@zappat said:
@sealionact: "Who were Sony crossplaying with if it wasn't with a PC running MICROSOFT'S Windows?"
1. That's really desperate damage control. We're talking about the Xbox here and anybody can make a game for Windows without MS having anything to do with it.
"The HDD was external, didn't work like a HDD, and came out TWO YEARS after the launch of the Xbox in the US. Big fail there......and are you saying that a console that had an HDD as well as memory cards is somehow worse than a console that has only memory cards?"
It came before the Xbox in Japan, so in the timeline Sony did it first. You can't copy something that came afterwards you dummy.
"Uh ..... point is your 360 game will work without gamepass, and you don't need to pay anything at all. "
We're talking about the renting service not BC and we already established that Sony had BC for 2 generations before MS so if anyone copied the other it was MS copying Sony. And they did a half-assed copy since Sony actually had full BC not like MS which has partial BC.
"I mean, are you trying to make yourself look silly?"
No, but you did achieve to look silly pretty effectively.
1. You are applying Nintendo's business model on a different platform business model. MS DOS/Windows clone PC business model enables Microsoft to minimally invest into 1st party programs while Windows OS beats OS alternatives e.g. AmigaOS lost the system war due to missing certain 3rd party A/AA/AAA programs. This mindset was copied into Xbox hence minimal investment with 1st party games until somebody at MS's executive board looked and argued for Netflix business model.
3rd party developers and clone hardware business has fueled MS-DOS/Windows dominance over alternatives. If Sony has apps on Windows, I select Windows over other OS alternative.
Microsoft has kick-out Sony's optical disc DRM root kits programs from Windows XP for increasing Microsoft's help line support!
Microsoft in the past has kicked out 3rd party program (blocked from installing) that causes BSOD that floods their help line support.
Recently, Microsoft kicked out certain HP keyboard driver during Windows 10 1809 update due to mass BSOD problem. MS has the market power to tell HP to stop mass BSOD.
Microsoft has the technical means to remotely kick-out 3rd party apps from Windows!
It's counter productive to block 3rd party applications from Windows that enhances it's desirability over alternative OS, but software causing mass BSODs that doesn't enhance Windows desirability, hence it gets kicked out.
Retail XBO in dev mode doesn't need MS intervention i.e. it's like Windows UWP environment without Explorer.exe desktop component.
XBO business model, enhanced DRM , consistent hardware environment. MS remotely managed OS and drivers installation.
Windows business model, clone hardware 2nd source and lower entry dev barriers.
Microsoft control's Windows development direction. There's many design choices within X86 PC that has Microsoft's bias e.g. ACPI** table, HAL ACPI**, high performance timers, UEFI secure boot (Microsoft has self sign capability), X86-64 vs legacy 32bit X86 instruction set co-designer. MS says we don't support IBM's PowerPC 620's X86/Power64 hybrid and this project dies while MS supports AMD64 i.e. fellow ex-DEC engineers between VAX (@Windows NT) and Alpha CPU (@AMD) teams bias.
**Microsoft's ACPI variant instead of open (dead) standard ACPI.
Log in to comment