PS5 weaker than the Series X? Ray Tracing not done by AMD?

Avatar image for Juub1990
Juub1990

12620

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Juub1990
Member since 2013 • 12620 Posts

So first of, Ariel, Ariel B0 and Oberon are all thought to be PS5 chips.

Then this

Folks are speculating a console with about 9-10 TFLOPs of compute performance which would put it significantly behind the rumored 12 TFLOPs of compute performance of the Series X. Both are believed to be RDNA2 so it should be an apples to apples comparisons.

This would also line up quite nicely with these old-ass benchmarks.

Would just like to stress NONE of that information is from primary sources so like with every rumor, take it with a grain of salt.

Combatants BEGIN!!

Avatar image for ellos
ellos

2532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2  Edited By ellos
Member since 2015 • 2532 Posts

We can only speculate at this time. I just made a post starting to realize that series X is exactly what Uncle Phill is trying to communicate it means as the name implies. Its the X model of the next generation. The most powerful premium console.

Avatar image for xantufrog
xantufrog

17875

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 5

#3 xantufrog  Moderator
Member since 2013 • 17875 Posts

At the end of the day, the only thing that matters is the PS5 will have the most powerful SSD the world has ever seen

Avatar image for Pedro
Pedro

69364

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

#4 Pedro
Member since 2002 • 69364 Posts

If the Series X has 12 TFLOPS I would actually be surprised but I know that it wouldn't despite the false hype.

Avatar image for Pedro
Pedro

69364

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

#5 Pedro
Member since 2002 • 69364 Posts
@xantufrog said:

At the end of the day, the only thing that matters is the PS5 will have the most powerful SSD the world has ever seen

LOL.

Avatar image for deactivated-642321fb121ca
deactivated-642321fb121ca

7142

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#6 deactivated-642321fb121ca
Member since 2013 • 7142 Posts

Both be 9-10, period. Unless either of them are pushing the TDP envelope a lot higher, with additional retail costs, suicide personally.

Avatar image for rrjim1
rrjim1

1983

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 rrjim1
Member since 2005 • 1983 Posts

@Pedro said:
@xantufrog said:

At the end of the day, the only thing that matters is the PS5 will have the most powerful SSD the world has ever seen

LOL.

This ^

Avatar image for davillain
DaVillain

56040

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#8 DaVillain  Moderator
Member since 2014 • 56040 Posts

@rrjim1 said:
@Pedro said:
@xantufrog said:

At the end of the day, the only thing that matters is the PS5 will have the most powerful SSD the world has ever seen

LOL.

This ^

I got nothing to add to this thread but this^

Avatar image for Juub1990
Juub1990

12620

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Juub1990
Member since 2013 • 12620 Posts

@Random_Matt: Well the Series X is a smaller PC tower so I think the TDP arguments are out the window.

Avatar image for deactivated-5f2b4872031c2
deactivated-5f2b4872031c2

2683

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#10 deactivated-5f2b4872031c2
Member since 2018 • 2683 Posts

I mean, there's a reason why MS didn't announce the Series X as being the most powerful console in the world, right?

Avatar image for JIMDOG4442002
JIMDOG4442002

731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#11 JIMDOG4442002
Member since 2012 • 731 Posts

@xantufrog: Even though I am excited about the PS5 we are still talking about a console here lol.

Avatar image for deactivated-642321fb121ca
deactivated-642321fb121ca

7142

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#12 deactivated-642321fb121ca
Member since 2013 • 7142 Posts

@Juub1990 said:

@Random_Matt: Well the Series X is a smaller PC tower so I think the TDP arguments are out the window.

So they have increased it?

Avatar image for Juub1990
Juub1990

12620

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Juub1990
Member since 2013 • 12620 Posts

@Random_Matt: The power draw and tdp will most certainly be higher than the Xbox One X. Richard of DF said he wouldn't be surprised if the Series X pulled 300W. As for the heat generation, with that large case with a vent at the top and reportedly a much better cooling solution, I don't think it'll be much of a problem. The physical limitations of traditional consoles don't apply to the Series X. At least not to the same extent.

Avatar image for nfamouslegend
NfamousLegend

1001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 NfamousLegend
Member since 2016 • 1001 Posts

@Random_Matt: only time will tell. DF seem convinced that the Series X at least is a genuine 12TF RDNA2 SoC.

https://youtu.be/3jkfy0MN7ZA

Avatar image for deactivated-642321fb121ca
deactivated-642321fb121ca

7142

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#15 deactivated-642321fb121ca
Member since 2013 • 7142 Posts

@Juub1990 said:

@Random_Matt: The power draw and tdp will most certainly be higher than the Xbox One X. Richard of DF said he wouldn't be surprised if the Series X pulled 300W. As for the heat generation, with that large case with a vent at the top and reportedly a much better cooling solution, I don't think it'll be much of a problem. The physical limitations of traditional consoles don't apply to the Series X. At least not to the same extent.

Fair enough, we will see soon enough. Won't be buying one anyway.

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33784

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33784 Posts

1-No one has confirmed the Xbox is 12TF phill claim 2X Xbox one X,which could be achieve with a 10TF Navi.

2-Cerny already confirmed HW raytracing.

3- Those are probably old and outdated.

Avatar image for StrongDeadlift
StrongDeadlift

6073

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 StrongDeadlift
Member since 2010 • 6073 Posts

Cows are very quickly parsing what their next narrative is going to be. Whether or not they care about hardware. If MS is able to squeeze out a more powerful machine and ALSO eat the cost and keep the price competitive with PS5, you're going to start seeing concern trolling Cows putting on their business suits and suddenly becoming VERY worried about if hundred-millionaire Phil Spencer can afford his next months rent. Or a second yahct.

I mean, Cows didnt give a shit when Sony was liquidating buildings, and damn near burning their own furnature to keep the heat on. And whether or not the company would even survive, let alone produce another Playstation, was legitimate open air speculation. Oh, but they will care,I promise you, when its about Microsoft. A company with a market cap that more closely resembles the GDP of a nuclear superpower than a corporation. MS has more cash in their warchest than twice the entire national defence budget of Russia btw.

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33784

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33784 Posts

@subspecies:

They didn't say that.🤣

They say the most powerful XBOX console we have ever built.

Just like they did not say 12TF,that is what people assumed,Navi is more efficient than Polaris so you don't need 12 TF Navi to double the Xbox one X,which is what Phill claimed 2X Xbox one X,and knowing MS and how they spin things I am sure this is the case.

Avatar image for fedor
Fedor

11612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 Fedor
Member since 2015 • 11612 Posts

@StrongDeadlift: What the hell are you going on about?

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33784

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33784 Posts

@StrongDeadlift:

Well you people cared about graphics for 2 generations in a row,same about exclusives and when 2013 arrived both went down the window.

Oh only to care about power again in 2017 when the Xbox one X came.

Avatar image for BenjaminBanklin
BenjaminBanklin

11053

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 BenjaminBanklin
Member since 2004 • 11053 Posts

@StrongDeadlift: LOL! And Sony still gave 'em that work. You'd think with all that capital behind them they would have actually won a gen.

Anyway, there's no use in stanning for Xbox in that fashion anymore. Their games are multiplat now. The console "war" is over for them, they waved the white flag. Giving away games with subs through multiple outlets is the name of the game now. I think you guys would have got the memo, but apparently not.

Avatar image for bluestars
Bluestars

2789

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#22  Edited By Bluestars
Member since 2019 • 2789 Posts

D foundry believe it’s 12 tflops

But a bunch of nobody’s on a system wars site say it’s not

Hmmmm who do I believe may be right? the renowned tech site or some butthurt fanboy

HAH

Avatar image for nfamouslegend
NfamousLegend

1001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 NfamousLegend
Member since 2016 • 1001 Posts

@bluestars: it's what I keep saying, but others are avoiding my post like the plague. BTW where is Goldenelemental? Has he been in hiding?

Avatar image for fedor
Fedor

11612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Fedor
Member since 2015 • 11612 Posts

@nfamouslegend: You posted a speculative youtube video... It's also been acknowledged several times on SW, nobody is afraid of your guessing game posts.

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33784

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33784 Posts

@bluestars:

In fact DF try to confirm the 12TF number with MS it self,and got no answer.

MS never EVER undersell their console their over sell it,so if they say 2X Xbox one X is not 12TF Navi rdna2 which is 1.25 more efficient than GCN is.

12TF rdna 2 is close to 3 times better than the Xbox one X,not twice which I am sure MS will never EVER allow to pass unseen,if the Xbox scarlet is 12 TF MS would have confirm it period.

Just like they confirmed HWRT.

Avatar image for deactivated-5f2b4872031c2
deactivated-5f2b4872031c2

2683

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#26 deactivated-5f2b4872031c2
Member since 2018 • 2683 Posts

@tormentos: I know they didn't, dude. I was being a bit sarcastic.

Avatar image for Archangel3371
Archangel3371

44105

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#27 Archangel3371
Member since 2004 • 44105 Posts

I don’t know why people are trying to make something out of Microsoft not declaring the Xbox Series X as the “most powerful” console. The PS5 is an unknown entity to those outside of Sony so why would Microsoft make such a declaration about the XSX. Same with Sony. They aren’t declaring the PS5 as “the most powerful console” either and why would they.

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33784

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33784 Posts

@Archangel3371:

Some people can't read between the lines,some actually claim that MS called the scarlet the most powerful console in the world,when in reality they simple say they make the strongest Xbox console ever.

I don't think sony make that claim even inside the PS brand.

What we know is for leaks of some insiders.

This leak is old it was already share in fact I argue about this months ago here when it was claim the GPU speed was 2.0ghz.

Cerny already confirmed HW ray tracing so this doesn't add up.

Avatar image for Archangel3371
Archangel3371

44105

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#29 Archangel3371
Member since 2004 • 44105 Posts

@tormentos: Meh. Some people just like to put their own spin on what they “read between the lines”.

Avatar image for bluestars
Bluestars

2789

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#30  Edited By Bluestars
Member since 2019 • 2789 Posts

@tormentos:

The didn’t deny it either

Sony and MS are about to go head to head on price and power in 11 months time so cards are being held close they’re chests for now

But DF did mention several sources and until confirmed I’ll stick with them in the hope they are right HAH

Avatar image for hrt_rulz01
hrt_rulz01

22372

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 hrt_rulz01
Member since 2006 • 22372 Posts

This wouldn't surprise me at all... MS seems to want to have the premium console on the market. And I expect the XSX will probably cost US$100 more than the PS5 because of it.

I think Sony's plan will be to still aim for the $US399 price point even if it means having a less powerful machine, because making money off the actual hardware is more important to Sony than MS.

If this does turn out to be true, it's going to be hilarious seeing cows' reactions. I'm guessing they'll continue their same "power difference isn't important" narrative they've been using since the XB1X came out. Lol.

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33784

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33784 Posts

@bluestars:

DF asked MS directly they refuse to answer.

Ms doesn't undersell their platforms,if the GPU is rdna2 and is 12 TF there is no way MS will say is just twice as powerful is simple not a smart move at all.

You are underselling it,if the machine is 12TF RDNA 2 is more twice as powerful almost 3 times I am sure that is something MS will voice all over just like Ray tracing vrs.

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33784

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33784 Posts

@hrt_rulz01:

You mean the argument you people had for the first 4 years of this gen? After hyping power for 2 generations in a row?

Cerny confirmed Hardware ray tracing that leak is wrong.

Avatar image for bluestars
Bluestars

2789

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#34  Edited By Bluestars
Member since 2019 • 2789 Posts

@tormentos:

Well we shall see,I’m with DF seeing as there video may not be the place MS wanted to confirm anything? Maybe E3 was meant for them details HAH

Avatar image for r-gamer
R-Gamer

2221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#35 R-Gamer
Member since 2019 • 2221 Posts

@Juub1990: The X1X doesn't have 12 TF. This is shitty game journalism at its finest. They said 8x more powerful then the Xbox one and 2x a X1X... so which is it? Because 8x a OG X1 is 10.4tf. I think people said 2x a X1X so everyone assumed 12 TF but the thing is a RDNA part clocked at 9.2tf would be about 2x the power of a X1X.

Avatar image for Juub1990
Juub1990

12620

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 Juub1990
Member since 2013 • 12620 Posts

@r-gamer said:

@Juub1990: The X1X doesn't have 12 TF. This is shitty game journalism at its finest. They said 8x more powerful then the Xbox one and 2x a X1X... so which is it? Because 8x a OG X1 is 10.4tf. I think people said 2x a X1X so everyone assumed 12 TF but the thing is a RDNA part clocked at 9.2tf would be about 2x the power of a X1X.


"rumored 12 TFLOPs".

Is that too complicated for your puny brain?

Avatar image for hrt_rulz01
hrt_rulz01

22372

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 hrt_rulz01
Member since 2006 • 22372 Posts

@tormentos: "You people"? Lol.

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33784

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33784 Posts

@hrt_rulz01:

Yep you were one of those..🤣

Avatar image for r-gamer
R-Gamer

2221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#39  Edited By R-Gamer
Member since 2019 • 2221 Posts

@Juub1990: Apparently basic Math is a little to much for you so I wouldn't be insulting people's intelligence.

Avatar image for Juub1990
Juub1990

12620

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 Juub1990
Member since 2013 • 12620 Posts
@r-gamer said:

@Juub1990: Apparently basic Math is a little to much for you so I wouldn't be insulting people's intelligence.

@r-gamer said:

@Juub1990: The X1X doesn't have 12 TF. This is shitty game journalism at its finest. They said 8x more powerful then the Xbox one and 2x a X1X... so which is it? Because 8x a OG X1 is 10.4tf. I think people said 2x a X1X so everyone assumed 12 TF but the thing is a RDNA part clocked at 9.2tf would be about 2x the power of a X1X.

“So when we do the math, we’re over eight times the GPU power of the Xbox One, and two times what an Xbox One X is.”

OVER EIGHT TIMES

Avatar image for r-gamer
R-Gamer

2221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#41  Edited By R-Gamer
Member since 2019 • 2221 Posts

@Juub1990: So if it was 12 why wouldn't they just say 9x the power of the OG X1? That would be 11.7tf.

Avatar image for Juub1990
Juub1990

12620

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 Juub1990
Member since 2013 • 12620 Posts
@r-gamer said:

@Juub1990: So if it was 12 why wouldn't they just say 9x? That would be 11.7tf.

Because the damn numbers aren't set in stone yet? Which is why it's still a rumor?

Avatar image for r-gamer
R-Gamer

2221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#43 R-Gamer
Member since 2019 • 2221 Posts

@Juub1990: Dude I'm just telling you how the rumor got started. If it was 12 tf on RDNA it would shitstomp a 2080ti. A 5700xt is about twice the power of a X1X and sits around 9.75 tf. RDNA TF and GCN TF are not the same.

I got excited when I heard the rumor and was really excited but regardless it will probably be a little better then a 5700xt and that's amazing for a console.

Avatar image for Juub1990
Juub1990

12620

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44  Edited By Juub1990
Member since 2013 • 12620 Posts

@r-gamer said:

@Juub1990: Dude I'm just telling you how the rumor got started. If it was 12 tf on RDNA it would shitstomp a 2080ti. A 5700xt is about twice the power of a X1X and sits around 9.75 tf. RDNA TF and GCN TF are not the same.

I got excited when I heard the rumor and was really excited but regardless it will probably be a little better then a 5700xt and that's amazing for a console.

No it wouldn't shitstomp a 2080 Ti. 12 TFLOPs 23% faster than 9.75 TFLOPs. The 2080 Super is about 25% faster than the 5700XT at 4K. 12 TFLOPs RDNA puts it on the same level as a 2080 Super. 2080 Ti is another 20% faster. It would need to be in excess of 15 TFLOPs to shitstomp a 2080 Ti.

You think I'm supporting it? No. I said it's rumored, never said it was true. WindowsCentral said that, DF for now are going with that. They asked Microsoft who refused to comment.

Avatar image for Pedro
Pedro

69364

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

#45 Pedro
Member since 2002 • 69364 Posts

@r-gamer said:

@Juub1990: The X1X doesn't have 12 TF. This is shitty game journalism at its finest. They said 8x more powerful then the Xbox one and 2x a X1X... so which is it? Because 8x a OG X1 is 10.4tf. I think people said 2x a X1X so everyone assumed 12 TF but the thing is a RDNA part clocked at 9.2tf would be about 2x the power of a X1X.

The One X was marketed as 4X the One so it makes sense that if the Series X is 2x the One X, it would be 8x the One. Seems pretty consistent to me.

Avatar image for deactivated-618bc23e9b1c9
deactivated-618bc23e9b1c9

7339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#46 deactivated-618bc23e9b1c9
Member since 2007 • 7339 Posts

Sony is turning in to Nintendo of the past: arrogant, full of censorship, over-depending on their own exclusives.

If they don't have a power advantage over their comp they'll be in trouble next gen because they are putting everything they have in Western content that tends to rely on higher end tech.

Avatar image for fedor
Fedor

11612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 Fedor
Member since 2015 • 11612 Posts

@briguyb13: Over depending on exclusives even though they get all AAA 3rd party titles? That doesn't make any sense.

Avatar image for deactivated-618bc23e9b1c9
deactivated-618bc23e9b1c9

7339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#48 deactivated-618bc23e9b1c9
Member since 2007 • 7339 Posts

@fedor said:

@briguyb13: Over depending on exclusives even though they get all AAA 3rd party titles? That doesn't make any sense.

Same thing happened to Microsoft with the 360, they were popular during gen 7, then over-relied on third party titles, then the Xbox One happened.

Sony is not above making a misstep.

Avatar image for r-gamer
R-Gamer

2221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#49 R-Gamer
Member since 2019 • 2221 Posts

@Pedro: And that may be true but I don't see it being 12 TF on RDNA. 12 TF on RDNA would be almost 3x a X1X.

Avatar image for fedor
Fedor

11612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 Fedor
Member since 2015 • 11612 Posts

@briguyb13: But Sony isn't relying on 3rd party and they release plenty of acclaimed exclusives. I'm not seeing the correlation.