The Mighty Xbox One X already has to resort to low settings

Avatar image for Juub1990
Juub1990

8752

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1  Edited By Juub1990
Member since 2013 • 8752 Posts

In Far Cry 5, according to Digital Foundry Terrain and Volumetrics are the equivalent of low settings? Who woulda thunk? The console isn’t even a year old and already has to drop some settings to low to lock 30fps at 4K.

Honestly I would rather get lower resolution but higher quality assets. Oh well there’s the PC version for that.

Avatar image for lifelessablaze
lifelessablaze

832

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#2 lifelessablaze
Member since 2017 • 832 Posts

dude if a GTX 1070 ti can't do 4k @ max settings then what makes you think a console that costs only $50 more can? Be honest with yourself...stop making these threads pretending to be dimwitted

Avatar image for lamprey263
lamprey263

36227

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#3 lamprey263
Member since 2006 • 36227 Posts

@lifelessablaze: "pretending"?

Avatar image for Juub1990
Juub1990

8752

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Juub1990
Member since 2013 • 8752 Posts

@lifelessablaze: Who spoke about max settings? I sure as hell was expecting more than some Low settings from the most powerful console in history.

Avatar image for PinchySkree
PinchySkree

1245

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#5  Edited By PinchySkree
Member since 2012 • 1245 Posts

Consoles are sold at a loss so making a direct comparison is dumb

Also a PC has far more value than a locked shitbox

Avatar image for lifelessablaze
lifelessablaze

832

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#6 lifelessablaze
Member since 2017 • 832 Posts

@Juub1990 said:

@lifelessablaze: Who spoke about max settings? I sure as hell was expecting more than some Low settings from the most powerful console in history.

native 4k just ain't that easy even on higher end gpus. get over it

Avatar image for i_p_daily
I_P_Daily

12837

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 I_P_Daily
Member since 2015 • 12837 Posts

@Juub1990: You're getting as bad as the cows as in talks more about something you don't own rather than playing games you do have, just sad.

Avatar image for Juub1990
Juub1990

8752

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8  Edited By Juub1990
Member since 2013 • 8752 Posts

@i_p_daily: Not my fault the Mighty X1X from a few months ago is already dropping down to Low settings. This is about the console. Not about me.

Avatar image for lifelessablaze
lifelessablaze

832

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#9 lifelessablaze
Member since 2017 • 832 Posts

@Juub1990 said:

@i_p_daily: Not my fault the Mighty X1X from a few months ago is already dropping down to Low settings. This is about the console. Not about me.

nah. this thread is now about you and your inability to think within reason.

Avatar image for Juub1990
Juub1990

8752

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Juub1990
Member since 2013 • 8752 Posts

@lifelessablaze: Don’t know what you’re on. You mentioned a 1070 Ti and max settings when I spoke nothing of the sort. Simply disappointed in what it can do. Especially when some were initially claiming it was max settings.

Avatar image for sealionact
sealionact

4229

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#11 sealionact
Member since 2014 • 4229 Posts

@Juub1990: Come on....you're not that dumb. Even for a pc master*****.

Avatar image for hrt_rulz01
hrt_rulz01

19357

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12  Edited By hrt_rulz01
Member since 2006 • 19357 Posts

Lol, yeah it's the console... not the devs.

I've never seen people so salty over a console/brand like some people on here are with XB1 X/Xbox as a whole. Kinda funny.

Avatar image for Xabiss
Xabiss

2917

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13  Edited By Xabiss
Member since 2012 • 2917 Posts

All I will say about this is the Xbox One X is running the game better at 4K then a 1060/580 and all for $500. Seems like a pretty damn good deal to me. Even DF said they could not make either card run the game at a locked 30FPS at ultra, Xbox One X settings, or even low settings. So what exactly is the problem? Seems to do pretty good for the price of the box. OP is just using dumb ass fanboy logic once again. Funny he picks on the Xbox One X but all of the other consoles run it even worse and not even a peep about those systems.

Avatar image for zaryia
Zaryia

9867

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14  Edited By Zaryia
Member since 2016 • 9867 Posts

@lifelessablaze said:

dude if a GTX 1070 ti can't do 4k @ max settings

Yes it can....DF specifically showed it can.

@lifelessablaze said:
@Juub1990 said:

@lifelessablaze: Who spoke about max settings? I sure as hell was expecting more than some Low settings from the most powerful console in history.

native 4k just ain't that easy even on higher end gpus. get over it

1080 does 4k 60 fps. Also, 3440x1440 at over 80fps on ultra is better anyways, which 1070 does.

Lmao forced to play on low and 30.

Avatar image for Juub1990
Juub1990

8752

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Juub1990
Member since 2013 • 8752 Posts

@sealionact: See the FC5. Early victories of Ultra settings/30fps. Boasts about it beating a 1070. Now the truth comes out.

Avatar image for Pedro
Pedro

35687

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 64

User Lists: 0

#16 Pedro
Member since 2002 • 35687 Posts

I guess the fact that Xbox One X is running at native 4k is still causing some folks to loose sleep at night. LMAO.

Avatar image for zaryia
Zaryia

9867

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17  Edited By Zaryia
Member since 2016 • 9867 Posts

@Xabiss said:

All I will say about this is the Xbox One X is running the game better at 4K then a 1060/580 and all for $500. Seems like a pretty damn good deal to me.

You're assuming the PC gamer isn't upgrading and that the 1X gamer isn't coming from XB1 (aka well over $1000 on XB this gen). That's a lot of assumptions. If you're buying a XB system every 3 years, and keeping up XBL, you're better off going just upgrading your PC.

Low/30fps and most games running far worse than this FC5 fiasco is not worth all that money on this fake console "upgrades".

Avatar image for jtothamtothap
JtoThaMtoThaP

1016

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 JtoThaMtoThaP
Member since 2016 • 1016 Posts

You can play the best version on your PC, why do you care if people want to spend much less and enjoy 4K gaming?

Avatar image for Pedro
Pedro

35687

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 64

User Lists: 0

#19 Pedro
Member since 2002 • 35687 Posts

@jtothamtothap said:

You can play the best version on your PC, why do you care if people want to spend much less and enjoy 4K gaming?

The 4k console is running games at 4k. The burn is real. The salt is real.

Avatar image for Xabiss
Xabiss

2917

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Xabiss
Member since 2012 • 2917 Posts

@zaryia said:
@Xabiss said:

All I will say about this is the Xbox One X is running the game better at 4K then a 1060/580 and all for $500. Seems like a pretty damn good deal to me.

Not if you're buying a XB system every 3 years, and keeping up XBL. In that case you're better off going PC.

Low/30fps is not worth all that money "upgrading".

Just like I upgrade my PC every 3 years? Just like I buy new consoles every 3 years. WTF does that matter. I don't think I have ever had a PC I didn't spend a shit ton of money every one or two years keeping it up to date. A 3 year old computer is still a 3 year computer and requires updates to get the most of them. It isn't like I build a computer now and it will last me 5-10 years.

Avatar image for xhawk27
xhawk27

11401

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 xhawk27
Member since 2010 • 11401 Posts

@Pedro said:
@jtothamtothap said:

You can play the best version on your PC, why do you care if people want to spend much less and enjoy 4K gaming?

The 4k console is running games at 4k. The burn is real. The salt is real.

These fools are sure salty much lately. Maybe they know RD2 is coming and only the Best version will be on X1X since No beggar version until over a year after console launch.

Avatar image for calvincfb
Calvincfb

0

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#22 Calvincfb
Member since 2018 • 0 Posts

This thread right here is the main reason why devs believe that shiny graphics and fps are better than fun factor in games. Smh.

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

54002

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#23  Edited By lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 54002 Posts

@calvincfb said:

This thread right here is the main reason why devs believe that shiny graphics and fps are better than fun factor in games. Smh.

Erm... They literally sacrifice fps in almost every instance.

Avatar image for Juub1990
Juub1990

8752

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Juub1990
Member since 2013 • 8752 Posts

@calvincfb: If devs cared about gameplay they would have aimed 60fps especially for a shooter. But then a piece of crap CPU made sure it’s impossible.

Avatar image for Pedro
Pedro

35687

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 64

User Lists: 0

#25 Pedro
Member since 2002 • 35687 Posts

@Juub1990 said:

@calvincfb: If devs cared about gameplay they would have aimed 60fps especially for a shooter. But then a piece of crap CPU made sure it’s impossible.

They cared enough about gameplay to gave gamers a stable performance across all console platforms. But I guess stable framerate doesn't matter now. LOL

The irony of this thread is the OP calls out the dev for sacrificing graphics for stable framerates then makes the above statement. You people are special.

Avatar image for calvincfb
Calvincfb

0

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#26 Calvincfb
Member since 2018 • 0 Posts

@Juub1990: no it isn't, devs can aim to 60fps of they wanted, but then you graphics whores would all go "MUH LOW GRAPHICS SETTINGS"

you graphic whores are the main reason beauty is more emphasized nowadays

Avatar image for quadknight
QuadKnight

12916

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27  Edited By QuadKnight
Member since 2015 • 12916 Posts
Loading Video...

? This video is so hilarious to watch now.

? @ “Its a beast”.

So many lies in one video.

Avatar image for Juub1990
Juub1990

8752

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 Juub1990
Member since 2013 • 8752 Posts

@Pedro: Don’t give a shit about 30fps. Give me 1080p/60fps.

Avatar image for Pedro
Pedro

35687

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 64

User Lists: 0

#29  Edited By Pedro
Member since 2002 • 35687 Posts

That 4k is burning some folks so bad. It must suck spending $400 on a marginal sub 4k upgrade. LOL.

One triple A game running native 4k and the fannies are loosing their minds. LOL.

Avatar image for xhawk27
xhawk27

11401

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 xhawk27
Member since 2010 • 11401 Posts

@Pedro said:

That 4k is burning some folks so bad. It must suck spending $400 on a marginal sub 4k upgrade. LOL.

One triple A game running native 4k and the fannies are loosing their minds. LOL.

Do you think Red Dead 2 is going to be in 4k or 1800p Native on X1X?

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

54002

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#31 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 54002 Posts
@Pedro said:

...loosing...

It's "losing," and 4k doesn't mean much if the actual IQ isn't up to snuff... Let alone the fps.

Avatar image for zaryia
Zaryia

9867

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 Zaryia
Member since 2016 • 9867 Posts

@xhawk27 said:
@Pedro said:
@jtothamtothap said:

You can play the best version on your PC, why do you care if people want to spend much less and enjoy 4K gaming?

The 4k console is running games at 4k. The burn is real. The salt is real.

No beggar version until over a year after console launch.

This isn't an issue considering PC obliterates XB in GS and MC each year, and plays the better version of 99% of games on XB1X each year.

Avatar image for Archangel3371
Archangel3371

28677

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#34  Edited By Archangel3371
Member since 2004 • 28677 Posts

This would probably mean something to me if I was at all interested in gaming on PC but I’m not so it doesn’t.

Avatar image for Pedro
Pedro

35687

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 64

User Lists: 0

#35 Pedro
Member since 2002 • 35687 Posts

@lundy86_4 said:
@Pedro said:

...loosing...

It's "losing," and 4k doesn't mean much if the actual IQ isn't up to snuff... Let alone the fps.

LOL. When your only counter argument is a typo you know you got nothing.

Avatar image for zaryia
Zaryia

9867

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36  Edited By Zaryia
Member since 2016 • 9867 Posts

@Pedro said:
@lundy86_4 said:
@Pedro said:

...loosing...

It's "losing," and 4k doesn't mean much if the actual IQ isn't up to snuff... Let alone the fps.

LOL. When your only counter argument is a typo you know you got nothing.

I'm positive he had an entire sentence after that typo correction...

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

54002

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#37 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 54002 Posts

@Pedro said:
@lundy86_4 said:
@Pedro said:

...loosing...

It's "losing," and 4k doesn't mean much if the actual IQ isn't up to snuff... Let alone the fps.

LOL. When your only counter argument is a typo you know you got nothing.

Did you read the rest of the sentence? Also the sentence after the ellipsis?

Avatar image for quadknight
QuadKnight

12916

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 QuadKnight
Member since 2015 • 12916 Posts

@zaryia said:
@Pedro said:
@lundy86_4 said:
@Pedro said:

...loosing...

It's "losing," and 4k doesn't mean much if the actual IQ isn't up to snuff... Let alone the fps.

LOL. When your only counter argument is a typo you know you got nothing.

I'm positive he had an entire sentence after that typo correction...

Be easy on him. Lems are not only illiterate they also have poor eyesight.

Avatar image for Pedro
Pedro

35687

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 64

User Lists: 0

#39 Pedro
Member since 2002 • 35687 Posts

@lundy86_4 said:

Did you read the rest of the sentence? Also the sentence after the ellipsis?

Stable 30 FPS. Did you miss that?

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

54002

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#40  Edited By lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 54002 Posts

@Pedro said:
@lundy86_4 said:

Did you read the rest of the sentence? Also the sentence after the ellipsis?

Stable 30 FPS. Did you miss that?

No. It wasn't in the post I quoted. Holy shit... Dude. It also isn't relevant to my post.

Avatar image for xhawk27
xhawk27

11401

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 xhawk27
Member since 2010 • 11401 Posts

@zaryia said:
@xhawk27 said:
@Pedro said:
@jtothamtothap said:

You can play the best version on your PC, why do you care if people want to spend much less and enjoy 4K gaming?

The 4k console is running games at 4k. The burn is real. The salt is real.

No beggar version until over a year after console launch.

This isn't an issue considering PC obliterates XB in GS and MC each year, and plays the better version of 99% of games on XB1X each year.

Yeah sure. I am not waiting to play a slightly better version.

Avatar image for Pedro
Pedro

35687

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 64

User Lists: 0

#42 Pedro
Member since 2002 • 35687 Posts

@lundy86_4 said:
@Pedro said:
@lundy86_4 said:

Did you read the rest of the sentence? Also the sentence after the ellipsis?

Stable 30 FPS. Did you miss that?

No. It wasn't in the post I quoted. Holy shit... Dude. It also isn't relevant to my post.

You mentioned FPS, I pointed out that it has stable FPS. Now FPS is not relevant to your post. Ok. :)

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

54002

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#43  Edited By lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 54002 Posts

@Pedro said:

You mentioned FPS, I pointed out that it has stable FPS. Now FPS is not relevant to your post. Ok. :)

It seems I have to explain more than spelling. If you referenced 30fps, and I missed it, your point would be relevant. You didn't, thus your point about 30fps was not relevant. If anything, it indicated a post I didn't quote. Jesus Christ, your grasp of the English language should be nobody elses undoing.

Trying to make a strawman argument is both sad and pathetic.

Avatar image for Xabiss
Xabiss

2917

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44  Edited By Xabiss
Member since 2012 • 2917 Posts

@zaryia said:
@xhawk27 said:
@Pedro said:
@jtothamtothap said:

You can play the best version on your PC, why do you care if people want to spend much less and enjoy 4K gaming?

The 4k console is running games at 4k. The burn is real. The salt is real.

No beggar version until over a year after console launch.

This isn't an issue considering PC obliterates XB in GS and MC each year, and plays the better version of 99% of games on XB1X each year.

PCs should always out perform consoles today. That is just common sense. You can throw money at a PC with hardware to get the performance metrics you want. PCs against any console it will always be no contest. Should never compare a $500 box to $750+ boxes. Hell most PC users on this forum run $1K+ boxes such as myself. But for $500 the X has pretty good value for performance and I enjoy mine.

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

54002

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#45 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 54002 Posts

@Xabiss said:

PCs should always out perform consoles today. That is just common sense. You can throw money at a PC with hardware to get the performance metrics you want. PCs against any console it will always be no contest. Should never compare a $500 box to $750+ boxes. Hell most PC users on this forum run $1K+ boxes such as myself. But for $500 the X has pretty good value for performance and I enjoy mine.

For price/performance, the X is damn good. I'm primarily PC, but there's no denying that the X is up to snuff in terms of modern gaming.

Avatar image for xhawk27
xhawk27

11401

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 xhawk27
Member since 2010 • 11401 Posts

I don't get you people. You complain about games in 4k only running at 30fps but you are happy enough to have games run in 720p on the Switch?

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

54002

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#47 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 54002 Posts

@xhawk27 said:

I don't get you people. You complain about games in 4k only running at 30fps but you are happy enough to have games run in 720p on the Switch?

What is with strawman arguments in this thread?

Avatar image for Pedro
Pedro

35687

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 64

User Lists: 0

#48 Pedro
Member since 2002 • 35687 Posts

@lundy86_4 said:
@Pedro said:

You mentioned FPS, I pointed out that it has stable FPS. Now FPS is not relevant to your post. Ok. :)

It seems I have to explain more than spelling. If you referenced 30fps, and I missed it, your point would be relevant. You didn't, thus your point about 30fps was not relevant. If anything, it indicated a post I didn't quote. Jesus Christ, your grasp of the English language should be nobody elses undoing.

Trying to make a strawman argument is both sad and pathetic.

You do realise that you called the game out on the IQ and fps right? Now why is the specifics on the fps confusing to you when you specifically referenced it?

Avatar image for xantufrog
xantufrog

11746

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 5

#49  Edited By xantufrog  Moderator
Member since 2013 • 11746 Posts

Why anyone would want to play games at the lowest settings and framerates just for resolution is beyond me. I don't like that trade-off at all. I really think the console designers and the game developers together are making a mistake building 4k 30fps machines and games over 1080-1440p 60fps.

Avatar image for Pedro
Pedro

35687

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 64

User Lists: 0

#50 Pedro
Member since 2002 • 35687 Posts

@xantufrog said:

Why anyone would want to play games at the lowest settings and framerates just for resolution is beyond me. I don't like that trade-off at all. I really think the console designers and the game developers together are making a mistake building 4k 30fps machines and games over 1080-1440p 60fps.

Based on the OP, the lowest setting were applied to terrain and volumetrics.