something as fast as a 6850 because a 6670 isnt much faster then old Geforce 8800's that came out nearly 6 years ago, however a 6670 is still 3-4x faster then whats in the 360 now. and memory will play a role in quality of detail and what they they can render. and consolers will still be drooling about how realistic things will look.

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155289

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#53 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155289 Posts

gtx 680's in sli.. yh right :lol:SPBoss
That's what I want!

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#54 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

[QUOTE="starjet905"]6670 :lol:04dcarraher

I think some like reach 3 aka loosingends just cant fathom the thought that the next xbox will not even surpass pc hardware(ie 5870/5850) that will be 4 years old by the time it comes out. Personally I wish they would use at least something as fast as a 6850 because a 6670 isnt much faster then old Geforce 8800's that came out nearly 6 years ago, however a 6670 is still 3-4x faster then whats in the 360 now. and memory will play a role in quality of detail. and consolers will still be drooling about how realistic things will look.

7770 @1Ghz rivals 6850. 7770@1.3Ghz should be able to pass 6850 or 5850.

The BOM between 7750 and 7770 would be similar i.e. same ASIC.

Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23623

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#55 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23623 Posts

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"]

[QUOTE="starjet905"]6670 :lol:ronvalencia

I think some like reach 3 aka loosingends just cant fathom the thought that the next xbox will not even surpass pc hardware(ie 5870/5850) that will be 4 years old by the time it comes out. Personally I wish they would use at least something as fast as a 6850 because a 6670 isnt much faster then old Geforce 8800's that came out nearly 6 years ago, however a 6670 is still 3-4x faster then whats in the 360 now. and memory will play a role in quality of detail. and consolers will still be drooling about how realistic things will look.

7770 @1Ghz rivals 6850. 7770@1.3Ghz should be able to pass 6850 or 5850.

The BOM between 7750 and 7770 would be similar i.e. same ASIC.

I highly doubt they will go with a highly overclocked 7770 , MS wants to get away from needing more cooling and power.... also a 1ghz 7770 does not rival a 6850 especially at 1080, the 6850 pixel fill rate is around 55% faster then 7770 let alone the 6850's memory bandwidth is like 75% faster.While both are nearly the same for texel fill rate.

Now a 7850 is a different story texel fill rate for a 7850 is like 50% faster then 6850 while the pixel fill rate is only 10% difference. and uses a whole 10 watts more.

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#56 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

[QUOTE="ronvalencia"]

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"] I think some like reach 3 aka loosingends just cant fathom the thought that the next xbox will not even surpass pc hardware(ie 5870/5850) that will be 4 years old by the time it comes out. Personally I wish they would use at least something as fast as a 6850 because a 6670 isnt much faster then old Geforce 8800's that came out nearly 6 years ago, however a 6670 is still 3-4x faster then whats in the 360 now. and memory will play a role in quality of detail. and consolers will still be drooling about how realistic things will look.

04dcarraher

7770 @1Ghz rivals 6850. 7770@1.3Ghz should be able to pass 6850 or 5850.

The BOM between 7750 and 7770 would be similar i.e. same ASIC.

I highly doubt they will go with a highly overclocked 7770 , MS wants to get away from needing more cooling and power.... also a 1ghz 7770 does not rival a 6850 especially at 1080, the 6850 pixel fill rate is around 55% faster then 7770 let alone the 6850's memory bandwidth is like 75% faster.

From link

perfrel_1920.gif

7770's 100 percent vs 6850's 107 percent is minor.

With Crysis 2's DX11+High res texture pack, 7770 smacks 6850/6870.

crysis2_1920_1200.gif

The console gaming platforms would be targeting specfic hardware strenghts.

Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23623

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#57 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23623 Posts
I never liked tech powerup general overall performance charts they have been wrong before. Also look at Crysis 2 on there that is way off and wrong..... 7770 out classing a 6870 and gtx 560ti. That chart alone will slew the overall performance numbers....
Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#58 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

I never liked tech powerup general overall performance charts they have been wrong before. Also look at Crysis 2 on there that is way off and wrong..... 7770 out classing a 6870 and gtx 560ti. That chart alone will slew the overall performance numbers.... 04dcarraher

Crysis 2 DX11 probably fall into 7770's architectural strenghts.

We could limit the workloads to DX11 type games and create a new graph i.e. next-gen console with next-gen 3D engines..

Avatar image for BPoole96
BPoole96

22818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#59 BPoole96
Member since 2008 • 22818 Posts

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"] I never liked tech powerup general overall performance charts they have been wrong before. Also look at Crysis 2 on there that is way off and wrong..... 7770 out classing a 6870 and gtx 560ti. That chart alone will slew the overall performance numbers.... ronvalencia

Crysis 2 DX11 probably fall into 7770's architectural strenghts.

We could limit the workloads to DX11 type games and create a new graph i.e. next-gen console with next-gen 3D engines..

Which card do you think Sony/MS will base their GPUs off of? You seem to know a lot about tech

Avatar image for ionusX
ionusX

25760

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#60 ionusX
Member since 2009 • 25760 Posts

So I gathered all the rumors, which GPU will 720 have?

Will it have:

2 7000 Southern Island series gpus

http://www.computerandvideogames.com/342342/xbox-720-has-blu-ray-2-gpus-always-on-internet-rumour/

1 custom AMD southern island 7000 series gpu

http://www.tgdaily.com/hardware-features/60921-rumor-xbox-720-chip-in-production

or

1 custom made amd 8000 series gpu

reach3

none of the above this is already old news.. it sports the hd 6690D dual gpu which is the result of a llano a8-3800 series and an hd 6670 working in unison. in short your getting a 9800gtx

Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23623

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#61 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23623 Posts
[QUOTE="ronvalencia"][QUOTE="04dcarraher"] I never liked tech powerup general overall performance charts they have been wrong before. Also look at Crysis 2 on there that is way off and wrong..... 7770 out classing a 6870 and gtx 560ti. That chart alone will slew the overall performance numbers....

Crysis 2 DX11 probably fall into 7770's architectural strenghts.

I doubt it..... techpowerup has had a few notable discrepancies before in the past. But when every other game a 6850 or 6870 beats the 7770 in Direct x 11 based games let alone Direct x 9 based games . and then a GTX 560ti is pretty much equal to a 7850.
Avatar image for ionusX
ionusX

25760

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#62 ionusX
Member since 2009 • 25760 Posts

[QUOTE="ronvalencia"]

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"] I never liked tech powerup general overall performance charts they have been wrong before. Also look at Crysis 2 on there that is way off and wrong..... 7770 out classing a 6870 and gtx 560ti. That chart alone will slew the overall performance numbers.... BPoole96

Crysis 2 DX11 probably fall into 7770's architectural strenghts.

We could limit the workloads to DX11 type games and create a new graph i.e. next-gen console with next-gen 3D engines..

Which card do you think Sony/MS will base their GPUs off of? You seem to know a lot about tech

ron knows jack ---- hes a moron.. he is lucky if he can find his way around a walmart un supervised

Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23623

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#63 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23623 Posts

[QUOTE="ronvalencia"]

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"] I never liked tech powerup general overall performance charts they have been wrong before. Also look at Crysis 2 on there that is way off and wrong..... 7770 out classing a 6870 and gtx 560ti. That chart alone will slew the overall performance numbers.... BPoole96

Crysis 2 DX11 probably fall into 7770's architectural strenghts.

We could limit the workloads to DX11 type games and create a new graph i.e. next-gen console with next-gen 3D engines..

Which card do you think Sony/MS will base their GPUs off of? You seem to know a lot about tech

I think he just raddle's off tech specs quotes relates from different sites and make it seem he understands the technical facts when he does not. I known a few IT majors that are on these forums scratch their heads trying to make heads or tails of what he posts sometimes. and I have yet seen him explain his facts or posts where the average joe and make sense of what he post. Sometimes I had to decrypt, break own his posts to make heads or tails.
Avatar image for ionusX
ionusX

25760

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#64 ionusX
Member since 2009 • 25760 Posts

[QUOTE="BPoole96"]

[QUOTE="ronvalencia"]

Crysis 2 DX11 probably fall into 7770's architectural strenghts.

We could limit the workloads to DX11 type games and create a new graph i.e. next-gen console with next-gen 3D engines..

04dcarraher

Which card do you think Sony/MS will base their GPUs off of? You seem to know a lot about tech

I think he just raddle's off tech specs quotes relates from different sites and make it seem he understands the technical facts when he does not. I known a few IT majors that are on these forums scratch their heads trying to make heads or tails of what he posts sometimes. and I have yet seen him explain his facts or posts where the average joe and make sense of what he post. Sometimes I had to decrypt, break own his posts to make heads or tails.

yeah he makes gambl3r look intelligent.. heck i would sooner believe loosing ends than ron XD

Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23623

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#65 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23623 Posts

[QUOTE="reach3"]

So I gathered all the rumors, which GPU will 720 have?

Will it have:

2 7000 Southern Island series gpus

http://www.computerandvideogames.com/342342/xbox-720-has-blu-ray-2-gpus-always-on-internet-rumour/

1 custom AMD southern island 7000 series gpu

http://www.tgdaily.com/hardware-features/60921-rumor-xbox-720-chip-in-production

or

1 custom made amd 8000 series gpu

ionusX

none of the above this is already old news.. it sports the hd 6690D dual gpu which is the result of a llano a8-3800 series and an hd 6670 working in unison. in short your getting a 9800gtx

Na not a 9800GTX an AMD 6750 :P
Avatar image for ionusX
ionusX

25760

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#66 ionusX
Member since 2009 • 25760 Posts

[QUOTE="ionusX"]

[QUOTE="reach3"]

So I gathered all the rumors, which GPU will 720 have?

Will it have:

2 7000 Southern Island series gpus

http://www.computerandvideogames.com/342342/xbox-720-has-blu-ray-2-gpus-always-on-internet-rumour/

1 custom AMD southern island 7000 series gpu

http://www.tgdaily.com/hardware-features/60921-rumor-xbox-720-chip-in-production

or

1 custom made amd 8000 series gpu

04dcarraher

none of the above this is already old news.. it sports the hd 6690D dual gpu which is the result of a llano a8-3800 series and an hd 6670 working in unison. in short your getting a 9800gtx

Na not a 9800GTX an AMD 6750 :P

well no matter how you slice things this will do wonders for amd. consoles will be buying two amd products not 1 to fulfill the same role. profits will be way up next gen for amd. i also project their cfx and hcf support to really take off though you wouldnt need a crystal ball for that. amd will be livings the high life at sheep, cows and lems expense.. im hoping they will pass this on to their msot favored son pc in better products.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LPJRzm5q7kg

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#67 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts
[QUOTE="ionusX"]

[QUOTE="BPoole96"]

[QUOTE="ronvalencia"]

Crysis 2 DX11 probably fall into 7770's architectural strenghts.

We could limit the workloads to DX11 type games and create a new graph i.e. next-gen console with next-gen 3D engines..

Which card do you think Sony/MS will base their GPUs off of? You seem to know a lot about tech

ron knows jack ---- hes a moron.. he is lucky if he can find his way around a walmart un supervised

What's your problem ionusX?
Avatar image for ionusX
ionusX

25760

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#68 ionusX
Member since 2009 • 25760 Posts

[QUOTE="ionusX"]

[QUOTE="BPoole96"]

Which card do you think Sony/MS will base their GPUs off of? You seem to know a lot about tech

ronvalencia

ron knows jack ---- hes a moron.. he is lucky if he can find his way around a walmart un supervised

What's your problem ionusX?

you run your mouth and barely know what your saying

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#69 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

[QUOTE="BPoole96"]

[QUOTE="ronvalencia"]

Crysis 2 DX11 probably fall into 7770's architectural strenghts.

We could limit the workloads to DX11 type games and create a new graph i.e. next-gen console with next-gen 3D engines..

04dcarraher

Which card do you think Sony/MS will base their GPUs off of? You seem to know a lot about tech

I think he just raddle's off tech specs quotes relates from different sites and make it seem he understands the technical facts when he does not. I known a few IT majors that are on these forums scratch their heads trying to make heads or tails of what he posts sometimes. and I have yet seen him explain his facts or posts where the average joe and make sense of what he post. Sometimes I had to decrypt, break own his posts to make heads or tails.

It seems you haven't done professional software programming if you haven't figured out "IT" contains specfic specialities.

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#70 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts
[QUOTE="ionusX"]

[QUOTE="ronvalencia"][QUOTE="ionusX"] ron knows jack ---- hes a moron.. he is lucky if he can find his way around a walmart un supervised

What's your problem ionusX?

you run your mouth and barely know what your saying

LOL your rich saying that.
Avatar image for BPoole96
BPoole96

22818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#71 BPoole96
Member since 2008 • 22818 Posts

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"][QUOTE="BPoole96"]

Which card do you think Sony/MS will base their GPUs off of? You seem to know a lot about tech

ionusX

I think he just raddle's off tech specs quotes relates from different sites and make it seem he understands the technical facts when he does not. I known a few IT majors that are on these forums scratch their heads trying to make heads or tails of what he posts sometimes. and I have yet seen him explain his facts or posts where the average joe and make sense of what he post. Sometimes I had to decrypt, break own his posts to make heads or tails.

yeah he makes gambl3r look intelligent.. heck i would sooner believe loosing ends than ron XD

He seems like he knows his stuff to me, but okay

Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23623

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#72 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23623 Posts

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"][QUOTE="BPoole96"]

Which card do you think Sony/MS will base their GPUs off of? You seem to know a lot about tech

ronvalencia

I think he just raddle's off tech specs quotes relates from different sites and make it seem he understands the technical facts when he does not. I known a few IT majors that are on these forums scratch their heads trying to make heads or tails of what he posts sometimes. and I have yet seen him explain his facts or posts where the average joe and make sense of what he post. Sometimes I had to decrypt, break own his posts to make heads or tails.

It seems you haven't done professional software programming if one haven't figured out "IT" contains specfic specialities.

Dont matter, you still dont simplify what you post if you truly understood you post you should explain it better for others to understand

Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23623

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#73 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23623 Posts

[QUOTE="ionusX"]

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"] I think he just raddle's off tech specs quotes relates from different sites and make it seem he understands the technical facts when he does not. I known a few IT majors that are on these forums scratch their heads trying to make heads or tails of what he posts sometimes. and I have yet seen him explain his facts or posts where the average joe and make sense of what he post. Sometimes I had to decrypt, break own his posts to make heads or tails. BPoole96

yeah he makes gambl3r look intelligent.. heck i would sooner believe loosing ends than ron XD

He seems like he knows his stuff to me, but okay

If he knows it then he should be able to simplify what he posts if he truly understood what he posts he should explain it better for others to understand. It seems he just copies and pastes info, with out much explaining why.
Avatar image for BPoole96
BPoole96

22818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#74 BPoole96
Member since 2008 • 22818 Posts

[QUOTE="BPoole96"]

[QUOTE="ionusX"]

yeah he makes gambl3r look intelligent.. heck i would sooner believe loosing ends than ron XD

04dcarraher

He seems like he knows his stuff to me, but okay

If he knows it then he should be able to simplify what he posts if he truly understood what he posts he should explain it better for others to understand. It seems he just copies and pastes info, with out much explaining why.

True, but I don't think that is enough to warrant saying he doesn't have a clue what he is talking about

Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23623

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#75 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23623 Posts

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"][QUOTE="BPoole96"]

He seems like he knows his stuff to me, but okay

BPoole96

If he knows it then he should be able to simplify what he posts if he truly understood what he posts he should explain it better for others to understand. It seems he just copies and pastes info, with out much explaining why.

True, but I don't think that is enough to warrant saying he doesn't have a clue what he is talking about

but never explaining the what and why on the technical posts does not show if he knows or not, raises the question. Even on the GS hardware forums people think he rattles off...

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#76 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

[QUOTE="ronvalencia"][QUOTE="04dcarraher"] I think he just raddle's off tech specs quotes relates from different sites and make it seem he understands the technical facts when he does not. I known a few IT majors that are on these forums scratch their heads trying to make heads or tails of what he posts sometimes. and I have yet seen him explain his facts or posts where the average joe and make sense of what he post. Sometimes I had to decrypt, break own his posts to make heads or tails. 04dcarraher

It seems you haven't done professional software programming if one haven't figured out "IT" contains specfic specialities.

Dont matter, you still dont simplify what you post if you truly understood you post you should explain it better for others to understand

What's needed to be simplified? Besides the techpowerup's graphs, my recent screenshot postings was about DX ASM (hence VM) and WDDM.
Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23623

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#77 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23623 Posts

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"]

[QUOTE="ronvalencia"] It seems you haven't done professional software programming if one haven't figured out "IT" contains specfic specialities.ronvalencia

Dont matter, you still dont simplify what you post if you truly understood you post you should explain it better for others to understand

What's needed to be simplified? Besides the techpowerup's graphs, my recent screenshot postings was about DX ASM (hence VM) and WDDM.

"my recent screenshot postings was about DX ASM (hence VM) and WDDM."

Most people have no idea what WDDM is or DX ASM, you should try explaining it better thats all..... you never do it, makes you look like your just rattling off numbers and data without reasoning... WDDM is windows display driver model, which is a newer way to give better performance graphics and new graphical abilities compared to windows xp and older OS's ways for supplying drivers for hardware, and DX ASM is direct x ASM which is Shader coding.

Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#78 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"]

[QUOTE="ronvalencia"] It seems you haven't done professional software programming if one haven't figured out "IT" contains specfic specialities.ronvalencia

Dont matter, you still dont simplify what you post if you truly understood you post you should explain it better for others to understand

What's needed to be simplified? Besides the techpowerup's graphs, my recent screenshot postings was about DX ASM (hence VM) and WDDM.

all your posts are like they are written in greek, might as well not be english at all. 99% of these forum's readers will never understand it even me, and I work in the field

Avatar image for xhawk27
xhawk27

11643

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 xhawk27
Member since 2010 • 11643 Posts

A potato wrapped in aluminum BPoole96

I heard that the PS4 is going to use 2 of those! :o

Avatar image for SPBoss
SPBoss

3746

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#80 SPBoss
Member since 2009 • 3746 Posts

[QUOTE="ronvalencia"][QUOTE="04dcarraher"] Dont matter, you still dont simplify what you post if you truly understood you post you should explain it better for others to understand

wis3boi

What's needed to be simplified? Besides the techpowerup's graphs, my recent screenshot postings was about DX ASM (hence VM) and WDDM.

all your posts are like they are written in greek, might as well not be english at all. 99% of these forum's readers will never understand it even me, and I work in the field

specific specialities' lol! Just trying to sound clever.. give up
Avatar image for BPoole96
BPoole96

22818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#81 BPoole96
Member since 2008 • 22818 Posts

[QUOTE="BPoole96"]A potato wrapped in aluminum xhawk27

I heard that the PS4 is going to use 2 of those! :o

I also heard the CPU is going to be run by a 2 gerbils on steroids running on a wheel. 720 only has a regular gerbil :cool:

Avatar image for gamecubepad
gamecubepad

7214

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -12

User Lists: 0

#82 gamecubepad
Member since 2003 • 7214 Posts

You guys trying to troll ronvalencia like you know something. What a joke. I've been following his posts for a while know and he has exponentially more knowledge about these things than you. Teuf is the only one I've seen on here with more understanding of tech and programming.

---

On topic, PS4 and X3 rumors seem to point to APU+GPU crossfire with mid-range tech. Should be enough to get C2/3 running maxed 1080p with no sweat. Not gonna be like the 360 where the tech stood up alright to PC hardware at the time. However, PC gfx and games are largely tied to console hardware, so the difference won't be that big.

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#83 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

[QUOTE="ronvalencia"][QUOTE="04dcarraher"] Dont matter, you still dont simplify what you post if you truly understood you post you should explain it better for others to understand

04dcarraher

What's needed to be simplified? Besides the techpowerup's graphs, my recent screenshot postings was about DX ASM (hence VM) and WDDM.

"my recent screenshot postings was about DX ASM (hence VM) and WDDM."

Most people have no idea what WDDM is or DX ASM, you should try explaining it better thats all..... you never do it, makes you look like your just rattling off numbers and data without reasoning... WDDM is windows display driver model, which is a newer way to give better performance graphics and new graphical abilities compared to windows xp and older OS's ways for supplying drivers for hardware, and DX ASM is direct x ASM which is Shader coding.

The context for WDDM was for "This is why AMD is total crap compared to nvidia" topic

If one wants to debate about some subject, one has to be prepared for it. I'm not going to waste my time on explaining the subject with this kind of topics or tone i.e. sniper postings will be returned in kind.

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#84 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts
[QUOTE="wis3boi"]

[QUOTE="ronvalencia"][QUOTE="04dcarraher"] Dont matter, you still dont simplify what you post if you truly understood you post you should explain it better for others to understand

What's needed to be simplified? Besides the techpowerup's graphs, my recent screenshot postings was about DX ASM (hence VM) and WDDM.

all your posts are like they are written in greek, might as well not be english at all. 99% of these forum's readers will never understand it even me, and I work in the field

They are english from American companies e.g. MS and AMD for this case.
Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#85 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts
[QUOTE="wis3boi"]

[QUOTE="ronvalencia"] What's needed to be simplified? Besides the techpowerup's graphs, my recent screenshot postings was about DX ASM (hence VM) and WDDM.ronvalencia

all your posts are like they are written in greek, might as well not be english at all. 99% of these forum's readers will never understand it even me, and I work in the field

They are english from American companies e.g. MS and AMD for this case.

filled with acronyms and other jargon that nobody understands.
Avatar image for tenaka2
tenaka2

17958

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 tenaka2
Member since 2004 • 17958 Posts

Whatever they choose it is going to be extremely cheap to make. It only has to be powerful enough to run kinect. The core market don't buy enough games for MS to target a console at them.

Avatar image for ionusX
ionusX

25760

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#87 ionusX
Member since 2009 • 25760 Posts

[QUOTE="wis3boi"]

[QUOTE="ronvalencia"] What's needed to be simplified? Besides the techpowerup's graphs, my recent screenshot postings was about DX ASM (hence VM) and WDDM.SPBoss

all your posts are like they are written in greek, might as well not be english at all. 99% of these forum's readers will never understand it even me, and I work in the field

specific specialities' lol! Just trying to sound clever.. give up

indeed. i also happen to work int he industry i know your full of BS.

Avatar image for ionusX
ionusX

25760

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#88 ionusX
Member since 2009 • 25760 Posts

You guys trying to troll ronvalencia like you know something. What a joke. I've been following his posts for a while know and he has exponentially more knowledge about these things than you. Teuf is the only one I've seen on here with more understanding of tech and programming.

---

On topic, PS4 and X3 rumors seem to point to APU+GPU crossfire with mid-range tech. Should be enough to get C2/3 running maxed 1080p with no sweat. Not gonna be like the 360 where the tech stood up alright to PC hardware at the time. However, PC gfx and games are largely tied to console hardware, so the difference won't be that big.

gamecubepad

excuse me.. you hang on pc ahrdware.. if you dont then you clearly dont know the circle of actual professions there exists.. here you go:

Gmaster95 (defunct)

UG95 (defunct)

IonusX (me)

C_Rule

Blazinwiipspman (feel free to correct me on his name)

wiseboi (spelt in 1337speak)

there may be more and ill happily acknowledge them if they step up. marcthpro might also be but hes also francophone so its often ahrd to understand him anyway. if theres one on gamespot you will find them there.. otherwise their full of BS and copy n paste stuff off google searches

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#89 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

[QUOTE="SPBoss"][QUOTE="wis3boi"]

all your posts are like they are written in greek, might as well not be english at all. 99% of these forum's readers will never understand it even me, and I work in the field

ionusX

specific specialities' lol! Just trying to sound clever.. give up

indeed. i also happen to work int he industry i know your full of BS.

It looks like you made a mistake with your wireless N limitations. LOL.

PS; I program in C++ (MFC/ATL/COM/network code) for a living not some easy C#/VB.NET/Java or PC network support

Avatar image for ionusX
ionusX

25760

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#90 ionusX
Member since 2009 • 25760 Posts

[QUOTE="ionusX"]

[QUOTE="SPBoss"] specific specialities' lol! Just trying to sound clever.. give upronvalencia

indeed. i also happen to work int he industry i know your full of BS.

It looks like you made a mistake with your wireless N limitations. LOL.

looks like you made a mistake in buying a fugly case LOL and wireless N while it has a theoretical limit of 300mbps hits more like 100mbps in real world. so says comp tia and cisco.. so it is written

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#91 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

[QUOTE="ronvalencia"][QUOTE="ionusX"] indeed. i also happen to work int he industry i know your full of BS.

ionusX

It looks like you made a mistake with your wireless N limitations. LOL.

looks like you made a mistake in buying a fugly case LOL and wireless N while it has a theoretical limit of 300mbps hits more like 100mbps in real world. so says comp tia and cisco.. so it is written

The case is for portability with 600Watts PS i.e. I sometimes bring it to work LOL. IF you can find a better ITX case, I would like to hear it. I'm aware of SG-08

Are you trying to wiggle out with theoretical vs practical? Practical speeds are also applicable to 80211.ac.

Saying 100MBit/s in absolute terms is unwise e.g. 138Mbit/s

ASUS_USB-N53_N300_Throughput.jpg

Btw, you still have packet overheads.

For the record, you started the personality base attacks, so let's be civil about this. If you played STO then you know about GeneR's vision.

Avatar image for gamecubepad
gamecubepad

7214

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -12

User Lists: 0

#92 gamecubepad
Member since 2003 • 7214 Posts

there may be more and ill happily acknowledge them if they step up. marcthpro might also be but hes also francophone so its often ahrd to understand him anyway. if theres one on gamespot you will find them there.. otherwise their full of BS and copy n paste stuff off google searches

ionusX

You jelly. Sooo obvious.

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#93 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

[QUOTE="wis3boi"]

[QUOTE="ronvalencia"] What's needed to be simplified? Besides the techpowerup's graphs, my recent screenshot postings was about DX ASM (hence VM) and WDDM.SPBoss

all your posts are like they are written in greek, might as well not be english at all. 99% of these forum's readers will never understand it even me, and I work in the field

specific specialities' lol! Just trying to sound clever.. give up

Well then, I don't need to explain things.

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#94 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts
[QUOTE="wis3boi"][QUOTE="ronvalencia"][QUOTE="wis3boi"]

all your posts are like they are written in greek, might as well not be english at all. 99% of these forum's readers will never understand it even me, and I work in the field

They are english from American companies e.g. MS and AMD for this case.

filled with acronyms and other jargon that nobody understands.

Tell that to "This is why AMD is total crap compared to nvidia"'s thread creator.
Avatar image for gamebreakerz__
gamebreakerz__

5120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#95 gamebreakerz__
Member since 2010 • 5120 Posts
[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

[QUOTE="RyviusARC"] It was beat without needing SLI or Crossfire. Also when the consoles first released they had shoddy optimization. My 6800gt from early 2004 was running games at better settings and fps compared to the Xbox 360.RyviusARC

And yet, a 7800GTX SLI that would cost a 3000$ PC in 2005, cant even start Witcher 2, it is not even a supported card at all !!!!

When 360 manages to run it with better lighting than PC and at a super steady frame rate and above medium settings

It is crazy how 360 completly destroys even 2010 video cards

Begone foul beast! Xbox 360  PC

Once again he leaves the thread when this comparison is posted :lol:
Avatar image for tenaka2
tenaka2

17958

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 tenaka2
Member since 2004 • 17958 Posts

[QUOTE="RyviusARC"][QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

And yet, a 7800GTX SLI that would cost a 3000$ PC in 2005, cant even start Witcher 2, it is not even a supported card at all !!!!

When 360 manages to run it with better lighting than PC and at a super steady frame rate and above medium settings

It is crazy how 360 completly destroys even 2010 video cards

gamebreakerz__

Begone foul beast! Xbox 360  PC

Once again he leaves the thread when this comparison is posted :lol:

I have no idea why, the top one with the cinematic blur is obviously better.

Avatar image for ReadingRainbow4
ReadingRainbow4

18733

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#97 ReadingRainbow4
Member since 2012 • 18733 Posts

Most likely a used pair of depends tc.

Avatar image for Strutten
Strutten

1263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 Strutten
Member since 2008 • 1263 Posts

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

[QUOTE="RyviusARC"] It was beat without needing SLI or Crossfire. Also when the consoles first released they had shoddy optimization. My 6800gt from early 2004 was running games at better settings and fps compared to the Xbox 360.nameless12345

And yet, a 7800GTX SLI that would cost a 3000$ PC in 2005, cant even start Witcher 2, it is not even a supported card at all !!!!

That may be true but Witcher 2 on the 360 looks like the PC version running on ultra-low detailand in sub-HD res, so yea...

Besides, you can get a card that beats the 360's for under 50 bucks these days (AMD 5670/5570).

Ehm what ? its not on low or anything dude .. tho it has poor aa imo, and the lack of higher res.. its atleast on med might some on low and high.. but overall i'd say around medium..

And no sh*t sherlock we are in 2012.. and consoles cant be upgrade as you know .. ofc they will beat it ..

Avatar image for Strutten
Strutten

1263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 Strutten
Member since 2008 • 1263 Posts

[QUOTE="gamebreakerz__"][QUOTE="RyviusARC"] Begone foul beast! Xbox 360  PC  tenaka2

Once again he leaves the thread when this comparison is posted :lol:

I have no idea why, the top one with the cinematic blur is obviously better.

Never understood that one, its not that blurry at all, only a little but sure as effing its not that blurry .. because when you talk to someone(tho not all) as so on and in cutscenes characters are at higher res.. and as we speak im at the same(ish) place..

"
CD Projekt RED rolls out higher detail character models and more effects work during the cut-scenes, and this results in a performance drop compared to gameplay, but overall frame-rates remain impressive bearing in mind the quality of the visuals"

DF

Avatar image for wakefulness
wakefulness

3989

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#100 wakefulness
Member since 2010 • 3989 Posts

A PowerVR.ShadowDeathX

IMG Tech actually makes really good GPU's. Escpecially now that they have been in al the major smartphones/tabs (iOS and Android) they can and really have boomed.