Nintendo has the best overall exclusive lineup of the 3

@boxrekt: ? I'll give you an A for effort.

GoW, Bloodborne and Horizon are part of the same genres. Bloodborne and GoW play very similarly too. If you played them you'd know this, but you didn't so I'm very disappointed in you BoxRekt. I thought you were above petty fanboy arguments ?

@ArchoNils2: You're right, I hadn't played it so I didn't realize it wasn't turn based. Many JRPGs are so I just assumed. Looks like somebody didn't do their homework ?. I'll fix it

I agree.

Super Mario Odyssey and Breath of the Wild are part of the same genres. Jumping, running around and collecting things you'd know they play very similarly too.

If you played them you'd know this, It's sad to know that such a strong supporter of Nintendo games is actually a fakeboy who never even toughed them. ?

I didn't think you'd buy into system wars fanboy acts like this. ? Disappointed/10

I don't think that this was largely debated. As a matter of fact, it's widely believed that's what is partially keeping Nintendo afloat. It's the multiplats support that Nintendo is lacking.

They don't play similarly at all, BoTW is an RPG and Super Mario Odyssey is a platformer.

GoW and Bloodborne even have a similar control scheme with a level up system and all sorts of bosses. It's sad to see such a strong supporter of Sony games is actually a fakeboy who never even toughed them :(.

Disappointed wouldn't even begin to describe how I feel. -2/10, I need to reevaluate my expectations in our relationship moving forward.

Agreed, if you're 12 years old and younger. :o

Shudup, I kid. lol

Anyhooie, I'll take the X1X offerings 8 dayzz a week. :P

LOL @ Metacritic. Okay, if we use the "user score" of BotW it's 85, The Witcher 3 (PC) 94. Bayonetta 2 is 84, DmC 5 (PC) is 87.

Just because someone is paid for his opinion on a game doesn't mean it's actually a valid one. Or paid in advance to change his opinion by the publisher, lol. Since we are all here on Gamespot, maybe you should look up its former employee Jeff Gerstmann.

TL;DR: If you buy your games based solely on review scores, then you miss out on a ton of great games. Also the review copies are most of the time the rough, unpatched ones lacking critical fixes/content...

They don't play similarly at all Bloodborne is a JRPG and God of War is a hack n slash game.

BoTW and Mario Odyssey even have a similar control scheme with jumping and all sorts of bosses. It's sad to see such a strong supporter of Nintendo games is actually a fakeboy

You were rekt and exposed ? it was sad to see you making things up about games you pretended to play in your own thread.

Disappointed wouldn't even begin to describe how I feel. -20/10, I need to reevaluate my expectations in our relationship moving forward.

@WESTBLADE:

The problem is that "user score" doesn't carry the same clout as an "official" score because of blatant biased views, and it's open for ANYONE to type a review, even to people who haven't played the game to people with other ulterior motives (if I spelled that correctly)

No argument here.

Bloodborne is basically a western RPG made by a japanese dev, GoW has just as many RPG elements as Bloodborne does. The facts don't lie BoxRekt, unlike your fakeboy attitude which has lies written all over it ;).

Xenoblade is a true JRPG and highly rated (which is all that matters), unlike your made up genres.

BoxRekt, you wrote the book on getting rekt and exposed, and I'm not a fan of it. You've left me questioning the lower limits of humanity's capabilities. This relationship isn't salvageable, it isn't me it's you, I'm asking for a divorce. -9000/10.

Of course there are haters/pretenders, who do all this kinda 0/10 shit, but there's also an exact opposite: blind fanboys who are determined to give it a 10 even before the game comes out.

And do you really believe the "oficial" reviews are not biased at all? Most of the time they don't even play the game the ''proper'' way - meaning playing it at easy difficulty, don't fully explore the game at all and even there are many cases when they don't even finish the game at all - many reviewers openely admitted it, review "deadline" being mostly being used as an excuse.

For example, give a hardcore sim racer that requires experienced player, to someone who plays only pure arcade racers, and he will dismiss it as a utter garbage. This happens in the "official score" world too, due to shortage of reviewers who are experienced in a specific genre - but that actually proves my point, i don't give a **** about strategy games, so they are all pretty much 2/10 by default for me, just because Starcraft II has a MC 93, i don't throw it around as an example of a ''godlike PC exclusive game'', because then i would be a pretender/stupid PC fanboy.

Nothing like users that review bombs games on MC.

phantom5200 Mar 7, 2017

1

too much water Don't believe the hype. The world feels empty and unfinished like an early access game. Framerates are horrid on docked mode. I don ind low framerates but the random constant swings are too noticable. Looks like a ps3 era game so why is it so laggy?

They benefit from no real competition on that category. Microsoft's first party is mediocre until we start seeing with this new fleet of studios starts providing them, and Sony's first party has always been secretly mediocre. We're in 2019, and that console has had a whopping 2 exclusives worth a damn (Bloodborne and Dad of War), the rest were all skippable as hell.

Nintendo's design chops are certainly ace when they have their shit together, but Odyssey I would argue is a bit disappointing (albeit good), Smash Ultimate is a good fighting game, still not up to snuff with Melee, or close to it. We don't know if Astral Chain is good (tho it looks good), and it could be forever until Bayonetta 3, plus if it sticks to the Bayonetta 2's combat system, what a waste of a really good ip that series has become.

Splatoon is fun, arms is okay, mario n rabbids is solid if a bit too xcom lite. They can certainly do more n better on all fronts. Fire Emblem could go either way, I like some of the changes, hopefully it's not as boring as Awakening and Fates, and more in line with the better games in the franchise.

Yeah I'd agree. I'll be honest & say that the Switch has definitely turned me into a bit of a Nintendo fanboy.

That's what I said: t's first party. Nintendo paid for it, published it, owns the rights to the games it published. Persona is not.

Persona can appear on any platform SEGA wishes unlike Bayo 2 or 3 which would require Nintendo's blessings.

Yet it didnt appear and never appeared elsewhere. So its valid.