PS4 owners need to understand what the definition of a MOVIE game is..

Maybe I'm old fashioned, but here's what I think when I hear "movie games":

Damn that's some great critical thinking, inspiring.

@kali-b1rd: a direct answer to an objective question. I'm not typing a wall of text to prove something that is obvious and everyone knows.

In other words you have nothing, I get it.

Well, then you are also wrong. I’m a PS4 owner and I’m disappointed over how obsessed Sony has become with movie "games" this generation. The poster that you were replying to is right in that you don’t seem to be able to conceive that there are in fact gamers out there that don’t like these movie "games" that Sony has put so much focus on and are wishing that Sony would offer more variety like they did during the PS1 and PS2 generations.

*Waits for somebody to try to claim that I’m lying about owning a PS4 which always seems to happen whenever I express my disappointment with the PS4 because they just can’t conceive the fact that Sony’s movie "games" are not satisfying all of their customers, so that I can then prove them wrong*

Your not alone, far from it.

Only Exclusive I've truly through was "great" was Bloodborne... a purchased re-skin.

Some things like P5 were alright, but available on PS3 and PC (emu).

Uncharted, Horizon and Last Guardian , just felt like I was buying them to justify even having a PS4 Pro .... which is incredibly loud for such a small device... christ.

Most of Sony's games involve shooter mechanics for the most part (all the big ones) which is always an inferior experience when limited to a controller.

There games... just shallow... Horizon, Cows attempt at "buh buh its not just a corridor" is puddle deep in its open world mechanics... mediocre story and characters, what other than "oooo shiny" is there?

Zzzzzz

Sony went from having a wide range of games and excellent Japaneses support... to just morn western 10 hour blockbusters with no depth.

@storm_of_swords: meltdown wall of text. Lol

lol nyaDC still trying hard I see. Never change...

OP is a cow that needs to shift the goal posts in order to damage control for their crappy console.

Movie games are based on:

- The percentage of a game's entire play time that cut scenes comprise.

- How much gameplay a game actually has (QTE and walking along a linear path while your character chats with an NPC are not gameplay).

Sony games are notorious for having 20-30% (or more) of their entire games comprised by these two conditions. It's especially concerning when the games are only a few hours long (Sony games are rarely longer than 10 hours). You're paying $60 for an afternoon or two of a crappy movie.

It's really silly for people to now act as if there's some new genre called "movie-game". You could say that some games have a somewhat cinematic style I suppose, and these games have their place like many other kinds of games. Plenty of them are highly acclaimed, but not everyone will like them, like any other games. But to pretend they are basically movies instead of games (or closer to being movies) is maybe the most ridiculous and pathetic thing I've ever seen on this forum. Now I see people are starting to make up their own long-winded definitions for what qualifies as a "movie game", giving conditions, percentages, etc. It's just comical.

The only games that I would consider "movie games" are Telltale games or a David Cage game. That's as close as you can get to a movie with gameplay. Everything else being labeled that is absurd.

I don't really like this 'movie games' label. It doesn't effectively describe many of the games that are considered to fall under it.

@UssjTrunks: The only thing notorious around here are dipshit like you that don't know what "movie" games actually are. It is funny watching you guys loose your shit every other post though, the salt is real with you lol.

@NoodleFighter: people don't call rts games movie games because none of the gameplay is cinematic. I love rts games, I don't love movie games. I consider games movie games when there is more ephasic on cinmatic sequences and story rather than depth of gameplay. No one cares about the StarCraft cinematics more than the gameplay. Multiplayer focused anyway.

SW, its serious folks. ;)