https://forum.beyond3d.com/posts/2170046/
Seems like Watchdogs: Legion is 1440p on XSX with RT’ing.
— Stewart Hart (@JAGLeMans) October 30, 2020
Wouldn’t be surprising considering how it performs on PC. pic.twitter.com/NQG318xm2w
With RT? Not all that surprising. Jeez, I tried to run Odyssey via UPlay+ on my PC, and I had to quit before the opening cutscene... It was a performance nightmare.
lol don't you have a 3080?
lol don't you have a 3080?
I f'in wish. I have fully-purchased one, but I need to wait until they come into stock lol. Rocking a 2080, and it's likely my issue, but I couldn't get Odyssey to work worth a damn... I'm also not an illiterate pr*ck, so God knows...
@mowgly1: I asked because my girlfriend is a filmmaker and she doesn't upload any of her projects to youtube , she hates the "4K" quality of youtube , says there isn't much different between 1080p and 4K with youtube videos , too much compression and lost of image quality. But well..It might be different and still works to count pixels.
So, the developer is lying about the resolution?
Open hand + cover mouth = the absolute shock.
November 10th we will know if their claim is false. I reckon it most likely would be as they advertised. I don't think any dev is that stupid to make a claim about their game on console and not have it scrutinized by gamers.
November 10th we will know if their claim is false. I reckon it most likely would be as they advertised. I don't think any dev is that stupid to make a claim about their game on console and not have it scrutinized by gamers.
I definitely wouldn't be surprised, but it's Ubi. I sincerely doubt this is an Xbox issue, as their games don't run all that well on modern PC hardware. Origins was decent regarding my "aging" hardware, but Odyssey I just couldn't fix.
Considering a 3080 with medium ray tracing runs 46 fps @ 1440p. This is impressive for the Series x !
lol don't you have a 3080?
I f'in wish. I have fully-purchased one, but I need to wait until they come into stock lol. Rocking a 2080, and it's likely my issue, but I couldn't get Odyssey to work worth a damn... I'm also not an illiterate pr*ck, so God knows...
I am guessing basement monkeys were in charge of the optimization. There's absolutely no way a single game wouldn't be able to perform well on a 2080, its not like a 2080 is a shit card. I am curious how CP2077 is gonna do, because that game looks so much better than the yearly asscreed.
I definitely wouldn't be surprised, but it's Ubi. I sincerely doubt this is an Xbox issue, as their games don't run all that well on modern PC hardware. Origins was decent regarding my "aging" hardware, but Odyssey I just couldn't fix.
Scratch that. In the video, they stated the game runs at 4k 30FPS but never stated with RT. 😂 They just talked about RT after that statement. Dirty buggers.
@mowgly1: I asked because my girlfriend is a filmmaker and she doesn't upload any of her projects to youtube , she hates the "4K" quality of youtube , says there isn't much different between 1080p and 4K with youtube videos , too much compression and lost of image quality. But well..It might be different and still works to count pixels.
Dunno about that. I'm on a 1440p monitor and i notice a huge difference between a 1080p and a 4k video on youtube when on full screen. Of course there's compression, but the difference is there, and its not tiny.
Makes sense. People are going to call 4K outputs 4K. Unless they specifically say "Native" 4K it's going to be some form of upscaled/reconstructed 4K. Learned that early on this gen with the refreshed consoles. And if this 100% true, then the Series X and PS5 will perform the same. Ubisoft loves its parity at the start.
Ubisoft and Microsoft are the biggest liars in the industry. Very pathetic that Microsoft paid Ubisoft to lie about performance on XSX to distract from them having zero first party launch titles in addition to the directors of Halo Infinite and Everwild abandoning ship.
It's SO badly optimised that it should not be used as a guideline for console or PC performance.
How is it badly optimized? Folks like to throw around badly optimized without any real validation to the claim.
At RTX 3080 with a 3900x should not be running at 45fps with max settings @1440p. That is a badly optimised port.
It may well run better on Console since it's ported to PC, but it's a terribly optimised PC port.
@navyguy21: probably 1440p but dynamically scaled so it’ll drop to a red just below that to hit the 30fps mark.
Makes you wonder what the PS5 will be
Enough of that talk, this is a MS bashing thread, don't you know the rules lol.
At RTX 3080 with a 3900x should not be running at 45fps with max settings @1440p. That is a badly optimised port.
It may well run better on Console since it's ported to PC, but it's a terribly optimised PC port.
Where are you getting this information?
At RTX 3080 with a 3900x should not be running at 45fps with max settings @1440p. That is a badly optimised port.
It may well run better on Console since it's ported to PC, but it's a terribly optimised PC port.
Where are you getting this information?
My own PC....
He averaged 50FPS in the benchmark and that was with RT off. That is rubbish for the hardware it's playing on.
With RT on I average the same at 1440p. That is a badly optimised port.
My own PC....
He averaged 50FPS in the benchmark and that was with RT off. That is rubbish for the hardware it's playing on.
With RT on I average the same at 1440p. That is a badly optimised port.
RT is computationally expensive. Pretending that 4K @ 60FPS with RT is common is just plain ignorant. I am glad you cleared that up.
Playing Watch Dogs on my PC right now. It does not run that smooth, can't imagine it runs great at all on console.
C'mon Ubisoft, you're the developer-publisher I want to hate but can't because your games are fun, but you keep giving me more and more reasons to dislike you.
AND WHY THE HELL DOES EVERYONE LOOK LIKE THEY JUST STRUTTED OFF THE CATWALK OF A FASHION SHOW!??!?!?!
My own PC....
He averaged 50FPS in the benchmark and that was with RT off. That is rubbish for the hardware it's playing on.
With RT on I average the same at 1440p. That is a badly optimised port.
RT is computationally expensive. Pretending that 4K @ 60FPS with RT is common is just plain ignorant. I am glad you cleared that up.
50fps average (with dips under 20) with RT off at 4k is NOT well optimised for a RTX 3080 and that CPU, there are no ifs or buts about it.
Clearly you made up your mind already and will ignore evidence to the contrary though.
be less ignorant.
Not surprising at all. 1440p with RT is super demanding
The majority of AAA titles this next generation are going to incorporate RT tech.
This game would suggest that 1440p will become standard (and apparently acceptable) for this gen in that case. Would be pretty poor wouldn't it?
Or perhaps, this game is poorly optimised.
This game is so trash. The most repetitive shitfest of an open world in a few years. God awful gameplay.
How is this even remotly enjoyable? And when you're literally doing the same shit for hundreds of times, i ask myself if watching paint dry is more enjoyable.
@Pedro: imagine how absolute garbage this will run on the series s? Bu bu bu it’s a 1440p machine lol
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment