This topic is locked from further discussion.
Moar shooters please. WWII would be cool.strudel420
are you serious? we get at least a couple WWII shooters every year. I don't remember a year without one of these.
anyways, i think there's a ton of shooters and some developers are making them just because a lot of people like them and well-known shooters like Halo 3 and COD4 are getting pretty high scores. Make a shooter, make it sound really cool and interesting, and hope it makes a profit.
if anything, I want to see a lot more turn-based strategy RPGs
I think there is a lot more variety this gen, especially for the 360. A lot of games have shooting in them, but I don't class them as shooters.
how can you fight a war without guns?beast667
I don't need your silly war. It feeds the rich while it buries the poor.
i agree IMO sony and MS seem to be trying to go head to head with who can have the best shooter when all this gen needs really ia for one of them to create a new brand, same with all game developers
can you imagine the success if one of them was to create a better american football game than madden? or a better football game than fifa? yet none of them seem to want to finance the risk, they just go for the easy failure of a lame shooter (looking at you Haze)
hopefully LBP and spore will both sell well and make huge waves
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment