Redfall vs Atomic Heart. which Q1 2023 new IP FPS looks better?

Atomic Heart looks like it could change everything (so so Bioshock clone with terrible screen effects)

Redfall looks incredibly much cringe, but it has a good developer behind it.

Very hard my freind. Very hard question.

you've been hyping up atomic heart for a while, but its not something im that interested in. Redfall though looks cool, with vampires, and gothic setting, plus they have campaign coop, which looks like its going to be amazing.

I’m going with RedFall.

and all of bioshock clone being better. ie Prey better than bioshock.

beside Atomic Heart is also Half life/portal clone too.

whatever it is. it will be my new STALKER/Metro.

Redfall looks like garbage. Atomic Heart looks very good. Eacy choice.

Atomic heart, unless it’s broken as some reoprt said. Much cooler art direction. It’s also pure SP, but the vibe I get from redfall is that it was designed primarily for co-op.

Both look Awesome

Both coming to GamePass.

Which according to some on this forum cannot happen. Only shovelware goes to GamePass.

But the same person was convinced Ragnarok could not be beaten in recent game awards, only to find out it was beaten by Stray.

Which still makes me chuckle.

I'll play both day one on Gamepass. Arkane does no wrong for me, so I'll vote for Redfall but Atomic Heart seems promising.

report was about early version. which was cancelled.

I have zero interest in Redfall, so Atomic Heart. Atomic Heart tooks like a game ill like but given that AAA games have a tendacy to dissapoint nowadays, ill wait for the public reception before buying.

Atomic heart, I'm just not as big on Arkane as others

Both look like they'll be good, but I'm more interested in Atomic Heart.

We agree on something for once.

this is not AAA mainstream game. thats plus point but mainstream media will give it 7 or 8. it will be treated like STALKER and Metro because IGN preview said game is too hardcore. means reviewer will complain about confusing level design.

Still barely know wtf Redfall is, let alone how it plays. Atomic Heart looks cool. Not sure about any of these games, but if I had to choose one now, I'd probably go with Atomic Heart.

of course it has map design like arkane games in vampire setting.

These two + System Shock will bring a FPS fan like me much glee.

exactly.

sick of third person movie games. need good FPS for change.

I like Arkane, but nothing has impressed me about Redfall, whereas Atomic Heart has impressed me a lot. So, I am much more excited for Atomic Heart.

Both will be on Game Pass, so not like I need to choose, and I plan on playing both.

@ghosts4ever: in first person the game itself tells the story. In third person you just sit back and watch a badly written tv show unfold. Zero input, I hate it.

Atomic Heart for the single player aspect. I'm not a fan of anything that involves online functionality.

as a fan of both Arcane and PvE co-op, Red Fall has my vote but definitely looking forward to trying out Atomic Heart on Game Pass..

Redfall looks generic AF, but Atomic on the other hand looks soooo dopeee

Both look like day one GARBAGE

back then people complain about "hurr another FPS hurr" now see. theres only 2 or 3 FPS release every year only.

developers listen to people who were sick of FPS. now they only make third person movie games.

People will never see quality, even if it hit them square in the face. They will just keep buying skins for their mobile games.

I'm all for the FPS renaissance.

@ghosts4ever: Both are Day 1 Game Pass, so I am going to be playing both of them.

Atomic Heart... captivating art style.

redfall for me

Thank you gamepass,I'll play both

They're like an ok 7/10 game studio to me. Haven't been very much into any of their games, but I don't think they're bad either. After playing Dishonored 1&2 and Prey, I know what they're capable of. Had no interest in playing Deathloop, have very little interest in Redfall.

Redfall looks much better but I’m buying both.

They are great at level design. That's it.

level design make or break game.

look at santa monica. GOW have literally have no level design and walking in staright line.

Man, I almost feel guilty getting these two big hitters free on GP. ;o

With tax that's like 150 bucks if you're a PS gamer. lol :P

Do you want me to post a video of Ragnarok that demolishes your little comment?👀Imagine even thinking that GoW has bad level design. OOF. Very clueless.

That is true.

Dare I say it? Thank you Phil!

bad level design? game literally have no level design. just set pieces or walking in straight line.

Shows that you haven't played shit.🤡

not going to watch the video as I'm going to play the game at some point. But the fact you had to find the 33 part to demonstrate not walking in a straight line is pretty bad.

Don't assume when you have no idea what you're talking about. MIDGARD is currently the location i am at. This is what i am currently exploring, and its my favorite level as of now. I have been saying for a while that GoW needs to go open world, and this level IS open world'ish, and its perfectly suiting the series. That is why i posted it.

so you have to waste so many hours to get a part which is not walking simulator but still feel too heavily scripted. LOL!!!

Gotta say, Atomic Heart is looking nice with all the footage on youtube so far. I am loving the setting, the enemies, the ferocious nature of it all, the Bioshock plasmid-looking weapons. I hope it turns out great but I won't get hyped until it is out and hopefully a great game.

You haven't watched shit, have you? I understand you're trying your best to shit on a masterpiece, but its not working, you need someone else's help.

nothing happened in this video.

Oh so i show you gameplay with no cutscenes, and this is just a small portion of the game, but you ignore it and pretend its a movie game with no level design. That's nothing but braindead criticism.

There are NO open world's areas. It's linear as can be.