PUBG On Phones Looks/Runs Better Than Xbox One Version?

  • 144 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Avatar image for goldenelementxl
#1 Posted by GoldenElementXL (2093 posts) -

Developed by Lightspeed & Quantum Studio, the game looks and runs amazing for the platform it's on. So far it only has an upcoming China release, along with another version of the game that focuses on land, sea and air battles. There are currently over 75 million people pre-registered for the game.

Nothing will stop the PUBG train!


Avatar image for SecretPolice
#2 Edited by SecretPolice (33350 posts) -

X1 version completely stomps PS4 / Switch version so there's that. Also must mean; Handheld Phones >>>>> Handheld Bait & Switch. Good stuff. :P

Avatar image for Sgt_Crow
#3 Edited by Sgt_Crow (5779 posts) -

TLHBO.

@SecretPolice said:

X1 version completely stomps PS4 / Switch version so there's that. Also must mean; Handheld Phones >>>>> Handheld Bait & Switch. Good stuff. :P

Avatar image for SecretPolice
#4 Posted by SecretPolice (33350 posts) -

@Sgt_Crow:

Oh he mad lolol...

:P

Avatar image for pelvist
#5 Posted by pelvist (7048 posts) -

Rofl.

Avatar image for davillain-
#6 Edited by DaVillain- (30594 posts) -

PUBG has already decline on PC, but I can see PUBG will be popular on Mobile due to China's popularity over there and it doesn't take much efforts to get it running good on Mobile since there's not much to work on then for console version X1X.

Avatar image for GioVela2010
#7 Posted by GioVela2010 (5301 posts) -

damn better resolution and frames than PC too

Avatar image for deactivated-5acbb9993d0bd
#8 Posted by deactivated-5acbb9993d0bd (12449 posts) -

@davillain- said:

PUBG has already decline on PC, but I can see PUBG will be popular on Mobile due to China's popularity over there and it doesn't take much efforts to get it running good on Mobile since there's not much to work on then for console version X1X.

A decline is a relative term... 70% of players still playing in the last 2 weeks out of all buyers (20 milllions active, 30 million bought)

2.6 million players today at peak.

I know Fortnite is currently higher.

But decline is waaaaaaay over exagurated

Avatar image for vvulturas
#9 Posted by vvulturas (1241 posts) -

@MBirdy88 said:
@davillain- said:

PUBG has already decline on PC, but I can see PUBG will be popular on Mobile due to China's popularity over there and it doesn't take much efforts to get it running good on Mobile since there's not much to work on then for console version X1X.

A decline is a relative term... 70% of players still playing in the last 2 weeks out of all buyers (20 milllions active, 30 million bought)

2.6 million players today at peak.

I know Fortnite is currently higher.

But decline is waaaaaaay over exagurated

Not only that, but Fortnite should be expected to have a higher concurrent player base. It's free to play and available on one more outlet. I'm surprised it even took this long, given the conditions.

Avatar image for Alucard_Prime
#10 Posted by Alucard_Prime (9491 posts) -

Lol doesn't look like it to me, and the mobile version running on a 50 inch screen would look glorious I'm sure

Avatar image for howmakewood
#11 Edited by Howmakewood (5235 posts) -

Not exactly a high treshold to beat

Avatar image for DragonfireXZ95
#12 Edited by DragonfireXZ95 (23912 posts) -

Doesn't look better, but it does seem to actually run better. Lol Besides the obvious trolling, that's actually damn impressive.

Avatar image for Grey_Eyed_Elf
#13 Posted by Grey_Eyed_Elf (5759 posts) -

@GioVela2010 said:

damn better resolution and frames than PC too

Maybe buy a better PC...

Avatar image for Xabiss
#14 Posted by Xabiss (1847 posts) -

Boy the fanboy bullshit that gets posted on this forum is just amazing.

Avatar image for davillain-
#15 Posted by DaVillain- (30594 posts) -
@vvulturas said:
@MBirdy88 said:
@davillain- said:

PUBG has already decline on PC, but I can see PUBG will be popular on Mobile due to China's popularity over there and it doesn't take much efforts to get it running good on Mobile since there's not much to work on then for console version X1X.

A decline is a relative term... 70% of players still playing in the last 2 weeks out of all buyers (20 milllions active, 30 million bought)

2.6 million players today at peak.

I know Fortnite is currently higher.

But decline is waaaaaaay over exagurated

Not only that, but Fortnite should be expected to have a higher concurrent player base. It's free to play and available on one more outlet. I'm surprised it even took this long, given the conditions.

Fortnite looks too cartoony vs the more realistic PUBG. It's going to take a better version of PUBG to knock off the champ. (better graphics, better controls, some improvements in design).

And yeah, I went exaggerating over PUBG PC at the number of players playing, but make no mistakes, new games are releasing and gamers are gonna find something else to play.

Avatar image for GioVela2010
#16 Posted by GioVela2010 (5301 posts) -

@Grey_Eyed_Elf said:
@GioVela2010 said:

damn better resolution and frames than PC too

Maybe buy a better PC...

I’ll stick to HDR OLED + ATMOS Master Race

Avatar image for ellos
#17 Posted by ellos (1550 posts) -

Cool it gives hope for what the console versions will eventually get to. Reduced poly and game renders only what it can. The rest draws when you get there, right in front of you. Look at that landing now that's whats optimization is all about. Great work by Lightspeed & Quantum Studio.

Avatar image for deactivated-5acbb9993d0bd
#18 Edited by deactivated-5acbb9993d0bd (12449 posts) -

@davillain- said:
@vvulturas said:
@MBirdy88 said:
@davillain- said:

PUBG has already decline on PC, but I can see PUBG will be popular on Mobile due to China's popularity over there and it doesn't take much efforts to get it running good on Mobile since there's not much to work on then for console version X1X.

A decline is a relative term... 70% of players still playing in the last 2 weeks out of all buyers (20 milllions active, 30 million bought)

2.6 million players today at peak.

I know Fortnite is currently higher.

But decline is waaaaaaay over exagurated

Not only that, but Fortnite should be expected to have a higher concurrent player base. It's free to play and available on one more outlet. I'm surprised it even took this long, given the conditions.

Fortnite looks too cartoony vs the more realistic PUBG. It's going to take a better version of PUBG to knock off the champ. (better graphics, better controls, some improvements in design).

And yeah, I went exaggerating over PUBG PC at the number of players playing, but make no mistakes, new games are releasing and gamers are gonna find something else to play.

You'd think that EA/DICE would be in the perfect position to create the market leading Battle Royale game.

They have one of the most gorgeous engines out there, with fantastic animations. Already supports 65 players for years with decent net code.... already has a large vehicle system in place.

People praise big publishers way too much around here, they are ALWAYS behind the curve.

Avatar image for Xplode_games
#19 Posted by Xplode_games (1835 posts) -

I saw the video and I guess they can make a pretty good Switch version. That would be cool.

Avatar image for stuff238
#20 Posted by stuff238 (3170 posts) -

Well yeah bro. My $1000 iPhone better damn well have better graphics than the $500 weak sauce X1X.

Avatar image for Grey_Eyed_Elf
#21 Posted by Grey_Eyed_Elf (5759 posts) -

@GioVela2010 said:
@Grey_Eyed_Elf said:
@GioVela2010 said:

damn better resolution and frames than PC too

Maybe buy a better PC...

I’ll stick to HDR OLED + ATMOS Master Race

Avatar image for ProtossRushX
#22 Posted by ProtossRushX (4313 posts) -

IPHONE X MOST POWErFUL CONSOLE

Avatar image for dxmcat
#23 Posted by dxmcat (2182 posts) -

@GioVela2010 said:
@Grey_Eyed_Elf said:
@GioVela2010 said:

damn better resolution and frames than PC too

Maybe buy a better PC...

I’ll stick to HDR OLED + ATMOS Master Race

8 games. lulz.

Avatar image for Xabiss
#24 Posted by Xabiss (1847 posts) -

@stuff238 said:

Well yeah bro. My $1000 iPhone better damn well have better graphics than the $500 weak sauce X1X.

Dude you are an idiot. Enough said.

Avatar image for deactivated-5acbb9993d0bd
#25 Posted by deactivated-5acbb9993d0bd (12449 posts) -

@dxmcat said:
@GioVela2010 said:
@Grey_Eyed_Elf said:
@GioVela2010 said:

damn better resolution and frames than PC too

Maybe buy a better PC...

I’ll stick to HDR OLED + ATMOS Master Race

8 games. lulz.

Not only that.

A TV no matter it's quality doesn't fill your vision as much as a monitor.

A good Studio Reference open-speaker headset with simulated surround sound would be far more useful than a room full of speakers at varied distances from you.

Literally, he has a cinema setup and assumes its somehow better for gaming.

Can't get through to some!

Avatar image for MonsieurX
#26 Posted by MonsieurX (37723 posts) -

@Xabiss said:
@stuff238 said:

Well yeah bro. My $1000 iPhone better damn well have better graphics than the $500 weak sauce X1X.

Dude you are an idiot. Enough said.

Old news

Avatar image for GioVela2010
#27 Posted by GioVela2010 (5301 posts) -

@MBirdy88 said:
@dxmcat said:
@GioVela2010 said:
@Grey_Eyed_Elf said:
@GioVela2010 said:

damn better resolution and frames than PC too

Maybe buy a better PC...

I’ll stick to HDR OLED + ATMOS Master Race

8 games. lulz.

Not only that.

A TV no matter it's quality doesn't fill your vision as much as a monitor.

A good Studio Reference open-speaker headset with simulated surround sound would be far more useful than a room full of speakers at varied distances from you.

Literally, he has a cinema setup and assumes its somehow better for gaming.

Can't get through to some!

Avatar image for Shewgenja
#29 Edited by Shewgenja (20429 posts) -

Non-VR is dated graphics.

Avatar image for techhog89
#30 Posted by Techhog89 (2710 posts) -

@SecretPolice said:

X1 version completely stomps PS4 / Switch version so there's that. Also must mean; Handheld Phones >>>>> Handheld Bait & Switch. Good stuff. :P

Avatar image for quadknight
#31 Edited by QuadKnight (12200 posts) -

I thought OP was trolling but this actually looks better than the Xbone version lol.

Better framerates too. TLHBO!

Avatar image for NoodleFighter
#32 Edited by NoodleFighter (9644 posts) -

@davillain- said:

PUBG has already decline on PC, but I can see PUBG will be popular on Mobile due to China's popularity over there and it doesn't take much efforts to get it running good on Mobile since there's not much to work on then for console version X1X.

I think PUBG only appears to be in a decline because some of the Chinese userbase are moving over to the Tencent version there is already 10 million pre registered users for it. But the mobile versions are getting crazy downloads both mobile versions in China already have over 75 million pre registrations combined. But is probably going to decline since Battle Royale's are becoming trendy with more and more being announced every day and some of them may find a niche that pulls players away from PUBG or are simply just bettered polished that attracts more people towards it.

Avatar image for getyeryayasout
#33 Posted by getyeryayasout (11722 posts) -

The lems have been phoned. :P

Avatar image for NoodleFighter
#34 Edited by NoodleFighter (9644 posts) -

@MBirdy88 said:
@davillain- said:
@vvulturas said:
@MBirdy88 said:
@davillain- said:

PUBG has already decline on PC, but I can see PUBG will be popular on Mobile due to China's popularity over there and it doesn't take much efforts to get it running good on Mobile since there's not much to work on then for console version X1X.

A decline is a relative term... 70% of players still playing in the last 2 weeks out of all buyers (20 milllions active, 30 million bought)

2.6 million players today at peak.

I know Fortnite is currently higher.

But decline is waaaaaaay over exagurated

Not only that, but Fortnite should be expected to have a higher concurrent player base. It's free to play and available on one more outlet. I'm surprised it even took this long, given the conditions.

Fortnite looks too cartoony vs the more realistic PUBG. It's going to take a better version of PUBG to knock off the champ. (better graphics, better controls, some improvements in design).

And yeah, I went exaggerating over PUBG PC at the number of players playing, but make no mistakes, new games are releasing and gamers are gonna find something else to play.

You'd think that EA/DICE would be in the perfect position to create the market leading Battle Royale game.

They have one of the most gorgeous engines out there, with fantastic animations. Already supports 65 players for years with decent net code.... already has a large vehicle system in place.

People praise big publishers way too much around here, they are ALWAYS behind the curve.

And now EA are looking into a Battle Royale mode or something similar with their next battlefield. Can't wait for E3 when all the AAA companies announce their battle royale mode/game.

There is one game I'm forward to which is called Project X and is going to show gameplay at the PC Gamer Weekender on Feb 17th. It's going to be a 1000 player MMO tactical shooter with a 400 player Battle Royale mode. I'm more interested in the 1000 player mode because we have not gotten a shooter of this scale in a long time. All we have is Planetisde and I'm getting tired of it. It's about time that game got competition especially since Daybreak are getting lazy with it, maybe Project X will be the fire under them that gets them serious again.

Avatar image for vaeh
#35 Posted by Vaeh (191 posts) -

@goldenelementxl said:

There are currently over 75 million people pre-registered for the game.

lol xbox

Avatar image for BenjaminBanklin
#36 Posted by BenjaminBanklin (2122 posts) -

This has been completely worth it for the responses alone. LOL! I don't see DF doing a comparison of these versions anytime soon.

Avatar image for appariti0n
#37 Posted by appariti0n (2443 posts) -

Makes sense. Phone cpus are getting to the point where they rival console cpus.

Avatar image for GioVela2010
#38 Posted by GioVela2010 (5301 posts) -

@appariti0n said:

Makes sense. Phone cpus are getting to the point where they rival console cpus.

Android CPU/GPU’s re still shit tho

iphone Master Race

Avatar image for zaryia
#39 Posted by Zaryia (4829 posts) -

@GioVela2010 said:

I’ll stick to HDR OLED + ATMOS Master Race

And the objectively worse version of PUBG.

Avatar image for GioVela2010
#40 Posted by GioVela2010 (5301 posts) -

@zaryia said:
@GioVela2010 said:

I’ll stick to HDR OLED + ATMOS Master Race

And the objectively worse version of PUBG.

Don’t play that game, don’t care

Avatar image for zaryia
#41 Posted by Zaryia (4829 posts) -

@MBirdy88 said:
@dxmcat said:
@GioVela2010 said:
@Grey_Eyed_Elf said:
@GioVela2010 said:

damn better resolution and frames than PC too

Maybe buy a better PC...

I’ll stick to HDR OLED + ATMOS Master Race

8 games. lulz.

Not only that.

A TV no matter it's quality doesn't fill your vision as much as a monitor.

A good Studio Reference open-speaker headset with simulated surround sound would be far more useful than a room full of speakers at varied distances from you.

Literally, he has a cinema setup and assumes its somehow better for gaming.

Can't get through to some!

Nah breh, it's okay that most games are categorically and factually worse on XBOX1.....I have ATMOS!

...

.......

.............

Avatar image for GioVela2010
#42 Posted by GioVela2010 (5301 posts) -

@zaryia said:
@MBirdy88 said:
@dxmcat said:
@GioVela2010 said:
@Grey_Eyed_Elf said:

Maybe buy a better PC...

I’ll stick to HDR OLED + ATMOS Master Race

8 games. lulz.

Not only that.

A TV no matter it's quality doesn't fill your vision as much as a monitor.

A good Studio Reference open-speaker headset with simulated surround sound would be far more useful than a room full of speakers at varied distances from you.

Literally, he has a cinema setup and assumes its somehow better for gaming.

Can't get through to some!

Nah breh, it's okay that most games are categorically and factually worse on XBOX1.....I have ATMOS!

...

.......

.............

Headphone Sound Stage

headphone Bass

Avatar image for deactivated-5acbb9993d0bd
#43 Posted by deactivated-5acbb9993d0bd (12449 posts) -

@GioVela2010 said:
@zaryia said:
@MBirdy88 said:
@dxmcat said:
@GioVela2010 said:

I’ll stick to HDR OLED + ATMOS Master Race

8 games. lulz.

Not only that.

A TV no matter it's quality doesn't fill your vision as much as a monitor.

A good Studio Reference open-speaker headset with simulated surround sound would be far more useful than a room full of speakers at varied distances from you.

Literally, he has a cinema setup and assumes its somehow better for gaming.

Can't get through to some!

Nah breh, it's okay that most games are categorically and factually worse on XBOX1.....I have ATMOS!

...

.......

.............

Headphone Sound Stage

headphone Bass

better for cinema, not for games. too bad.

Avatar image for GioVela2010
#44 Posted by GioVela2010 (5301 posts) -

@MBirdy88 said:
@GioVela2010 said:
@zaryia said:
@MBirdy88 said:
@dxmcat said:

8 games. lulz.

Not only that.

A TV no matter it's quality doesn't fill your vision as much as a monitor.

A good Studio Reference open-speaker headset with simulated surround sound would be far more useful than a room full of speakers at varied distances from you.

Literally, he has a cinema setup and assumes its somehow better for gaming.

Can't get through to some!

Nah breh, it's okay that most games are categorically and factually worse on XBOX1.....I have ATMOS!

...

.......

.............

Headphone Sound Stage

headphone Bass

better for cinema, not for games. too bad.

yeah pretending low frequencies don’t exist is awesome

Avatar image for deactivated-5acbb9993d0bd
#45 Edited by deactivated-5acbb9993d0bd (12449 posts) -

@GioVela2010 said:
@MBirdy88 said:
@GioVela2010 said:
@zaryia said:
@MBirdy88 said:

Not only that.

A TV no matter it's quality doesn't fill your vision as much as a monitor.

A good Studio Reference open-speaker headset with simulated surround sound would be far more useful than a room full of speakers at varied distances from you.

Literally, he has a cinema setup and assumes its somehow better for gaming.

Can't get through to some!

Nah breh, it's okay that most games are categorically and factually worse on XBOX1.....I have ATMOS!

...

.......

.............

Headphone Sound Stage

headphone Bass

better for cinema, not for games. too bad.

yeah pretending low frequencies don’t exist is awesome

Ah yes the magic Diminishing returns of overpriced technology! that 10% better range! That rumble that brings your house down yet drowns everything else out!

Nervermind the surround system that is larger than your screen (more than likely) making a disconnect between what you are seeing and hearing.

There's a reason you don't see competitive gamers using friggin speaker systems for surround. ITS FOR TV.

Avatar image for appariti0n
#46 Posted by appariti0n (2443 posts) -

@MBirdy88: Especially said subwoofer sitting directly on a wood floor LOL.

Avatar image for GioVela2010
#47 Posted by GioVela2010 (5301 posts) -

@MBirdy88 said:
@GioVela2010 said:
@MBirdy88 said:
@GioVela2010 said:
@zaryia said:

Nah breh, it's okay that most games are categorically and factually worse on XBOX1.....I have ATMOS!

...

.......

.............

Headphone Sound Stage

headphone Bass

better for cinema, not for games. too bad.

yeah pretending low frequencies don’t exist is awesome

Ah yes the magic Diminishing returns of overpriced technology! that 10% better range! That rumble that brings your house down yet drowns everything else out!

Nervermind the surround system that is larger than your screen (more than likely) making a disconnect between what you are seeing and hearing.

There's a reason you don't see competitive gamers using friggin speaker systems for surround. ITS FOR TV.

I’lmao you really gonna try and deminish the awesomeness of a subwoofer. Gtfo man, this shit is just laughable.

and I’m not a competitive gamer, I’m a casual

Avatar image for Heil68
#48 Posted by Heil68 (58123 posts) -

hahahahhahaha

Avatar image for GioVela2010
#49 Posted by GioVela2010 (5301 posts) -

@appariti0n said:

@MBirdy88: Especially said subwoofer sitting directly on a wood floor LOL.

What? Explain how that’s a bad thing

Avatar image for topgunmv
#50 Edited by topgunmv (10754 posts) -

Try using something other than the beats kiosk at bestbuy.

@GioVela2010 said:
@MBirdy88 said:
@GioVela2010 said:
@zaryia said:
@MBirdy88 said:

Not only that.

A TV no matter it's quality doesn't fill your vision as much as a monitor.

A good Studio Reference open-speaker headset with simulated surround sound would be far more useful than a room full of speakers at varied distances from you.

Literally, he has a cinema setup and assumes its somehow better for gaming.

Can't get through to some!

Nah breh, it's okay that most games are categorically and factually worse on XBOX1.....I have ATMOS!

...

.......

.............

Headphone Sound Stage

headphone Bass

better for cinema, not for games. too bad.

yeah pretending low frequencies don’t exist is awesome