Really enjoyed it. Love the era, the story, the style. But game of the gen? Not for me. It felt like the first in what could have been a great series. If they improved on some things along the way it might have been one of my favourite series.
1. Open world: Either it has a use or it doesn't. Felt unnecessary here. I wouldn't personally take it away (because I love open world), just make it far more purposeful. Lots more collectibles/side quests etc.
2. It's hard to get the investigation side right but I feel that this could have been tightened up. Essentially you knew if you'd done something wrong straight away, and the search part, it just about told you when you'd done all you could. Point?
3. Action scenes felt largely unnecessary at times.
The latest Sherlock Holmes game improves on the investigation side for me, it was still a tad on the easy side but that's besides the point. It had puzzles that actually felt necessary, intuition, a branching investigation method. Love me some Sherlock Holmes and I love that game.
If they ever did revisit the franchise I'd take a fictional city over a real one, just for ease of making the open world more interesting and the world events less tied to real life. I'd take a look at how the other rockstar games manage to open world without adding a GTA style anarchy to the mix.
Log in to comment