Killzone: Shadow Fall vs. Ryse: Son of Rome

Both look great but I think KZ has a slight edge.

Those Killzone screens from Neogaf are crazy

I like the Art style of Ryse Son of Rome.

Stop posting prerendred cutscene shots of Ryse, the ingame graphics has worse lighting and shadowing. KZ still edges it even at rendering 40% more pixels.

@FreedomFreeLife: Ryse. No doubt about it.

Killzone>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ryse

Ryse is more comparable to AC4 on PS4.

DF disagrees so I will too. Anyways, Isn't it time for you to start hyping UC4 since Crapzone failed to dethrone Crysis 3/BF4 or even touch them?

cutscenes? i took it from gameplay...its all in game, no cutscenes, its all in there, gameplay too.

Killzone: Shadow Fall

Ryse:Son of Rome

Don't mind gpuking he's eternally insecure and butthurt that KZ isn't the stellar franchise he hypes it up to be.

glad to see everyone is choosing Killzone.

Someone can't read the poll results properly it seems

@FreedomFreeLife said:

I see you have an agenda... good for you I guess.

LOL @ posting non gameplay

The OP did it right... was fair and unbiased.... showed some nice screens of both games in action.... but KILLZONE wins. It's better looking to anyone without fanboy goggles on. Ryse has a slight fuzziness to it... due to 720p vs Killzones 1080p

but both games are pleasing to the eye.

Killzone is the better game of the 2 though.

In alternate reality may be but in this world Ryse towers over KZ:SF. :P

Nah, he doesn't care about KZ, I wouldn't be surprise if he just rented the game. Make a simple word game a Sony exclusive and he will start touting it having the best graphics ever with throwing around terms he can't even pronounce right.

Ryse renders at 1600x900p with 1920x1080p native frame buffer for the AA stage i.e. more pixels for AA.

Read http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2013-09-30-crytek-boss-discusses-xbox-one-exclusive-ryses-900p-resolution

"Ryse runs at 1600x900 for best perf & res, we apply our upscaler for AA, framebuffer native 1080p"

Ryse look sbetter graphically, but killzone is probably the better game, being all scorign a higher number and all. Sicne this thread did not ask which is the better game, but which 'looked' better, its definitely Ryse.

Is this the new gamespot forum tradition, comparing games that have absolutely nothing in common at all?

Whats next tetris vs world of warcraft?

Both look great but I like the look of Kz a bit more. Ryse looks its best during cutscenes while the game play looks not as detailed. Ryse does look great though so I'm not downplaying that.

It's late 2013 and people still use crappy ass compressed JPGs...seriously now? I only use uncompressed PNGs for games I take pics of because they won't look like s***, if you want a fair comparison, here's one, all in game as well, all from me for Ryse, and right click to view image to see their proper quality:

Here's some from Killzone I took as well:

I picked to Ryse to rustle some jimmies :3

Killzone has slightly better graphics. If I were a lem I would be embarassed to even compare them. Killzone is more open, has destructibility and still has better graphics. Ryse is a very linear QTE fest.

@mitu123: folks thank you for the pics LIKE I SAID BEFORE RYSE IS A GEN ABOVE KILLZONE it shows that 900p vs 1080p don't matter and that dumbass 1.3 tf vs 1.8tf don't mean shyt. Another thing if they are only using 1.3tf for RYSE and they can upclock to 1.9tf on the x1 and yes it can just imagine how the rest of this gen is gonna be. Im not bashing killzone at all its a great looking game really nice also but RYSE something else.

Since I have both and can answer truthfully, honestly and from the heart, Killzone is the better game.

Someone seems jelly. :)

@Heil68: better looking? naw I don't think so

Killzone 4: Shadowfall edges out Ryse: Son of Rome.

the only pic in the KZ part from the OP that has a gun ready and a HUD is the 4th one. And the face doesn't look great, jaggies are everywhere (but honestly not a big deal to me) armor looks nice but the cloak looks bad. IDK how anyone can say it looks better then ryse. the environments are pretty but the character models are not better looking then we've seen on the PS3/360

You should learn to read polls or troll better

Eh, it's a toss up.

Not when DF declares Ryse the winner. :D

I was going to add that if I really cared I could probably compare them and find a winner...but I don't really care

no next gen games come close to KZ and to even compete the game needs to be,,,, you know,,,,, 1080p.

Neither do I but I love to rub it in the faces of cows after all the tall claims of KZ:SF 'KILLZOWING' Crysis 3.

BF4

DF disagrees. There's Ryse and then up in the ladder Crysis 2, BF3, BF4 > Crysis 3.

i have it and its far from looking as good. bf4 has a lot of shitty textures because its much more open and actually have good physics. for that reason its not 'better' looking but may be as technically impressive.

@zeeshanhaider: DF gave a bone to Xbone. If it wasn't Ryse, what exactly is impressive on that brand new five hundred dollars system? Nothing. Lems should thank DF.

I have both aswell and BF4 easily beats KZ:SF in the looks department, and destroys it in the tech and gameplay departments.

May be DF did and may be lems should thank DF but as of now industry's analysts have place Ryse above KZ:SF.

dude you need to pay attention to textures and lighting. kz decapitates it and of course gameplay is MUUUUUUCH better in bf4, that's not even a thing. vaseline layer alone makes bf4 look way less impressive because even 'if' it did have kz kind of textures, it wouldn't be noticeable cuz its blurry.

Wait, which version of BF4 are you guys talking about?

I'm assuming that since he claims to be a PC gamer he was talking about the PC version.

I definitely think KZ looks better and has a larger scale.

Pretty great that it's only a launch game.

I own both as well. I feel that Ryse is the better game of the two. Killzone started out "open" and then got just as linear as Ryse. But what killed Shadow Fall for me was some of the design choices. Pretty much everything after Chapter 6 was a chore to complete. Carrying around those power generators was a real drag. Ryse graphics wise looks better than Killzone to me as well. I mean the changes in facial expressions are just crazy. And the gameplay is no more repetitive than the FPS genre now a days. Killzone wins the multiplayer award though. Ryse is fun for a little bit, but 2 player co op loses it's sizzle after a while.