Tom McShea gives Ratchet and Clank: All 4 One a 7/10

The Good

• A variety of enjoyable activities
• Teaming up with three friends is fun
• Smart puzzles require coordination
• Fast-moving vehicle sequences.

The Bad

• Shooting is usually dull
• Some tedious boss fights
• Fixed camera creates problems.

http://www.gamespot.com/ps3/action/ratchet-clank-all-4-one/review.html?tag=tabs%3Breviews

Tom McShea giving a PS3 exclusive a low score what a surprise:P

Not too shabby I guess.

Tom McShea giving a PS3 exclusive a low score what a surprise:P

spookykid143

Teh bias! :P *puts ear to the ground* Here comes the cattle stampede!

There´s already a thread discussing this,but I have to lol at your attempt to imply some conspiracy by using the name of the reviewer on the title.

Trying a bit too hard man.

Can I be honest? I had no idea this game was a thing.

Tom McShea giving a PS3 exclusive a low score what a surprise:P

spookykid143

For the lolz.

Tom McShea giving a PS3 exclusive a low score what a surprise:P

spookykid143

I won't lie, I laughed a little.:P I hope he reviews every PS3 exclusive from now on and flops them all just so it would stir s*** up.:lol:

Isn't this the guy that gave us the bull **** I2 review?

Anyway, never trusted GS reviews on R&C since TOD

Also,the game is already a 78 on MC and the GS review isn´t even counted yet....that´s a huge bias! :o :lol:

Tom McShea giving a PS3 exclusive a low score what a surprise:P

spookykid143

Fingers crossed for similar scoring for UC3. ;)

There´s already a thread discussing this,but I have to lol at your attempt to imply some conspiracy by using the name of the reviewer on the title.

Trying a bit too hard man.

Arach666

Tom McShea giving a PS3 exclusive a low score what a surprise:P

spookykid143

And then the cows reacted!

Curse you, Tom!

xD

Also,the game is already a 78 on MC and the GS review isn´t even counted yet....that´s a huge bias! :o :lol:

Arach666

The game looked like crap to begin with.:P I'm amazed at how it at least got some positive reception after taking such a big step back from Crack in Time.:P

[QUOTE="Arach666"]

There´s already a thread discussing this,but I have to lol at your attempt to imply some conspiracy by using the name of the reviewer on the title.

Trying a bit too hard man.

GeneralShowzer

[QUOTE="spookykid143"]

Tom McShea giving a PS3 exclusive a low score what a surprise:P

vashkey

[QUOTE="Arach666"]

Also,the game is already a 78 on MC and the GS review isn´t even counted yet....that´s a huge bias! :o :lol:

sanim02

The game looked like crap to begin with.:P I'm amazed at how it at least got some positive reception after taking such a big step back from Crack in Time.:P

Well the new NC branch of Insomniac did this one(actually their first game)

The CA (main) branch did all the other console ones

[QUOTE="spookykid143"]

Tom McShea giving a PS3 exclusive a low score what a surprise:P

vashkey

The emoticon signifies a joke, but I'm sure there are certain individuals who believe such things, and to that I lol.:P

[QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"][QUOTE="Arach666"]

There´s already a thread discussing this,but I have to lol at your attempt to imply some conspiracy by using the name of the reviewer on the title.

Trying a bit too hard man.

kuraimen

[QUOTE="sanim02"]

[QUOTE="Arach666"]

Also,the game is already a 78 on MC and the GS review isn´t even counted yet....that´s a huge bias! :o :lol:

dercoo

The game looked like crap to begin with.:P I'm amazed at how it at least got some positive reception after taking such a big step back from Crack in Time.:P

Well the new NC branch of Insomniac did this one

Makes sense. I'm guessing the majority of their folks were tasked to work on Resistance 3 and pre-production of Overstrike. Man I hope Overstrike does well.:?

I expected around a 7.5-8.0. Still, a 7 is a good score and another solid exclusive for the PS3. I will pick this game up for sure down the road.djsifer01

But this is SW... 7= utter crap.

[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"] Forza 4 flopped hard, and I've never seen damage control by lems. GeneralShowzer

How is it damage control to complain about a poorly written review that is a negative outlier to the rest of the professional reviews that are 8.5+

I'm not surprised. I had a feeling the game wouldn't score that high.

[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"] Forza 4 flopped hard, and I've never seen damage control by lems. GeneralShowzer

[QUOTE="dercoo"]

[QUOTE="sanim02"]

The game looked like crap to begin with.:P I'm amazed at how it at least got some positive reception after taking such a big step back from Crack in Time.:P

sanim02

Well the new NC branch of Insomniac did this one

Makes sense. I'm guessing the majority of their folks were tasked to work on Resistance 3 and pre-production of Overstrike. Man I hope Overstrike does well.:?

R3 did good, but they should have focused more attention on the multi(especially coop)

Removing the previous games most loved feature was bull *****

Overstirke looks great so far, can't wait for gameplay

Why did you specify the reviewers name...?

GeneralShowzer

Once I've gotten familiar with the GS staff, I've started to specify their name once they post a review, this isn't the first time I've done this.

There´s already a thread discussing this,but I have to lol at your attempt to imply some conspiracy by using the name of the reviewer on the title.

Trying a bit too hard man.

Arach666

Didn't see a thread that had a topic on the review that was posted, and lol at your attempt to imply that I'm starting a conspiracy by using the name of the reviewer on the title. :|

http://www.gamespot.com/forums/topic/28762522/rage-hype-thread---can-you-feel-the-rage-56k-warning?msg_id=333244519#333244519

http://www.gamespot.com/forums/topic/28758281/-resistance-3-hype-8.5-keep-it-here-?msg_id=332798281#332798281

Like I said earlier, I've specified the names of the reviewers before, don't be so quick to point fingers, thanks.

[QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"][QUOTE="kuraimen"] LMAO, did you miss the Forza 4 hype thread!!? It was even locked because lems were crying to the mods and so the mods made another thread for discussion only.dercoo

How is it damage control to complain about a poorly written review that is a negative outlier to the rest of the professional reviews that are 8.5+

[QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"]

Why did you specify the reviewers name...?

Wesrcks13

Once I've gotten familiar with the GS staff, I've started to specify their name once they post a review, this isn't the first time I've done this.

There´s already a thread discussing this,but I have to lol at your attempt to imply some conspiracy by using the name of the reviewer on the title.

Trying a bit too hard man.

Arach666

Didn't see a thread that had a topic on the review that was posted, and lol at your attempt to imply that I'm starting a conspiracy by using the name of the reviewer on the title. :|

http://www.gamespot.com/forums/topic/28762522/rage-hype-thread---can-you-feel-the-rage-56k-warning?msg_id=333244519#333244519

http://www.gamespot.com/forums/topic/28758281/-resistance-3-hype-8.5-keep-it-here-?msg_id=332798281#332798281

Like I said earlier, I've specified the names of the reviewers before, don't be so quick to point fingers, thanks.

[QUOTE="dercoo"]

[QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"] Huh. Well OK, I admit I didn't check out the Forza 4 hype thread. However, we had Infamous 2 damage control in new threads for months after the game released. Even now...vashkey

How is it damage control to complain about a poorly written review that is a negative outlier to the rest of the professional reviews that are 8.5+

You know I'm talking about I2 right?

The review right along side Mario kart 64 6.4, and TOD 7.5 as GS most idiotic review

[QUOTE="vashkey"][QUOTE="dercoo"]

How is it damage control to complain about a poorly written review that is a negative outlier to the rest of the professional reviews that are 8.5+

dercoo

You know I'm talking about I2 right?

Didn't see a thread that had a topic on the review that was posted, and lol at your attempt to imply that I'm starting a conspiracy by using the name of the reviewer on the title. :|

http://www.gamespot.com/forums/topic/28762522/rage-hype-thread---can-you-feel-the-rage-56k-warning?msg_id=333244519#333244519

http://www.gamespot.com/forums/topic/28758281/-resistance-3-hype-8.5-keep-it-here-?msg_id=332798281#332798281

Like I said earlier, I've specified the names of the reviewers before, don't be so quick to point fingers, thanks.

Wesrcks13

None of those threads have the name of the reviewer on the title like this one,wich was what I was talking about,but nice try.

You are fooling no one but yourself.

I hope he reviews Uncharted 3. Lol.foxhound_fox

I hope he reviews Uncharted 3. Lol.foxhound_fox

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]I hope he reviews Uncharted 3. Lol.II_Seraphim_II

And still no review of The ico and shadow collection. I bet they'll review haloanniversary but not this these masterpieces , so sad.

There´s already a thread discussing this,but I have to lol at your attempt to imply some conspiracy by using the name of the reviewer on the title.

Trying a bit too hard man.

Arach666

I hope he reviews Uncharted 3. Lol.foxhound_fox

Sounds spot on.

And still no review of The ico and shadow collection. I bet they'll review haloanniversary but not this these masterpieces , so sad.

chronocross668