What are your predictions for the Ps5 Assassins Creed frame rate ?

Avatar image for greygoose12
Greygoose12

54

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#1 Greygoose12
Member since 2020 • 54 Posts

If the series x runs this at 30 fps minimum/4k I was wondering what your predictions are for the Ps5 ?

Avatar image for Random_Matt
Random_Matt

5130

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#2 Random_Matt
Member since 2013 • 5130 Posts

Can mods start to get a grip on GS.

Avatar image for x_hedon
x_hedon

334

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 5

#3 x_hedon
Member since 2019 • 334 Posts

60fps due to the secret sauce in the SSD.

Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

36057

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 SecretPolice
Member since 2007 • 36057 Posts

PS Jive at 10 fps with with dips

Bait & Switch at 0 fps no dips. lol :P

Avatar image for Juub1990
Juub1990

9891

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5  Edited By Juub1990
Member since 2013 • 9891 Posts

Identical with maybe lower-res shadows or lower settings here and there. Won't be able to tell them apart unless you zoom in on some scenes at the same time of day.

Avatar image for Pedro
Pedro

39999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 66

User Lists: 0

#6 Pedro
Member since 2002 • 39999 Posts

Well since the PS5 has an SSD which now enable developers to create seamless worlds that were impossible prior to the SSD and it supposedly can enhance graphical details and reduce the load on the GPU, my guess would be around 120FPS.

Avatar image for Juub1990
Juub1990

9891

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Juub1990
Member since 2013 • 9891 Posts

@Pedro: Lol shoulda expected the SSD jokes to crop up.

Avatar image for mclarenmaster18
mclarenmaster18

3048

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 29

User Lists: 5

#8 mclarenmaster18
Member since 2014 • 3048 Posts

Probably same as Xbox Series X version and the visuals may appear to be slightly inferior.

Avatar image for tdkmillsy
tdkmillsy

3386

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 tdkmillsy
Member since 2003 • 3386 Posts

Same as SX with less resolution and/or effects

Avatar image for Telekill
Telekill

9226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#10 Telekill
Member since 2003 • 9226 Posts

Wasn't there a 50 post limit for thread starters?

Avatar image for Grey_Eyed_Elf
Grey_Eyed_Elf

7202

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Grey_Eyed_Elf
Member since 2011 • 7202 Posts

Where are all the people that attacked me for saying games won't be 60FPS on XSX/PS5?...

You clowns, I swear same story every generation.

The SSD's and Zen 2 core's don't mean a thing at 4K... Its a GPU bottleneck! You guys are excited by having GPU's that can't even compete with a 2080 S and 2080 Ti which are literally about to be replaced by cards 40-50% better.

Main reason I just can't deal with consoles, seriously 30FPS in 2020... You think I spend thousands on a OLED TV and Speaker setup to play games at 30FPS in 2020?

Enjoy guys, the worst is yet to come... 20FPS dips in heavy raytraced games!

Avatar image for Pedro
Pedro

39999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 66

User Lists: 0

#12 Pedro
Member since 2002 • 39999 Posts

@Telekill said:

Wasn't there a 50 post limit for thread starters?

Was is the keyword.

Avatar image for Telekill
Telekill

9226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#13 Telekill
Member since 2003 • 9226 Posts

@Pedro: Maybe they should re-implement that.

Avatar image for FinalFighters
FinalFighters

3364

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 FinalFighters
Member since 2013 • 3364 Posts

The PS5 version will be 30FPS also but it will be checkerboard 4k (fake 4k) as opposed to the Native 4k on the Series X

Avatar image for tenaka2
tenaka2

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 tenaka2
Member since 2004 • 17384 Posts

Oh look suddenly the console peasants care about fps and graphics and 4k resolution.....

Hypocritical gits.

Avatar image for bluestars
Bluestars

1022

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#16 Bluestars
Member since 2019 • 1022 Posts

4k/60

Xbox series.x

4k/30

Ps5

Dynamic 4k/30

Xb1x

1440/30

PS4 pro

1080-30

PS4

900/30

Xbox one s

And you can take that to the bank

HaH

Avatar image for lamprey263
lamprey263

36907

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#17 lamprey263
Member since 2006 • 36907 Posts

I think 30fps is not because next gen systems can't do 60fps, developers though feel pressure to have prettier games are trying to achieve more of a superficial accomplishment, by having lower target framerate they can make the games look better. I understand their worries too if they fail to have the best looking graphics on surface they'll get hell for that too.

I wonder too with developers working on meatier hardware if they've not bothered utilizing optimization tricks they've come to use this gen, like variable resolution to keep framerate stable, temporal supersampling, checkerboard rendering.

I read an interesting random article few weeks back about how games have better success optimizing games to target a lower resolution output with smaller texture files to keep overhead down then spruce up the image in post processing is a nice but effective cheat at achieving 4K performance, a significantly better trade-off compared to targeting native 4K output with high resolution textures.

Avatar image for Random_Matt
Random_Matt

5130

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#18 Random_Matt
Member since 2013 • 5130 Posts

@lamprey263 said:

I think 30fps is not because next gen systems can't do 60fps, developers though feel pressure to have prettier games are trying to achieve more of a superficial accomplishment, by having lower target framerate they can make the games look better. I understand their worries too if they fail to have the best looking graphics on surface they'll get hell for that too.

I wonder too with developers working on meatier hardware if they've not bothered utilizing optimization tricks they've come to use this gen, like variable resolution to keep framerate stable, temporal supersampling, checkerboard rendering.

I read an interesting random article few weeks back about how games have better success optimizing games to target a lower resolution output with smaller texture files to keep overhead down then spruce up the image in post processing is a nice but effective cheat at achieving 4K performance, a significantly better trade-off compared to targeting native 4K output with high resolution textures.

There is not enough time nor money when you have seven consoles to work with. The pressure for pretty games never existed.