The Witcher 2 Early Review In!!!

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for ducati101
ducati101

1741

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 ducati101
Member since 2004 • 1741 Posts

PC Format UK, has reviewed an early (pre-release) build of The Witcher 2.

Can't link it, as I'm viewing the actual the mag. To cut a long story short,the score is 92/100.

Summary: Involving Combat, Stupendous Visuals, Varied gaming.

It goes on to say; If the bugs are stamped out (awkward pathfinding), we've got a new king of role-playing to doff our caps to. Witcher 2 is vast, varied and challenging.

Not too bad at all, considering CD Project is still polishing the game. I for one can't wait for the 17th!!!

Avatar image for GeneralShowzer
GeneralShowzer

11598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#2 GeneralShowzer
Member since 2010 • 11598 Posts
How can they review a preview build? It was just the first chapter.
Avatar image for AAllxxjjnn
AAllxxjjnn

19992

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 AAllxxjjnn
Member since 2008 • 19992 Posts
Awesome. Little less than a month : )
Avatar image for funsohng
funsohng

29976

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 funsohng
Member since 2005 • 29976 Posts
Bugs for the vanilla version of the game was expected, at least for me.
Avatar image for Zurrur
Zurrur

1701

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Zurrur
Member since 2009 • 1701 Posts

Flop? Early reviews always give full score to anticipated games

Avatar image for deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab

17476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#6 deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
Member since 2008 • 17476 Posts

Flop? Early reviews always give full score to anticipated games

Zurrur
Let me get this straight. you are predicting it will flop because it was given a high score?
Avatar image for GeneralShowzer
GeneralShowzer

11598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#7 GeneralShowzer
Member since 2010 • 11598 Posts

Flop? Early reviews always give full score to anticipated games

Zurrur
DA II first review was 95. DA II : 1 Witcher 2 : 0
Avatar image for Lethalhazard
Lethalhazard

5451

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#8 Lethalhazard
Member since 2009 • 5451 Posts
Wait, they gave a full review before the actual full game is out? What kind of credibility is that? Especially when it's on a preview version...
Avatar image for GeneralShowzer
GeneralShowzer

11598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#9 GeneralShowzer
Member since 2010 • 11598 Posts
Anyway, this review holds no weight at all, they are reviewing only 1/3 of a game, and a preview build no less where it's full with bugs and nothing is finalized.
Avatar image for osan0
osan0

17813

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 osan0
Member since 2004 • 17813 Posts
How can they review a preview build? It was just the first chapter.GeneralShowzer
its probably the full game but with issues and not fully tested yet....a beta basically. it was the same with shogun 2......reviewers have played and reviewed a version with DX11...something we dont have yet. mags do that from time to time to ensure that the review is out early or on time. other mags have a policy of only reviewing the finished article though. anywho looking good. i have a lot of RPGing to do next month....modded morrowind, DS3, drakensang (just dug up my copy :D ) and this....good month :).
Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#11 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

Flop? Early reviews always give full score to anticipated games

Zurrur
Batman AA got like 9.4-9.6 for 1st score and look how that turned out.
Avatar image for JohnF111
JohnF111

14190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#12 JohnF111
Member since 2010 • 14190 Posts
Anyway, this review holds no weight at all, they are reviewing only 1/3 of a game, and a preview build no less where it's full with bugs and nothing is finalized.GeneralShowzer
A lot of games get this, people complain that games should be re-evaluated after patches and updates plus they are hardly going to play the game from start to finish on every difficulty setting while collecting every item and slaying every beast before deciding on how good a game is, does this mean that people who say "I played 2 hours and gave up" didn't do a thorough enough test and that their opinions are wrong?
Avatar image for GeneralShowzer
GeneralShowzer

11598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#13 GeneralShowzer
Member since 2010 • 11598 Posts

[QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"]Anyway, this review holds no weight at all, they are reviewing only 1/3 of a game, and a preview build no less where it's full with bugs and nothing is finalized.JohnF111

A lot of games get this, people complain that games should be re-evaluated after patches and updates plus they are hardly going to play the game from start to finish on every difficulty setting while collecting every item and slaying every beast before deciding on how good a game is, does this mean that people who say "I played 2 hours and gave up" didn't do a thorough enough test and that their opinions are wrong?

Huh?

No...it means that this is far from the full finalized game and it's unprofessional to give a review of an early demo. That little message up there is present for this reason alone. See?

Avatar image for ducati101
ducati101

1741

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 ducati101
Member since 2004 • 1741 Posts
The score doesn't really interest me. What does is this; Involving Combat, Stupendous Visuals, Varied gaming. Now that is something to look forward too!
Avatar image for GeneralShowzer
GeneralShowzer

11598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#15 GeneralShowzer
Member since 2010 • 11598 Posts
[QUOTE="ducati101"]The score doesn't really interest me. What does is this; Involving Combat, Stupendous Visuals, Varied gaming. Now that is something to look forward too!

Yeah, well all the previews have been saying that. Indeed it is something to look forward too.
Avatar image for Heil68
Heil68

60712

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#16 Heil68
Member since 2004 • 60712 Posts
[QUOTE="Zurrur"]

Flop? Early reviews always give full score to anticipated games

GeneralShowzer
DA II first review was 95. DA II : 1 Witcher 2 : 0

Anyway, this review holds no weight at all, they are reviewing only 1/3 of a game, and a preview build no less where it's full with bugs and nothing is finalized.GeneralShowzer
Game is only 3 chapters long? D: [spoiler] :P [/spoiler]
Avatar image for deactivated-58b6232955e4a
deactivated-58b6232955e4a

15594

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 deactivated-58b6232955e4a
Member since 2006 • 15594 Posts
I thought it was 5 chapters long?
Avatar image for Gibsonsg527
Gibsonsg527

3313

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 Gibsonsg527
Member since 2010 • 3313 Posts

I never trust these early review.

Avatar image for lawlessx
lawlessx

48753

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#19 lawlessx
Member since 2004 • 48753 Posts
I thought it was 5 chapters long? SAGE_OF_FIRE
pretty sure devs said the game would have 3 chapters.
Avatar image for GeneralShowzer
GeneralShowzer

11598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#20 GeneralShowzer
Member since 2010 • 11598 Posts
[QUOTE="SAGE_OF_FIRE"]I thought it was 5 chapters long? lawlessx
pretty sure devs said the game would have 3 chapters.

I think there's a prologue and an epilogue as well.
Avatar image for RyuRanVII
RyuRanVII

4257

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#21 RyuRanVII
Member since 2006 • 4257 Posts

The game will have three chapters plus prologue and epilogue. Chapters 2 and 3 will be entirely different depending on the players' choices.

Branches

Avatar image for MikeRpgFan
MikeRpgFan

72

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 MikeRpgFan
Member since 2007 • 72 Posts
Found links to this review. If anyone interested, pls pm me.
Avatar image for SkyWard20
SkyWard20

4509

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 SkyWard20
Member since 2009 • 4509 Posts

[QUOTE="JohnF111"][QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"]Anyway, this review holds no weight at all, they are reviewing only 1/3 of a game, and a preview build no less where it's full with bugs and nothing is finalized.GeneralShowzer

A lot of games get this, people complain that games should be re-evaluated after patches and updates plus they are hardly going to play the game from start to finish on every difficulty setting while collecting every item and slaying every beast before deciding on how good a game is, does this mean that people who say "I played 2 hours and gave up" didn't do a thorough enough test and that their opinions are wrong?

Huh?

No...it means that this is far from the full finalized game and it's unprofessional to give a review of an early demo. That little message up there is present for this reason alone. See?

If CDProjekt gave permission to review, then it's ok.

Avatar image for deactivated-5c79c3cfce222
deactivated-5c79c3cfce222

4715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#24 deactivated-5c79c3cfce222
Member since 2009 • 4715 Posts
Obviously this is a review you can trust.
Avatar image for PcGamingRig
PcGamingRig

7386

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 PcGamingRig
Member since 2009 • 7386 Posts

its only a preview build so not that conclusive, but the comments about the gameplay in the review look positive. :)

Avatar image for h575309
h575309

8551

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#26 h575309
Member since 2005 • 8551 Posts

Its pretty sad how much faith we put in reviews really. The dev's last outing was strong, the game looks amazing and early previews have been stellar. What else do you need?

Avatar image for BlbecekBobecek
BlbecekBobecek

2949

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#27 BlbecekBobecek
Member since 2006 • 2949 Posts

[QUOTE="Zurrur"]

Flop? Early reviews always give full score to anticipated games

GeneralShowzer

DA II first review was 95. DA II : 1 Witcher 2 : 0

But why do you compare DA II to an RPG? :question:

Avatar image for rzepak
rzepak

5758

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 rzepak
Member since 2005 • 5758 Posts

[QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"]

[QUOTE="JohnF111"]

A lot of games get this, people complain that games should be re-evaluated after patches and updates plus they are hardly going to play the game from start to finish on every difficulty setting while collecting every item and slaying every beast before deciding on how good a game is, does this mean that people who say "I played 2 hours and gave up" didn't do a thorough enough test and that their opinions are wrong?SkyWard20

Huh?

No...it means that this is far from the full finalized game and it's unprofessional to give a review of an early demo. That little message up there is present for this reason alone. See?

If CDProjekt gave permission to review, then it's ok.

I think the first official review is supposed to be in the Polish Pc mag CD-Action. I may be wrong though.

Avatar image for herezjarchus
herezjarchus

316

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 herezjarchus
Member since 2007 • 316 Posts

This review is a sign for me to not trust "PC Format UK". Early reviews of a not yet released games (like this one) are far from being professional and bring no valuable information - no wonder that they gave a very high score to DA2 (95, I believe) while the general consensus among the gaming sites was that DA2 was far from being a great game or at least nowhere close DA:O... It just proves that they don't treat game journalism, game reviewing and even gamers seriously, and that they're just a bunch of damn lazybones only knowing how to take money for a badly done job.

Avatar image for SkyWard20
SkyWard20

4509

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 SkyWard20
Member since 2009 • 4509 Posts

This review is a sign for me to not trust "PC Format UK". Early reviews of a not yet released games (like this one) are far from being professional and bring no valuable information - no wonder that they gave a very high score to DA2 (95, I believe) while the general consensus among the gaming sites was that DA2 was far from being a great game or at least nowhere close DA:O... It just proves that they don't treat game journalism, game reviewing and even gamers seriously, and that they're just a bunch of damn lazybones only knowing how to take money for a badly done job.

herezjarchus
Wasn't that PC Gamer UK? I think those are two different magazines.
Avatar image for ducati101
ducati101

1741

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 ducati101
Member since 2004 • 1741 Posts

Its pretty sad how much faith we put in reviews really. The dev's last outing was strong, the game looks amazing and early previews have been stellar. What else do you need?

h575309
Absolutely, that's why I didn't even pay attention to the score. But the summary, Involving Combat, Stupendous Visuals, Varied gaming etc. This is why I mentioned the review. :)
Avatar image for gamebreakerz__
gamebreakerz__

5120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#32 gamebreakerz__
Member since 2010 • 5120 Posts
Don't get your hopes up, the first review of Dragon Age 2 said it was revolutionary.
Avatar image for herezjarchus
herezjarchus

316

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 herezjarchus
Member since 2007 • 316 Posts

[QUOTE="herezjarchus"]

This review is a sign for me to not trust "PC Format UK". Early reviews of a not yet released games (like this one) are far from being professional and bring no valuable information - no wonder that they gave a very high score to DA2 (95, I believe) while the general consensus among the gaming sites was that DA2 was far from being a great game or at least nowhere close DA:O... It just proves that they don't treat game journalism, game reviewing and even gamers seriously, and that they're just a bunch of damn lazybones only knowing how to take money for a badly done job.

SkyWard20

Wasn't that PC Gamer UK? I think those are two different magazines.

I was confused there for moment after your answer, but I've checked it to make sure that I didn't mistaken the sites, and I've found it - their early review of Dragon Age 2 (one day before launch) with score - 95. http://pcformat.techradar.com/review/dragon-age-2-review-07-03-11

PC Gamer UK, indeed made a similar review (although not early, but still written surprisingly fast after the game's release (on the same day actually)) and with score of 94. http://www.pcgamer.com/2011/03/08/dragon-age-2-review/

Avatar image for Pvt_r3d
Pvt_r3d

7901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 Pvt_r3d
Member since 2006 • 7901 Posts
I lost trust in early reviews after PC gamer gave Dragon Age II a 92/100 a week before the release.
Avatar image for wizdom
wizdom

10111

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#35 wizdom
Member since 2003 • 10111 Posts
How can they review a preview build? It was just the first chapter.GeneralShowzer
I agree, if it wasn't final build that they shouldn't review it
Avatar image for krisk7
krisk7

102

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 krisk7
Member since 2010 • 102 Posts

CD Projekt Senior Producer Tomasz Gop stated during a live chat today that no media received full game so far so they could only have done a preview not a review.

By they way today CD Projekt sent gold master to production!

Avatar image for tomarlyn
tomarlyn

20148

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#37 tomarlyn
Member since 2005 • 20148 Posts
PC magazine, PC exclusive, AAA....... *troll mode deactivated*
Avatar image for Crimsader
Crimsader

11672

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 Crimsader
Member since 2008 • 11672 Posts
Good news. I gotta pre-order it.
Avatar image for xqtr74
xqtr74

34

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 xqtr74
Member since 2011 • 34 Posts

Scans:

http://i.imgur.com/7kkym.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/XB1r8.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/BNWSf.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/kulsz.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/LFIhk.jpg

The game will have three chapters plus prologue and epilogue. Chapters 2 and 3 will be entirely different depending on the players' choices.

RyuRanVII

And there are eight different versions of epilogue, each one with two different endings.

Avatar image for PcGamingRig
PcGamingRig

7386

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 PcGamingRig
Member since 2009 • 7386 Posts

Scans:

http://i.imgur.com/7kkym.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/XB1r8.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/BNWSf.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/kulsz.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/LFIhk.jpg

[QUOTE="RyuRanVII"]

The game will have three chapters plus prologue and epilogue. Chapters 2 and 3 will be entirely different depending on the players' choices.

xqtr74

And there are eight different versions of epilogue, each one with two different endings.

i hope they're big chapters. :)

Avatar image for herezjarchus
herezjarchus

316

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 herezjarchus
Member since 2007 • 316 Posts

[QUOTE="RyuRanVII"]

The game will have three chapters plus prologue and epilogue. Chapters 2 and 3 will be entirely different depending on the players' choices.

xqtr74

And there are eight different versions of epilogue, each one with two different endings.

Yes :) ...From what I've heard the game will have:

1 Prologue

5 Chapters (One 1st chapter, two 2nd chapters and two 3rd chapters)

8 Epilogues

But obviously we will visit only one from the 2nd and 3rd chapters and only one of the epilogues. If this confirms to be true, then it could be one of the best rpgs since long time.

Avatar image for deactivated-660c2894dc19c
deactivated-660c2894dc19c

2190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#42 deactivated-660c2894dc19c
Member since 2004 • 2190 Posts

Weird to review a preview copy, but I'm sure the game will rock.

Avatar image for Coyful
Coyful

373

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 Coyful
Member since 2011 • 373 Posts
...I have one question; Can you change his god aweful haircut? If I'm going to role play, I'd rather not look like a glam rock barbarian.
Avatar image for philiwaniuk
philiwaniuk

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 philiwaniuk
Member since 2011 • 25 Posts
Hi everyone, I'm the guy who reviewed The Witcher 2 for PC Format, and since a number of people across different forums have wrongly suggested I review preview code or an incomplete version of the game, I think it's best to clarify. I reviewed the game at CDP Red's HQ and played the review code from start to finish including different narrative paths, NOT the preview code. The review code had all the same content as the shelved copy of the game, but as I mentioned in the review (and opened a pandora's box by doing so) it was 'pre-final' in the sense that bug testers were still working on ironing out issues before the game went gold. I felt I had a responsibility to mention the bugs i encountered in the game in case they weren't fixed, but an equal responsibility to note that CDP were working on it. Whatever people's opinions are on review code vs retail (perfectly valid reservations, in my opinions), it's not correct and unfair to say PC Format wrote a review based on preview code. Thanks for reading, Phil
Avatar image for philiwaniuk
philiwaniuk

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 philiwaniuk
Member since 2011 • 25 Posts
Hi everyone, I'm the guy who reviewed The Witcher 2 for PC Format, and since a number of people across different forums have wrongly suggested I review preview code or an incomplete version of the game, I think it's best to clarify. I reviewed the game at CDP Red's HQ and played the review code from start to finish including different narrative paths, NOT the preview code. The review code had all the same content as the shelved copy of the game, but as I mentioned in the review (and opened a pandora's box by doing so) it was 'pre-final' in the sense that bug testers were still working on ironing out issues before the game went gold. I felt I had a responsibility to mention the bugs i encountered in the game in case they weren't fixed, but an equal responsibility to note that CDP were working on it. Whatever people's opinions are on review code vs retail (perfectly valid reservations, in my opinions), it's not correct and unfair to say PC Format wrote a review based on preview code. Thanks for reading, Phil
Avatar image for philiwaniuk
philiwaniuk

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 philiwaniuk
Member since 2011 • 25 Posts
Hi everyone, I'm the guy who reviewed The Witcher 2 for PC Format, and since a number of people across different forums have wrongly suggested I review preview code or an incomplete version of the game, I think it's best to clarify. I reviewed the game at CDP Red's HQ and played the review code from start to finish including different narrative paths, NOT the preview code. The review code had all the same content as the shelved copy of the game, but as I mentioned in the review (and opened a pandora's box by doing so) it was 'pre-final' in the sense that bug testers were still working on ironing out issues before the game went gold. I felt I had a responsibility to mention the bugs i encountered in the game in case they weren't fixed, but an equal responsibility to note that CDP were working on it. Whatever people's opinions are on review code vs retail (perfectly valid reservations, in my opinions), it's not correct and unfair to say PC Format wrote a review based on preview code. Thanks for reading, Phil