Watchdogs PC version trailer looks

maxing out a game means the highest settings you can enable ingame irrespective of resolution. theres rly no grounds for debate here. ur wrong on all accounts.

*facepalm*

That's loosingends level of reasoning right there.

loosingends? is that you?

@04dcarraher: thx

**** it i wait untill titan comes down in price i pass on watch dogs

@kalipekona said:

@EducatingU_PCMR said:

Looks as good as the E3 2013 PS4 demo.

It's still downgraded from the 2012 demo though.

It definitely looks better than the PS4 footage from 2013. Especially in terms of things like shadow quality and overall image quality.

Loading Video...

And as far as the initial E3 2012 demo, I don't understand what some people think looks better about it. Aside from the cinematic BS at the beginning of the video, the actual gameplay looks no better than this PC footage.

Let's look at some screen captures from the 2012 demo and the recent PS4 footage:

(Not to mention that the PC footage looks better than the PS4 footage)

Those images from 2014 are taken from PS4 dev kit . Which means it was enhanced version of actual PS4 version . The real PS4 gameplay looks like this in 2014 (Starts at 0:29). Video also contains dev kit footage .

And PC version like this .

The difference is huge (even if you compare it with PS4 dev kit footage , which have awful shadows , taking best shots doesn't from video doesn't help either)

it looks just as good if not better.

name them

Consolites will go from the ps4 is king to graphics and mods don't matter to steam sucks lmfao

obviously you need a titan to get to that level LMAO there goes your 500$ system not so powerfull anymore

titan gold edition announced pretty soon exclusive for the witcher 3

crysis 3, metro, tomb raider

And the glorious super charged PC that the 900pStation is, runs all of them is 3980x2160 @ 120 FPS in 4D.

You shouldn't look at the fast advancement as something negative. Your PC will be able to play games in a beautiful way. The faster it goes it will just mean that your next PC will be that much better than this already great PC. The developers are not going to cut support for your PC just because it's a couple years old no matter how fast it goes, because they like money. The worst thing that could happen is for it to slow down because Sony and MS can't sell decent configurations to their shareholders. I sincerely hope that people abandon the PS4 and X1 and that PC hardware skyrockets instead of slowing down.

I can see people still damage controlling . I don't get it , I really want to meet one of these corporate slaves and see how they look . What is the point of defending a plastic from a corporation that doesn't care about you .? You can believe whatever you want . You can (try to) misguide people by saying that you'll need 2,000+$ PC to run the game at high settings but it doesn't change the fact that Watch Dogs look a lot better on PC than consoles and you don't need more than 700-800$ to build a high end PC that can last for years to come . Deal with it and get a life .

I believe this gen consoles will face annihilation, it is already start to happen at the beginning of the gen. kind of inevitable with the low-end hardware they pack in.

Now, those games you listed have documented performance problems and are also some of the most demanding PC games on the market.

Metro being a prime example of said performance issues, released around the time of the "lol housefires" GTX480 and even now a GTX780Ti has trouble running it with all the bells and whistles. That is not the problem of the card, that is a game related problem.

Thats not going to change going forward though. my point was people act like having a 780ti is instant max settings in all games at 4k.

"cant wait to play this in 4k on my 780"

If you were playing games at 4K, I'd assume you'd have the hardware to back that claim up considering the cost of a 4K panel.

that wasnt my quote. i have a single 780ti and would never purchase a 4k monitor until multi gpu is completely redesigned.

IFY, it would help if you quoted the person you are responding too, makes things easier.

Multiple GPU's are always going to have problems. Its gotten better but its no where near where it should.

was someone from page 1 of this thread. i expect a framerate between 20 and 40 fps on my system at 1080p maxed settings(4x txaa)

pics or gtfo

Can't see shit captin.

@m3dude1 said:

Lol, mad

Enjoy your suspension

@m3dude1 whats the point increasing AA when it doesnt look any diffirent as IF games on consoles are maxed out or run at 60 fps, they can even get 30 fps steady.

what are you talking about?

@m3dude1:

More nonsense. The GTX 780ti easily maxes out those games. Hell, even my 770 maxes out those games with reasonable anti-aliasing at 1920 x 1080 resolution.

sure, go pick the highest settings in every one of those games(AA and physx included) and report back your framerates slick