How would you rate that Wii U bird tech demo from a PC tech demo perspective?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for nameless12345
nameless12345

15125

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 nameless12345
Member since 2010 • 15125 Posts

How does it compare to PC tech demos and where would you place it on the PC tech demo list (i.e. what graphics chip)?

Here is the clip if anyone still hasn't seen it:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Shch7LNkVXw

Avatar image for NoodleFighter
NoodleFighter

11806

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 NoodleFighter
Member since 2011 • 11806 Posts

Samaritan poops on it!

this would probably considered average in the DX10/9 era

Avatar image for NoodleFighter
NoodleFighter

11806

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 NoodleFighter
Member since 2011 • 11806 Posts

Samaritan poops on it!

Wii U tech demowould probably considered average in the DX10/9 era

Avatar image for rasengan2552
rasengan2552

5071

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 rasengan2552
Member since 2009 • 5071 Posts

First of all Nintendo can't even name the dev team who did it ... we don't even know what the engine is. The Wii-U won't produce anything of that quality.

Avatar image for Kinthalis
Kinthalis

5503

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#5 Kinthalis
Member since 2002 • 5503 Posts

The problem with tech demos is that it's hard to tell just what could be carried into an actual game, and what looks amazing, but could never coexist ina game engine runnign pathfinding, AI, various effects, etc, etc.

Take a look at this old Nvidia tech demo:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x6yXTcgO7Xw&feature=related

It ran on a GTX 200 series vidoe card. But we have yet to see games with a ton of character that are THAT detailed. And we won't for another 5+ years.

Avatar image for morapuler
morapuler

116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 morapuler
Member since 2005 • 116 Posts

Laughable, at best.

Avatar image for ChubbyGuy40
ChubbyGuy40

26442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 ChubbyGuy40
Member since 2007 • 26442 Posts

First of all Nintendo can't even name the dev team who did it ... we don't even know what the engine is. The Wii-U won't produce anything of that quality.

rasengan2552

From what Digital Foundry said, the water looks incredibly similar to the water found in Gears of War 2. For some reason I wanna think Epic made it because it does look like something they could easily do and they already love Wii-U. A more realistic guess would be Retro.

We don't exactly know that. The Zelda tech demo looked great and they admitted that was very rushed. Also the tech demo looks even better if you see the uncut video that has more footage.

Avatar image for rasengan2552
rasengan2552

5071

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 rasengan2552
Member since 2009 • 5071 Posts

[QUOTE="rasengan2552"]

First of all Nintendo can't even name the dev team who did it ... we don't even know what the engine is. The Wii-U won't produce anything of that quality.

ChubbyGuy40

From what Digital Foundry said, the water looks incredibly similar to the water found in Gears of War 2. For some reason I wanna think Epic made it because it does look like something they could easily do and they already love Wii-U. A more realistic guess would be Retro.

We don't exactly know that. The Zelda tech demo looked great and they admitted that was very rushed. Also the tech demo looks even better if you see the uncut video that has more footage.

But Epic is the type of dev team that would want full credit for that if they did make it lol. I just can't see a team like Epic going unannounced like that.
Avatar image for ChubbyGuy40
ChubbyGuy40

26442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 ChubbyGuy40
Member since 2007 • 26442 Posts

But Epic is the type of dev team that would want full credit for that if they did make it lol. I just can't see a team like Epic going unannounced like that.rasengan2552

Epic kept quiet about working with Microsoft for developing the 360 specsfor a few yearsif I remember right.:P

Avatar image for topgunmv
topgunmv

10880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 topgunmv
Member since 2003 • 10880 Posts

Kind of reminds me of these shogun 2 pictures:

Just swap out the hundreds of guys and horses for... a bird.

Avatar image for Yundex
Yundex

60

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Yundex
Member since 2009 • 60 Posts
It looks awful, not even including the lack of feedback on the water. It must have been rushed because I think even the 360 could do that.
Avatar image for 22Toothpicks
22Toothpicks

12546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 22Toothpicks
Member since 2005 • 12546 Posts

First of all Nintendo can't even name the dev team who did it ... we don't even know what the engine is. The Wii-U won't produce anything of that quality.

rasengan2552
Uhh that tech demo isn't even that impressive. I'm sure the Wii-U will most certainly produce better.
Avatar image for LOXO7
LOXO7

5595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 LOXO7
Member since 2008 • 5595 Posts
The bird looks great when it's on its feet. I think the animators nailed it, but the flight looks wack and cartoony. Maybe that's their direction? But it didn't fit with what the bird did in the tree. Way too many flaps. I've never saw a bird fly like that. :)
Avatar image for Cheese-Muffins
Cheese-Muffins

569

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Cheese-Muffins
Member since 2008 • 569 Posts

That video they showed during the conference (and the link you provided) is worse and shorter than what they had on the floor. Here's the full video with improved features (offscreen however): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i2Nsa06KRLo

It's pretty good for being made on early hardware. I'll reserve full judgement until we actually see something on the finalized specs.

Avatar image for rasengan2552
rasengan2552

5071

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 rasengan2552
Member since 2009 • 5071 Posts
[QUOTE="rasengan2552"]

First of all Nintendo can't even name the dev team who did it ... we don't even know what the engine is. The Wii-U won't produce anything of that quality.

22Toothpicks
Uhh that tech demo isn't even that impressive. I'm sure the Wii-U will most certainly produce better.

some parts of the tech demo were very impressive for a demo that "supposedly" built ground up from a console dev kit. Compared to anything on a PC its old news though, regardless I still doubt the Wii-U can produce anything like that.
Avatar image for Half-Way
Half-Way

5001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Half-Way
Member since 2010 • 5001 Posts

Kind of reminds me of these shogun 2 pictures:

Just swap out the hundreds of guys and horses for... a bird.

topgunmv

lmao, i came in to say just that.

its shogun 2 without the scale:P

its not like tech demos matter much, i remember tech demos for the ps3 looking alot better then the actual games themselves. Heavy rain comes to mind.

Avatar image for TailBlood
TailBlood

944

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 TailBlood
Member since 2011 • 944 Posts

[QUOTE="topgunmv"]

Kind of reminds me of these shogun 2 pictures:

Just swap out the hundreds of guys and horses for... a bird.

Half-Way

lmao, i came in to say just that.

its shogun 2 without the scale:P

its not like tech demos matter much, i remember tech demos for the ps3 looking alot better then the actual games themselves. Heavy rain comes to mind.

*cough* Alan Wake pc version *cough*

Avatar image for Mr-Espresso
Mr-Espresso

372

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 Mr-Espresso
Member since 2011 • 372 Posts

It was sub-par at best, the kind of tech demo's that you see these days are just mind blowing and the Wii U Japanese Garden demo was fairly middle of the road compared to most.

Avatar image for ArchoNils2
ArchoNils2

10534

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19 ArchoNils2
Member since 2005 • 10534 Posts

comprared to PC it looks horrible, comprared to current gen consoles pretty good

Avatar image for Zophar87
Zophar87

4344

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#20 Zophar87
Member since 2008 • 4344 Posts

The Wii U won't produce anything on PC tech demo quality. Sorry to say.

Avatar image for Rude_Bwoii
Rude_Bwoii

523

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Rude_Bwoii
Member since 2011 • 523 Posts

The demo was meh if it was a pc gpu demo I doubt it would have even been shown. The r700 has some ruby demo's that crush that bird demo.

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#22 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

How does it compare to PC tech demos and where would you place it on the PC tech demo list (i.e. what graphics chip)?

Here is the clip if anyone still hasn't seen it:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Shch7LNkVXw

nameless12345

RV770 Ruby demo http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aT37b2QjkZc

This Ruby demo includes raytacing.

Avatar image for GTSaiyanjin2
GTSaiyanjin2

6018

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#23 GTSaiyanjin2
Member since 2005 • 6018 Posts

[QUOTE="nameless12345"]

How does it compare to PC tech demos and where would you place it on the PC tech demo list (i.e. what graphics chip)?

Here is the clip if anyone still hasn't seen it:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Shch7LNkVXw

ronvalencia

RV770 Ruby demo http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aT37b2QjkZc

This Ruby demo includes raytacing.

I dont think that tech demo was ever released.... So I'm calling BS that a 4870 could run it. And I think the Wii U has a similar GPU as the 48XX series.

Avatar image for ugoo18
ugoo18

1005

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 ugoo18
Member since 2010 • 1005 Posts

Im not making any assumptions/judgements till 2 things happen.

1. We actually get a direct feed video not a video of a video showing the demo, also when i say direct feed i mean of a recent version of that bird demo since the one on the show floor was improved upon fairly significantly compared to what was shown during Nintendo's E3 presentation according to some of the people who witnessed it first hand.

2. We see a direct feed of that demo redone on the new versions of the WiiU dev kits that devs will be recieving within the next month or so.

Avatar image for amaneuvering
amaneuvering

4809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#25 amaneuvering
Member since 2009 • 4809 Posts

I think it looks very good overall but it's just a tech demo so it's hard to tell how close Wii U could get in an actual game with full interaction and gameplay etc.