@ermacness said:
@WESTBLADE:
The problem is that "user score" doesn't carry the same clout as an "official" score because of blatant biased views, and it's open for ANYONE to type a review, even to people who haven't played the game to people with other ulterior motives (if I spelled that correctly)
Of course there are haters/pretenders, who do all this kinda 0/10 shit, but there's also an exact opposite: blind fanboys who are determined to give it a 10 even before the game comes out.
And do you really believe the "oficial" reviews are not biased at all? Most of the time they don't even play the game the ''proper'' way - meaning playing it at easy difficulty, don't fully explore the game at all and even there are many cases when they don't even finish the game at all - many reviewers openely admitted it, review "deadline" being mostly being used as an excuse.
For example, give a hardcore sim racer that requires experienced player, to someone who plays only pure arcade racers, and he will dismiss it as a utter garbage. This happens in the "official score" world too, due to shortage of reviewers who are experienced in a specific genre - but that actually proves my point, i don't give a **** about strategy games, so they are all pretty much 2/10 by default for me, just because Starcraft II has a MC 93, i don't throw it around as an example of a ''godlike PC exclusive game'', because then i would be a pretender/stupid PC fanboy.
Log in to comment