Halo 4 or Killzone Shadow Fall: Which one sucked more?

Neither.. Next question.

I wouldn't say either sucked as I had a great time with both. Shadow Fall was my least favorite of the two though.

Halo 4 sucked? News to me.

Mario.

Halo 4 was awesome. Shadow Fall was good in its first few missions then fell flat.

So Shadow Fall sucked more.

Both of them sucks

Never played halo4, kzsf is the weakest in the series I loved the first 3

I can't believe this is a topic of discussion. KZ:SF is far worse than Halo 4, in just about every single way. I own and have beaten both, and KZ:SF for the most part has a terribly designed campaign from a gameplay perspective, while halo is far more interesting. Halo 4 has great co-op play, better online play (maps and balance), an in game map editor, and more. KZ is bare bones in comparison, badly designed single player (that makes no use of a somewhat interesting setting) and a meh multiplayer mode vs a pretty well polished Halo game....IMO Halo 4 is at least an 8 or an 8.5, while I personally regard Killzone as a 6.

Killzone

Please don't compare godlo to clownzone

Shadow Fall by a long shot. Never got why people thought Halo 4 sucked so much, it wasn't amazing but it was on par with Reach in my eyes. Shadow Fall was on par with Killzone 1. The singleplayer was awful and the multiplayer isn't much better, everything about it just feels sloppily done apart from the graphics.

Killzone, hands down..

Halo was a much much much better game that killzone garbage

Well, Killzone was always designed strictly to be (or at least attempt to be) a "Halo killer". Now that Bungie has left MS, Guerilla has become a studio without any more goals left to achieve. No wonder Killzone Shadow Fall fell apart.

Neither sucked but Killzone was the bigger letdown, by far.

oh please

how can you insult a game like halo 4 in comparing it to the biggest pile of steaming turd we have seen to date.

the only ones choosing halo 4 are the stubborn cows that wont accept the brilliance of halo because tey luv teh sony kaz

Look at this timeline of the series since 343 took over http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=709697

If thats not killing an IP I don't know what is.

KZ:SF was the most traded back game at launch for a reason.

The people who dislike Halo 4 simply have bad taste in video games. If you actually think Shadow Fall was a better game then Halo 4, then I can't help but think that you like generic, rushed, and unpolished trash.

I enjoyed Halo 4's campaign and multiplayer was still very fun. KZSF's campaign was enthralling and I felt sunk into the story. The multiplayer? It was just horrible. It's just too slow for me.

Halo 4 is actually a good game . Shadow Fall is weakest in the series , and overall series isn't that good either .

Lol. Has nothing to do with the thread.

Both were awful. I'm gonna say Halo 4 sucked more though since I at least managed to finish shadow fall.

Halo 4 because I expect it to be good. Seriously halo 4 is such a garbage game even the devs admitted they made many mistakes and asked for forgivness. Halo reach is also garbage

Well, I have to disagree that KZSF was the weakest entry. The story was a lot more personal, you felt connected to Lucas which I think I did not feel the same way in other entries. It was told rather decently, if not in a rather quaint European fashion that has ways to catch up with American storytelling. KZSF campaign was easily the best out of all Killzone campaigns. I never enjoyed Killzone's multiplayer however. It always felt too slow and clunky. I'd rather a pace closer to Battlefield 4 but that's just me.

Didn't really play much of the Halo 4 multiplayer, but I must say the campaign is much better than the KZ:SF campaign. More interesting enemies, story, gameplay, art, that sort of stuff. KZ:SF has the graphics, sure, but it honestly just feels like a half-baked, assembly line FPS, where Halo 4 still had some heart and flavor put into it. I wouldn't say it's the best Halo by any stretch, and probably gets beat by KZ2 or maybe 3, but it's a much better entry than SF in either franchise.

Neither sucked. Halo 4 was a great game and Shadow Fall was just ok.

Halo 4 didn't suck. Shadowfall is the very definition of how not to make a FPS.

I can excuse 343, seeing as how it's their first game, and not to mention it's Halo. Not exactly an easy task to take over Halo.
GG had already worked on 3 Killzone games, and yet they managed to set the bar lower with the 4th installment.

Uh, Halo 4 was fckng spectacular. Best solo fps this gen, BY FAR(Halo3 remains best multiplayer fps).

Shadowfall by a big margin.

Halo
9/10 by gamespot.

Killzone
7/10 by gamespot

Neither sucked and both look gorgeous and Killzone was also a "Launch title game for the PS4".
The only thing that does suck is that those who have not played them yet. ;)

@charizard1605 Halo 4 was not a bad game. It was a let down as a Halo game, but it was not a bad game.

Halo remains the first and so far only time that:

• I had to give up on the campaign of a Halo game because of how bad it was
• A Halo game's multiplayer didn't become our de facto standard multiplayer game for game nights (speaking for me and my buddies here)- even Reach, with its broken armor abilities, managed that
• I didn't care for the soundtrack in a Halo game (I recognize this might sound subjective, but I honestly believe that Halo 4's soundtrack is demonstrably inferior to the Bungie Halo games)
• For more tangible effects, Halo 4 also had the lowest population of any Halo games just months after it launched, and that number continued to fall even more off a cliff after that

I think Halo 4 was a mediocre game. Sure, it's not even in the same league of sucking as Shadow Fall, but the fact that this comparison can be made at all is pretty telling overall.

Different expectations.

Personally, I enjoyed SF more. The disastrous Halo 4 MP will never leave me.

Even the worst Halo game is better than whatever the best flopzone game is.

I never got into them. I feel more inclined to check out Halo though.

LOL Killzone. Comparing it to something as godly as Halo is just wrong.

I really liked both games, both of their multiplayer was astonishing to play and look at. But both fell flat from a single-player experience, I was more disappointed with Killzone's campaign because that was a hot mess lol. I didn't like Halo 4's either, but at least he tied up some loose ends

As disappointing as Halo 4 might have been I don't think there's any possible way it could be as boring as a Killzone title. Killzone is the Mona Lisa of shit.

Halo 4 was decent,pretty good in many ways,Killzone SF was mediocre at best,like most(if not all) of that series entries.

I never played Halo 4, but I can't imagine it being any worse than Shadow Fall... not that I played that one all the way either, about an hour of it was all I could take.

Halo 4 was awesome and i have yet to play Killzone shadowfall but it does look good i suppose

Neither really. Shadowfall was the most enjoyable KZ for me, but Halo 4 was a much better game.

Halo 4 had an amazing campaign.

Shadow Fall. I enjoyed the SP, but did not enjoy the MP. I enjoyed both with Halo 4.