"Long term exclusive partnership with Bungie" - SONY

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for drakekratos
drakekratos

2311

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 drakekratos
Member since 2011 • 2311 Posts

tumblr_mo7m4cftuk1s63ovdo1_1280.png

 

MEGATON. 

 

Early DLC. Exclusive Content. Who wouldve ever thought there would be a day when the creators of Halo, are making games for PlayStation and giving it exclusive content. 

 

Xbox fanboys will try their hardest to downplay this, but this is a huge steal for Sony. 

Avatar image for Kingpin0114
Kingpin0114

2607

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Kingpin0114
Member since 2008 • 2607 Posts

There was a rumor yesterday that the deal is for 10 years too

Avatar image for Jonwh18
Jonwh18

9350

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Jonwh18
Member since 2009 • 9350 Posts

I could care less because destiny is an MMO, and I hate those. But I must say it is rather lulzy. 

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

whoopty doo

Avatar image for timbers_WSU
timbers_WSU

6076

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#5 timbers_WSU
Member since 2012 • 6076 Posts

tumblr_mo7m4cftuk1s63ovdo1_1280.png

 

MEGATON. 

 

Early DLC. Exclusive Content. Who wouldve ever thought there would be a day when the creators of Halo, are making games for PlayStation and giving it exclusive content. 

 

Xbox fanboys will try their hardest to downplay this, but this is a huge steal for Sony. 

drakekratos
We already knew this from the first Sony conference.
Avatar image for mems_1224
mems_1224

56919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 mems_1224
Member since 2004 • 56919 Posts
this news is old as f*** at least the PS4 has a decent fps besides battlefield now.
Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

this news is old as f*** at least the PS4 has a decent fps besides battlefield now. mems_1224

so multiplats?

Avatar image for dotWithShoes
dotWithShoes

5591

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 dotWithShoes
Member since 2006 • 5591 Posts
[QUOTE="mems_1224"]this news is old as f*** at least the PS4 has a decent fps besides battlefield now.

And MS gets Exclusive content for Battlefield now.. and early access to the rest of the DLC.
Avatar image for Aidenfury19
Aidenfury19

2488

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#9 Aidenfury19
Member since 2007 • 2488 Posts

This means little really, unless that "exclusive content" is a pretty big deal, which I doubt given the other examples presented during the conference.

Avatar image for timbers_WSU
timbers_WSU

6076

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#10 timbers_WSU
Member since 2012 • 6076 Posts

I thought Cows laughed at exclusive DLC? Damn you all are dumb.

Avatar image for Lionheart08
Lionheart08

15814

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#11 Lionheart08
Member since 2005 • 15814 Posts

Kind of vague though.

Avatar image for Aidenfury19
Aidenfury19

2488

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#12 Aidenfury19
Member since 2007 • 2488 Posts

I thought Cows laughed at exclusive DLC? Damn you all are dumb.

timbers_WSU

In this particular case given the stakes I welcome any edge Sony or Nintendo can get over Microsoft.

Avatar image for mems_1224
mems_1224

56919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 mems_1224
Member since 2004 • 56919 Posts

[QUOTE="mems_1224"]this news is old as f*** at least the PS4 has a decent fps besides battlefield now. lostrib

so multiplats?

yea, but multiplats that might numb the pain of losing Halo for me :P
Avatar image for PurpleMan5000
PurpleMan5000

10085

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 PurpleMan5000
Member since 2011 • 10085 Posts

[QUOTE="timbers_WSU"]

I thought Cows laughed at exclusive DLC? Damn you all are dumb.

Aidenfury19

In this particular case given the stakes I welcome any edge Sony or Nintendo can get over Microsoft.

Meh. Sony is charging for online play. Everything else Microsoft is trying this gen sucks, but it's not as bad as charging you to use your own internet connection on games that you paid for. The Xbox One and PS4 are both awful.
Avatar image for Aidenfury19
Aidenfury19

2488

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#15 Aidenfury19
Member since 2007 • 2488 Posts

[QUOTE="Aidenfury19"]

[QUOTE="timbers_WSU"]

I thought Cows laughed at exclusive DLC? Damn you all are dumb.

PurpleMan5000

In this particular case given the stakes I welcome any edge Sony or Nintendo can get over Microsoft.

Meh. Sony is charging for online play. Everything else Microsoft is trying this gen sucks, but it's not as bad as charging you to use your own internet connection on games that you paid for. The Xbox One and PS4 are both awful.

No, both are bad but one is most definitely worse and paid online play is not it. You maintain single-player no matter what you do with Sony, Microsoft is attempting to overturn the first sale doctrine in the console space and that is a line that should NEVER be crossed.

Our worldviews color our perceptions, but if you really think that paid online is worse I'd ask you to re-evaluate as calmly and rationally as possible.

Avatar image for nhh18
nhh18

6538

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 nhh18
Member since 2009 • 6538 Posts

Too bad the game looks awful. It is amazing that killzone shadow fall may be the best shooter on next gen.

Avatar image for PurpleMan5000
PurpleMan5000

10085

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 PurpleMan5000
Member since 2011 • 10085 Posts

[QUOTE="PurpleMan5000"][QUOTE="Aidenfury19"]

In this particular case given the stakes I welcome any edge Sony or Nintendo can get over Microsoft.

Aidenfury19

Meh. Sony is charging for online play. Everything else Microsoft is trying this gen sucks, but it's not as bad as charging you to use your own internet connection on games that you paid for. The Xbox One and PS4 are both awful.

No, both are bad but one is most definitely worse and paid online play is not it. You maintain single-player no matter what you do with Sony, Microsoft is attempting to overturn the first sale doctrine in the console space and that is a line that should NEVER be crossed.

Our worldviews color our perceptions, but if you really think that paid online is worse I'd ask you to re-evaluate as calmly and rationally as possible.

I'm not trying to defend Microsoft in any way. Removing consumer rights by manipulating the market to give preferred retailers exclusive rights to used games is pretty low. I just don't think it's as low as putting services that I pay for from vendors who are completely unrelated to Sony or Microsoft behind a pay wall. If XBLG were free, I would be more likely to purchase an Xbox One than a PS4 at this point. It's not, though, so there is almost zero chance I will ever own either.
Avatar image for Aidenfury19
Aidenfury19

2488

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#18 Aidenfury19
Member since 2007 • 2488 Posts

[QUOTE="Aidenfury19"]

[QUOTE="PurpleMan5000"] Meh. Sony is charging for online play. Everything else Microsoft is trying this gen sucks, but it's not as bad as charging you to use your own internet connection on games that you paid for. The Xbox One and PS4 are both awful.PurpleMan5000

No, both are bad but one is most definitely worse and paid online play is not it. You maintain single-player no matter what you do with Sony, Microsoft is attempting to overturn the first sale doctrine in the console space and that is a line that should NEVER be crossed.

Our worldviews color our perceptions, but if you really think that paid online is worse I'd ask you to re-evaluate as calmly and rationally as possible.

I'm not trying to defend Microsoft in any way. Removing consumer rights by manipulating the market to give preferred retailers exclusive rights to used games is pretty low. I just don't think it's as low as putting services that I pay for from vendors who are completely unrelated to Sony or Microsoft behind a pay wall. If XBLG were free, I would be more likely to purchase an Xbox One than a PS4 at this point. It's not, though, so there is almost zero chance I will ever own either.

That I can respect, I just have a hard time imagining someone getting an XBONE over a PS4 from a consumer rights perspective, but hats off to you for sticking to your guns.

Avatar image for Benny_Blakk
Benny_Blakk

910

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#19 Benny_Blakk
Member since 2007 • 910 Posts

[QUOTE="Aidenfury19"]

[QUOTE="PurpleMan5000"] Meh. Sony is charging for online play. Everything else Microsoft is trying this gen sucks, but it's not as bad as charging you to use your own internet connection on games that you paid for. The Xbox One and PS4 are both awful.PurpleMan5000

No, both are bad but one is most definitely worse and paid online play is not it. You maintain single-player no matter what you do with Sony, Microsoft is attempting to overturn the first sale doctrine in the console space and that is a line that should NEVER be crossed.

Our worldviews color our perceptions, but if you really think that paid online is worse I'd ask you to re-evaluate as calmly and rationally as possible.

I'm not trying to defend Microsoft in any way. Removing consumer rights by manipulating the market to give preferred retailers exclusive rights to used games is pretty low. I just don't think it's as low as putting services that I pay for from vendors who are completely unrelated to Sony or Microsoft behind a pay wall. If XBLG were free, I would be more likely to purchase an Xbox One than a PS4 at this point. It's not, though, so there is almost zero chance I will ever own either.

Microsoft is the company that has used this tactic, not SONY. Tretton specifically stated that the PS+ subscription applies strictly to that gaming aspect and that other services from unrelated vendors are not impacted by having or not having a PS+ subscription.

 

That being said, I kind of sensed all along that SONY would end free online play. In that respect, PC is king for avoiding this tactic (to my knowledge at least). $5 a month is not a hefty fee, but can add up over the course of several years. However, PS+ has always had the bonus of free games, a value that has been praised by the gaming community. So much so that Microsoft has announced that they will be copying this very same model. I just hope that they allow you to pay the fee monthly as you go, as opposed to demand bulk payments. You may be into a game that is single player and would have no use for online for a while.

Avatar image for Slow_Show
Slow_Show

2018

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Slow_Show
Member since 2011 • 2018 Posts

Anyone else remember the heady days when Sony fans would go apeshit every time MS announced a new exclusive DLC deal?

And it's hard to say if this is even really exclusive DLC. The fact they don't even use the word "content" suggests this is probably more marketing-related than anything else.