This topic is locked from further discussion.
Why are people delving into this incident so deeply, GS scores are the only ones that matter in SW so why do people care so much about GT?
Why are people delving into this incident so deeply, GS scores are the only ones that matter in SW so why do people care so much about GT?
ThatsSimtastic
I don't understand either
It is blown way out of proportion, people must've not been here when Uncharted got 8.0
did u even read what tc wrote? he said IF it's the same game with better graphics , keyword IFWe don't know anything about Reach except the story
A little early to jump to conclusions
thelastguy
What I learned today
1. 9.3 is a horrific score and should not be touched with a 1000 foot pole.
I lol'ed :lol:I really don't get it.. I was on here reading how people was talkin about gametrailer giving uncharted 2 a 9.3 and halo 3 got a 9.8... they say the uncharted was a rehash of gear of war and tomb rider...(i really dont get that at all when one is slow paced and the other is fast paced). And that graphic don't make a game (as that is true).. this is what i'm asking if halo reach is the same game but new story as all the other halos but just with better graphic should it get a 9.8 or a 9.3 like uncharted 2 has gotten... before you say have i played uncharted 2 yes i have i work at gamestop so i do have it.. i do love gears of war 1 and 2 but this game is really good..(the story is where it really shine).. and stands on its own in every way you can think of.. i'm getting from my point if halo has the a new story but the same gameplay should it get a 9.8... p.s halo odst is trash.. and we all know it should had been dlc... LET THE FIGHT START lolbloombergmoneyLOL The stories cows will make up to make a game look better....
before you say have i played uncharted 2 yes i have i work at gamestop so i do have it.. bloombergmoneyCouple Points" 1. From now on 9.3 is the new 1 (its like Big Rigs honestly) 2. You managed to get work? really? 3. Very mature of you in general, and of the GT crowd 4. Does this actually matter to you? 5. Why do you care? 6. Its .5 of a mark (a difference in opinion between two people writing two different reviews)
We don't know anything about Reach except the story
A little early to jump to conclusions
I've heard its going to be a sqaud based game, halo style, granted i hope its not squad based like odst was stealthy....these kind of threads are starting to get really annoying. I'll replace gametrailer and gave U2 an 11/10 so all of u guys can be happy about it. Seriously AAAE game, what can you ask for more?OPuniverse
There's already a 14 page long thread about this explaining why people are pissed that uncharted 2 got 9.3 on gametrailers. It has nothing to do with the score itself (9.3 is a great score), it has to do that they explained the docking of points by saying it was "unoriginal" yet they gave games like Halo 3 a 9.8 (and Halo 3 was definitely not original).
[QUOTE="OPuniverse"]these kind of threads are starting to get really annoying. I'll replace gametrailer and gave U2 an 11/10 so all of u guys can be happy about it. Seriously AAAE game, what can you ask for more?Eggimannd
There's already a 14 page long thread about this explaining why people are pissed that uncharted 2 got 9.3 on gametrailers. It has nothing to do with the score itself (9.3 is a great score), it has to do that they explained the docking of points by saying it was "unoriginal" yet they gave games like Halo 3 a 9.8 (and Halo 3 was definitely not original).
really? because all i see is cows complaining all about the score itself. Yes i've been to the 14 pages thread.[QUOTE="OPuniverse"]these kind of threads are starting to get really annoying. I'll replace gametrailer and gave U2 an 11/10 so all of u guys can be happy about it. Seriously AAAE game, what can you ask for more?Eggimannd
There's already a 14 page long thread about this explaining why people are pissed that uncharted 2 got 9.3 on gametrailers. It has nothing to do with the score itself (9.3 is a great score), it has to do that they explained the docking of points by saying it was "unoriginal" yet they gave games like Halo 3 a 9.8 (and Halo 3 was definitely not original).
I don't see the confusion.
A reviewer plays the game - game leaves impression on reviewer. Reviewer gives game a numerical score and justifies it with a well thought out review.
The Uncharted 2 review had a great score and the reviewer even suggested every PS3 owner buy the game. He obviously played the game and liked it, but maybe the game reminded him of GeoW or something. Doesn't really matter - it was a minor setback. At most the reviewer knocked off .2 points from the game, hardly anything to scream about.
Halo 3 came out 2 years ago and included some great features. The reviewer was impressed - and personally I don't know too many high quality games like Halo. CoD? Nothing like it. PDZ - nah. I think Halo has a unique identity for a shooter - maybe it's not original but does it have to be? Maybe the reviewer simply had fun with the game. Maybe that reviewer knocked off .2 points too.
Get it over it, it's called an opinion. Maybe the reviewers though Halo 3 and Gears were a better experiences to begin with- Gear's could have have scored a 9.7 and Halo 3 a 10 for all we know until the got docked a few points. But does it really matter considering all game still received stellar ratings? This 9.3 mess is the definition of making a mountain out of a molehill.
Or maybe I should listen to the fanboys and simply agree that every sequel to release this gen needs to have up to .5 points taken away because GT gave Uncharted 9.3.
[QUOTE="Eggimannd"]
[QUOTE="OPuniverse"]these kind of threads are starting to get really annoying. I'll replace gametrailer and gave U2 an 11/10 so all of u guys can be happy about it. Seriously AAAE game, what can you ask for more?Kickinurass
There's already a 14 page long thread about this explaining why people are pissed that uncharted 2 got 9.3 on gametrailers. It has nothing to do with the score itself (9.3 is a great score), it has to do that they explained the docking of points by saying it was "unoriginal" yet they gave games like Halo 3 a 9.8 (and Halo 3 was definitely not original).
I don't see the confusion.
A reviewer plays the game - game leaves impression on reviewer. Reviewer gives game a numerical score and justifies it with a well thought out review.
The Uncharted 2 review had a great score and the reviewer even suggested every PS3 owner buy the game. He obviously played the game and liked it, but maybe the game reminded him of GeoW or something. Doesn't really matter - it was a minor setback. At most the reviewer knocked off .2 points from the game, hardly anything to scream about.
Halo 3 came out 2 years ago and included some great features. The reviewer was impressed - and personally I don't know too many high quality games like Halo. CoD? Nothing like it. PDZ - nah. I think Halo has a unique identity for a shooter - maybe it's not original but does it have to be? Maybe the reviewer simply had fun with the game. Maybe that reviewer knocked off .2 points too.
Get it over it, it's called an opinion. Maybe the reviewers though Halo 3 and Gears were a better experiences to begin with- Gear's could have have scored a 9.7 and Halo 3 a 10 for all we know until the got docked a few points. But does it really matter considering all game still received stellar ratings? This 9.3 mess is the definition of making a mountain out of a molehill.
Or maybe I should listen to the fanboys and simply agree that every sequel to release this gen needs to have up to .5 points taken away because GT gave Uncharted 9.3.
But that's the thing. I'll bet you anything Gears 2 and Halo 3 were scored without having that idea of docking points for originality. It really just seems that gametrailers were annoyed with all these people complaining about the 9.3 score and came up with a retarded excuse for it (hence the originality thing).
I have no problems with the score. It's just gametrailers screwed themselves up even more by coming up with this originality thing. If they want to use that as an explanation they have to be consistent with it which they are not.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment