Is the way Microsoft brings Dead Rising 3 exclusive to launch a console the same

Sony developers work hard to bring exclusive gaming as far as they can reach. Sony also provides support for what they believe is a solid gaming experience for the consumer. I want to be sure, and figure out if this sort of thing is common practice to begin what you declare to be the future of gaming. A game, in which the second part was shared, being funded by Microsoft.

A number of different issues arise from this.

First thing that comes to mind is:

If this is truly funding, then why not fund in house development, such as Rare? This leads me to think this is all short term.

Is rare even there?

Second thing that comes to mind:

Why dead rising? And if so, why wasn't this secured earlier? Seems to me like something is going on.

The trailer looked good, and seems like it dropped just in time. But why so close to GTA5?

This is something on the side.

In conclusion, this game should deliver. Recalling the developer interview at E3 on GS, it sounded fit. Also, how many open world games have capcom developed in the past? Hopefully it brings something fresh to the table.

wut?

.

see, the thing is...

wut?

I'm gonna guess he's asking if M$ moneyhatting Crapcom into making Dead Rising 3 exclusive to the Xbox One is the same as Sony working hard with their own talent to actually create games. handssss

I don't see how this is unique to MS. Contracting other dev houses to make an exclusive for your console. Sony does it too, demon's souls for example or Nintendo with Bayonetta.

wut?

lostrib

Firstly, Dead Rising is a series that was born on Xbox. DR1 and Case Zero never went to playstation, so why people are so dumbfounded that DR3 is exclusive is beyond me.

Secondly, not only are MS funding but they're helping with development as well. So while yes it is being developed by Capcom vancouver, theres Microsoft talent there helping who are more familar with the XOne hardware.

Thirdly, "Sony also provides support for what they believe is a solid gaming experience for the consumer". Do you mean games like ... Knack? :lol:

Fourthly, its time to stop begging for DR3 cows, its beyond desperate now

:cool:

dafuq did i read

I think Dead Rising 3 should be good as well?

.mems_1224

Couldn't read is more like it.  I figured the topic title might make sense after glancing over the OP, but nope.

TC sounds like a butthurt Sony fan that wishes the game was multiplat.CanYouDiglt

TC sounds like a freaking imbecile who can't form a complete sentence. 

Has Anyone Really Been Far Even as Decided to Use Even Go Want to do Look More Like?

who cares about PSN, the thread talks about MS business methodology. the fact is MS started this pay-to-play-your-already-bought-game bs in console which sony follows, and now they trying a new rip off scheme in xbone by making the entire game a rental with resale value equal to zero, and no definite guaranteed support. people who are too dumb to support these or past it up as a freaking SOLID BUSINESS MODEL is helping these greedy companies in establishing their anti consumer policies. yeap it will work alright because there are lots of people like who like being screwed in the a$$strawhatlupi

Hey there new cow on the block, what is this supposed to mean, could you translate it?. Or are you somehow stuck in the past before MS did a 180 on the DRM strategy?.

It seems to me that Sony does the same thing that is pay for 3rd party exclusivity.

[QUOTE="strawhatlupi"]who cares about PSN, the thread talks about MS business methodology. the fact is MS started this pay-to-play-your-already-bought-game bs in console which sony follows, and now they trying a new rip off scheme in xbone by making the entire game a rental with resale value equal to zero, and no definite guaranteed support. people who are too dumb to support these or past it up as a freaking SOLID BUSINESS MODEL is helping these greedy companies in establishing their anti consumer policies. yeap it will work alright because there are lots of people like who like being screwed in the a$$Snugenz

Hey there new cow on the block, what is this supposed to mean, could you translate it?. Or are you somehow stuck in the past before MS did a 180 on the DRM strategy?.

[QUOTE="Snugenz"]

[QUOTE="strawhatlupi"]who cares about PSN, the thread talks about MS business methodology. the fact is MS started this pay-to-play-your-already-bought-game bs in console which sony follows, and now they trying a new rip off scheme in xbone by making the entire game a rental with resale value equal to zero, and no definite guaranteed support. people who are too dumb to support these or past it up as a freaking SOLID BUSINESS MODEL is helping these greedy companies in establishing their anti consumer policies. yeap it will work alright because there are lots of people like who like being screwed in the a$$strawhatlupi

Hey there new cow on the block, what is this supposed to mean, could you translate it?. Or are you somehow stuck in the past before MS did a 180 on the DRM strategy?.

No different to Sony, in other words you have no arguement besides, "MS want to make money and they're looking for better ways to do so", no fvcking way!!!.

Your tinfoil hat is showing with the last few sentences aswell, alot of moo and paranoia.

yeap i know, it backed fires on MS hence the 180 . but the fact is, it is part of their core business plan in the first place. a plan that doesnt benefits consumer neither improve their products quality. a plan that will only guarantee their control over their consumer and to make more cash. pretty much they invest on these schemes long before they announce it. thats is what im saying. MS business model focuses on scheme that will generate more profit while offering very little for their consumers.strawhatlupi

There used to be another crazy cow that always spelled "yep" "yeap", did your other account get banned?.

[QUOTE="strawhatlupi"][QUOTE="Snugenz"]

Hey there new cow on the block, what is this supposed to mean, could you translate it?. Or are you somehow stuck in the past before MS did a 180 on the DRM strategy?.

Snugenz

No different to Sony, in other words you have no arguement besides, "MS want to make money and they're looking for better ways to do so", no fvcking way!!!.

Your tinfoil hat is showing with the last few sentences aswell, alot of moo and paranoia.

[QUOTE="Snugenz"]

[QUOTE="strawhatlupi"] stuck in past? no... i know how xbox 1 become xbox 180. im stating that in general, MS business strategy is more focused on conceiving a more efficient money-milking scheme rather than focusing on improving their product's quality. these are evident in the way they remake "hit" games over and over again because it has little risks instead of supporting non mainstream genre. The fact that they also plan to hijack gamers game ownership in xbox one with their DRM and mandatory subscription (though it back fires miserably), the fact that they force their non essential spy cam which is tied with their ad programs Nuads on their consumers. MS is more concern on devising devious ways on jow to extract every nickel and dime from their consumers. thats the focus of their business.strawhatlupi

No different to Sony, in other words you have no arguement besides, "MS want to make money and they're looking for better ways to do so", no fvcking way!!!.

Your tinfoil hat is showing with the last few sentences aswell, alot of moo and paranoia.

Link please, i can't wait to see this.

How is TLOU not a mainstream title -_-, you cows really do come up with some shite.

[QUOTE="strawhatlupi"] yeap i know, it backed fires on MS hence the 180 . but the fact is, it is part of their core business plan in the first place. a plan that doesnt benefits consumer neither improve their products quality. a plan that will only guarantee their control over their consumer and to make more cash. pretty much they invest on these schemes long before they announce it. thats is what im saying. MS business model focuses on scheme that will generate more profit while offering very little for their consumers.Snugenz

There used to be another crazy cow that always spelled "yep" "yeap", did your other account get banned?.

[QUOTE="strawhatlupi"][QUOTE="Snugenz"]

No different to Sony, in other words you have no arguement besides, "MS want to make money and they're looking for better ways to do so", no fvcking way!!!.

Your tinfoil hat is showing with the last few sentences aswell, alot of moo and paranoia.

Snugenz

Link please, i can't wait to see this.

How is TLOU not a mainstream title -_-, you cows really do come up with some shite.

[QUOTE="Snugenz"]

[QUOTE="strawhatlupi"] stuck in past? no... i know how xbox 1 become xbox 180. im stating that in general, MS business strategy is more focused on conceiving a more efficient money-milking scheme rather than focusing on improving their product's quality. these are evident in the way they remake "hit" games over and over again because it has little risks instead of supporting non mainstream genre. The fact that they also plan to hijack gamers game ownership in xbox one with their DRM and mandatory subscription (though it back fires miserably), the fact that they force their non essential spy cam which is tied with their ad programs Nuads on their consumers. MS is more concern on devising devious ways on jow to extract every nickel and dime from their consumers. thats the focus of their business.strawhatlupi

No different to Sony, in other words you have no arguement besides, "MS want to make money and they're looking for better ways to do so", no fvcking way!!!.

Your tinfoil hat is showing with the last few sentences aswell, alot of moo and paranoia.

[QUOTE="Snugenz"]

[QUOTE="strawhatlupi"] Sony at least did venture in supporting non main stream titles like Heavy Rain, Journey, and even TLoU. but including Sony in the argument is irrelevant because the topic is about MS business strategy. and no tinfoil here as thre are facts that support that MS did support illegal espionage and surveillance, and have plans to use their products to data mine their consumers.strawhatlupi

Link please, i can't wait to see this.

How is TLOU not a mainstream title -_-, you cows really do come up with some shite.

Wow, the tinfoil hat club. :shock:

[QUOTE="Snugenz"]

[QUOTE="strawhatlupi"] Sony at least did venture in supporting non main stream titles like Heavy Rain, Journey, and even TLoU. but including Sony in the argument is irrelevant because the topic is about MS business strategy. and no tinfoil here as thre are facts that support that MS did support illegal espionage and surveillance, and have plans to use their products to data mine their consumers.strawhatlupi

Link please, i can't wait to see this.

How is TLOU not a mainstream title -_-, you cows really do come up with some shite.

http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-57594011-38/microsoft-u.s-constitution-is-suffering-from-nsa-secrecy/ http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/jul/11/microsoft-nsa-collaboration-user-data http://www.extremetech.com/gaming/139706-microsofts-new-kinect-patent-goes-big-brother-will-spy-on-you-for-the-mpaa

3rd link shows no data mining except an automated process by which to monitor how many people are using a product a person only purchased one license for.

2nd link In a statement, Microsoft said: "When we upgrade or update products we aren't absolved from the need to comply with existing or future lawful demands." The company reiterated its argument that it provides customer data "only in response to government demands and we only ever comply with orders for requests about specific accounts or identifiers".

1st link Microsoft on Tuesday asked the Obama administration to allow it to reveal details about how it responds to orders from the U.S. government for user account data

Also.

http://www.engadget.com/2013/07/19/sony-patent-vital-sign-tagging/

http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-57561943-1/sony-files-patent-for-tech-to-block-used-games/#!

http://www.digitalspy.com/gaming/news/a348864/sony-files-patent-for-controller-to-monitor-heart-rate-breathing-rate.html

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/technology/tech-news/sony-data-breach-fuels-privacy-concerns/article577889/

http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/106072/Sony_copy_protection_software_raises_security_privacy_concerns

[QUOTE="strawhatlupi"][QUOTE="Snugenz"]

Link please, i can't wait to see this.

How is TLOU not a mainstream title -_-, you cows really do come up with some shite.

Snugenz

Wow, the tinfoil hat club. :shock:

[QUOTE="Snugenz"]

[QUOTE="strawhatlupi"] http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-57594011-38/microsoft-u.s-constitution-is-suffering-from-nsa-secrecy/ http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/jul/11/microsoft-nsa-collaboration-user-data http://www.extremetech.com/gaming/139706-microsofts-new-kinect-patent-goes-big-brother-will-spy-on-you-for-the-mpaastrawhatlupi

Wow, the tinfoil hat club. :shock:

Also.

http://www.engadget.com/2013/07/19/sony-patent-vital-sign-tagging/

http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-57561943-1/sony-files-patent-for-tech-to-block-used-games/#!

http://www.digitalspy.com/gaming/news/a348864/sony-files-patent-for-controller-to-monitor-heart-rate-breathing-rate.html

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/technology/tech-news/sony-data-breach-fuels-privacy-concerns/article577889/

http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/106072/Sony_copy_protection_software_raises_security_privacy_concerns

 

WilliamRLBaker

[QUOTE="strawhatlupi"][QUOTE="Snugenz"]

Wow, the tinfoil hat club. :shock:

WilliamRLBaker

[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"][QUOTE="strawhatlupi"] government cannot force you to do illegal things. and what do you think data means? the fact that kinect was designed and is patented to support the ability to conduct surveillance means it is at least planned to be used for data mining purposes strawhatlupi

Odd how your the one claiming that the NSA walked into Microsofts offices and said hey yeah we need information on all 100+ million of your OS users, xbox owners...etc and they just handed over a memory stick with said information. The proof is on you that Microsoft willingly without court order or any sort of coercion just gave up information, Specially so since I already pointed out that the links you gave say as much.

""3rd link shows no data mining except an automated process by which to monitor how many people are using a product a person only purchased one license for.

2nd link In a statement, Microsoft said: "When we upgrade or update products we aren't absolved from the need to comply with existing or future lawful demands." The company reiterated its argument that it provides customer data "only in response to government demands and we only ever comply with orders for requests about specific accounts or identifiers".

1st link Microsoft on Tuesday asked the Obama administration to allow it to reveal details about how it responds to orders from the U.S. government for user account data""

I see no proof of data mining, I see no proof of Microsoft willingly giving away information they were infact ordered too, and even pleaded with the current administration to be allowed to reveal details of what they were ordered to do, and when, and how, But it doesn't matter what I say or any sort of proof I give, I could go to the white house right now, where me and Obama could have a cordial chat and give me documents showing orders by Government ogranizations to give up information as well as warrants for Microsoft to give up info on select users and you would still be....

BUBUBUBBUBUBU the sony tehy are amazing they never ever ever give information, or Data mine, or use underhanded business practices bubububub.

Another horrible looking game for the xbone: 

So ugly :shock: click image for full size

[QUOTE="strawhatlupi"][QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"] lol 1.A court order for information about individuals is not illegal it falls well within the letter of the law. 2. yes the government can force you do to things...otherwise Snowden would still be in america right now.WilliamRLBaker

Odd how your the one claiming that the NSA walked into Microsofts offices and said hey yeah we need information on all 100+ million of your OS users, xbox owners...etc and they just handed over a memory stick with said information. The proof is on you that Microsoft willingly without court order or any sort of coercion just gave up information, Specially so since I already pointed out that the links you gave say as much.

""3rd link shows no data mining except an automated process by which to monitor how many people are using a product a person only purchased one license for.

2nd link In a statement, Microsoft said: "When we upgrade or update products we aren't absolved from the need to comply with existing or future lawful demands." The company reiterated its argument that it provides customer data "only in response to government demands and we only ever comply with orders for requests about specific accounts or identifiers".

1st link Microsoft on Tuesday asked the Obama administration to allow it to reveal details about how it responds to orders from the U.S. government for user account data""

I see no proof of data mining, I see no proof of Microsoft willingly giving away information they were infact ordered too, and even pleaded with the current administration to be allowed to reveal details of what they were ordered to do, and when, and how, But it doesn't matter what I say or any sort of proof I give, I could go to the white house right now, where me and Obama could have a cordial chat and give me documents showing orders by Government ogranizations to give up information as well as warrants for Microsoft to give up info on select users and you would still be....

BUBUBUBBUBUBU the sony tehy are amazing they never ever ever give information, or Data mine, or use underhanded business practices bubububub.

Another horrible looking game for the xbone: 

So ugly :shock: click image for full size

ramonnl