Is PUBG worse than COD and Battlefield?

Hello friends,

So i recently watch this video

and this video sum up everything wrong with this game. first of, no matter how stale COD and battlefield, they still feel like high production game unlike PUBG which is most popular game on steam but feel like cheap indie game that is overpriced which should have been F2P from start.

the game is buggy, and broken which rated so high by critics that its unbelievable. it mostly apeal to casuals/non gamers and game itself is no fun to play.

theres a lot of problems with this game for having too much price. its one of the biggest rip off of this generation.

so what do you think friends? is it even worse than COD and battlefield? discuss.

worst than

Is your opinion worst than anyone else here?

typing mistake. sorry. but why its always the coincide that every most popular game always turn out bad?

Hold the phone.

Since when is Battlefield a bad game?

Again, your opinion.

But you hate anything popular anyway

It's just one, and not great, gamemode IMO. Definitely not worth the hype.

Apples and oranges. COD and Battlefield are not battle royale games.

Doom is pretty popular too.

I only watched a tiny bit of the video, and man, what a freakin' crybaby. I could see the tears dripping into his edited video.

TL;DR, @ghosts4ever: what exactly is broken about the game? I asked you this in another thread, and you never responded.

bugs, glitches, terrible gunplay in general.

i mean game like this can be fine as F2P but not as game that charge too much price.

You act as if every game doesn't have glitches. Terrible gunplay? How is it terrible? It has a lean function, bullet drop, great stealth mechanics, vaulting.

What is so terrible about the gunplay?

I don’t see why it’s such a phenomenon myself. It’s in trouble though, because both COD and BF are adding battle royale modes to upcoming titles, chances are if PUBG doesn’t fix its issues soon they both could outdo PUBG at its own...er...game.

Actually no, it's better. COD and Battlfield are same old same old from 1999. PUGB was unique for its time. Although I can excuse battfield 1 that was the only BF game that was great since Battfield 2 (one of my fav shooters of all time)

I'm burnt out on traditional BF and especially COD gameplay, but last-man-standing/clan arena games I've still got time for. I don't have a problem with a bit less polish if the gameplay is tight and fun, so not for me, no.

I hate Call of Duty and Battlefield, but I love PUBG, so I would definitely disagree with that.

I love the every man for himself and do whatever it takes to survive until you are the last man standing type of gameplay that PUBG has. It's the kind of thing that I wanted to see from Call of Duty or Battlefield since before PUBG was ever even released.