This topic is locked from further discussion.
imo, but some of the textures needs work. But my biggest problem with KZ2 is the AI. I've seen most vids and the AI looks retarded, they just stand there doin nothing. After almost 4 years of development Guerrilla must have come up with some good ai wouldnt you think. Some may is its a work-in-progress game, but i've seen countless of w.i.p. games with better ai than KZ2. I seriously hope they boost the enemy AI.acekall
http://www.n4g.com/tech/News-172489.aspx
[QUOTE="acekall"]imo, but some of the textures needs work. But my biggest problem with KZ2 is the AI. I've seen most vids and the AI looks retarded, they just stand there doin nothing. After almost 4 years of development Guerrilla must have come up with some good ai wouldnt you think. Some may is its a work-in-progress game, but i've seen countless of w.i.p. games with better ai than KZ2. I seriously hope they boost the enemy AI.Conjuredevil
http://www.n4g.com/tech/News-172489.aspx
That's for the Demo they showed us -_- Wow...
[QUOTE="Conjuredevil"][QUOTE="acekall"]imo, but some of the textures needs work. But my biggest problem with KZ2 is the AI. I've seen most vids and the AI looks retarded, they just stand there doin nothing. After almost 4 years of development Guerrilla must have come up with some good ai wouldnt you think. Some may is its a work-in-progress game, but i've seen countless of w.i.p. games with better ai than KZ2. I seriously hope they boost the enemy AI.ChrnoTrigger
http://www.n4g.com/tech/News-172489.aspx
That's for the Demo they showed us -_- Wow...
instead of toning down the AI they could've been playing in god-mode like most gamedevs do for a presentation. It gives people better impressions of the game instead of retarded ai.
[QUOTE="ChrnoTrigger"][QUOTE="Conjuredevil"][QUOTE="acekall"]imo, but some of the textures needs work. But my biggest problem with KZ2 is the AI. I've seen most vids and the AI looks retarded, they just stand there doin nothing. After almost 4 years of development Guerrilla must have come up with some good ai wouldnt you think. Some may is its a work-in-progress game, but i've seen countless of w.i.p. games with better ai than KZ2. I seriously hope they boost the enemy AI.acekall
http://www.n4g.com/tech/News-172489.aspx
That's for the Demo they showed us -_- Wow...
instead of toning down the AI they could've been playing in god-mode like most gamedevs do for a presentation. It gives people better impressions of the game instead of retarded ai.
could be an excuse too
It does, but there will be alot of people that disagree with you.mustaf_nur89
[QUOTE="acekall"][QUOTE="ChrnoTrigger"][QUOTE="Conjuredevil"][QUOTE="acekall"]imo, but some of the textures needs work. But my biggest problem with KZ2 is the AI. I've seen most vids and the AI looks retarded, they just stand there doin nothing. After almost 4 years of development Guerrilla must have come up with some good ai wouldnt you think. Some may is its a work-in-progress game, but i've seen countless of w.i.p. games with better ai than KZ2. I seriously hope they boost the enemy AI.Conjuredevil
http://www.n4g.com/tech/News-172489.aspx
That's for the Demo they showed us -_- Wow...
instead of toning down the AI they could've been playing in god-mode like most gamedevs do for a presentation. It gives people better impressions of the game instead of retarded ai.
could be an excuse too
I think it's an excuse, i don't even know what do people see in this game, so far i have seen nothing special or new, just the fps cover.
I find Resistance 2 way more impressive and excited then KZ2, so far what i have seen from KZ2 im not buying it, it looks like a generic fps with a similar crapy aim as the first one while Resistance 2 has an amazing art and atmosphere, stunning boss fights and battles.
Watch this video, this is far more epic then KZ2
http://www.insidegamer.nl/playstation3/resistance2/videos/8101
[QUOTE="mustaf_nur89"]It does, but there will be alot of people that disagree with you.MojondeVACA
What i really meant was, there will be alot of biased opinions.
IgorVitaly, if you're going to use gifs, don't use them against KZ2 :P
Sorry KZ2 always will have the best gifs :)
[QUOTE="MojondeVACA"][QUOTE="mustaf_nur89"]It does, but there will be alot of people that disagree with you.mustaf_nur89
What i really meant was, there willbe alot of biased opinions.
[QUOTE="mustaf_nur89"][QUOTE="MojondeVACA"][QUOTE="mustaf_nur89"]It does, but there will be alot of people that disagree with you.MojondeVACA
What i really meant was, there willbe alot of biased opinions.
Exactly :|
Nice KZ2 gifs, they clearly shows Gears 2 looks better, eve nlighting wise and effect wise!IgorVitaly
I always thought the dim lighting is for the whole feel of the scene, seeing as the game is set on a planet called helghast, and not Earth like Gears.
Nice KZ2 gifs, they clearly shows Gears 2 looks better, eve nlighting wise and effect wise!
IgorVitaly
And OMG at the KZ2 overbloom, I thought that was a last-gen thing.
[QUOTE="IgorVitaly"]Nice KZ2 gifs, they clearly shows Gears 2 looks better, eve nlighting wise and effect wise!mustaf_nur89
I always thought the dim lighting is for the whole feel of the scene, seeing as the game is set on a planet called helghast, and not Earth like Gears.
Doesnt mather, the Gears 2 lighting is more intense in a realistic way aswell as revealing the surrounding details.
[QUOTE="IgorVitaly"]Nice KZ2 gifs, they clearly shows Gears 2 looks better, eve nlighting wise and effect wise!mustaf_nur89
I always thought the dim lighting is for the whole feel of the scene, seeing as the game is set on a planet called helghast, and not Earth like Gears.
[QUOTE="mustaf_nur89"][QUOTE="IgorVitaly"]Nice KZ2 gifs, they clearly shows Gears 2 looks better, eve nlighting wise and effect wise!IgorVitaly
I always thought the dim lighting is for the whole feel of the scene, seeing as the game is set on a planet called helghast, and not Earth like Gears.
Doesnt mather, the Gears 2 lighting is more intense in a realistic way aswell as revealing the surrounding details.
Well if we're down to minor lighting differences, lets just leave it at both games have great graphics. :|
[QUOTE="IgorVitaly"][QUOTE="mustaf_nur89"][QUOTE="IgorVitaly"]Nice KZ2 gifs, they clearly shows Gears 2 looks better, eve nlighting wise and effect wise!mustaf_nur89
I always thought the dim lighting is for the whole feel of the scene, seeing as the game is set on a planet called helghast, and not Earth like Gears.
Doesnt mather, the Gears 2 lighting is more intense in a realistic way aswell as revealing the surrounding details.
Well if we're down to minor lighting differences, lets just leave it at both games have great graphics. :|
They do look good both of them.... well not in all areas but they are for consoles. Though there is nothing making KZ2 excel infront of Gears 2... if anything its the reverse!
[QUOTE="mustaf_nur89"][QUOTE="IgorVitaly"][QUOTE="mustaf_nur89"][QUOTE="IgorVitaly"]Nice KZ2 gifs, they clearly shows Gears 2 looks better, eve nlighting wise and effect wise!IgorVitaly
I always thought the dim lighting is for the whole feel of the scene, seeing as the game is set on a planet called helghast, and not Earth like Gears.
Doesnt mather, the Gears 2 lighting is more intense in a realistic way aswell as revealing the surrounding details.
Well if we're down to minor lighting differences, lets just leave it at both games have great graphics. :|
They do look good both of them.... well not in all areas but they are for consoles. Though there is nothing making KZ2 excel infront of Gears 2... if anything its the reverse!
:P ok if u say so
Dude take off your fanboy goggles, it's not even in the same plane of existence as Gears 2 FACT.
TPS's>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>FPS's
FACT
They both look great! The difference is GeOW is a classic and the first Killzone was horrible, I never understand why this is not brought up more?Khansoul
True, this is why im hesitant to buy Killzone 2, i may as well find a copy of the first game before i play KZ2 i wouldnt know wtf is going on otherwise
Dude take off your fanboy goggles, it's not even in the same plane of existence as Gears 2 FACT.
TPS's>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>FPS's
FACT
TriggerheartEx
lul what? i think u still got your goggles on :|
[QUOTE="TriggerheartEx"]Dude take off your fanboy goggles, it's not even in the same plane of existence as Gears 2 FACT.
TPS's>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>FPS's
FACT
mustaf_nur89
lul what? i think u still got your goggles on :|
Gears games are about detail and massive amounts of it. It's not just the graphics it's the art direction also, TPS games look much better than FPS in my opinion, there is more stuff on screen, and just much more going on in a game like Gears. Did you see some of the campaign footage? There is NOTHING like it. A game like K2 has been done a thousand times, sure it looks realistic I'll give you that, but there is no detail, it looks blurry as he'll.
[QUOTE="mustaf_nur89"][QUOTE="TriggerheartEx"]Dude take off your fanboy goggles, it's not even in the same plane of existence as Gears 2 FACT.
TPS's>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>FPS's
FACT
TriggerheartEx
lul what? i think u still got your goggles on :|
Gears games are about detail and massive amounts of it. It's not just the graphics it's the art direction also, TPS games look much better than FPS in my opinion, there is more stuff on screen, and just much more going on in a game like Gears. Did you see some of the campaign footage? There is NOTHING like it. A game like K2 has been done a thousand times, sure it looks realistic I'll give you that, but there is no detail, it looks blurry as he'll.
k kool, your opinion, just dont thro a caps FACT in there next time...
instead of toning down the AI they could've been playing in god-mode like most gamedevs do for a presentation. It gives people better impressions of the game instead of retarded ai. acekall
But then the complaint would be the game looked too easy......you lose either way.
[QUOTE="acekall"]
instead of toning down the AI they could've been playing in god-mode like most gamedevs do for a presentation. It gives people better impressions of the game instead of retarded ai. darthogre
But then the complaint would be the game looked too easy......you lose either way.
no because we would a least get an idea how the ai works while the devs explainthe play in god-mode.
They both look great! The difference is GeOW is a classic and the first Killzone was horrible, I never understand why this is not brought up more?Khansoul
Because the 2nd game was much better, so the 3rd game looks to improve upon that .
[QUOTE="Khansoul"]They both look great! The difference is GeOW is a classic and the first Killzone was horrible, I never understand why this is not brought up more?Gunblade20
Because the 2nd game was much better, so the 3rd game looks to improve upon that .
Are you guys desperate enough to count the PSP title as the 2nd game? Geez you're in worse shape than I thought.
[QUOTE="Gunblade20"][QUOTE="Khansoul"]They both look great! The difference is GeOW is a classic and the first Killzone was horrible, I never understand why this is not brought up more?Khansoul
Because the 2nd game was much better, so the 3rd game looks to improve upon that .
Are you guys desperate enough to count the PSP title as the 2nd game? Geez you're in worse shape than I thought.
Not only that, but the PSP game wasn't even an FPS
Killzone 2 looks better. But will it play better?thrones
gameplay !!!! hhmmm thats something i will discover once the game gets released and i get my copy... however ask lemmings since they already know the gameplay is boring and mediocre... probably KZ2 is already out on 360 and they played it :)
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment