Just Cause 3 on Xbox One: sub 20FPS framerate, 900p, 15 minute loading times

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

61473

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#201 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 61473 Posts

@lostrib: Damn straight. I've been playing my PC a lot more, and my PC should run this no problem... Probably.

Avatar image for BigBadBully
BigBadBully

2367

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#202 BigBadBully
Member since 2006 • 2367 Posts

So if you have xbox one version, don't die?

Avatar image for princeofshapeir
princeofshapeir

16652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#203 princeofshapeir
Member since 2006 • 16652 Posts

There's a video of the game being played at 4k and 60 FPS and the system requirements look pretty reasonable so the PC version should be fine.

lol at console versions.

Avatar image for mr_huggles_dog
Mr_Huggles_dog

7805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#204  Edited By Mr_Huggles_dog
Member since 2014 • 7805 Posts

So I looked up the system requirements and I'm not sure about my system.

I tried to look up futuremark scores for the CPU vs mine to sorta gauge the difference but the page won't load.

So anyone know if;

i5 760 2.8Ghz

12GB ram

GTX 680

Will cut it?

Avatar image for notafanboy
NotAFanboy

573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#205 NotAFanboy
Member since 2015 • 573 Posts

But I thought the Xbone had the better CPU and can handle more things on the screen at once.

Looks like lemmings are full of crap once again. The PS4 is a gen ahead of the Xbone, and nothing WilliamRLBaker and the other lemmings say will change that fact.

Avatar image for MonsieurX
MonsieurX

39858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#206 MonsieurX
Member since 2008 • 39858 Posts

@notafanboy said:

But I thought the Xbone had the better CPU and can handle more things on the screen at once.

Looks like lemmings are full of crap once again. The PS4 is a gen ahead of the Xbone, and nothing WilliamRLBaker and the other lemmings say will change that fact.

But that's not even a fact

Avatar image for cainetao11
cainetao11

38032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 77

User Lists: 1

#207 cainetao11
Member since 2006 • 38032 Posts

@mr_huggles_dog said:

Ha....char had to edit the original post to appease Nyadc.

I feel if it were tormentos or someone said person would l been laughed at.

Hell yes if it were tormentos we would have laughed at you.

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#208 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

@BigBadBully said:

So if you have xbox one version, don't die?

X1 version is hardcore confirmed!

Avatar image for mr_huggles_dog
Mr_Huggles_dog

7805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#209 Mr_Huggles_dog
Member since 2014 • 7805 Posts

@cainetao11: I guess you have to bitch a long time for it to become an art form that makes others do things for you.

Avatar image for cainetao11
cainetao11

38032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 77

User Lists: 1

#210 cainetao11
Member since 2006 • 38032 Posts

@mr_huggles_dog said:

@cainetao11: I guess you have to bitch a long time for it to become an art form that makes others do things for you.

Right, 563 got it.

Avatar image for Cheleman
Cheleman

8198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#211 Cheleman
Member since 2012 • 8198 Posts

theres people in this thread who paid $85 for this piece of shit.

smh tbh...

Avatar image for notafanboy
NotAFanboy

573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#212 NotAFanboy
Member since 2015 • 573 Posts

@MonsieurX said:
@notafanboy said:

But I thought the Xbone had the better CPU and can handle more things on the screen at once.

Looks like lemmings are full of crap once again. The PS4 is a gen ahead of the Xbone, and nothing WilliamRLBaker and the other lemmings say will change that fact.

But that's not even a fact

The PS4 sports higher res and higher framerates. It's a gen ahead of the Xbone, just like the PS3 was a gen ahead of Wii.

Avatar image for flyincloud1116
Flyincloud1116

6418

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 5

#213 Flyincloud1116
Member since 2014 • 6418 Posts

Another great day to be a Lem.

Avatar image for mr_huggles_dog
Mr_Huggles_dog

7805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#214 Mr_Huggles_dog
Member since 2014 • 7805 Posts

@cainetao11: exactly my friend....exactly.

Avatar image for MonsieurX
MonsieurX

39858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#215 MonsieurX
Member since 2008 • 39858 Posts

@notafanboy said:
@MonsieurX said:
@notafanboy said:

But I thought the Xbone had the better CPU and can handle more things on the screen at once.

Looks like lemmings are full of crap once again. The PS4 is a gen ahead of the Xbone, and nothing WilliamRLBaker and the other lemmings say will change that fact.

But that's not even a fact

The PS4 sports higher res and higher framerates. It's a gen ahead of the Xbone, just like the PS3 was a gen ahead of Wii.

So PC is several gens ahead?

Avatar image for lamprey263
lamprey263

44542

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#216 lamprey263
Member since 2006 • 44542 Posts

If the memory leaking can be attributed to horrible load times can it also be attributed to the horrible performance? Like say, Skyrim on PS3? In other words, is hoping they fix the memory leak problem stabilize the game enough to play?

Avatar image for notafanboy
NotAFanboy

573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#217 NotAFanboy
Member since 2015 • 573 Posts

@MonsieurX said:
@notafanboy said:
@MonsieurX said:
@notafanboy said:

But I thought the Xbone had the better CPU and can handle more things on the screen at once.

Looks like lemmings are full of crap once again. The PS4 is a gen ahead of the Xbone, and nothing WilliamRLBaker and the other lemmings say will change that fact.

But that's not even a fact

The PS4 sports higher res and higher framerates. It's a gen ahead of the Xbone, just like the PS3 was a gen ahead of Wii.

So PC is several gens ahead?

It's pretty obvious that a machine that costs $20,000 to build would be slightly stronger than a $300 console. What's impressive is that the PS4 can stack up against $5,000 gaming PCs.

Avatar image for mjorh
mjorh

6749

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#218 mjorh
Member since 2011 • 6749 Posts

@notafanboy said:
@MonsieurX said:
@notafanboy said:
@MonsieurX said:
@notafanboy said:

But I thought the Xbone had the better CPU and can handle more things on the screen at once.

Looks like lemmings are full of crap once again. The PS4 is a gen ahead of the Xbone, and nothing WilliamRLBaker and the other lemmings say will change that fact.

But that's not even a fact

The PS4 sports higher res and higher framerates. It's a gen ahead of the Xbone, just like the PS3 was a gen ahead of Wii.

So PC is several gens ahead?

It's pretty obvious that a machine that costs $20,000 to build would be slightly stronger than a $300 console. What's impressive is that the PS4 can stack up against $5,000 gaming PCs.

"What we can say right now with a fair amount of confidence is that the GTX 950 paired with a Haswell Core i3 processor can easily run Just Cause 3 at 1080p maxed with SMAA anti-aliasing and 8x anisotropic filtering and stay well north of 30fps"

So, nope.

Avatar image for MonsieurX
MonsieurX

39858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#219 MonsieurX
Member since 2008 • 39858 Posts

@notafanboy said:
@MonsieurX said:
@notafanboy said:
@MonsieurX said:
@notafanboy said:

But I thought the Xbone had the better CPU and can handle more things on the screen at once.

Looks like lemmings are full of crap once again. The PS4 is a gen ahead of the Xbone, and nothing WilliamRLBaker and the other lemmings say will change that fact.

But that's not even a fact

The PS4 sports higher res and higher framerates. It's a gen ahead of the Xbone, just like the PS3 was a gen ahead of Wii.

So PC is several gens ahead?

It's pretty obvious that a machine that costs $20,000 to build would be slightly stronger than a $300 console. What's impressive is that the PS4 can stack up against $5,000 gaming PCs.

"Slightly stronger"

And the PS4 doesn't even stack up against a 400$ build lol

Avatar image for notafanboy
NotAFanboy

573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#220  Edited By NotAFanboy
Member since 2015 • 573 Posts

@mjorh said:
@notafanboy said:
@MonsieurX said:
@notafanboy said:

The PS4 sports higher res and higher framerates. It's a gen ahead of the Xbone, just like the PS3 was a gen ahead of Wii.

So PC is several gens ahead?

It's pretty obvious that a machine that costs $20,000 to build would be slightly stronger than a $300 console. What's impressive is that the PS4 can stack up against $5,000 gaming PCs.

"What we can say right now with a fair amount of confidence is that the GTX 950 paired with a Haswell Core i3 processor can easily run Just Cause 3 at 1080p maxed with SMAA anti-aliasing and 8x anisotropic filtering and stay well north of 30fps"

So, nope.

Devs don't optimize PS4 games. They spend all their time optimizing the Xbone version and do a 2-man port to the PS4.

You're comparing highly optimized code with the PS4 bruteforcing unoptimized code. If you put the PS4 in capable hands like Naughty Dog, you get games that even $10,000 PCs can't compete with. UC4 is the graphics king that's putting $20,000 PC hermits in meltdown mode.

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

61473

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#221  Edited By lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 61473 Posts

@notafanboy is trying to be one of those funny trolls, and coming off as a pleb lol.

Avatar image for notafanboy
NotAFanboy

573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#222 NotAFanboy
Member since 2015 • 573 Posts

@MonsieurX said:
@notafanboy said:
@MonsieurX said:
@notafanboy said:
@MonsieurX said:

But that's not even a fact

The PS4 sports higher res and higher framerates. It's a gen ahead of the Xbone, just like the PS3 was a gen ahead of Wii.

So PC is several gens ahead?

It's pretty obvious that a machine that costs $20,000 to build would be slightly stronger than a $300 console. What's impressive is that the PS4 can stack up against $5,000 gaming PCs.

"Slightly stronger"

And the PS4 doesn't even stack up against a 400$ build lol

Show me a single PC game that looks better than UC4.

Not even $10,000 gaming PCs can run UC4 over single-digit FPS.

Avatar image for MonsieurX
MonsieurX

39858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#223 MonsieurX
Member since 2008 • 39858 Posts

@notafanboy said:
@mjorh said:
@notafanboy said:
@MonsieurX said:
@notafanboy said:

The PS4 sports higher res and higher framerates. It's a gen ahead of the Xbone, just like the PS3 was a gen ahead of Wii.

So PC is several gens ahead?

It's pretty obvious that a machine that costs $20,000 to build would be slightly stronger than a $300 console. What's impressive is that the PS4 can stack up against $5,000 gaming PCs.

"What we can say right now with a fair amount of confidence is that the GTX 950 paired with a Haswell Core i3 processor can easily run Just Cause 3 at 1080p maxed with SMAA anti-aliasing and 8x anisotropic filtering and stay well north of 30fps"

So, nope.

Devs don't optimize PS4 games. They spend all their time optimizing the Xbone version and do a 2-man port to the PS4.

You're comparing highly optimized code with the PS4 bruteforcing unoptimized code. If you put the PS4 in capable hands like Naughty Dog, you get games that even $10,000 PCs can't compete with. UC4 is the graphics king that's putting $20,000 PC hermits in butthurt mode.

http://www.gamespot.com/forums/system-wars-314159282/why-the-ps4-will-have-best-graphics-this-8th-gener-32794223/#289

This thread told me otherwise.

Who's lying? :(

Avatar image for MonsieurX
MonsieurX

39858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#224 MonsieurX
Member since 2008 • 39858 Posts

@notafanboy said:
@MonsieurX said:
@notafanboy said:
@MonsieurX said:
@notafanboy said:

The PS4 sports higher res and higher framerates. It's a gen ahead of the Xbone, just like the PS3 was a gen ahead of Wii.

So PC is several gens ahead?

It's pretty obvious that a machine that costs $20,000 to build would be slightly stronger than a $300 console. What's impressive is that the PS4 can stack up against $5,000 gaming PCs.

"Slightly stronger"

And the PS4 doesn't even stack up against a 400$ build lol

Show me a single PC game that looks better than UC4.

Not even $10,000 gaming PCs can run UC4 over single-digit FPS.

Show me a single PS4 currently running the final build of UC4

Avatar image for mjorh
mjorh

6749

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#225  Edited By mjorh
Member since 2011 • 6749 Posts

@notafanboy said:
@mjorh said:
@notafanboy said:
@MonsieurX said:

So PC is several gens ahead?

It's pretty obvious that a machine that costs $20,000 to build would be slightly stronger than a $300 console. What's impressive is that the PS4 can stack up against $5,000 gaming PCs.

"What we can say right now with a fair amount of confidence is that the GTX 950 paired with a Haswell Core i3 processor can easily run Just Cause 3 at 1080p maxed with SMAA anti-aliasing and 8x anisotropic filtering and stay well north of 30fps"

So, nope.

Devs don't optimize PS4 games. They spend all their time optimizing the Xbone version and do a 2-man port to the PS4.

You're comparing highly optimized code with the PS4 bruteforcing unoptimized code. If you put the PS4 in capable hands like Naughty Dog, you get games that even $10,000 PCs can't compete with. UC4 is the graphics king that's putting $20,000 PC hermits in butthurt mode.

Don't wanna burst your bubble but UC4 is not the graphics king and ND, a "capable dev" , couldn't pull it off too ...900P multiplayer is the evident fact. Consoles are weak, accept it and don't wait for a miracle.

Avatar image for silversix_
silversix_

26347

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#226 silversix_
Member since 2010 • 26347 Posts

LMAO Xbone dropping into low 20's just by turning the camera!!!

Avatar image for glez13
glez13

10310

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#227 glez13
Member since 2006 • 10310 Posts

...and I thought 40 second loading screens were way to long...

Avatar image for MonsieurX
MonsieurX

39858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#228  Edited By MonsieurX
Member since 2008 • 39858 Posts

@mjorh said:
@notafanboy said:
@mjorh said:
@notafanboy said:
@MonsieurX said:

So PC is several gens ahead?

It's pretty obvious that a machine that costs $20,000 to build would be slightly stronger than a $300 console. What's impressive is that the PS4 can stack up against $5,000 gaming PCs.

"What we can say right now with a fair amount of confidence is that the GTX 950 paired with a Haswell Core i3 processor can easily run Just Cause 3 at 1080p maxed with SMAA anti-aliasing and 8x anisotropic filtering and stay well north of 30fps"

So, nope.

Devs don't optimize PS4 games. They spend all their time optimizing the Xbone version and do a 2-man port to the PS4.

You're comparing highly optimized code with the PS4 bruteforcing unoptimized code. If you put the PS4 in capable hands like Naughty Dog, you get games that even $10,000 PCs can't compete with. UC4 is the graphics king that's putting $20,000 PC hermits in butthurt mode.

Don't wanna burst your bubble but UC4 is not the graphics king and ND, a "capable dev" , couldn't pull it off too ...900P multiplayer is the evident fact. Consoles are weak, accept it and don't wait for a miracle.

But the amazing action-packed 120 players multiplayer games!1111

Avatar image for SonySoldier-_-
SonySoldier-_-

1186

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#229  Edited By SonySoldier-_-
Member since 2012 • 1186 Posts

@Articuno76 said:

This thread is ridiculous. Charizard pointed out the game is garbage on the Xbox One (which is actually a point no one is contending) and because of that no one should buy it (again a point that no one is contending). The entire point of contention here is about a point he never made (that the PS4 version is really solid) because the context didn't demand it.

Butthurt fanboys have two options:

Accept that Charizard doesn't have an agenda and shut up (because your aren't changing your mind or anyone else's)

Don't except that Charizard doesn't have an agenda and **** off (because he's not changing his mind or post)

Pretty much this.

Lems just don't like being exposed for having the most inferior version so I an see why they are lashing out with all the butthurt replies.

Avatar image for cainetao11
cainetao11

38032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 77

User Lists: 1

#230  Edited By cainetao11
Member since 2006 • 38032 Posts

@lundy86_4 said:

@notafanboy is trying to be one of those funny trolls, and coming off as a pleb lol.

I think he's hilarious

Avatar image for jhonMalcovich
jhonMalcovich

7090

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#231 jhonMalcovich
Member since 2010 • 7090 Posts

Doesn't this belong to sticky lol ? It looks like Char doesn't like to force this rule on himself.

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#232 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

Playing a Just Cause game on anything but PC is like playing a Bethesda game on anything but PC...

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

61473

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#233 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 61473 Posts

@jhonMalcovich said:

Doesn't this belong to sticky lol ? It looks like Char doesn't like to force this rule on himself.

There isn't a JC3 sticky. That's a thread where you can reserve the JC3 hype thread.

Avatar image for chikenfriedrice
chikenfriedrice

13561

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#234 chikenfriedrice
Member since 2006 • 13561 Posts

Just scored an 8 here and on IGN. Looks like I will have a blast with the PC version

Avatar image for jhonMalcovich
jhonMalcovich

7090

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#235 jhonMalcovich
Member since 2010 • 7090 Posts

IGN published PC review first as so called next gen consoles can't run it lol

http://ca.ign.com/articles/2015/11/30/just-cause-3-pc-review?%20hub%20page%20%28front%20page%29&utm_content=1

Avatar image for -God-
-God-

3627

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#236 -God-
Member since 2004 • 3627 Posts

Between this, fo4, syndacite, and battelfront.....what happened to console optimization? GPUKING promised me PS4 was the gfx king...

Avatar image for Zero_epyon
Zero_epyon

20103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#237 Zero_epyon
Member since 2004 • 20103 Posts

No point in making a new thread, so here. DF made their analysis as well.

Digital Foundry Just Cause 3 Framerate Test PS4 vs Xbox One

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#238 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

@jhonMalcovich said:

IGN published PC review first as so called next gen consoles can't run it lol

http://ca.ign.com/articles/2015/11/30/just-cause-3-pc-review?%20hub%20page%20%28front%20page%29&utm_content=1

or because that's the version they received first

and it's not exactly a glowing review of PC performance

On one of the two PCs I played on (a Core i7-980X with a GeForce GTX 970 and 8GB RAM) I saw generally great frame rates interrupted by some major slowdowns and stuttering… but the other PC (Core i7-4790K, GeForce GTX 980, and 16GB RAM) was almost flawless. On both I saw occasional crashes, and some frame rate problems arose when huge explosions went off. I also wouldn’t recommend playing without an SSD, because load times can be exceptionally long when using a hard drive.

Avatar image for notafanboy
NotAFanboy

573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#239 NotAFanboy
Member since 2015 • 573 Posts

@lostrib said:
@jhonMalcovich said:

IGN published PC review first as so called next gen consoles can't run it lol

http://ca.ign.com/articles/2015/11/30/just-cause-3-pc-review?%20hub%20page%20%28front%20page%29&utm_content=1

or because that's the version they received first

and it's not exactly a glowing review of PC performance

On one of the two PCs I played on (a Core i7-980X with a GeForce GTX 970 and 8GB RAM) I saw generally great frame rates interrupted by some major slowdowns and stuttering… but the other PC (Core i7-4790K, GeForce GTX 980, and 16GB RAM) was almost flawless. On both I saw occasional crashes, and some frame rate problems arose when huge explosions went off. I also wouldn’t recommend playing without an SSD, because load times can be exceptionally long when using a hard drive.

It's so sad some people would waste thousands on a PC when they can get a superior machine for $299 + Uncharted collection.

Avatar image for Juub1990
Juub1990

12620

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#240 Juub1990
Member since 2013 • 12620 Posts
@notafanboy said:

It's so sad some people would waste thousands on a PC when they can get a superior machine for $299 + Uncharted collection.

Man are you even trying?

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#241 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

@notafanboy said:
@lostrib said:
@jhonMalcovich said:

IGN published PC review first as so called next gen consoles can't run it lol

http://ca.ign.com/articles/2015/11/30/just-cause-3-pc-review?%20hub%20page%20%28front%20page%29&utm_content=1

or because that's the version they received first

and it's not exactly a glowing review of PC performance

On one of the two PCs I played on (a Core i7-980X with a GeForce GTX 970 and 8GB RAM) I saw generally great frame rates interrupted by some major slowdowns and stuttering… but the other PC (Core i7-4790K, GeForce GTX 980, and 16GB RAM) was almost flawless. On both I saw occasional crashes, and some frame rate problems arose when huge explosions went off. I also wouldn’t recommend playing without an SSD, because load times can be exceptionally long when using a hard drive.

It's so sad some people would waste thousands on a PC when they can get a superior machine for $299 + Uncharted collection.

Avatar image for MonsieurX
MonsieurX

39858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#242 MonsieurX
Member since 2008 • 39858 Posts

@notafanboy said:
@lostrib said:
@jhonMalcovich said:

IGN published PC review first as so called next gen consoles can't run it lol

http://ca.ign.com/articles/2015/11/30/just-cause-3-pc-review?%20hub%20page%20%28front%20page%29&utm_content=1

or because that's the version they received first

and it's not exactly a glowing review of PC performance

On one of the two PCs I played on (a Core i7-980X with a GeForce GTX 970 and 8GB RAM) I saw generally great frame rates interrupted by some major slowdowns and stuttering… but the other PC (Core i7-4790K, GeForce GTX 980, and 16GB RAM) was almost flawless. On both I saw occasional crashes, and some frame rate problems arose when huge explosions went off. I also wouldn’t recommend playing without an SSD, because load times can be exceptionally long when using a hard drive.

It's so sad some people would waste thousands on a PC when they can get a superior machine for $299 + Uncharted collection.

lol last gen games that still look like shit

Avatar image for lamprey263
lamprey263

44542

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#243  Edited By lamprey263
Member since 2006 • 44542 Posts

While the Digital Foundry video doesn't look nearly as bad as the OP, the PS4 version looks more playable and the Xbox One version not as bad but still obviously got performance issues and I'm not going to take the plunge until I know damn well this has gotten fixed, might go to Walmart tonight to get Xenoblade Chronicles X if I'm bored... well, if that couple rounds of Battlefront doesn't turn into 5 fucking hours again.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjDWu6dEuxA - sorry can't post videos or links

Avatar image for jhonMalcovich
jhonMalcovich

7090

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#244  Edited By jhonMalcovich
Member since 2010 • 7090 Posts

@lostrib said:
@jhonMalcovich said:

IGN published PC review first as so called next gen consoles can't run it lol

http://ca.ign.com/articles/2015/11/30/just-cause-3-pc-review?%20hub%20page%20%28front%20page%29&utm_content=1

or because that's the version they received first

and it's not exactly a glowing review of PC performance

On one of the two PCs I played on (a Core i7-980X with a GeForce GTX 970 and 8GB RAM) I saw generally great frame rates interrupted by some major slowdowns and stuttering… but the other PC (Core i7-4790K, GeForce GTX 980, and 16GB RAM) was almost flawless. On both I saw occasional crashes, and some frame rate problems arose when huge explosions went off. I also wouldn’t recommend playing without an SSD, because load times can be exceptionally long when using a hard drive.

On my PC, I have never got stutter so far, except for Batman AK, as I usually maintain it well updated and free of unnecessary stuff running in the background. But I decided to be extra careful with JC3. So no preorder until the game gets several hundreds reviews on Steam and good proportion of those reviews must be positive. Meanwhile Fallout 4 will keep me occupied till Christmas.

Avatar image for desprado
Desprado

60

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#245  Edited By Desprado
Member since 2015 • 60 Posts

PC version is totally fine and running it on GTX 980 @1440p. Getting beyond 60fps.

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#246  Edited By lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

I guess you need a decent CPU (according to Nvidia)

"To collect like-for-like data in 18 benchmark runs we used Just Cause 3's introductory, plane-riding sequence, which we should note offers a good GPU workout, but doesn't account for the times Just Cause 3 is bottlenecked by its impressive CPU-intensive destruction. During these explosive moments, which can't be accurately recreated and tested across a multitude of benchmarks, CPU bottlenecking can greatly reduce overall performance"

Avatar image for napo_sp
napo_sp

649

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#247  Edited By napo_sp
Member since 2006 • 649 Posts

@lostrib said:

I guess you need a decent CPU (according to Nvidia)

"To collect like-for-like data in 18 benchmark runs we used Just Cause 3's introductory, plane-riding sequence, which we should note offers a good GPU workout, but doesn't account for the times Just Cause 3 is bottlenecked by its impressive CPU-intensive destruction. During these explosive moments, which can't be accurately recreated and tested across a multitude of benchmarks, CPU bottlenecking can greatly reduce overall performance"

The reason why it run so bad on console might be by what nvidia optimization guide stated : the game use nvidia waveworks that forced to run on cpu

Dem tabletz cpu on consolols are crying because of that lulz...

Avatar image for cainetao11
cainetao11

38032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 77

User Lists: 1

#248  Edited By cainetao11
Member since 2006 • 38032 Posts

Amazing how other games get dinged for this stuff. JC3 got an 8/10 from Gamespot.

Avatar image for aroxx_ab
aroxx_ab

13236

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#249 aroxx_ab
Member since 2005 • 13236 Posts

@desprado said:

PC version is totally fine and running it on GTX 980 @1440p. Getting beyond 60fps.

Heard some people have crashes here and there

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#250 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

@cainetao11: well they note the problems but it seems the review was mostly done on the PC version