Metal Gear Solid 6 or Resident Evil 8?

Which will come out sooner?

Are Konami seriously going to make another one without Kojima.

I hope not.

I don't think so and even if they do it would flop. MGS is a dead franchise without Kojima.

Resident Evil 3.

Resident Evil 2 already hints at it and a rumor has been circulating.

Similar to the way that Capcom made lots of Resident Evil games without Shinji Mikami, I'm pretty sure Konami will make new Metal Gear Solid games.(Survive was a spin off so it doesn't count here)

MGS V TPP was successful and they still have majority of the talents behind that game in Konami Digital Entertainment.

Most highly it will be a mid budget game.(AA game)

I don't know where the MGS can go without kojima.

Resident evil 3 remake will be just RE2 remake featuring jill. waste of time

on other hand i really want MGS1 Remake. thats going to be amazing if done right.

Both especially now that Kojima has left and MGS can finally have somewhat of a consistent narrative/story/the overall game design. The mechanics are already solid in MGS V so they just have to build from that.

Good gollys.

Well, RE3 was my least favourite among the classic RE games, so I wouldn't mind if they skip it.

MGS1 already had a remake with The Twin Snakes. I'd rather see 3D remakes of the original 8-bit MSX2 games Metal Gear and Metal Gear 2: Solid Snake. Which would be timely, as they'd essentially be sequels to MGSV.

RE:CV remake.

Skyrim Remake.

Morrowinf Remake.

Skyrim Remake.

Gran Turismo remake.

I think this more-so than 2 would have benefited from the remake. The whole idea of RPG like decision making was great but very limited. And Nemesis himself almost solely as the boss got very repetitive. Carlos Oliveira role was rather limited as well, expanding him to a full A/B campaign would welcome.

I preferred the decision-making approach of RE1. It seems like RE3 went for a more visual-novel-like approach, selecting from a set of choices in cutscenes. Whereas RE1 had a more gameplay-oriented approach, with your decisions outside of cutscenes affecting how the plot unfolds. And it felt like RE1's decisions had more narrative weight to them, determining the fates of characters and who makes it out alive.

But otherwise, yeah. I agree RE3 would benefit more from a remake than RE2 did. There's a lot more room for improvement in RE3's case.

Death stranding Is metal gear solid 6

Just not chronologically. And with some copy right loop holes since he's no longer with konami lol

@tohot240:

Better yet, Resident Evil 3 Remake. That's what I'm looking forward to!

I would imagine that Resident Evil 8 will definitely come out before Metal Gear Solid 6. Given the current state of Konami I really can’t see them developing MGS6 any time soon especially without Kojima.

I don't know if you remember this Since you probably played this game long ago, but I played RE 3 one year ago and it did have some multiple paths that weren't told to players:

For example:

1. you can meet carlos either in that Bar or that building near the bar.

2.Nikolai can die in multiple areas(Either in that garage or that part where zombies break the glass)23

3.that hospital level had multiple paths with different cutscenes which the game never tells you about it.

Resident evil 8, Capcom has been on a roll!

As for metal gear I would rather have them reboot it or leave it alone. 4 ended snakes story quite nicely I think.

RE3 remake.

I don't remember the second one, but I remember the first and the third. But yeah, it's been a long time, so there's plenty I've forgotten about it.

Still, I remember being disappointed with how there wasn't really much difference between the endings in RE3. Your decisions didn't really seem to matter much in the end, as it's already pre-determined who lives and dies, regardless of your decisions. In some ways, RE3's choices were like most RPGs, in the sense that your choices don't really mean much in the end.

Whereas in RE1, there was more weight to your choices, as it determines who lives and dies, and who survives in the endings. RE1's choices were more subtle, yet more meaningful. And the choices were entirely gameplay-driven, rather than cutscene-driven, with no signposting whatsoever. I actually prefer the way RE1 handled choices & consequences over most RPGs, to be honest. Yet, despite RE1 being popular, it doesn't really get much credit for its choices & consequences.

RE98

er

Better misspelled honestly

But yeah RE8

I would like a remaster of MGS1 or 3 with the new fox engine. I would not trust mgs6 without Kojima.

If RE8 is first person I won't be buying it. MGS5 wasn't that good. I can see them making a better game than that with the right devs.

Konami doesn't make AAA games anymore so RE8 no contest.

I can't think of a worse idea than doing a Metal Gear solid game without Kojima. His uber-fans would reject the game wholly. Plus I could see Konami skimping on the budget since their auteur is gone now.

Final Fantasy 8 Remake will make me very happy

A new Resident Evil game

RE8 might be a while, Capcom is on a remaster track for RE, Nemesis is next. Konami can't really make a MGS game without Kojima, at least not one that'll please fans, but I don't see that stopping them from trying.

Since anything Konami makes without Kojima is destined to fail simply by virtue of fan loyalty, a major pivot is needed, I say they need to partner with other studios/publishers, give it to Ubisoft or something, Splinter Cell games were better games in that they were made to be played like games and not criminal levels of exposition crammed into them.