Sony, Xbox, or Nintendo - who has the most polish in their first party games?

  • 63 results
  • 1
  • 2
Avatar image for SolidGame_basic
SolidGame_basic

24720

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Poll: Sony, Xbox, or Nintendo - who has the most polish in their first party games? (87 votes)

Sony 36%
Xbox 9%
Nintendo 55%

I think Sony does. Games like God of War, Horizon, Last of Us, etc all look fantastic. While I don't have an Xbox, I read they've had quality issues with games like Sea of Thieves. Nintendo usually does a good job, although I do remember Breath of the Wild having frame rate/stutter issues. But when I buy a Sony game, I can count on it looking and playing great.

How about you, SW? Who has the most polish in their first party games out of the big three console makers?

 • 
Avatar image for sakaixx
sakaiXx

6513

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 5

#1 sakaiXx
Member since 2013 • 6513 Posts

Voted for Sony for obvious graphical reasons. Their level of polish is just stunning

Avatar image for Random_Matt
Random_Matt

4488

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#2 Random_Matt
Member since 2013 • 4488 Posts

People will be biased, and likely don't own various platforms.

Avatar image for ajstyles
AJStyles

1233

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#3 AJStyles
Member since 2018 • 1233 Posts

Sony has the most polish. High quality AAA games pushing graphics to new heights. Awesome gameplay, stories, voice acting etc.

Microsoft is somewhere in the middle. For every Gears of War 4 which is pretty good, they have shovelware like Recore.

Nintendo is the worst out of the 3. They don’t push anything. Nintendo doesn’t even use textures in their games. It’s hard to mess up a games graphics when they are simplistic and cartoony. They are still making N64 games with a cartoon coat of paint.

They should not be getting praise. They also have terrible online, bad stories, bad voice acting and simplistic gameplay and often gimmicks that make there games worse to control.

Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

35386

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4  Edited By SecretPolice
Member since 2007 • 35386 Posts

Xbox Won.. for proof, look no further than Forza Horizon 4, polished to a mirror like finish. :P.

Avatar image for robert_sparkes
robert_sparkes

3520

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#5 robert_sparkes
Member since 2018 • 3520 Posts

Sony

MS

Nintendo

Avatar image for davillain-
DaVillain-

39445

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#6 DaVillain-  Moderator
Member since 2014 • 39445 Posts

Without a doubt, Nintendo is the only out of the big 3 who always have outstanding polish 1st party games, no more/less. Sony comes second place as they too polish their 1st party games but Nintendo still outshines Sony but still, I like'em both and if I must pick 1, it's Nintendo who get's my vote.

Avatar image for jaydan
jaydan

2786

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 jaydan
Member since 2015 • 2786 Posts
@ajstyles said:

Sony has the most polish. High quality AAA games pushing graphics to new heights. Awesome gameplay, stories, voice acting etc.

Microsoft is somewhere in the middle. For every Gears of War 4 which is pretty good, they have shovelware like Recore.

Nintendo is the worst out of the 3. They don’t push anything. Nintendo doesn’t even use textures in their games. It’s hard to mess up a games graphics when they are simplistic and cartoony. They are still making N64 games with a cartoon coat of paint.

They should not be getting praise. They also have terrible online, bad stories, bad voice acting and simplistic gameplay and often gimmicks that make there games worse to control.

I guess you haven't played Nintendo since the N64 days.

Avatar image for Archangel3371
Archangel3371

29027

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#8 Archangel3371
Member since 2004 • 29027 Posts

Nintendo gets my vote.

Avatar image for princessgomez92
PrincessGomez92

5747

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 201

User Lists: 5

#9 PrincessGomez92
Member since 2013 • 5747 Posts

Definitely Nintendo. Pretty easy choice.

Avatar image for osan0
osan0

15507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 osan0
Member since 2004 • 15507 Posts

overall nintendo. i dont have an issue with buying their games day one as i know they are, for the most part, in good shape at launch. they do expansion packs for some of their games now but the base games for those are not exactly lacking either (though i dont get their release strategy for Splatoon and arms.....very few maps with free ones added later. odd). nintendo are not perfect. BOTW has performance issues that were never sorted on the wiiu (i hear they are mostly sorted on the switch) and xenoblade 2 is not as smooth running as xenoblade X (though overall it was still released in good shape).

probably the one area that would let them down on the polish front is online. the online experience is not great from what i hear (i dont use it personally).

Sony: generally solid at launch but more dugs certainly get through. at lest they did on the PS3. they can also look very polished but the gameplay can be anything but. i dont have a PS4 so i dont know if things have improved. are there big day 1 patches for many of their games?

they do have the record for worst out of the box experience for me in a game though: GT6. if i put my GT6 disc into a new PS3 it will take 8 hours to patch before i can play it. 8 FRICKIN HOURS. im not exaggerating either. i had to disable the auto shutdown setting on the PS3 because it would time out. some of those patches are extra stuff yes but 8 hours.....thats insane (this is on a 100Mb/s connection that is working just fine). i dont want to know what horror state that was released in.

I cant comment on MS. i hear the master chief collection was a dumpster fire at launch but i never played it.

Avatar image for speedfreak48t5p
speedfreak48t5p

13734

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 62

User Lists: 0

#11 speedfreak48t5p
Member since 2009 • 13734 Posts

Nintendo definitely.

Avatar image for mandzilla
mandzilla

4246

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#12 mandzilla  Moderator
Member since 2017 • 4246 Posts

Nintendo as usual.

Avatar image for enzyme36
enzyme36

4326

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13  Edited By enzyme36
Member since 2007 • 4326 Posts

Nintendo by a mile

Avatar image for ezekiel43
Ezekiel43

2028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#14 Ezekiel43  Online
Member since 2017 • 2028 Posts

I don't know. But Nintendo makes better games than Sony and especially Microsoft. They're just fun. Sony is too obsessed with expensive presentation and cinematic storytelling now.

Avatar image for Sevenizz
Sevenizz

4139

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#15  Edited By Sevenizz
Member since 2010 • 4139 Posts

@undefined: ‘I read they've had quality issues with games like Sea of Thieves’

Wrong. While there were minor bugs just about any online game faces upon launch, the game was playable for most since day one.

@sakaiXx ‘Voted for Sony for obvious graphical reasons. Their level of polish is just stunning’

‘Graphical’? That’s not what polish means. It means overall quality which sony also has issues with on occasion. Driveclub was broken on launch and took about a year to fix.

First party wise though, I’d have to go Nintendo for overall polish. You’d be hard pressed to find glaring issues with their first party titles. Although speedrunners often find and exploit hacks the average person wouldn’t find. Nintendo also isn’t as resource heavy as most so polish is easier to control. I picked MS second as well, I don’t buy playstations so I can’t judge them properly. Forza games launch dripping with polish.

Avatar image for sakaixx
sakaiXx

6513

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 5

#16  Edited By sakaiXx
Member since 2013 • 6513 Posts

@Sevenizz said:

@undefined: ‘I read they've had quality issues with games like Sea of Thieves’

Wrong. While there were minor bugs just about any online game faces upon launch, the game was playable for most since day one.

@sakaiXx ‘Voted for Sony for obvious graphical reasons. Their level of polish is just stunning’

‘Graphical’? That’s not what polish means. It means overall quality which sony also has issues with on occasion. Driveclub was broken on launch and took about a year to fix.

First party wise though, I’d have to go Nintendo for overall polish. You’d be hard pressed to find glaring issues with their first party titles. Although speedrunners often find and exploit hacks the average person wouldn’t find. Nintendo also isn’t as resource heavy as most so polish is easier to control. I picked MS second as well, I don’t buy playstations so I can’t judge them properly. Forza games launch dripping with polish.

I can judge based on what I think is important as overall polish. I judged on graphic cause I think all 3 nailed on gameplay part and all console publisher have unique thing that they do best. Sony does well on one part, nintendo dnintendo does well on casuals, xbox does well on their market so I judged based on what I think differentiate best.

Anyhow gameplay wise I will never go to a nintendo game. Its another mario, its another pokemon, is another nintendo something aka its another nintendo recycled content. overrated, overhyped, lazy cash grab.

Avatar image for i_p_daily
I_P_Daily

13566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#17 I_P_Daily
Member since 2015 • 13566 Posts

How many ways can the OP make threads to gobble on Sony's knob? that's the real question here folks.

Avatar image for appariti0n
appariti0n

2824

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#18 appariti0n
Member since 2009 • 2824 Posts

I think CDPR has the most Polish.

Avatar image for fedor
Fedor

5474

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 Fedor
Member since 2015 • 5474 Posts

Nintendo is the obvious choice.

Avatar image for xantufrog
xantufrog

11925

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 5

#20 xantufrog  Moderator
Member since 2013 • 11925 Posts

Definitely Nintendo. Sony produces the largest volume of graphically striking games. But that's not the same thing at all as overall polish, to my mind. Not to snub awesome games like HZD which run rock solid and are fun to play

Avatar image for hrt_rulz01
hrt_rulz01

19559

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21  Edited By hrt_rulz01
Member since 2006 • 19559 Posts

@Archangel3371 said: Nintendo gets my vote.

Yeah, same. Mario Odyssey is a prime example.

Avatar image for Gamerno6666
Gamerno6666

6999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#22 Gamerno6666
Member since 2013 • 6999 Posts

Ninty

Avatar image for mandzilla
mandzilla

4246

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#23 mandzilla  Moderator
Member since 2017 • 4246 Posts
@appariti0n said:

I think CDPR has the most Polish.

Bravo.

Avatar image for evilross
evilross

2010

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#24 evilross
Member since 2003 • 2010 Posts

This isn’t even close. Nintendo games are near flawless at release.

Avatar image for papermario
Papermario

238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#25 Papermario
Member since 2016 • 238 Posts

although playstation is a clearly better console.....

nintendo has the best

mario sonic and pokemon

Avatar image for boxrekt
BoxRekt

2071

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#26 BoxRekt
Member since 2019 • 2071 Posts

it's a really hard choice between Sony and Nintendo for different reasons. Both are excellent for polish in different ways.

Nintendo has fantastic polish for fan friendly nostalgic games

and

Sony has unmatched polish for AAA graphically impressive blockbuster games

I chose Sony because I think it's a bit more difficult to have bar setting graphically impressive games that are also among the most polished games on the market but It could go either way really.

Avatar image for SolidGame_basic
SolidGame_basic

24720

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 SolidGame_basic
Member since 2003 • 24720 Posts
@boxrekt said:

it's a really hard choice between Sony and Nintendo for different reasons. Both are excellent for polish in different ways.

Nintendo has fantastic polish for fan friendly nostalgic games

and

Sony has unmatched polish for AAA graphically impressive blockbuster games

I chose Sony because I think it's a bit more difficult to have bar setting graphically impressive games that are also among the most polished games on the market but It could go either way really.

Yea, I agree with you. Sony games are graphically way more intensive than Nintendo's. Not sure how Nintendo is getting so much credit here.

Avatar image for mandzilla
mandzilla

4246

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#28 mandzilla  Moderator
Member since 2017 • 4246 Posts

The PS4 cutscenes are very polished I will say, best cutscenes in the business! Got that cinematic experience down to a tee.

Avatar image for saltslasher
SaltSlasher

1391

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 SaltSlasher
Member since 2015 • 1391 Posts

If talking polish day 1, clearly Nintendo hands down. I don't think I've played a botched game from them.

With Xbox, I give them edge of PlayStation cause even if a game isn't 100% golden day 1, they will remaster that game for free like they did Master Chief Collection and Recore. I don't know what you read about Sea of Thieves but that game was polished, people just didn't like lack of content. State of Decay 2 is the one with some jank. While Forza Horizon 4 had more polish than God of War and Spider-Man combined.

Not sure if every exclusive I played was Sony's, but Knack was wrankity when I played it, Until Dawn wasn't polished at all, Bloodborne was really choppy, The Last Guardian had issues, and Gravity Rush had issues as well.

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

54349

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#30 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 54349 Posts

Nintendo, by far.

Avatar image for ProtossRushX
ProtossRushX

5734

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 ProtossRushX
Member since 2007 • 5734 Posts

Spiderman

God of the Year War

nuff said sony wins

Avatar image for jaydan
jaydan

2786

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32  Edited By jaydan
Member since 2015 • 2786 Posts
@sakaixx said:
@Sevenizz said:

@undefined: ‘I read they've had quality issues with games like Sea of Thieves’

Wrong. While there were minor bugs just about any online game faces upon launch, the game was playable for most since day one.

@sakaiXx ‘Voted for Sony for obvious graphical reasons. Their level of polish is just stunning’

‘Graphical’? That’s not what polish means. It means overall quality which sony also has issues with on occasion. Driveclub was broken on launch and took about a year to fix.

First party wise though, I’d have to go Nintendo for overall polish. You’d be hard pressed to find glaring issues with their first party titles. Although speedrunners often find and exploit hacks the average person wouldn’t find. Nintendo also isn’t as resource heavy as most so polish is easier to control. I picked MS second as well, I don’t buy playstations so I can’t judge them properly. Forza games launch dripping with polish.

I can judge based on what I think is important as overall polish. I judged on graphic cause I think all 3 nailed on gameplay part and all console publisher have unique thing that they do best. Sony does well on one part, nintendo dnintendo does well on casuals, xbox does well on their market so I judged based on what I think differentiate best.

Anyhow gameplay wise I will never go to a nintendo game. Its another mario, its another pokemon, is another nintendo something aka its another nintendo recycled content. overrated, overhyped, lazy cash grab.

Blanket statements like these make me realize the people that say these things don't actually play Nintendo games to know better; but hey, at least you clarified that one by saying you never play them.

Avatar image for sakaixx
sakaiXx

6513

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 5

#33 sakaiXx
Member since 2013 • 6513 Posts

@jaydan said:
@sakaixx said:

I can judge based on what I think is important as overall polish. I judged on graphic cause I think all 3 nailed on gameplay part and all console publisher have unique thing that they do best. Sony does well on one part, nintendo dnintendo does well on casuals, xbox does well on their market so I judged based on what I think differentiate best.

Anyhow gameplay wise I will never go to a nintendo game. Its another mario, its another pokemon, is another nintendo something aka its another nintendo recycled content. overrated, overhyped, lazy cash grab.

Blanket statements like these make me realize the people that say these things don't actually play Nintendo games to know better.

To me, Nintendo is just like Activision or EA sport title. Yearly releases of Pokemon is equal to yearly releases of CoD and FIFA in my eye. No difference at all, all reharshed content from way back with a coat of new engine. All equally crap.

Avatar image for ellos
ellos

2088

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 ellos
Member since 2015 • 2088 Posts

Its nintendo they seem to make sure all there works are quality most of the time. Sony and MS seem to not care for there smaller studios works. They have let out stinkers. Sony has the polish when it comes to there big studios.

Avatar image for x_karen_x
X_Karen_x

501

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#35 X_Karen_x
Member since 2019 • 501 Posts

@sakaixx:

Zelda Link in the Wild. This game more a exception. Okay the other game called Arm is also unique. Let just say they release SOME complete new game. But, it easy to agree because it true. Smash Bro is just wiiu game. I not even counting re release game like Mario Car 8 or Donkey Kong Tropical Breeze. Game like Splattoon 2 is just like Call of Duty.

What make matter worse is nintendo fanboy jump to it defense and make me laugh when nintendo fanboy return is to complain about Sony “movie game” which have nothing to do with a good comparison or analogy.

Avatar image for jaydan
jaydan

2786

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36  Edited By jaydan
Member since 2015 • 2786 Posts
@sakaixx said:
@jaydan said:
@sakaixx said:

I can judge based on what I think is important as overall polish. I judged on graphic cause I think all 3 nailed on gameplay part and all console publisher have unique thing that they do best. Sony does well on one part, nintendo dnintendo does well on casuals, xbox does well on their market so I judged based on what I think differentiate best.

Anyhow gameplay wise I will never go to a nintendo game. Its another mario, its another pokemon, is another nintendo something aka its another nintendo recycled content. overrated, overhyped, lazy cash grab.

Blanket statements like these make me realize the people that say these things don't actually play Nintendo games to know better.

To me, Nintendo is just like Activision or EA sport title. Yearly releases of Pokemon is equal to yearly releases of CoD and FIFA in my eye. No difference at all, all reharshed content from way back with a coat of new engine. All equally crap.

Summing it up like that is a pretty superficial and ignorant way of looking at it. Nintendo is a mascot-driven company, and that's why you see their biggest mascots in the spotlight, because mascots are their niche. It's not just a new Mario game that gets rehashed - just looking at the main 3D games (64, Sunshine, Galaxy 1&2, 3D World, Odyssey) - they are all very different from one another that offer drastically different gameplay elements. It's not just the same old Mario game every single time that you incline. I'm not going to begin to count how many franchises Mario has alone, but I'm pretty sure there's more franchises owned by Mario than what I can count with my own ten fingers. So yeah, "it's just another Mario game," but which of the many different types of Mario games are you referring to that is all samey?

Nintendo is definitely not perfect, and yeah some games feel rehashed (Mario Party, for example) but to say Nintendo's catalog entirely is a bunch of rehashes is shortsighted.

Avatar image for jaydan
jaydan

2786

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 jaydan
Member since 2015 • 2786 Posts
@x_karen_x said:

@sakaixx:

Zelda Link in the Wild. This game more a exception. Okay the other game called Arm is also unique. Let just say they release SOME complete new game. But, it easy to agree because it true. Smash Bro is just wiiu game. I not even counting re release game like Mario Car 8 or Donkey Kong Tropical Breeze. Game like Splattoon 2 is just like Call of Duty.

What make matter worse is nintendo fanboy jump to it defense and make me laugh when nintendo fanboy return is to complain about Sony “movie game” which have nothing to do with a good comparison or analogy.

You know what's the funniest thing about that statement? Literally every fanboy defends their consoles of choice. Cows tend to be the funniest ones when they get so cocky, imo.

Avatar image for techhog89
Techhog89

3818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 Techhog89
Member since 2015 • 3818 Posts

Nintendo and Sony are fairly even at this point, with Microsoft just a bit behind due to how they treat games they're not sure about. I voted for Nintendo though because... well, BotW and Smash Ultimate.

Avatar image for sakaixx
sakaiXx

6513

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 5

#39 sakaiXx
Member since 2013 • 6513 Posts

@jaydan said:
@sakaixx said:
@jaydan said:
@sakaixx said:

I can judge based on what I think is important as overall polish. I judged on graphic cause I think all 3 nailed on gameplay part and all console publisher have unique thing that they do best. Sony does well on one part, nintendo dnintendo does well on casuals, xbox does well on their market so I judged based on what I think differentiate best.

Anyhow gameplay wise I will never go to a nintendo game. Its another mario, its another pokemon, is another nintendo something aka its another nintendo recycled content. overrated, overhyped, lazy cash grab.

Blanket statements like these make me realize the people that say these things don't actually play Nintendo games to know better.

To me, Nintendo is just like Activision or EA sport title. Yearly releases of Pokemon is equal to yearly releases of CoD and FIFA in my eye. No difference at all, all reharshed content from way back with a coat of new engine. All equally crap.

Summing it up like that is a pretty superficial and ignorant way of looking at it. Nintendo is a mascot-driven company, and that's why you see their biggest mascots in the spotlight, because mascots are their niche. It's not just a new Mario game that gets rehashed - just looking at the main 3D games (64, Sunshine, Galaxy 1&2, 3D World, Odyssey) - they are all very different from one another that offer drastically different gameplay elements. It's not just the same old Mario game every single time that you incline. I'm not going to begin to count how many franchises Mario has alone, but I'm pretty sure there's more franchises owned by Mario than what I can count with my own ten fingers. So yeah, "it's just another Mario game," but which of the many different types of Mario games are you referring to that is all samey?

Nintendo is definitely not perfect, and yeah some games feel rehashed (Mario Party, for example) but to say Nintendo's catalog entirely is a bunch of rehashes is shortsighted.

CoD and FiFA and Madden is their respective company flagship titles like Nintendo Mascot titles that gets releases every single damn year. Its very funny to me when Nintendo fans tried to defend yearly releases of their games even though its essentially the same experience as last year, just like FIFA, CoD, and others.

I will give prop that nintendo do something else sometimes but, its Nintendo, wont be long till they rehashes something and fans called it amazing for "staying true to its roots". Its Its basic the same thing you get the past 30 years.

Avatar image for techhog89
Techhog89

3818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 Techhog89
Member since 2015 • 3818 Posts
@sakaixx said:
@jaydan said:
@sakaixx said:

I can judge based on what I think is important as overall polish. I judged on graphic cause I think all 3 nailed on gameplay part and all console publisher have unique thing that they do best. Sony does well on one part, nintendo dnintendo does well on casuals, xbox does well on their market so I judged based on what I think differentiate best.

Anyhow gameplay wise I will never go to a nintendo game. Its another mario, its another pokemon, is another nintendo something aka its another nintendo recycled content. overrated, overhyped, lazy cash grab.

Blanket statements like these make me realize the people that say these things don't actually play Nintendo games to know better.

To me, Nintendo is just like Activision or EA sport title. Yearly releases of Pokemon is equal to yearly releases of CoD and FIFA in my eye. No difference at all, all reharshed content from way back with a coat of new engine. All equally crap.

Pokemon isn't developed by Nintendo.

Avatar image for jasonofa36
JasonOfA36

1359

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#41 JasonOfA36
Member since 2016 • 1359 Posts

Sony has the budget, but Nintendo definitely has more polished games. Heck, I still play BOTW from time to time cos' it's just so engaging. Spiderman on the other hand is now collecting dust.

Avatar image for jasonofa36
JasonOfA36

1359

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#42 JasonOfA36
Member since 2016 • 1359 Posts
@appariti0n said:

I think CDPR has the most Polish.

Goddamnit.

Avatar image for mandzilla
mandzilla

4246

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#43  Edited By mandzilla  Moderator
Member since 2017 • 4246 Posts

@techhog89: Yup, plus the company that does develop it is coming out with a new IP this year lol.

Avatar image for sakaixx
sakaiXx

6513

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 5

#44  Edited By sakaiXx
Member since 2013 • 6513 Posts

@techhog89 said:
@sakaixx said:
@jaydan said:
@sakaixx said:

I can judge based on what I think is important as overall polish. I judged on graphic cause I think all 3 nailed on gameplay part and all console publisher have unique thing that they do best. Sony does well on one part, nintendo dnintendo does well on casuals, xbox does well on their market so I judged based on what I think differentiate best.

Anyhow gameplay wise I will never go to a nintendo game. Its another mario, its another pokemon, is another nintendo something aka its another nintendo recycled content. overrated, overhyped, lazy cash grab.

Blanket statements like these make me realize the people that say these things don't actually play Nintendo games to know better.

To me, Nintendo is just like Activision or EA sport title. Yearly releases of Pokemon is equal to yearly releases of CoD and FIFA in my eye. No difference at all, all reharshed content from way back with a coat of new engine. All equally crap.

Pokemon isn't developed by Nintendo.

Yeah and nintendo dont own parts of the IP.

Avatar image for techhog89
Techhog89

3818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45  Edited By Techhog89
Member since 2015 • 3818 Posts
@sakaixx said:
@techhog89 said:
@sakaixx said:
@jaydan said:

Blanket statements like these make me realize the people that say these things don't actually play Nintendo games to know better.

To me, Nintendo is just like Activision or EA sport title. Yearly releases of Pokemon is equal to yearly releases of CoD and FIFA in my eye. No difference at all, all reharshed content from way back with a coat of new engine. All equally crap.

Pokemon isn't developed by Nintendo.

Yeah and nintendo dont own parts of the IP.

You're trying to say that them owning a third of the IP means that they have complete creative control of the IP, eve though they literally helped to establish an entire company to independently manage it?

Avatar image for sakaixx
sakaiXx

6513

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 5

#46 sakaiXx
Member since 2013 • 6513 Posts

@techhog89 said:
@sakaixx said:
@techhog89 said:
@sakaixx said:
@jaydan said:

Blanket statements like these make me realize the people that say these things don't actually play Nintendo games to know better.

To me, Nintendo is just like Activision or EA sport title. Yearly releases of Pokemon is equal to yearly releases of CoD and FIFA in my eye. No difference at all, all reharshed content from way back with a coat of new engine. All equally crap.

Pokemon isn't developed by Nintendo.

Yeah and nintendo dont own parts of the IP.

You're trying to say that them owning a third of the IP means that they have complete creative control of the IP, eve though they literally helped to establish an entire company to independently manage it?

Nevertheless, its a nintendo IP that released yearly same as from other company that does the same. Rehashed content every year, just like the others

Avatar image for mandzilla
mandzilla

4246

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#47 mandzilla  Moderator
Member since 2017 • 4246 Posts

@sakaixx: I look forward to your posts later this year when Pokemon finishes off the PS4 in Japan.

Avatar image for techhog89
Techhog89

3818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 Techhog89
Member since 2015 • 3818 Posts
@sakaixx said:
@techhog89 said:
@sakaixx said:
@techhog89 said:
@sakaixx said:

To me, Nintendo is just like Activision or EA sport title. Yearly releases of Pokemon is equal to yearly releases of CoD and FIFA in my eye. No difference at all, all reharshed content from way back with a coat of new engine. All equally crap.

Pokemon isn't developed by Nintendo.

Yeah and nintendo dont own parts of the IP.

You're trying to say that them owning a third of the IP means that they have complete creative control of the IP, eve though they literally helped to establish an entire company to independently manage it?

Nevertheless, its a nintendo IP that released yearly same as from other company that does the same. Rehashed content every year, just like the others

Uh-huh. This is very strawman. That said, you're saying that because of this one almost annual IP, the entire company is just another EA no matter what else happens? Just one IP is all it takes? Just want to be clear here.

Avatar image for sakaixx
sakaiXx

6513

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 5

#49 sakaiXx
Member since 2013 • 6513 Posts

@mandzilla: sure.

Avatar image for sakaixx
sakaiXx

6513

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 5

#50 sakaiXx
Member since 2013 • 6513 Posts

@techhog89: my point was clearly about nintendo's various IP