The point of this thread was supposed to be not how can we make VR popular but should we.
Technology should bring people together and enrich our lives, not isolate us further.
These are the dangers sc-fi writers tackle repeatedly. Some optimistically but usually pessimistically.
I'm not sure VR is the direction I want technology to go in to be frank. I simply don't see the advantage over a flat screen for the majority of applications.
As for haptic feedback. I would be worried that someone could drug me in my sleep and hook me up to a computer and I would never know and be stuck in a virtual nightmare like the film Inception or The Matrix.
Technology needs to progress with humanity not leading, because it can so easily overwhelm if not treated with caution.
I would request the mods lock this thread now because that is my closing statement and it's repeating itself.
I'm going to stop you there. VR is objectively speaking the most connective technology ever created. It's the only way people can connect in a way that mimics real life.
VR will also greatly enrich our lives. I mean how can it not? Anyone having a panic attack can immediately transport themselves to a calm environment by a riverside. Someone who hates the state of their real life (like billions of us) can choose to escape for a bit. People who can't move or go anywhere can do so in VR. People who can't afford to travel can do so in VR. People who want access to high quality equipment can often simulate it in VR. People who want to live new types of lives can do it in VR, living a second life. People who want to try new things can do so in VR. People who want to become someone else can do so in VR. People who want to relive their memories of their wedding, birthday party can do so in VR. Someone who wants a productive work environment has a lot to gain with VR.
You don't see an advantage because you keep ignoring everything that people state. You don't like the idea, so you plug your ears, pretending you never heard anything.
Log in to comment