@Cranler: not sure what that has to do with anything I said
By the time BF 5 releases there will be at least 3x as many PS 4 and xbone owners so you wont be able to play the pc vs one console card anymore.
Why are you taking the "more players" as something good?
If anything it shows PC players have a brain and stopped playing that TURD.
On the contrary, for the lack of games on next gen, is one of the only mp FPS consolites can play.
So it's not anything to be proud of.
A lot of pc gamers are too busy playing 1. f2p turds and paying to be an alpha tester to play a 2. quality shooter like BF.
1. Still better than BF4.
2.
@Cranler: not sure what that has to do with anything I said
By the time BF 5 releases there will be at least 3x as many PS 4 and xbone owners so you wont be able to play the pc vs one console card anymore.
Why are you taking the "more players" as something good?
If anything it shows PC players have a brain and stopped playing that TURD.
On the contrary, for the lack of games on next gen, is one of the only mp FPS consolites can play.
So it's not anything to be proud of.
A lot of pc gamers are too busy playing 1. f2p turds and paying to be an alpha tester to play a 2. quality shooter like BF.
1. Still better than BF4.
2.
Yeah ok, Warface, Combat Arms, Ghost Recon Phantoms are much higher quality.
Quality of gameplay can be subjective but fact is BF is the most technologically advanced and also one of the deepest shooters in existence.
ive checked bf4 stats on too many occasion to remember and ps4 always has a big lead.
Eh, actually the PS4 version has the most players on BF4. These are the current players right now and every time I check the PS4 version has the most players by a good deal followed closely by PS3.
Most currently online=/=most players
PS4 actually has the most players.
There's not a single time I've checked since the game launched that PC has been ahead of PS4 in number of players. PS4 is always ahead by a lot.
Here is a pic I took and posted on SW a while back when the BF4 first launched...
and here is one from 4 months back....
Once again, most online=/=most players
Here from BF4DB: Note where it says Players, PC has the most
The pc vs one console card. Consolites are split between gens and competition which are factors that don't exist with pc.
Did you actually read it?
I didn't play that card, they pitted the PS4 against the PC. One console vs PC
"PS4 actually has the most players."
"actually the PS4 version has the most players on BF4"
"ps4 always has a big lead."
"There's not a single time I've checked since the game launched that PC has been ahead of PS4 in number of players. PS4 is always ahead by a lot."
ive checked bf4 stats on too many occasion to remember and ps4 always has a big lead.
Eh, actually the PS4 version has the most players on BF4. These are the current players right now and every time I check the PS4 version has the most players by a good deal followed closely by PS3.
Most currently online=/=most players
PS4 actually has the most players.
There's not a single time I've checked since the game launched that PC has been ahead of PS4 in number of players. PS4 is always ahead by a lot.
Here is a pic I took and posted on SW a while back when the BF4 first launched...
and here is one from 4 months back....
Once again, most online=/=most players
Here from BF4DB: Note where it says Players, PC has the most
The pc vs one console card. Consolites are split between gens and competition which are factors that don't exist with pc.
Did you actually read it?
I didn't play that card, they pitted the PS4 against the PC. One console vs PC
"PS4 actually has the most players."
"actually the PS4 version has the most players on BF4"
"ps4 always has a big lead."
"There's not a single time I've checked since the game launched that PC has been ahead of PS4 in number of players. PS4 is always ahead by a lot."
PC doesn't have the most players and that's conveyed in every screen posted. Console player count obliterates pc.
@Cranler: not sure what that has to do with anything I said
By the time BF 5 releases there will be at least 3x as many PS 4 and xbone owners so you wont be able to play the pc vs one console card anymore.
Why are you taking the "more players" as something good?
If anything it shows PC players have a brain and stopped playing that TURD.
On the contrary, for the lack of games on next gen, is one of the only mp FPS consolites can play.
So it's not anything to be proud of.
A lot of pc gamers are too busy playing 1. f2p turds and paying to be an alpha tester to play a 2. quality shooter like BF.
1. Still better than BF4.
2.
Yeah ok, Warface, Combat Arms, Ghost Recon Phantoms are much higher quality.
Quality of gameplay can be subjective but fact is BF is the most technologically advanced and also one of the deepest shooters in existence.
What does that have to do with the thread or the fact that the game is shit, as in gameplay?
"Deepest", please elaborate. It has nothing revolutionary compared to old BFs.
If you call "deepest" the ability to have endless useless attachments and redundant guns, ROFL
pc gamers are terribad at games.
http://www.esportsearnings.com/
http://www.esportsearnings.com/games
P.S. The word "Terribad" came from pc online gaming. LOL CARLOS.
@Cranler: not sure what that has to do with anything I said
By the time BF 5 releases there will be at least 3x as many PS 4 and xbone owners so you wont be able to play the pc vs one console card anymore.
Why are you taking the "more players" as something good?
If anything it shows PC players have a brain and stopped playing that TURD.
On the contrary, for the lack of games on next gen, is one of the only mp FPS consolites can play.
So it's not anything to be proud of.
A lot of pc gamers are too busy playing 1. f2p turds and paying to be an alpha tester to play a 2. quality shooter like BF.
1. Still better than BF4.
2.
Yeah ok, Warface, Combat Arms, Ghost Recon Phantoms are much higher quality.
Quality of gameplay can be subjective but fact is BF is the most technologically advanced and also one of the deepest shooters in existence.
What does that have to do with the thread or the fact that the game is shit, as in gameplay?
"Deepest", please elaborate. It has nothing revolutionary compared to old BFs.
If you call "deepest" the ability to have endless useless attachments and redundant guns, ROFL
It has to do with you saying f2p games have higher quality. Every aspect of a game including graphics and sound fx factor into the overall quality of a game.
I said BF not BF 4 specifically. By depth I mean how much there is to learn.
@Cranler:
@Cranler: not sure what that has to do with anything I said
By the time BF 5 releases there will be at least 3x as many PS 4 and xbone owners so you wont be able to play the pc vs one console card anymore.
Why are you taking the "more players" as something good?
If anything it shows PC players have a brain and stopped playing that TURD.
On the contrary, for the lack of games on next gen, is one of the only mp FPS consolites can play.
So it's not anything to be proud of.
A lot of pc gamers are too busy playing 1. f2p turds and paying to be an alpha tester to play a 2. quality shooter like BF.
1. Still better than BF4.
2.
Yeah ok, Warface, Combat Arms, Ghost Recon Phantoms are much higher quality.
Quality of gameplay can be subjective but fact is BF is the most technologically advanced and also one of the deepest shooters in existence.
What does that have to do with the thread or the fact that the game is shit, as in gameplay?
"Deepest", please elaborate. It has nothing revolutionary compared to old BFs.
If you call "deepest" the ability to have endless useless attachments and redundant guns, ROFL
It has to do with you saying f2p games have higher quality. Every aspect of a game including graphics and sound fx factor into the overall quality of a game.
I said BF not BF 4 specifically. By depth I mean how much there is to learn.
I never said that. I said some F2P games play better than BF4.
Doesn't matter good it looks or how nice it sounds, the game in general is uber shit. Nothing will change that.
There is nothing to learn on that game. Make sure your ping is high, get in a game and then watch everyone rage as you kill them behind cover.
@Cranler: not sure what that has to do with anything I said
By the time BF 5 releases there will be at least 3x as many PS 4 and xbone owners so you wont be able to play the pc vs one console card anymore.
Why are you taking the "more players" as something good?
If anything it shows PC players have a brain and stopped playing that TURD.
On the contrary, for the lack of games on next gen, is one of the only mp FPS consolites can play.
So it's not anything to be proud of.
A lot of pc gamers are too busy playing 1. f2p turds and paying to be an alpha tester to play a 2. quality shooter like BF.
1. Still better than BF4.
2.
Yeah ok, Warface, Combat Arms, Ghost Recon Phantoms are much higher quality.
Quality of gameplay can be subjective but fact is BF is the most technologically advanced and also one of the deepest shooters in existence.
What does that have to do with the thread or the fact that the game is shit, as in gameplay?
"Deepest", please elaborate. It has nothing revolutionary compared to old BFs.
If you call "deepest" the ability to have endless useless attachments and redundant guns, ROFL
It has to do with you saying f2p games have higher quality. Every aspect of a game including graphics and sound fx factor into the overall quality of a game.
I said BF not BF 4 specifically. By depth I mean how much there is to learn.
I never said that. I said some F2P games play better than BF4.
Doesn't matter good it looks or how nice it sounds, the game in general is uber shit. Nothing will change that.
There is nothing to learn on that game. Make sure your ping is high, get in a game and then watch everyone rage as you kill them behind cover.
You said those free to play games were simply better. You didn't say play better but wth does play better really mean? That's kind of vague.
Just because you don't like it doesn't mean it's uber shit.
If you want to have the highest win ratio possible you would want to learn everything. That way if you're on a team that has no good heli pilots for instance you could pick up the slack.
@Cranler
Both LoL and Dota2 (which is what i assume you mean by the "f2p turds") have a higher score than BF4 here, on top of being played at a much higher competitive level than BF4 is.
Your opinion on them being "turds" is completely irrelevant.
I was speaking of f2p shooters which I brought up later in this thread. Remember that price is factored into scores. No one expects the same quality out of a f2p game as they do a game you pay for. The gamespot review doesn't even mention the addition of a cover system which makes the reviewer lose credibility.
CoD is played at a higher competitive level too but that doesn't make CoD any better or more hardcore than BF.
My opinion on f2p shooters is perfectly relevant when responding to someone who says all f2p are better than BF 4. The only truly good f2p shooters are the one that were originally not f2p.
@Cranler:
I always give BF some slack when it comes to netcode due to the grand scale of the game. I've had tons of fun playing BF 4.
@Cranler: clean up your quote chains
Nothing more to say about the server browsers then? I guess you realized that one server browser can be objectively better than another.
actually it's because I never got a notification for it
And this response confirms my last post.
Where was there a confirmation anywhere in my post. I only said I did not receive any notification about server browsers
Well you still have nothing to say about server browsers.
@Cranler: not sure what that has to do with anything I said
By the time BF 5 releases there will be at least 3x as many PS 4 and xbone owners so you wont be able to play the pc vs one console card anymore.
Why are you taking the "more players" as something good?
If anything it shows PC players have a brain and stopped playing that TURD.
On the contrary, for the lack of games on next gen, is one of the only mp FPS consolites can play.
So it's not anything to be proud of.
A lot of pc gamers are too busy playing 1. f2p turds and paying to be an alpha tester to play a 2. quality shooter like BF.
1. Still better than BF4.
2.
Yeah ok, Warface, Combat Arms, Ghost Recon Phantoms are much higher quality.
Quality of gameplay can be subjective but fact is BF is the most technologically advanced and also one of the deepest shooters in existence.
What does that have to do with the thread or the fact that the game is shit, as in gameplay?
"Deepest", please elaborate. It has nothing revolutionary compared to old BFs.
If you call "deepest" the ability to have endless useless attachments and redundant guns, ROFL
It has to do with you saying f2p games have higher quality. Every aspect of a game including graphics and sound fx factor into the overall quality of a game.
I said BF not BF 4 specifically. By depth I mean how much there is to learn.
I never said that. I said some F2P games play better than BF4.
Doesn't matter good it looks or how nice it sounds, the game in general is uber shit. Nothing will change that.
There is nothing to learn on that game. Make sure your ping is high, get in a game and then watch everyone rage as you kill them behind cover.
You said 1. those free to play games were simply better. You didn't say play better but wth does play better really mean? That's kind of vague.
Just because you don't like it doesn't mean it's uber shit.
If you want to have the highest win ratio possible you would want to learn everything. That way if you're on a team that has no good heli pilots for instance you could pick up the slack.
@Cranler
Both LoL and Dota2 (which is what i assume you mean by the "f2p turds") have a higher score than BF4 here, on top of being played at a much higher competitive level than BF4 is.
Your opinion on them being "turds" is completely irrelevant.
I was speaking of f2p shooters which I brought up later in this thread. Remember that price is factored into scores. No one expects the same quality out of a f2p game as they do a game you pay for. The gamespot review doesn't even mention the addition of a cover system which makes the reviewer lose credibility.
CoD is played at a higher competitive level too but that doesn't make CoD any better or more hardcore than BF.
My opinion on f2p shooters is perfectly relevant when responding to someone who says 2. all f2p are better than BF 4. The only truly good f2p shooters are the one that were originally not f2p.
1. Which ones? I never mentioned a specific F2P.
2. No one said that, prove it, you can't. You're just typing bullshit.
And yes, it's true, a lot of F2P are better than Battleshit 4. Period.
Just because you can't tell the horrible netcode it doesn't mean the game works. It's a fact that the game plays like shit, most casual players won't tell and the most retarded ones will be too distracted with the shiny graphics and sound and will just ignore that fact.
I'm backed up by a lot of users and gaming sites that know BF4 is just shit. EA and DICE are a big joke because of that. If it wouldn't be that bad, devs themselves wouldn't have made netcode a priority.
So stop making a fool out of yourself, we all know how BF4 plays.
@Cranler: not sure what that has to do with anything I said
By the time BF 5 releases there will be at least 3x as many PS 4 and xbone owners so you wont be able to play the pc vs one console card anymore.
Why are you taking the "more players" as something good?
If anything it shows PC players have a brain and stopped playing that TURD.
On the contrary, for the lack of games on next gen, is one of the only mp FPS consolites can play.
So it's not anything to be proud of.
A lot of pc gamers are too busy playing 1. f2p turds and paying to be an alpha tester to play a 2. quality shooter like BF.
1. Still better than BF4.
2.
Yeah ok, Warface, Combat Arms, Ghost Recon Phantoms are much higher quality.
Quality of gameplay can be subjective but fact is BF is the most technologically advanced and also one of the deepest shooters in existence.
What does that have to do with the thread or the fact that the game is shit, as in gameplay?
"Deepest", please elaborate. It has nothing revolutionary compared to old BFs.
If you call "deepest" the ability to have endless useless attachments and redundant guns, ROFL
It has to do with you saying f2p games have higher quality. Every aspect of a game including graphics and sound fx factor into the overall quality of a game.
I said BF not BF 4 specifically. By depth I mean how much there is to learn.
I never said that. I said some F2P games play better than BF4.
Doesn't matter good it looks or how nice it sounds, the game in general is uber shit. Nothing will change that.
There is nothing to learn on that game. Make sure your ping is high, get in a game and then watch everyone rage as you kill them behind cover.
You said 1. those free to play games were simply better. You didn't say play better but wth does play better really mean? That's kind of vague.
Just because you don't like it doesn't mean it's uber shit.
If you want to have the highest win ratio possible you would want to learn everything. That way if you're on a team that has no good heli pilots for instance you could pick up the slack.
@Cranler
Both LoL and Dota2 (which is what i assume you mean by the "f2p turds") have a higher score than BF4 here, on top of being played at a much higher competitive level than BF4 is.
Your opinion on them being "turds" is completely irrelevant.
I was speaking of f2p shooters which I brought up later in this thread. Remember that price is factored into scores. No one expects the same quality out of a f2p game as they do a game you pay for. The gamespot review doesn't even mention the addition of a cover system which makes the reviewer lose credibility.
CoD is played at a higher competitive level too but that doesn't make CoD any better or more hardcore than BF.
My opinion on f2p shooters is perfectly relevant when responding to someone who says 2. all f2p are better than BF 4. The only truly good f2p shooters are the one that were originally not f2p.
1. Which ones? I never mentioned a specific F2P.
2. No one said that, prove it, you can't. You're just typing bullshit.
And yes, it's true, a lot of F2P are better than Battleshit 4. Period.
Just because you can't tell the horrible netcode it doesn't mean the game works. It's a fact that the game plays like shit, most casual players won't tell and the most retarded ones will be too distracted with the shiny graphics and sound and will just ignore that fact.
I'm backed up by a lot of users and gaming sites that know BF4 is just shit. EA and DICE are a big joke because of that. If it wouldn't be that bad, devs themselves wouldn't have made netcode a priority.
So stop making a fool out of yourself, we all know how BF4 plays.
I called f2p turds and you said still better than BF 4 which basically says all f2p games are better than BF 4.
Prove what? Not sure what part you're referring to. Janka seemed to be alluding to the fact that Dota and LoL have a bigger competitive scene, well that doesn't mean shit because CoD has a huge competitive scene too.
Sorry to hear the netcode caused you so much trouble. No need to take your frustrations out on others with the name calling. BF 4's cons don't outwiegh the pros for me and I'm very happy with my purchase. Sorry to hear you regret your purchase. Maybe you should do more research before buying in the future.
What f2p shooters are better than BF 4?
Log in to comment