Microsofts Parity Clause. What a bunch of tools.

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Murderstyle75
Murderstyle75

4412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Murderstyle75
Member since 2011 • 4412 Posts

A developer has revealed that it must delay its multiplatform game on PlayStation 4, Vita and Wii U, or face being unable to release it on Xbox One due to Microsoft's "parity clause".

According to Eurogamer, Australian developer Witch Beam is encountering issues trying to get its twin stick shooter Assault Android Cactus on Microsoft's console.

The ID@Xbox programme requires games on the console to have "day one parity", meaning developers can only release their titles on Xbox One if they haven't already been released on other consoles.

Talking to Eurogamer, co-creator Sanatana Mishra said, "The simple answer is that our plans wouldn't meet the launch day parity requirement of the ID@Xbox program.

"We started development on our other console versions long before self-publishing was an option for Xbox One, and the only way we could meet that requirement would be to delay the other versions of Assault Android Cactus."

While a reprieve could have been found if Witch Beam had exclusivity deals in place before the ID@Xbox programme was announced, as Microsoft will work with studios on a case by case basis to consider waiving its rules in those instances, unfortunately this doesn't help the Assault Android Cactus team. Mishra explained they "didn't have an exclusivity agreement in place with another console platform before the ID@Xbox program was announced, which could have allowed us to get a waiver."

The full list of devs making use of the new programme was announced last week. While Microsoft has suggested the indie dev send through an application to get the game released anyway, Mishra concluded saying, "Overall I think think the ID program is very developer friendly and light years ahead of what Microsoft were doing even six months ago.

"But it's also coming in late with a clause that punishes those who have been developing on other platforms that were readily available for the past year, and that's something they need to fix before it's a viable option."

Source: http://www.ign.com/articles/2013/12/09/studio-must-delay-multiplatform-game-to-get-xbox-one-release

Avatar image for GrenadeLauncher
GrenadeLauncher

6843

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2  Edited By GrenadeLauncher
Member since 2004 • 6843 Posts

Bu bu but muh free Unity

Typical MS behaviour, no one should be shocked.

Avatar image for gameofthering
gameofthering

11286

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#3  Edited By gameofthering
Member since 2004 • 11286 Posts

If it was me I'd just release it on every other system possible. Try and teach them a lesson.

Avatar image for LanceSSJ
LanceSSJ

882

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 LanceSSJ
Member since 2003 • 882 Posts

I don't see the big deal lol. Sucks but release parity makes sense for the platforms. Quit bitchn

Avatar image for KungfuKitten
KungfuKitten

27389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#5  Edited By KungfuKitten
Member since 2006 • 27389 Posts

Just one of the many reasons why you never want MS to enter an industry that you love.
There's no place for them in gaming. Cut your losses MS and bail.

Avatar image for gensigns
gensigns

1495

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6  Edited By gensigns
Member since 2007 • 1495 Posts

You want the free goodies, you play by their rules. Pretty simple, actually.

Avatar image for NFJSupreme
NFJSupreme

6605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 NFJSupreme
Member since 2005 • 6605 Posts

So destiny isn't coming to Xbox then? Because it's coming out first on ps4.

Avatar image for KungfuKitten
KungfuKitten

27389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#8 KungfuKitten
Member since 2006 • 27389 Posts

@gensigns said:

You want the free goodies, you play by their rules. Pretty simple, actually.

Being a dick does make things easier.

Avatar image for YD_11
YD_11

1867

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#9 YD_11
Member since 2006 • 1867 Posts

Smart business play by ms. Is this much different than third party exclusives ? I think not

Avatar image for shawn30
shawn30

4409

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 shawn30
Member since 2006 • 4409 Posts

@LanceSSJ said:

I don't see the big deal lol. Sucks but release parity makes sense for the platforms. Quit bitchn

Same here. Its business. And MS already stated that on a case by case basis they will waive the clause. Its no big deal to me as at some point I expect this game will be on Xbox One.

Avatar image for urbansys
urbansys

235

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 urbansys
Member since 2003 • 235 Posts

Ohhh nooo a business protecting its self... you kids need to learn what the real would is like and stop crying over the "harsh" realities of BUSINESS.

This is a very smart move by MS.

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#12 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

Couldn't care less

Avatar image for KungfuKitten
KungfuKitten

27389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#13  Edited By KungfuKitten
Member since 2006 • 27389 Posts

@urbansys said:

Ohhh nooo a business protecting its self... you kids need to learn what the real would is like and stop crying over the "harsh" realities of BUSINESS.

This is a very smart move by MS.

Yeah I bet it took them a lot of thinking to come to this brilliant idea. Man. You should be employed.
I wonder why Sony and Nintendo are not doing the exact same thing. It must be their lack of sheer American brilliance.

Avatar image for withe1982
withe1982

450

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14  Edited By withe1982
Member since 2005 • 450 Posts

Could backfire massively for MS considering most indie developers we're developing for PS4 primarily before MS reversed it's policies. Basically they're acting like they're the big boy in the playground and If you want to play here you play by their rules. Would,'t be surprised if a few developers just bypass MS altogether.

Avatar image for Murderstyle75
Murderstyle75

4412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15  Edited By Murderstyle75
Member since 2011 • 4412 Posts

@NFJSupreme:

Of course there is exceptions since Microsoft is in no position to push Activision around.

Avatar image for urbansys
urbansys

235

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 urbansys
Member since 2003 • 235 Posts

@KungfuKitten said:

Just one of the many reasons why you never want MS to enter an industry that you love.

There's no place for them in gaming. Cut your losses MS and bail.

Ya I hate when Top 100 companies enter an industry i love for the sake of competition and better products...

You know these Devs have the choice of not releasing it on xbox right?

MS has pushed hard to be indie friendly, but bafons like you will never be satisfied.

Avatar image for Scipio8
Scipio8

937

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 Scipio8
Member since 2013 • 937 Posts

Its because these guys haven't signed a contract with Sony yet. If they had then it doesn't matter but because they haven't MS want the game released at least as the same time as other platforms. Sounds like a wise business decision to me.

Avatar image for locopatho
locopatho

24259

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 locopatho
Member since 2003 • 24259 Posts

Unfortunate when a small friendly indie dev gets hit with stuff like this but it's a pretty straightforward deal isn't it? "We publish your game, just make sure we get it first". Doesn't seem as "evil" as people are making out.

Avatar image for Telekill
Telekill

12061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#20 Telekill
Member since 2003 • 12061 Posts

Not that I'm buying this game or even care about its release, but I wonder how many games the X1 wouldn't be getting that other platforms would if all the devs just gave Microsoft the finger and left them in the dust due to this clause?

Avatar image for KungfuKitten
KungfuKitten

27389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#21 KungfuKitten
Member since 2006 • 27389 Posts

@urbansys said:

@KungfuKitten said:

Just one of the many reasons why you never want MS to enter an industry that you love.

There's no place for them in gaming. Cut your losses MS and bail.

Ya I hate when Top 100 companies enter an industry i love for the sake of competition and better products...

You know these Devs have the choice of not releasing it on xbox right?

MS has pushed hard to be indie friendly, but bafons like you will never be satisfied.

Right this is extremely indie friendly. They sound very pleased. Top 100 companies are wonderful competitors because the way to the top in capitalism is to mean well and to care for the industry and consumer.

Avatar image for NFJSupreme
NFJSupreme

6605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 NFJSupreme
Member since 2005 • 6605 Posts

So are Sony dbags for securing destiny as a timed exclusive? I don't get you guys sometimes. The console business is very competitive so all companies in it do things like this.

Avatar image for edidili
edidili

3449

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23  Edited By edidili
Member since 2004 • 3449 Posts

@farrell2k said:

anyway, Microsoft never planned to allow indie development until the consumer backlash.

No idea what this means to be honest. Not allow indie development? Are we forgetting indie games on consoles became a thing on xbox live arcade, years ago. Way before Sony deciding to come out and declare their love for indies too as the copy-cat that they are.

The consumer backlash was because of some harsh policies, it was not because MS was supposedly not allowing indie development.

Avatar image for Hexagon_777
Hexagon_777

20348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24  Edited By Hexagon_777
Member since 2007 • 20348 Posts

@urbansys said:

Ohhh nooo a business protecting its self... you kids need to learn what the real would is like and stop crying over the "harsh" realities of BUSINESS.

This is a very smart move by MS.

Accepting things as they are instead of making things better = Pathetic. Bend over for the "real world" as much as you like, brah.

Avatar image for Shewgenja
Shewgenja

21456

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#25 Shewgenja
Member since 2009 • 21456 Posts

Bu-Bu-Bu teh competitionz is good for teh gamorz.

That's what some of ya'll were saying, right? Steambox can't steamroll this XBox bullshit out of gaming fast enough.

Avatar image for StormyJoe
StormyJoe

7806

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#26  Edited By StormyJoe
Member since 2011 • 7806 Posts

@Murderstyle75:

I am sure Sony has a similar clause...

Avatar image for TheTruthIsREAL
TheTruthIsREAL

813

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 TheTruthIsREAL
Member since 2013 • 813 Posts

Microsoft should be ashamed. Here is Sony with no restrictions to how they release their games n Microsoft is just so fucking selfish... Who makes this up? You have to release your game on our platform at least the same time as other releases but timed exclusive deals are okay tho.... Like really

Avatar image for locopatho
locopatho

24259

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 locopatho
Member since 2003 • 24259 Posts

@Shewgenja said:

Bu-Bu-Bu teh competitionz is good for teh gamorz.

That's what some of ya'll were saying, right? Steambox can't steamroll this XBox bullshit out of gaming fast enough.

Yes, it clearly is good.

You do know that Microsoft are the ones that brought indie games to consoles? Xbox Live Arcade and Xbox Live Indie Games were two innovations of the Xbox 360 that Sony flat out copied. Which is terrific, it enhances gaming for everyone.

Stop the cancerous hateful fanboy bullshit, if you never had Xbox then PS4 wouldn't be getting awesome indie and PC titles.

Avatar image for gensigns
gensigns

1495

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29  Edited By gensigns
Member since 2007 • 1495 Posts

@TheTruthIsREAL said:

Microsoft should be ashamed. Here is Sony with no restrictions to how they release their games n Microsoft is just so fucking selfish... Who makes this up? You have to release your game on our platform at least the same time as other releases but timed exclusive deals are okay tho.... Like really

So fucking selfish they give away dev kits for nothing and expect the games to be released on the same date as other versions.

Who makes this up.. like really

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33784

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33784 Posts

@edidili said:

@farrell2k said:

anyway, Microsoft never planned to allow indie development until the consumer backlash.

No idea what this means to be honest. Not allow indie development? Are we forgetting indie games on consoles became a thing on xbox live arcade, years ago. Way before Sony deciding to come out and declare their love for indies too as the copy-cat that they are.

The consumer backlash was because of some harsh policies, it was not because MS was supposedly not allowing indie development.

There have been Indies in PS consoles before the xbox brand even existed,what in hell do you think Net Yaroze was.?

Basically a black PS1 consoles that double as dev kit and was aimed at Indies.

This is how sad some of you are and how some actually think that MS started everything in consoles,much like the believe that halo make FPS popular on consoles..

Avatar image for urbansys
urbansys

235

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 urbansys
Member since 2003 • 235 Posts

@KungfuKitten said:

@urbansys said:

@KungfuKitten said:

Just one of the many reasons why you never want MS to enter an industry that you love.

There's no place for them in gaming. Cut your losses MS and bail.

Ya I hate when Top 100 companies enter an industry i love for the sake of competition and better products...

You know these Devs have the choice of not releasing it on xbox right?

MS has pushed hard to be indie friendly, but bafons like you will never be satisfied.

Right this is extremely indie friendly. They sound very pleased. Top 100 companies are wonderful competitors because the way to the top in capitalism is to mean well and to care for the industry and consumer.

MS must be doing something right at number 35....http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune500/2013/full_list/index.html?iid=F500_sp_full

You don't get that high with bad customer service and care for the industry.... Your personal opinion and feelings for MS reflects a very small %....

Also here is a link showing Indie devs are warming up to MS despite your claims

http://www.theverge.com/2013/12/4/5151428/xbox-one-vs-ps4-next-gen-indie-games

Avatar image for urbansys
urbansys

235

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 urbansys
Member since 2003 • 235 Posts

@Hexagon_777 said:

@urbansys said:

Ohhh nooo a business protecting its self... you kids need to learn what the real would is like and stop crying over the "harsh" realities of BUSINESS.

This is a very smart move by MS.

Accepting things as they are instead of making things better = Pathetic. Bend over for the "real world" as much as you like, brah.

Make things better??? It is not like MS has made these devs sign a no compete. They receive free dev kits and support and in turn MS only ask that they release multi plats at the same time.....

Avatar image for mems_1224
mems_1224

56919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 mems_1224
Member since 2004 • 56919 Posts

Who cares?

Avatar image for KungfuKitten
KungfuKitten

27389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#35  Edited By KungfuKitten
Member since 2006 • 27389 Posts

@urbansys said:

@KungfuKitten said:

@urbansys said:

@KungfuKitten said:

Just one of the many reasons why you never want MS to enter an industry that you love.

There's no place for them in gaming. Cut your losses MS and bail.

Ya I hate when Top 100 companies enter an industry i love for the sake of competition and better products...

You know these Devs have the choice of not releasing it on xbox right?

MS has pushed hard to be indie friendly, but bafons like you will never be satisfied.

Right this is extremely indie friendly. They sound very pleased. Top 100 companies are wonderful competitors because the way to the top in capitalism is to mean well and to care for the industry and consumer.

MS must be doing something right at number 35....http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune500/2013/full_list/index.html?iid=F500_sp_full

You don't get that high with bad customer service and care for the industry.... Your personal opinion and feelings for MS reflects a very small %....

Also here is a link showing Indie devs are warming up to MS despite your claims

http://www.theverge.com/2013/12/4/5151428/xbox-one-vs-ps4-next-gen-indie-games

Yeah AT&T is an exemplary company. If a company is that 'successful' (i.e. makes that much money off of the backs of people) it is exactly because they are abusing their position, confusing the consumers and using loopholes and children in 3rd world countries and every other dirty trick in the book. That is how you save money and beat your competition. By not caring about anything other than making a profit and standing for nothing, being completely unreliable as a business partner. Cutting corners, betraying people and lying through your teeth is a way cheaper solution to problems than doing things right, so the companies ending up on top are just the companies that are best at doing things wrong. If you want to compete honestly, you're not going to make that list. If you value anything like the law or ethics or even your mission statement than you're not going to do well. Your competition uses slave labour you better do the same thing or you're going to be out of business.

The link about indie devs is hilarious. We got this statistic of more people signing up after we forced their hand, they are really loving us! ::fake smile and thumbs up::

Avatar image for Merex760
Merex760

4381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#36  Edited By Merex760
Member since 2008 • 4381 Posts

What a joke. There goes indie support for XB1.

Avatar image for blackace
blackace

23576

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#37 blackace
Member since 2002 • 23576 Posts

@NFJSupreme said:

So destiny isn't coming to Xbox then? Because it's coming out first on ps4.

It'll come out on both systems at the same time. lol!!

Avatar image for hiphops_savior
hiphops_savior

8535

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 2

#38 hiphops_savior
Member since 2007 • 8535 Posts

Nintendo does crap like this, and publishers tell them to shove it and leave. Microsoft does this, and it gets praised as clever?