Lens Of Truth PS3 Battlefield 3 Beta vs. Killzone 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Blazerdt47
Blazerdt47

5671

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Blazerdt47
Member since 2004 • 5671 Posts

Well Lens Of Truth is at it again, here you go. It's clear that Killzone 3 is a graphical beast.

Lens Of Truth PS3 Battlefield 3 vs. Killzone 3

http://www.lensoftruth.com/head2head-battlefield-3-ps3-beta-vs-killzone-3-analysis/

Avatar image for Messiahbolical-
Messiahbolical-

5670

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Messiahbolical-
Member since 2009 • 5670 Posts
Killzone 3 looked amazing, especially in 3D. But I honestly prefer the look of Killzone 2 over it. Killzone 2 has the best graphics on consoles IMO. Maybe Killzone 3 is more advanced on the technical side of things, but I like Killzone 2's overly exaggerated special effects and motion blur, along with it's dark gritty feel. It just looks epic when you're playing it. :) And yes, I played Crysis 2 and no I wasn't too impressed. It ran like crap at times with so many framerate drops compared to Killzone 3 which ran buttery smooth and honestly it just didn't look as good anyways(had worse animations, the gun models looked worse, and it ran at a lower resolution to top it off). It might be a slightly more advanced engine-wise, but who really cares about that? It's all about the looks and the performance and Killzone 2-3 are unmatched on console FPS.
Avatar image for percech
percech

5237

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 percech
Member since 2011 • 5237 Posts
and which one is the duller game? KZ3.
Avatar image for Ravirr
Ravirr

7931

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#4 Ravirr
Member since 2004 • 7931 Posts

beta vs real product

I lol'd

Avatar image for rich-sac
rich-sac

420

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 rich-sac
Member since 2011 • 420 Posts

and which one is the duller game? KZ3.percech

COD health (BF3) will never beat Killzone games

Avatar image for rich-sac
rich-sac

420

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 rich-sac
Member since 2011 • 420 Posts

Killzone 3 looked amazing, especially in 3D. But I honestly prefer the look of Killzone 2 over it. Killzone 2 has the best graphics on consoles IMO. Maybe Killzone 3 is more advanced on the technical side of things, but I like Killzone 2's overly exaggerated special effects and motion blur, along with it's dark gritty feel. It just looks epic when you're playing it. :) And yes, I played Crysis 2 and no I wasn't too impressed. It ran like crap at times with so many framerate drops compared to Killzone 3 which ran buttery smooth and honestly it just didn't look as good anyways(had worse animations, the gun models looked worse, and it ran at a lower resolution to top it off). It might be a slightly more advanced engine-wise, but who really cares about that? It's all about the looks and the performance and Killzone 2-3 are unmatched on console FPS. Messiahbolical-

KZ2 technically > KZ3. KZ3 just looks sharper and have better polygons, draw distance because of what they sacrificed from KZ2. gun muzzle fire dont cast shadows anymore, smoke, explosions, shrapnel are tuned down, max player count cut, motion blur decreased, smaller levels, etc. I think KZ2 with MLAA would be the console graphics king

Avatar image for walkingdream
walkingdream

4883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 walkingdream
Member since 2009 • 4883 Posts

BF3 64 players, on ultra with jets, tanks ect...

just doesn't compare with KZ3

Avatar image for 2Chalupas
2Chalupas

7284

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#8 2Chalupas
Member since 2009 • 7284 Posts

These comparisons are just getting dumber.

Lets just compare a beta and finished product of two completely random and different games.:roll:

Avatar image for Promised_Trini
Promised_Trini

3651

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 Promised_Trini
Member since 2008 • 3651 Posts

and which one is the duller game? KZ3.percech

Have you ever played the game?.Or just hate it for no reason like most people on SW?.

Avatar image for soapandbubbles
soapandbubbles

3412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 soapandbubbles
Member since 2010 • 3412 Posts

These comparisons are just getting dumber.

Lets just compare a beta and finished product of two completely random and different games.:roll:

2Chalupas
how are they different? it's common sense or rather logical to compare both being military First person shooters. Chill! (obviously different in characters, design, etc)
Avatar image for soapandbubbles
soapandbubbles

3412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 soapandbubbles
Member since 2010 • 3412 Posts

[QUOTE="percech"]and which one is the duller game? KZ3.Promised_Trini

Have you ever played the game?.Or just hate it for no reason like most people on SW?.

agreed K3 is good...more FPS need the slide to cover mechanic..it's so neat. Sadly K3 fell short story/design-wise. Didn't like the levels or characters.
Avatar image for Promised_Trini
Promised_Trini

3651

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#12 Promised_Trini
Member since 2008 • 3651 Posts

[QUOTE="Promised_Trini"]

[QUOTE="percech"]and which one is the duller game? KZ3.soapandbubbles

Have you ever played the game?.Or just hate it for no reason like most people on SW?.

agreed K3 is good...more FPS need the slide to cover mechanic..it's so neat. Sadly K3 fell short story/design-wise. Didn't like the levels or characters.

I'll agree on the story wise part.