Phil Fish: YouTubers need to give a huge cut to devs

Avatar image for nintendoboy16
#1 Posted by nintendoboy16 (33994 posts) -

So, here's what Phil Fish has to say on YTers and making money off of playing games.

"YouTubers should have to pay out a huge portion of their revenue to the developers from which they steal all their content. Ad revenue should be shared with developers. This should be built into YouTube. Anything else is basically piracy."

  • "If you generate money from putting my content on your channel, you owe me money. Simple as that."
  • "If you buy a movie, are you then allowed to stream the entirety of it publicly for people to watch for free? No, because that's illegal."
  • "Systems are in place to prevent that. But buy Fez, put ALL of it on YouTube, turn on ads, make money from it and that's TOTALLY FINE."
  • "And the developer should in NO WAY be compensated for their work being freely distributed to the world. Right. Makes sense."
Avatar image for lostrib
#2 Posted by lostrib (49999 posts) -

Isn't this the dumbass that cancelled his game and left the industry because the media hurt his wittle feelings?

Avatar image for trugs26
#4 Posted by trugs26 (7497 posts) -

He could be right. People throw out the "free advertising" claim, but in all honesty, a lot of people just watch a game and don't bother with buying it. They're there because of the commentary, which is supplemented by the source material (ie the game).

Avatar image for freedomfreak
#5 Edited by freedomfreak (50012 posts) -

That dude is a proper moron.

God, I remember when he was going on about VR. "It should be like discovering new things, you know, like when you do acid.."

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
#6 Posted by deactivated-59d151f079814 (47239 posts) -


Meanwhile, the youtuber is more or less advertising their game.. Many games I would have never known existed or knew it were good if I hadn't seen it on youtube.. The door goes both ways, and seeing as these developers and publishers are exploding with money.. With each project getting bigger and bigger, I would like to tell Phil to fvck off.

Avatar image for silversix_
#7 Posted by silversix_ (26347 posts) -

Fish: STFU Edition.

Avatar image for nintendoboy16
#8 Edited by nintendoboy16 (33994 posts) -

@lostrib said:

Isn't this the dumbass that cancelled his game and left the industry because the media hurt his wittle feelings?

Yep...

Avatar image for GamingGod999
#9 Edited by GamingGod999 (3135 posts) -

Phil Fish should learn to STFU.

Avatar image for lostrib
#10 Edited by lostrib (49999 posts) -

His twitter account before he deleted it

Avatar image for speedfreak48t5p
#11 Posted by speedfreak48t5p (12737 posts) -

@lostrib said:

His twitter account before he deleted it

LOL what a dumbass.

Avatar image for CrownKingArthur
#12 Posted by CrownKingArthur (5262 posts) -

i find this issue interesting but without any real practical solutions.

probably best to stick to the status quo.

after all young dev, wouldn't a widely watched youtube video about your computer game, a video produced by someone else - wouldn't that be essentially 'free' advertising? sure they get money from youtube, but the dev's not directly funding marketing of the game.

let's just hope the game has significant merit, so the youtuber doesn't slam the game.

Avatar image for LegatoSkyheart
#13 Posted by LegatoSkyheart (29702 posts) -

I thought he wasn't part of the Industry anymore.

Avatar image for ActicEdge
#14 Posted by ActicEdge (24492 posts) -

Just because you watch a let's play, doesn't mean someone was gonna buy your game. That's a HUGE leap in logic. Also, the commentary makes the Let's Play, no one watches those with shitty uninteresting people narrating.

Avatar image for ninjapirate2000
#15 Posted by ninjapirate2000 (3347 posts) -

So should publications cut money to the devs for previewing their game too?

Avatar image for amazonangry
#16 Posted by AmazonAngry (968 posts) -

I agree with him.

Avatar image for Netret0120
#17 Posted by Netret0120 (3478 posts) -

@amazonangry said:

I agree with him.

I can agree with him too but I can also say that developers wouldn't even get the money if other gamers didn't watch these channels online and end up buying the games themselves.

I wouldn't have been interested in the Batman games until I watched a few parts of a walkthrough and liked what I saw and ended up buying the game myself hence giving the developer money.

Avatar image for donalbane
#18 Edited by donalbane (16383 posts) -

Watching somebody play a game is not the same as playing the game yourself.

Avatar image for ReadingRainbow4
#19 Posted by ReadingRainbow4 (18733 posts) -

lmao

Avatar image for FlamesOfGrey
#20 Posted by FlamesOfGrey (7511 posts) -

I agree. Without the content being created in the first place, these Youtubers making bank wouldn't be since they'd have nothing to comment on and play. Revenue should be split 50/50 for Youtubers that do commentaries. For users that just upload gameplay, well, they should barely get anything. I know the only time I even check out a game through a LP is if I have no plans on buying it. Most games don't have multiple endings or branching paths so, that excuse of free advertising is pretty flat. We're talking about full playthroughs.

Avatar image for jsmoke03
#23 Posted by jsmoke03 (13696 posts) -

he has more grounds with getting a cut from used game sales than he has with free advert from youtube users

Avatar image for popeanonymousxv
#24 Posted by PopeAnonymousXV (168 posts) -

Phil Fish isn't relevant to gaming now, never was, in fact.

Avatar image for f50p90
#25 Edited by f50p90 (3767 posts) -

If someone cuts and edits the content and uses it for say a review, like an Angry Joe, then that's Joe's content and developers don't deserve a cut from that. If someone simply streams a game or posts clips of game play, then they aren't even supposed to get revenue from that in the first place. There is no cut for developers to get.. Youtube revenue is supposed to only be for original content which that isn't

Avatar image for lundy86_4
#26 Edited by lundy86_4 (48721 posts) -

What a boob.

Avatar image for clyde46
#27 Posted by clyde46 (49050 posts) -

@amazonangry said:

I agree with him.

Explain?

Avatar image for jsmoke03
#28 Posted by jsmoke03 (13696 posts) -

@f50p90 said:

If someone cuts and edits the content and uses it for say a review, like an Angry Joe, then that's Joe's content and developers don't deserve a cut from that. If someone simply streams a game or posts clips of game play, then they aren't even supposed to get revenue from that in the first place. There is no cut for developers to get.. Youtube revenue is supposed to only be for original content which that isn't

phil fish has nothing to stand on even with that.

so do developers get money from gaming websites that post walk thru? or gaming previous?

so do developers get money from gaming websites for the advert revenue that they receive?

if phil fish wanted revenue from youtube...he should make an account and troll some people.

he should stop worrying what pewdiepie does and worry about his games

Avatar image for ReadingRainbow4
#29 Edited by ReadingRainbow4 (18733 posts) -

Whoever made happy wheels should be filthy rich then with how many Youtubers that have whored that flash game out.

Avatar image for lostrib
#30 Posted by lostrib (49999 posts) -

@clyde46 said:

@amazonangry said:

I agree with him.

Explain?

Somehow I doubt that will help

Avatar image for lawlessx
#31 Posted by lawlessx (48753 posts) -

isn't this the guy that cried his way out of the gaming industry?

Avatar image for clyde46
#32 Posted by clyde46 (49050 posts) -

@lawlessx said:

isn't this the guy that cried his way out of the gaming industry?

Yes, yes it was.

Avatar image for aroxx_ab
#33 Edited by aroxx_ab (13236 posts) -

@Slashkice said:

Comparing watching a movie to watching a streamed game is a stupid point, but Phil does like to say a lot of stupid things.

But some movies is advertised as games, then the full thing is uploaded on youtube. He got a point.

Avatar image for CrownKingArthur
#34 Edited by CrownKingArthur (5262 posts) -
@lostrib said:

@clyde46 said:

@amazonangry said:

I agree with him.

Explain?

Somehow I doubt that will help

maybe like a few hours ago we'll see a deleted post

Avatar image for UnifiedConsole
#35 Posted by UnifiedConsole (44 posts) -

I Like his work but I dislike him. Wish he would focus on making great games and hire a PR person.

Avatar image for f50p90
#36 Edited by f50p90 (3767 posts) -

@jsmoke03 said:

@f50p90 said:

If someone cuts and edits the content and uses it for say a review, like an Angry Joe, then that's Joe's content and developers don't deserve a cut from that. If someone simply streams a game or posts clips of game play, then they aren't even supposed to get revenue from that in the first place. There is no cut for developers to get.. Youtube revenue is supposed to only be for original content which that isn't

phil fish has nothing to stand on even with that.

so do developers get money from gaming websites that post walk thru? or gaming previous?

so do developers get money from gaming websites for the advert revenue that they receive?

if phil fish wanted revenue from youtube...he should make an account and troll some people.

he should stop worrying what pewdiepie does and worry about his games

That's not really my point. Even the uploader isn't supposed to get any revenue from that PER YouTube terms and conditions. So yeah basically what i'm saying is there is no where for a developer to get youtube revenue. It's either original content where the revenue belongs to the uploader, or it's not original and no one gets revenue

Avatar image for Lulu_Lulu
#37 Posted by Lulu_Lulu (19564 posts) -

Mr. Fish is still alive ey ?

You know whats funny.... He's absolutely right... But theres no way in hell I'm agreeing to any of those terms simply because I don't want....

Avatar image for bbkkristian
#38 Posted by bbkkristian (14971 posts) -

He should be glad people are even playing his damn game.

Look, these lets play things are great marketing, now for them to do games where there is little gameplay and more story (heavy rain, beyond two souls), I can understand wanting compensation. But for games like Grand Theft Auto, Zelda, and Mario, these demand more user interaction and appeal the audience to go play the game (or not) just like an advertisement.

Avatar image for The_Last_Ride
#39 Posted by The_Last_Ride (76371 posts) -

The guy needs to shut the **** up, he's a fucking idiot. Go back an make Fez 2...

Avatar image for R3FURBISHED
#40 Posted by R3FURBISHED (12396 posts) -
@lostrib said:

Isn't this the dumbass that cancelled his game and left the industry because the media hurt his wittle feelings?

Its not that simple, what the public said about him was beyond reproach -- just horrid things in every way. The reason because he delayed his game in order to finish it and because he cancelled Fez 2 because of what terrible things gamers said about him.

Avatar image for Lulu_Lulu
#41 Posted by Lulu_Lulu (19564 posts) -

@The_Last_Ride

I don't Ive ever heard you talk like that before. :o

yes... I watch you quietly from a distance....

Avatar image for CrownKingArthur
#42 Posted by CrownKingArthur (5262 posts) -
@R3FURBISHED said:
@lostrib said:

Isn't this the dumbass that cancelled his game and left the industry because the media hurt his wittle feelings?

Its not that simple, what the public said about him was beyond reproach -- just horrid things in every way. The reason because he delayed his game in order to finish it and because he cancelled Fez 2 because of what terrible things gamers said about him.

i wonder how 'complete' fez 2 was in order for him to cancel it in a huff.

i mean, it's a huge investment of time, effort and energy - video game production. i reckon the game was probably barely past the conceptual stage, otherwise who's going to toss away that amount of work because someone on the internet behaved like a person on the internet?

surely if the game was at something like alpha/beta testing and debugging stage, he wouldn't go tossing aside a project that far into completion.

Avatar image for The_Last_Ride
#43 Posted by The_Last_Ride (76371 posts) -

@Lulu_Lulu said:

@The_Last_Ride

I don't Ive ever heard you talk like that before. :o

yes... I watch you quietly from a distance....

sorry, but it's fair use. He get's free advertisment and it's not the same as a movie. A game is played differently everytime you play it. Companies/publishers and developers have freaking realized this. Guys like this and Cliff might make awesome games, but they need to shut the **** up

Avatar image for SexyJazzCat
#44 Edited by SexyJazzCat (2784 posts) -

Phil Fish should pay people to upload videos of Fez.

I wanna see him pay for advertisement that youtube generates.

Avatar image for lostrib
#45 Edited by lostrib (49999 posts) -

@R3FURBISHED said:
@lostrib said:

Isn't this the dumbass that cancelled his game and left the industry because the media hurt his wittle feelings?

Its not that simple, what the public said about him was beyond reproach -- just horrid things in every way. The reason because he delayed his game in order to finish it and because he cancelled Fez 2 because of what terrible things gamers said about him.

What exactly was said that was so beyond reproach from the media? though if he let a bunch of dicks on twitter get to him enough to throw away his game, that's kind of sad.

Although, he's not exactly well known for saying nice things or being overly tactful.

Avatar image for Lulu_Lulu
#46 Posted by Lulu_Lulu (19564 posts) -

@The_Last_Ride

Guys like him would fit in quite nicely in Micro$oft. :p

Avatar image for uninspiredcup
#47 Edited by uninspiredcup (25656 posts) -

Isn't this the hipster young person who said potty mouth bad things and then cried and left when someone said a potty mouth bad thing back?

Avatar image for SexyJazzCat
#48 Posted by SexyJazzCat (2784 posts) -

@f50p90: Clearly you're wrong, otherwise youtube wouldn't allow monetization of such content.

Avatar image for The_Last_Ride
#49 Posted by The_Last_Ride (76371 posts) -

@Lulu_Lulu said:

@The_Last_Ride

Guys like him would fit in quite nicely in Micro$oft. :p

Not likely, because he quit gaming, yet he still bitches

Avatar image for nutcrackr
#50 Posted by nutcrackr (13029 posts) -

I think there is some merit to what he is saying but it's a really grey area. One question that should be asked is whether the actual use of lets plays reduce sales for games and I don't think there is any evidence of that. Some games like Goat Simulator see huge sales boosts when somebody like pewdiepie plays with it.