@Gaming-Planet said:
@Juub1990 said:
@Gaming-Planet said:
Do I need a 10 bit monitor to get HDR?
I think I might have seen some RE7 HDR screenshots on steam and they look like paintings.
In reality yes. You need a 10-bit panel to have 1.07 billion colors compared ton 16.8 million for 8-bit. So for true HDR yes, 10-bit is needed.
Wow, that's a huge gap in contrast.
It is. To answer the original question though, 10 bit is not necessary for HDR. HDR will necessitate 10 bit color depth. Hmm...let me try again. HDR is 10 bit at least, but the HDR contains higher contrast than 10 bit. So...10 bit depth is ONE of the features of HDR, but HDR is MORE than just 10 bit content and display. The brights are bright, and there's a level of depth in the shadows that brings detail to life that you CANNOT at all see on a regular panel. Imagine being in a dark room with 1 window open during the daytime and you have a view outside...it's bright out, and you can see detail in the shadows in your room. The greater contrast is far better for visual fidelity than even the step from 1080p to 4k. It adds a layer of fidelity that's impossible to understand without seeing it in your home (big box stores are so bright, and the displays so poorly calibrated...really...in the home, it's NUTS to see for the first time).
If people are looking at "HDR" pictures (A poster above mentioned it didn't look good) on a standard monitor/tv, you are NOT seeing HDR. Because it HAS to be on an HDR screen for you to see the difference. Just like a 4k picture on a 1080p monitor...it doesn't matter. Your still looking at 1080p.
To the other poster that claimed RE7 isn't the best looking game out right now...you're wrong. You need to see it in 4k/60hz HDR. It's absolutely astounding. Screenshots on a normal monitor/tv won't do it justice. I'm not claiming it's technically the most advanced looking game...I'm saying it LOOKS the best out of any game experience I've seen...well above Crysis 3 in 4k, or Tomb Raider, etc.
Lastly...yeah, my setup was a bit. I'm running 1070's sli (RE7 supports sli through Nvidia Inspector) with 16gb Ram/4790k @4.8ghz, off an 850 pro. My surround sound is an Onkyo 7.1 THX setup with Klipsch Reference setup, Towers in front, smalls in surround, and a BIG damn subwoofer. I have my desk next to the home theater with a Swift Rog monitor, and a separate Yamaha Receiver powering Polk Reference Bookshelves (Schiit Stack separate DAC/Headphone Amp powering Beyerdynamic DT990's at 600ohm if I need cans). Both my home theater and desk speakers run to the same sub as this is my man cave, damnit. I only run 1 signal to the sub at a time and there's no need for 2 subs in my room. Anyways...that's some of the stuff I have have, since you wanted to know. Oh yeah...TV is Sammy 65 inch curved HDR...I forget which model. It's not the fancy Quantum Dot one though...it's the step below. The Quantum Dot one's are really sweet, but were 3x the price at the time I purchased mine for the same screen size. It still hurts your eyes to look at a "sun" in HDR though.
Back to the subject, I think if I experienced RE7 on a lesser setup, it wouldn't of had the impact. Jack cutting off my leg in 4k/60hz/hdr is gruesome indeed! PSVR is crap, crap, crap. Tried it, and VERY unimpressed. Maybe in another gen or 2 they'll not have such crap hardware and graphics. What's the point of VR if it looks like shit? Admittedly, it'd be a game changer to have HDR tech in VR with big boy hardware to push it!
Log in to comment