[QUOTE="HAZE-Unit"][QUOTE="JangoWuzHere"] In what I must ask?
JangoWuzHere
The gadgets, the sneaking missions, the controls were better and the story was also great, gameplay wise it was better becuase it had alot of unique and new ideas with each mission.The gadgets
explain because I only recall a few gadgets from the first SF and I never used the taser because I could simply just headshot everyone with a pistol.
the sneaking missions
If anything SF had some pretty broken stealth. Some of it was also trial and error and Theif came first by the way.
the controls were better
better then what?
the story was also great
Story was good but that does not make it ahead of its time. Their were games that had far greater storys then the game.
gameplay wise it was better becuase it had alot of unique and new ideas with each mission.
it was better then what?
I said SF was better than MGS and you asked better in what and I've answered so obviously I was comparing it to the first MGS game..duh. And it was a loooong time since I played the games and this is what I remember of the first SF, I liked it more than MGS, I can't go in detail becuase as I said I don't remember the details.
This is the best I could explain about the game.
Log in to comment