Resolution obsession, yet neither can do 1080p...

  • 172 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for MBirdy88
#1 Posted by MBirdy88 (12230 posts) -

So much for these new consoles, cows spamming threads about 720p vs 900p...

900p... ladies and gentlemen.

as some sort of victory... 900p really? £350+ devices.... 900p...

"Resolution-gate" your both gated by these craptastic upgraded devices.

who are you trying to fool here?

Avatar image for jg4xchamp
#2 Posted by jg4xchamp (61462 posts) -

Consolites

The end.

Avatar image for MonsieurX
#3 Edited by MonsieurX (36872 posts) -

B-b-b-but all the other 1080P games!111

Avatar image for TwistedShade
#4 Posted by TwistedShade (3139 posts) -

900p obviously sucks....unless the PS4 is doing it than it's incredible and the best thing since sliced bread.

Avatar image for Jankarcop
#5 Posted by Jankarcop (11056 posts) -

900p 30 fps

lmao console multiplats

Avatar image for Heil68
#6 Posted by Heil68 (57844 posts) -

Both have games that are in 1080.

Avatar image for tyloss
#7 Posted by tyloss (846 posts) -

Look! Hermits trying to stay relevant!

Avatar image for BeardMaster
#8 Edited by BeardMaster (1686 posts) -

Cows deserve to lord their victories over xbox fans. But when they start getting to the point of how anything less than 1080p and 60fps is a blurry slideshow... when none of their games run at that and PC gamers have been playing at 1080 and 60fps for years. You gotta check your own BS. You just look stupid.

Avatar image for EZs
#9 Edited by EZs (1460 posts) -

@Heil68 said:

Both have games that are in 1080.

True therefore this thread is invalid.

TC is misinformed.

Avatar image for k2theswiss
#10 Posted by k2theswiss (16599 posts) -

bla who cares. it look and be fun

Avatar image for mems_1224
#11 Posted by mems_1224 (56917 posts) -

Cows gonna cow

Avatar image for Dire_Weasel
#12 Posted by Dire_Weasel (16681 posts) -

Fact check: So far the only 900p Playstation 4 game is Battlefield 4. Everything else that's been released is 1080p.

There are rumors that the Witcher 3 might be 900p, and if true, that would be the second Playstation 4 game that runs at sub-1080p.

I'm glad I could clear that up for you, OP.

Avatar image for EZs
#13 Edited by EZs (1460 posts) -

@mems_1224 said:

Cows gonna cow

Lems can't catch a break.

Avatar image for aroxx_ab
#14 Posted by aroxx_ab (13236 posts) -

@TwistedShade said:

900p obviously sucks....unless the PS4 is doing it than it's incredible and the best thing since sliced bread.

900p is not good but it is better than when xbox run the same game at 720p ...:P

Avatar image for BeardMaster
#15 Posted by BeardMaster (1686 posts) -

@Dire_Weasel said:

Fact check: So far the only 900p Playstation 4 game is Battlefield 4. Everything else that's been released is 1080p.

There are rumors that the Witcher 3 might be 900p, and if true, that would be the second Playstation 4 game that runs at sub-1080p.

I'm glad I could clear that up for you, OP.

Fact check, like no ps4 games are 60fps. But when an overpriced version of tomb raider came out.. apparently anything less than 60fps is unacceptable. Ignoring the fact tomb raider is more like 45fps during actual gameplay. Shhh cows, goto sleep.

Avatar image for tyloss
#16 Posted by tyloss (846 posts) -

@BeardMaster said:

@Dire_Weasel said:

Fact check: So far the only 900p Playstation 4 game is Battlefield 4. Everything else that's been released is 1080p.

There are rumors that the Witcher 3 might be 900p, and if true, that would be the second Playstation 4 game that runs at sub-1080p.

I'm glad I could clear that up for you, OP.

Fact check, like no ps4 games are 60fps. But when an overpriced version of tomb raider came out.. apparently anything less than 60fps is unacceptable. Ignoring the fact tomb raider is more like 45fps during actual gameplay. Shhh cows, goto sleep.

So butthurt. Always playing victim.

Avatar image for lundy86_4
#17 Posted by lundy86_4 (48646 posts) -

Both have done 1080p. Still, they are markedly lackluster. I was using 1080p when I originally built my gaming rig, which was 6-7 or so years ago.

Avatar image for clyde46
#18 Edited by clyde46 (49050 posts) -

Welcome to 2009 consolites.

Avatar image for Dire_Weasel
#19 Edited by Dire_Weasel (16681 posts) -

@BeardMaster said:

@Dire_Weasel said:

Fact check: So far the only 900p Playstation 4 game is Battlefield 4. Everything else that's been released is 1080p.

There are rumors that the Witcher 3 might be 900p, and if true, that would be the second Playstation 4 game that runs at sub-1080p.

I'm glad I could clear that up for you, OP.

Fact check, like no ps4 games are 60fps. But when an overpriced version of tomb raider came out.. apparently anything less than 60fps is unacceptable. Ignoring the fact tomb raider is more like 45fps during actual gameplay. Shhh cows, goto sleep.

I think you've confused "facts" with "tales from your ass". There are definitely 1080p / 60fps games on the Playstation 4. Resogun is one of them.

Also, I think you've confused "anyone that disagrees with you" with "a cow". It's a pretty common mistake, at least among the Microsoft evangelists on this site.

Avatar image for NFJSupreme
#20 Posted by NFJSupreme (6504 posts) -

Another generation of consolites arguing over who got the nicest smelling piece of shit when it comes to multiplats this Gen. Just sit back and laugh at them. I get a good kick out of this place.

Avatar image for misterpmedia
#21 Edited by misterpmedia (6209 posts) -

It's technically not solely about 1080p specifically, it's about the difference between the boxes. 900p is still superior to 720p on the Xbone.

If they were both the same, on all multiplat games, there wouldn't be an issue. 900p still shows that the PS4 can handle that particular game better than the Xbone therefore the point is still relevant.

Avatar image for Bigboi500
#22 Posted by Bigboi500 (35550 posts) -

Pretty sure I've played games both on PS4 and Wii U in glorious 1080p, so your thread title is flat out wrong.

Avatar image for APiranhaAteMyVa
#23 Edited by APiranhaAteMyVa (3780 posts) -

Hermits with their 460GTX cards trying to convince everyone else that they can max out games at 4k/120 with ease. Check out the benchmarks for high end cards like Titan, 780GTX and the R9 290x:

1920x1080R9 290R9 290XGTX 780GTX 780 TiGTX Titan
Metro 2033, Very High, 4x MSAA44.1fps51.5fps47.5fps51.8fps49.0fps
Metro: Last Light, Very High, SSAA43.2fps46.6fps40.7fps48.9fps43.0fps
Hitman: Absolution, Ultra, 8x MSAA52.3fps55.2fps47.0fps53.0fps49.8fps
Sleeping Dogs, Extreme64.8fps67.8fps61.0fps72.0fps66.5fps

lulz, the same reviewer of the 290x review mentioned locking Crysis 3 to 30fps as it fluctuates all over the place.

Avatar image for MBirdy88
#24 Posted by MBirdy88 (12230 posts) -

@EZs said:

@Heil68 said:

Both have games that are in 1080.

True therefore this thread is invalid.

TC is misinformed.

most of the lower end games are, i never ;laimed otherwise... any game that TRIES to be a powerhouse fails to do so in one way or antoher.

anpother gen of you morons haveing low standards.... and then claiming invalid when one or 2 exceptions occur.

meanwhile.... ive had 1080p as a standard for nearly 10 years

Avatar image for CrownKingArthur
#25 Posted by CrownKingArthur (5262 posts) -

lol, silver medal at best.

Avatar image for edwardecl
#26 Posted by edwardecl (2240 posts) -
@Heil68 said:

Both have games that are in 1080.

Don't forget the PS3 can do 1080p as well...

Avatar image for clyde46
#27 Posted by clyde46 (49050 posts) -

@APiranhaAteMyVa said:

Hermits with their 460GTX cards trying to convince everyone else that they can max out games at 4k/120 with ease. Check out the benchmarks for high end cards like Titan, 780GTX and the R9 290x:

1920x1080R9 290R9 290XGTX 780GTX 780 TiGTX Titan
Metro 2033, Very High, 4x MSAA44.1fps51.5fps47.5fps51.8fps49.0fps
Metro: Last Light, Very High, SSAA43.2fps46.6fps40.7fps48.9fps43.0fps
Hitman: Absolution, Ultra, 8x MSAA52.3fps55.2fps47.0fps53.0fps49.8fps
Sleeping Dogs, Extreme64.8fps67.8fps61.0fps72.0fps66.5fps

lulz, the same reviewer of the 290x review mentioned locking Crysis 3 to 30fps as it fluctuates all over the place.

Ultra, Very High, Extreme, 4xMSAA, 8xMSAA.... I don't see consoles running those games at those settings.

Avatar image for Bigboi500
#28 Posted by Bigboi500 (35550 posts) -

@MBirdy88 said:

@EZs said:

@Heil68 said:

Both have games that are in 1080.

True therefore this thread is invalid.

TC is misinformed.

most of the lower end games are, i never ;laimed otherwise... any game that TRIES to be a powerhouse fails to do so in one way or antoher.

anpother gen of you morons haveing low standards.... and then claiming invalid when one or 2 exceptions occur.

meanwhile.... ive had 1080p as a standard for nearly 10 years

"i never claimed otherwise" "neither can do 1080p" You're the only moron here, with poor writing standards to boot.

Avatar image for I_can_haz
#29 Posted by I_can_haz (6511 posts) -

@tyloss said:

Look! Hermits trying to stay relevant!

Avatar image for Gue1
#30 Posted by Gue1 (12171 posts) -

@EZs said:

@mems_1224 said:

Cows gonna cow

Lems can't catch a break.

lol so much ownage.Who thought this gen would turn out to be this much fun. ;)

Avatar image for StormyJoe
#31 Posted by StormyJoe (7557 posts) -

@I_can_haz said:

@tyloss said:

Look! Hermits trying to stay relevant!

You just said in another thread that you game on a PC, now you bash hermits.

LOL!!!

Cows gonna cow.

Avatar image for MBirdy88
#32 Posted by MBirdy88 (12230 posts) -

@Bigboi500 said:

@MBirdy88 said:

@EZs said:

@Heil68 said:

Both have games that are in 1080.

True therefore this thread is invalid.

TC is misinformed.

most of the lower end games are, i never ;laimed otherwise... any game that TRIES to be a powerhouse fails to do so in one way or antoher.

anpother gen of you morons haveing low standards.... and then claiming invalid when one or 2 exceptions occur.

meanwhile.... ive had 1080p as a standard for nearly 10 years

"i never claimed otherwise" "neither can do 1080p" You're the only moron here, with poor writing standards to boot.

im using an ancient slow laptop while lying on my back... oh no.... someone who's too dense to see that this is a reactionary topic based on the other threads popping up and assumes LITERALLY no game is 1080p on my behalf... despite being here all the time to see when you morons have an orgasm over a game that does 1080p.

fact is, the games currently being discussed can't do 1080p. the only recent exception is MGSV ... which doesn't even look next gen.

so yea.... even after i post clearing up what i meant you make this post... but whatever. my point still stands.. cherry picking very rare exceptions just like last gen.

Avatar image for APiranhaAteMyVa
#33 Posted by APiranhaAteMyVa (3780 posts) -

@clyde46 said:

@APiranhaAteMyVa said:

Hermits with their 460GTX cards trying to convince everyone else that they can max out games at 4k/120 with ease. Check out the benchmarks for high end cards like Titan, 780GTX and the R9 290x:

1920x1080R9 290R9 290XGTX 780GTX 780 TiGTX Titan
Metro 2033, Very High, 4x MSAA44.1fps51.5fps47.5fps51.8fps49.0fps
Metro: Last Light, Very High, SSAA43.2fps46.6fps40.7fps48.9fps43.0fps
Hitman: Absolution, Ultra, 8x MSAA52.3fps55.2fps47.0fps53.0fps49.8fps
Sleeping Dogs, Extreme64.8fps67.8fps61.0fps72.0fps66.5fps

lulz, the same reviewer of the 290x review mentioned locking Crysis 3 to 30fps as it fluctuates all over the place.

Ultra, Very High, Extreme, 4xMSAA, 8xMSAA.... I don't see consoles running those games at those settings.

These card range from £300-800, if they was running at the same settings as console that would be embarrassing. Still shows that most hermits aren't maxing out their games with ease.

Avatar image for TorqueHappens08
#34 Edited by TorqueHappens08 (1219 posts) -

780 FTW for all around good gaming. And reasonable price.

Avatar image for CrownKingArthur
#35 Posted by CrownKingArthur (5262 posts) -
@edwardecl said:
@Heil68 said:

Both have games that are in 1080.

Don't forget the PS3 can do 1080p as well...

and the xbox 360.

Avatar image for clyde46
#36 Posted by clyde46 (49050 posts) -
@APiranhaAteMyVa said:

@clyde46 said:

@APiranhaAteMyVa said:

Hermits with their 460GTX cards trying to convince everyone else that they can max out games at 4k/120 with ease. Check out the benchmarks for high end cards like Titan, 780GTX and the R9 290x:

1920x1080R9 290R9 290XGTX 780GTX 780 TiGTX Titan
Metro 2033, Very High, 4x MSAA44.1fps51.5fps47.5fps51.8fps49.0fps
Metro: Last Light, Very High, SSAA43.2fps46.6fps40.7fps48.9fps43.0fps
Hitman: Absolution, Ultra, 8x MSAA52.3fps55.2fps47.0fps53.0fps49.8fps
Sleeping Dogs, Extreme64.8fps67.8fps61.0fps72.0fps66.5fps

lulz, the same reviewer of the 290x review mentioned locking Crysis 3 to 30fps as it fluctuates all over the place.

Ultra, Very High, Extreme, 4xMSAA, 8xMSAA.... I don't see consoles running those games at those settings.

These card range from £300-800, if they was running at the same settings as console that would be embarrassing. Still shows that most hermits aren't maxing out their games with ease.

Why are you then beating down on these cards for running games at a higher resolution AND at a higher graphical setting with AA to boot....

Avatar image for StrongBlackVine
#37 Posted by StrongBlackVine (13262 posts) -

@clyde46 said:

@APiranhaAteMyVa said:

Hermits with their 460GTX cards trying to convince everyone else that they can max out games at 4k/120 with ease. Check out the benchmarks for high end cards like Titan, 780GTX and the R9 290x:

1920x1080R9 290R9 290XGTX 780GTX 780 TiGTX Titan
Metro 2033, Very High, 4x MSAA44.1fps51.5fps47.5fps51.8fps49.0fps
Metro: Last Light, Very High, SSAA43.2fps46.6fps40.7fps48.9fps43.0fps
Hitman: Absolution, Ultra, 8x MSAA52.3fps55.2fps47.0fps53.0fps49.8fps
Sleeping Dogs, Extreme64.8fps67.8fps61.0fps72.0fps66.5fps

lulz, the same reviewer of the 290x review mentioned locking Crysis 3 to 30fps as it fluctuates all over the place.

Ultra, Very High, Extreme, 4xMSAA, 8xMSAA.... I don't see consoles running those games at those settings.

Damage control.

Avatar image for clyde46
#38 Posted by clyde46 (49050 posts) -

@StrongBlackVine said:

@clyde46 said:

@APiranhaAteMyVa said:

Hermits with their 460GTX cards trying to convince everyone else that they can max out games at 4k/120 with ease. Check out the benchmarks for high end cards like Titan, 780GTX and the R9 290x:

1920x1080R9 290R9 290XGTX 780GTX 780 TiGTX Titan
Metro 2033, Very High, 4x MSAA44.1fps51.5fps47.5fps51.8fps49.0fps
Metro: Last Light, Very High, SSAA43.2fps46.6fps40.7fps48.9fps43.0fps
Hitman: Absolution, Ultra, 8x MSAA52.3fps55.2fps47.0fps53.0fps49.8fps
Sleeping Dogs, Extreme64.8fps67.8fps61.0fps72.0fps66.5fps

lulz, the same reviewer of the 290x review mentioned locking Crysis 3 to 30fps as it fluctuates all over the place.

Ultra, Very High, Extreme, 4xMSAA, 8xMSAA.... I don't see consoles running those games at those settings.

Damage control.

Is that the best retort you got? Fact is, those cards are running games at a much higher setting and at a larger resolution.....

Avatar image for MBirdy88
#39 Posted by MBirdy88 (12230 posts) -

@StrongBlackVine said:

@clyde46 said:

@APiranhaAteMyVa said:

Hermits with their 460GTX cards trying to convince everyone else that they can max out games at 4k/120 with ease. Check out the benchmarks for high end cards like Titan, 780GTX and the R9 290x:

1920x1080R9 290R9 290XGTX 780GTX 780 TiGTX Titan
Metro 2033, Very High, 4x MSAA44.1fps51.5fps47.5fps51.8fps49.0fps
Metro: Last Light, Very High, SSAA43.2fps46.6fps40.7fps48.9fps43.0fps
Hitman: Absolution, Ultra, 8x MSAA52.3fps55.2fps47.0fps53.0fps49.8fps
Sleeping Dogs, Extreme64.8fps67.8fps61.0fps72.0fps66.5fps

lulz, the same reviewer of the 290x review mentioned locking Crysis 3 to 30fps as it fluctuates all over the place.

Ultra, Very High, Extreme, 4xMSAA, 8xMSAA.... I don't see consoles running those games at those settings.

Damage control.

so the consolite arguments is "PC gamers cant max games due to 16x Anti aliasing being an option" ...... really? if they could you could then have the option to go higher again.... so if that sim[possible now its not maxxed?

muppets....

Avatar image for princeofshapeir
#40 Edited by princeofshapeir (16604 posts) -

Why would you even benchmark Sleeping Dogs with supersampling enabled? That's like benchmarking The Witcher 2 with ubersampling at max. Those options are frame-killers with a very slight return in visual quality.

If you want a fair comparison you need only look at BF4 benchmarks, and compare its performance on different GPUs to the performance of the console versions.

Avatar image for Karpetburnz
#41 Posted by Karpetburnz (532 posts) -

"Neither can do 1080p"

so far 99% of all PS4 games have been 1080p at least. talk about uninformed.

and the only reason people make a big deal out of 900p on PS4 vs 720p on Xbone is because it shows a difference in power. same with Tomb Raider.

Avatar image for tdkmillsy
#42 Posted by tdkmillsy (2615 posts) -

If I could get the Kinect experience and the Xbox One exclusives on PC I'd build a PC in a second.

Avatar image for StrongBlackVine
#43 Posted by StrongBlackVine (13262 posts) -

@clyde46 said:

@StrongBlackVine said:

@clyde46 said:

@APiranhaAteMyVa said:

Hermits with their 460GTX cards trying to convince everyone else that they can max out games at 4k/120 with ease. Check out the benchmarks for high end cards like Titan, 780GTX and the R9 290x:

1920x1080R9 290R9 290XGTX 780GTX 780 TiGTX Titan
Metro 2033, Very High, 4x MSAA44.1fps51.5fps47.5fps51.8fps49.0fps
Metro: Last Light, Very High, SSAA43.2fps46.6fps40.7fps48.9fps43.0fps
Hitman: Absolution, Ultra, 8x MSAA52.3fps55.2fps47.0fps53.0fps49.8fps
Sleeping Dogs, Extreme64.8fps67.8fps61.0fps72.0fps66.5fps

lulz, the same reviewer of the 290x review mentioned locking Crysis 3 to 30fps as it fluctuates all over the place.

Ultra, Very High, Extreme, 4xMSAA, 8xMSAA.... I don't see consoles running those games at those settings.

Damage control.

Is that the best retort you got? Fact is, those cards are running games at a much higher setting and at a larger resolution.....

Not running games the highest setting with a constant 60fps.Never said it wasn't better than what consoles are capable of. Looks like sacrifices have to be made on PC as well unless you have an unlimited budget(and maybe even then).

Avatar image for CrownKingArthur
#44 Posted by CrownKingArthur (5262 posts) -

@StrongBlackVine said:

@clyde46 said:

@StrongBlackVine said:

@clyde46 said:

@APiranhaAteMyVa said:

Hermits with their 460GTX cards trying to convince everyone else that they can max out games at 4k/120 with ease. Check out the benchmarks for high end cards like Titan, 780GTX and the R9 290x:

1920x1080R9 290R9 290XGTX 780GTX 780 TiGTX Titan
Metro 2033, Very High, 4x MSAA44.1fps51.5fps47.5fps51.8fps49.0fps
Metro: Last Light, Very High, SSAA43.2fps46.6fps40.7fps48.9fps43.0fps
Hitman: Absolution, Ultra, 8x MSAA52.3fps55.2fps47.0fps53.0fps49.8fps
Sleeping Dogs, Extreme64.8fps67.8fps61.0fps72.0fps66.5fps

lulz, the same reviewer of the 290x review mentioned locking Crysis 3 to 30fps as it fluctuates all over the place.

Ultra, Very High, Extreme, 4xMSAA, 8xMSAA.... I don't see consoles running those games at those settings.

Damage control.

Is that the best retort you got? Fact is, those cards are running games at a much higher setting and at a larger resolution.....

Not running games the highest setting with a constant 60fps.Never said it wasn't better than what consoles are capable of. Looks like sacrifices have to be made on PC as well unless you have an unlimited budget(and maybe even then).

i have a question. well actually a few questions.

if anything less than the maximum is a sacrifice, then because i'm not playing on a 4k monitor, am i making a sacrifice?

also, do you accept that the magnitude of sacrifice by console gamers must be greater?

also, is it really necessary to use FPS tanking exotic methods of anti aliasing?

Avatar image for StrongBlackVine
#46 Edited by StrongBlackVine (13262 posts) -

@CrownKingArthur said:

@StrongBlackVine said:

@clyde46 said:

@StrongBlackVine said:

@clyde46 said:

@APiranhaAteMyVa said:

Hermits with their 460GTX cards trying to convince everyone else that they can max out games at 4k/120 with ease. Check out the benchmarks for high end cards like Titan, 780GTX and the R9 290x:

1920x1080R9 290R9 290XGTX 780GTX 780 TiGTX Titan
Metro 2033, Very High, 4x MSAA44.1fps51.5fps47.5fps51.8fps49.0fps
Metro: Last Light, Very High, SSAA43.2fps46.6fps40.7fps48.9fps43.0fps
Hitman: Absolution, Ultra, 8x MSAA52.3fps55.2fps47.0fps53.0fps49.8fps
Sleeping Dogs, Extreme64.8fps67.8fps61.0fps72.0fps66.5fps

lulz, the same reviewer of the 290x review mentioned locking Crysis 3 to 30fps as it fluctuates all over the place.

Ultra, Very High, Extreme, 4xMSAA, 8xMSAA.... I don't see consoles running those games at those settings.

Damage control.

Is that the best retort you got? Fact is, those cards are running games at a much higher setting and at a larger resolution.....

Not running games the highest setting with a constant 60fps.Never said it wasn't better than what consoles are capable of. Looks like sacrifices have to be made on PC as well unless you have an unlimited budget(and maybe even then).

i have a question. well actually a few questions.

if anything less than the maximum is a sacrifice, then because i'm not playing on a 4k monitor, am i making a sacrifice?

also, do you accept that the magnitude of sacrifice by console gamers must be greater?

also, is it really necessary to use FPS tanking exotic methods of anti aliasing?

Seems like that comes down to personal preference.I'm sure there PC gamers that not satisfied with any thing less than absolute best settings. I am constant seeing PC gamers claim they are running games at MAX settings with 60fps and that shows the majority them are lying. Looks they are comparing to console and not what the the game is actually capable of on PC. Its all relative. Also that is kind of disappointing that even the top cards around can't max all games out.

Avatar image for TheFadeForever
#47 Posted by TheFadeForever (2653 posts) -

@StrongBlackVine:

And what games do they claim they can max?

Avatar image for NFJSupreme
#48 Posted by NFJSupreme (6504 posts) -

Console games aren't on max settings so the argument is stupid. Fact is you can achieve 1080p 60fps solid with little to no dips all while running the game at a higher graphical level than console on pc. That is all that matters. If not stop making threads about the xbone being crap because the ps4 runs the same game at a higher resolution even if it is 900p

Avatar image for ReadingRainbow4
#49 Posted by ReadingRainbow4 (18733 posts) -

@TwistedShade said:

900p obviously sucks....unless the PS4 is doing it than it's incredible and the best thing since sliced bread.

but 792p is a barely noticeable difference.

Avatar image for ermacness
#50 Posted by ermacness (7665 posts) -

@clyde46 said:

@StrongBlackVine said:

@clyde46 said:

@APiranhaAteMyVa said:

Hermits with their 460GTX cards trying to convince everyone else that they can max out games at 4k/120 with ease. Check out the benchmarks for high end cards like Titan, 780GTX and the R9 290x:

1920x1080R9 290R9 290XGTX 780GTX 780 TiGTX Titan
Metro 2033, Very High, 4x MSAA44.1fps51.5fps47.5fps51.8fps49.0fps
Metro: Last Light, Very High, SSAA43.2fps46.6fps40.7fps48.9fps43.0fps
Hitman: Absolution, Ultra, 8x MSAA52.3fps55.2fps47.0fps53.0fps49.8fps
Sleeping Dogs, Extreme64.8fps67.8fps61.0fps72.0fps66.5fps

lulz, the same reviewer of the 290x review mentioned locking Crysis 3 to 30fps as it fluctuates all over the place.

Ultra, Very High, Extreme, 4xMSAA, 8xMSAA.... I don't see consoles running those games at those settings.

Damage control.

Is that the best retort you got? Fact is, those cards are running games at a much higher setting and at a larger resolution.....

@ 2x the price of a ps4. Congratz