It does. Unmoded open world to boot ;)
care to explain why
Why are you posting a screenshot of a corridor, which herms constantly accuse console games of being, to prove your point? And Infamous SS still looks better while being open world.
lol you must be a delusional fanboy if you think ISS looks better than pics I posted
which Pray_to_Me failed to showed anything
Not sure why those herms have anything to do with me
what was the point posting this it doesn't look better than those crysis screenshots posted
It does. Unmoded open world to boot ;)
care to explain why
Why are you posting a screenshot of a corridor, which herms constantly accuse console games of being, to prove your point? And Infamous SS still looks better while being open world.
Lol it's pretty Ironic that Windows fanboys are using a linear last gen console game to defend PC. Heavily modded bullshots too with no hud or player in field.
It does. Unmoded open world to boot ;)
care to explain why
Why are you posting a screenshot of a corridor, which herms constantly accuse console games of being, to prove your point? And Infamous SS still looks better while being open world.
Lol it's pretty Ironic that Windows fanboys are using a linear last gen console game to defend PC. Heavily modded bullshots too with no hud or player in field.
proof its a bullshot
and dude you can turn things like the HUD off with console commands
It does. Unmoded open world to boot ;)
care to explain why
Why are you posting a screenshot of a corridor, which herms constantly accuse console games of being, to prove your point? And Infamous SS still looks better while being open world.
Lol it's pretty Ironic that Windows fanboys are using a linear last gen console game to defend PC. Heavily modded bullshots too with no hud or player in field.
Its not a bullshot and not heavily modded lol And you can turn those off genius
lol please you were bragging about killflop for months and doing that for the Order
Still haven't shown me any better ISS screenshots than the crysis ones I posted since many already agreed mine look better lol
Upcoming open world game that going to enjoy playing and testing this year
Wow closer objects have more detail who cares. Still graphics king. And you can cherry pick a shitty screengrab from any game at any setting.
Crysis "very high" looking like a PS2 game
yea man the closer the more detail
lol that's cute
Mmm yeah you like that
Dude . That looks nowhere near as good as screenshots that he posted . It is a complete joke that you even tried . At least post some decent pics .
Question is how does that even look good? Rowe looks blurry and lacks detail.
Lighting probably. It's not zoomed into the character, but you can notice the improved detail on the wall with different lighting.
Still not as good as these textures shown in above pics .
Lighting is just a distraction . It doesn't make textures look better .
I never said it was, stop being so insecure.
Wow closer objects have more detail who cares. Still graphics king. And you can cherry pick a shitty screengrab from any game at any setting.
Crysis "very high" looking like a PS2 game
yea man the closer the more detail
lol that's cute
Mmm yeah you like that
Dude . That looks nowhere near as good as screenshots that he posted . It is a complete joke that you even tried . At least post some decent pics .
Question is how does that even look good? Rowe looks blurry and lacks detail.
Lighting probably. It's not zoomed into the character, but you can notice the improved detail on the wall with different lighting.
Still not as good as these textures shown in above pics .
Lighting is just a distraction . It doesn't make textures look better .
I never said it was, stop being so insecure.
Even with the lighting change Rowe still looks like crap
Wow closer objects have more detail who cares. Still graphics king. And you can cherry pick a shitty screengrab from any game at any setting.
Crysis "very high" looking like a PS2 game
yea man the closer the more detail
lol that's cute
Mmm yeah you like that
Dude . That looks nowhere near as good as screenshots that he posted . It is a complete joke that you even tried . At least post some decent pics .
Question is how does that even look good? Rowe looks blurry and lacks detail.
Lighting probably. It's not zoomed into the character, but you can notice the improved detail on the wall with different lighting.
Still not as good as these textures shown in above pics .
Lighting is just a distraction . It doesn't make textures look better .
I never said it was, stop being so insecure.
Even with the lighting change Rowe still looks like crap
Right click open in new tab.
You can count the threads, so...unless you want to be able to zoom into the atoms I'd say that's pretty good for an open world game.
It does. Unmoded open world to boot ;)
care to explain why
Why are you posting a screenshot of a corridor, which herms constantly accuse console games of being, to prove your point? And Infamous SS still looks better while being open world.
Lol it's pretty Ironic that Windows fanboys are using a linear last gen console game to defend PC. Heavily modded bullshots too with no hud or player in field.
Its not a bullshot and not heavily modded lol And you can turn those off genius
lol please you were bragging about killflop for months and doing that for the Order
Still haven't shown me any better ISS screenshots than the crysis ones I posted since many already agreed mine look better lol
Upcoming open world game that going to enjoy playing and testing this year
Star Citizen and The Vanishing of Ethan Carter look amazing .
It's all well and good that there is 11 mill polys per frame, that's amazing, but the LOD distance and pop in is an eye sore because of this. I'd rather it had been less poly intensive per frame to kill the pop ins.
No , it doesn't render 11 million polygons per frame . That title is misleading , read the article . The engine draws those polygons but doesn't render until character gets closer . Which means that , those are total polygons on entire map and not all of them are there when you look at distant objects . There are only few polygons to make the geometry of distant object similar to actual one . When you get closer , more polygons are rendered and added to it and it becomes more detailed . Meanwhile , polygons in area behind you , are reduced as you move further away .
OP wrote:
Inslaymous SS is polygon count king 11 million slays per frame.
It's all well and good that there is 11 mill polys per frame, that's amazing, but the LOD distance and pop in is an eye sore because of this. I'd rather it had been less poly intensive per frame to kill the pop ins.
No , it doesn't render 11 million polygons per frame . That title is misleading , read the article . The engine draws those polygons but doesn't render until character gets closer . Which means that , those are total polygons on entire map and not all of them are there when you look at distant objects . There are only few polygons to make the geometry of distant object similar to actual one . When you get closer , more polygons are rendered and added to it and it becomes more detailed . Meanwhile , polygons in area behind you , are reduced as you move further away .
Exactly. But cows will continue having a circle jerk over just the title of the thread. I can bet none of them even read the damn article, not even the gpuking himself.
Not only that but he copy pasted comment from NeoGaf about Star Citizen Cruiser , without doing any research about the game itself . The thread was pretty weak from the start , for discussion because of that comparison . Not to mention that nowhere in the article it says that all of those polygons are rendered at the same time . Actually it clearly states that , problem do occur when player moves faster and engine fails to render extra polygons at same speed , which results in blurry textures and terrible pop ins , and someone already posted pics about that glitch in this thread .
@Cloud_imperium
The game indeed renders 11 million polys per frame if you climb on the roof and get a panorama view of the entire city, there are more than enough spots to get those shots, so there's absolutely no cheating.
http://www.dualshockers.com/2014/04/14/infamous-second-sons-characters-are-120000-polygons-11-million-rendered-regularly-by-the-engine/
It says :
As stated in last point , doesn't look like 11 million polygons are rendered here .
It's all well and good that there is 11 mill polys per frame, that's amazing, but the LOD distance and pop in is an eye sore because of this. I'd rather it had been less poly intensive per frame to kill the pop ins.
No , it doesn't render 11 million polygons per frame . That title is misleading , read the article . The engine draws those polygons but doesn't render until character gets closer . Which means that , those are total polygons on entire map and not all of them are there when you look at distant objects . There are only few polygons to make the geometry of distant object similar to actual one . When you get closer , more polygons are rendered and added to it and it becomes more detailed . Meanwhile , polygons in area behind you , are reduced as you move further away .
Exactly. But cows will continue having a circle jerk over just the title of the thread. I can bet none of them even read the damn article, not even the gpuking himself.
Not only that but he copy pasted comment from NeoGaf about Star Citizen Cruiser , without doing any research about the game itself . The thread was pretty weak from the start , for discussion because of that comparison . Not to mention that nowhere in the article it says that all of those polygons are rendered at the same time . Actually it clearly states that , problem do occur when player moves faster and engine fails to render extra polygons at same speed , which results in blurry textures and terrible pop ins , and someone already posted pics about that glitch in this thread .
@Cloud_imperium
The game indeed renders 11 million polys per frame if you climb on the roof and get a panorama view of the entire city, there are more than enough spots to get those shots, so there's absolutely no cheating.
http://www.dualshockers.com/2014/04/14/infamous-second-sons-characters-are-120000-polygons-11-million-rendered-regularly-by-the-engine/
It says :
As stated in last point , doesn't look like 11 million polygons are rendered here .
ya bro posting some screen of a lod glitch totally discounts their statements of poly counts.
Amazing graphics for an open world game...
All these screencaps , were taken using this technic...
This is In-game !
It's all well and good that there is 11 mill polys per frame, that's amazing, but the LOD distance and pop in is an eye sore because of this. I'd rather it had been less poly intensive per frame to kill the pop ins.
No , it doesn't render 11 million polygons per frame . That title is misleading , read the article . The engine draws those polygons but doesn't render until character gets closer . Which means that , those are total polygons on entire map and not all of them are there when you look at distant objects . There are only few polygons to make the geometry of distant object similar to actual one . When you get closer , more polygons are rendered and added to it and it becomes more detailed . Meanwhile , polygons in area behind you , are reduced as you move further away .
Exactly. But cows will continue having a circle jerk over just the title of the thread. I can bet none of them even read the damn article, not even the gpuking himself.
Not only that but he copy pasted comment from NeoGaf about Star Citizen Cruiser , without doing any research about the game itself . The thread was pretty weak from the start , for discussion because of that comparison . Not to mention that nowhere in the article it says that all of those polygons are rendered at the same time . Actually it clearly states that , problem do occur when player moves faster and engine fails to render extra polygons at same speed , which results in blurry textures and terrible pop ins , and someone already posted pics about that glitch in this thread .
@Cloud_imperium
The game indeed renders 11 million polys per frame if you climb on the roof and get a panorama view of the entire city, there are more than enough spots to get those shots, so there's absolutely no cheating.
http://www.dualshockers.com/2014/04/14/infamous-second-sons-characters-are-120000-polygons-11-million-rendered-regularly-by-the-engine/
It says :
As stated in last point , doesn't look like 11 million polygons are rendered here .
ya bro posting some screen of a lod glitch totally discounts their statements of poly counts.
I like how you completely ignored what he highlighted in bold from the presentation slide. Famous for no shadows would be lucky to reach even a million poly at once. Such a shame it can't even top a game from 2011.
did you just compare a pc game to a console game?
jesus Christ what the **** is wrong with some people.
and not only that the game isn't even out yet.
you know....never mind **** you,
people still do this shit? seriously what the ****,
why not compare a watermelon to a bag of oranges while you are at it.
Well tell that to your fellow cows. They are the ones who brought them up. Did you even read the OP? Pretty silly thing to do if you ask me but then what else could you expect from idiots (cows).
It's all well and good that there is 11 mill polys per frame, that's amazing, but the LOD distance and pop in is an eye sore because of this. I'd rather it had been less poly intensive per frame to kill the pop ins.
No , it doesn't render 11 million polygons per frame . That title is misleading , read the article . The engine draws those polygons but doesn't render until character gets closer . Which means that , those are total polygons on entire map and not all of them are there when you look at distant objects . There are only few polygons to make the geometry of distant object similar to actual one . When you get closer , more polygons are rendered and added to it and it becomes more detailed . Meanwhile , polygons in area behind you , are reduced as you move further away .
Exactly. But cows will continue having a circle jerk over just the title of the thread. I can bet none of them even read the damn article, not even the gpuking himself.
Not only that but he copy pasted comment from NeoGaf about Star Citizen Cruiser , without doing any research about the game itself . The thread was pretty weak from the start , for discussion because of that comparison . Not to mention that nowhere in the article it says that all of those polygons are rendered at the same time . Actually it clearly states that , problem do occur when player moves faster and engine fails to render extra polygons at same speed , which results in blurry textures and terrible pop ins , and someone already posted pics about that glitch in this thread .
@Cloud_imperium
The game indeed renders 11 million polys per frame if you climb on the roof and get a panorama view of the entire city, there are more than enough spots to get those shots, so there's absolutely no cheating.
http://www.dualshockers.com/2014/04/14/infamous-second-sons-characters-are-120000-polygons-11-million-rendered-regularly-by-the-engine/
It says :
As stated in last point , doesn't look like 11 million polygons are rendered here .
ya bro posting some screen of a lod glitch totally discounts their statements of poly counts.
I like how you completely ignored what he highlighted in bold from the presentation slide. Famous for no shadows would be lucky to reach even a million poly at once. Such a shame it can't even top a game from 2011.
did you just compare a pc game to a console game?
jesus Christ what the **** is wrong with some people.
and not only that the game isn't even out yet.
you know....never mind **** you,
people still do this shit? seriously what the ****,
why not compare a watermelon to a bag of oranges while you are at it.
Well tell that to your fellow cows. They are the ones who brought them up. Did you even read the OP? Pretty silly thing to do if you ask me but then what else could you expect from idiots (cows).
Listen we all know PC is much more powerful, but you are acting like ISS is not impressive at all for an open world game. Please stop being a troll and realize it's strengths and not just it's flaws like draw distance and no night shadows. It is impressive and I'm sure you would agree if you had it. Do you really hate it to that degree? Why?
Because it isn't impressive, if you are used to playing PC games on a high-end machine.
look left
the water looks from a game of 2006
Log in to comment