Gran Turismo Sport Hype Thread!

Because they haven't but they have done a review and have gone back after bug fixes and patches. If this were an X1 game you cows would be crying about GS being biased and all.

Because I do know it all cow, comes with age and the fact I was born with common sense which cows seem to severely lack.

I would pass on this game if it didn't have a VR mode (which is quite good!). I gave it an A because I hate this newfangled 'buy incomplete games' thing going on these days. Breath of the Wild me or go home.

@Chutebox: Lol yes. It's so frustrating when you are doing ok and then this happens in the last lap.

But this is not about bugs, this is about a feature of the game that won't be available until later and that they have to wait to review it properly. If the game releases broken and full of bugs then of course it would be fair to review it right there accordingly but this is not the case here because the game is not broken or buggy, it is just another feature that is not available at all times and they have to wait for a specific moment to try it. Gosh how is this so difficult for you to understand?

@Douevenlift_bro: it clearly has competiton, don't be a dingus

What features? A tournament? A race? All features are available on the retail release. What specific feature isn't available?

For GT Sport the online tournament participation is one of its main features. All the rating and profiling of racers is made around these events so why wouldn't they test how the game uses all the information to match up users and make the events fair and competitive? If they fail in that and the events are a mess because of bad matching and preparation/training then they might have even more source for criticism.

A tournament? That doesn't change how the game performs. It's no different that how iRacing uses it's rating system and licenses. You don't hold a review back for something like that because it doesn't change how the game plays. It effects WHO you might be racing against but not the handling, graphics or content. It's a poor excuse to hold back a review and hypocritical of GS. As of right now you could go into the game a join a race. The physics, graphics and servers are all available to the public. A tournament is not a valid reason to hold back a review.

These events are a central feature of the game. It would be like ignoring the vs mode on a fighting game completely and making a review of the rest of the game. I don't see GS reviewing iR BTW, there's a reason many regular gaming sites don't review it because it takes a special approach to a game like that. If GS had done that with another similar game then you might have a point but there hasn't been a situation like this with a game here before so it's a first and that's why the reviewer is saying that PD is taking a risk.

I don't support any game that requires a constant online connection. In fact, fvck those games and fvck the dev/publishers who are responsible that decision.

@pinkanimal: My best guess is that GS doesn't want to do a follow up review due to both November/December holidays are coming up, they got other stuff to cover so it looks like they want to do it all review rather then to work up a follow up.

Hell I always support a reviewer to take there time with the game for the most parts. Angry Joe comes to mind when he takes his time working on a review.

These events have no effect on how the game plays period. It's no different than iRacings hosted leagues. It's an integral part of iRacing but it doesn't change how the game performs.

Stop with this game being the 1st of it's kind BS. This game isn't breaking any new ground and from what I read it's just as much arcade as it is SIM. Nothing new

It's the first racing simulator that is centered around esports on consoles. It's iRacing on consoles. Gamespot didn't even bother reviewing iRacing. It's got a 79 (I think) on metacritic.

When more games like these start to get released and GS keeps using this method for review will you stop crying then?

Flopza ?

Different platform =/= new. It's been done before just like consoles having an online infrastructure. It wasn't new, just new to consoles but that doesn't make it unique.

iRacing is extremely niche so it doesn't surprise me that GS didn't review it. GT isn't and shouldn't be treated as such. It should be reviewed just as any other game. If they wanted to revise the review then fine but they're not doing that here. I just believe if a game is released to the public then it should be reviewed as any other game would be. It's not like it has massive amounts of content that would prevent a review from being completed quickly.

Will you stop crying about lems every time they don't agree with your heavily biased opinions?

I will continue to champion logic and reasoning in debates instead of fanboy butthurt which is apparently the only thing lems have left. The reviewer here wrote a perfectly reasonable and good explanation about why he's waiting for the review and all you guys can do is go into tantrums about how biased and unfair GS is.

GS isn't new, but GT doing esports like a niche title is. Since they never reviewed an esport focused racing game before, it is new and requires a new approach. That's it.

7 here. nothing higher

Logic and reason doesn't apply when you're as big a fanboy as you are. You're unreasonable and will justify/defend everything Sony. You've been called out on it many many many times. You can't use that "logic and reason" because you being the fanboy you are, don't use logic or reason.

That should qualify it for a delayed review just because GT hasn't done it. The FULL game has been released. Everyone can join a race and play. Everyone can experience the games driving and servers.

It's not new, it doesn't require a new approach.

I'm merely repeating what the reviewer here clearly explained. You're the one choosing not to believe his explanation and making out fanboyish conclusions without proof or evidence whatsoever that he is somehow lying or being unfair about it so don't talk to me about being reasonable because you are as farther away from it as possible here.

Because the review is most likely biased. Believe it or not all reviewers are neutral and since this isn't normal for reviews I'll stick to what I see not what I'm told by biased fanboys.

Sorry cow but I'm being more sensible than you are. This type of game isn't new, reviewers will usually delay a review is there is a massive amount of content but that's not the case here. YOU are the fanboy being unreasonable and defending everything and anything when it comes to Sony.

@kingtito: What do you think the real reason for the delay is, if not because the game's setup being unique?

So we are supposed to believe the reviewer is biased and you one of the most butthurt lemmings on this board somehow has a sixth sense for detecting bias in reviews. You're a bad joke dude

IMO, the reviewer is biased. Trying to give Sony every chance but that's just my opinion. I could be wrong but you asked what I think.

Better than believing you cow. You're the most biased, fanatical fanboy to ever come to this site. You couldn't be objective if it saved your life

Lol... not from what I'm seeing from a lot of reviewers.

I mean, did you see his previews?

Honestly, I did not.

I would read them. He's pretty harsh, and nothing about what he said is going to change by November. Or ever.

Perhaps I should. Not sure it'll change my opinion but I'll keep an open mind.

Again I'm just repeating exactly what the reviewer said, you're the one going into a fanboyish temper tantrum because a gaming site made you butthurt. Grow up lemming.

Oh now that you know the reviewer said bad stuff about it you're going to keep an open mind? Before you were teh biazzz!!! See what I said about being reasonable? I accepted the reviewers criticisms without melting in tears. This is funny because you're going to get owned if the reviewer actually gives it a bad score because all your butthurt conspiracy theory will fall to pieces. But I'm sure you'll be crying for the next PS4 game review just the same way.

Why would I get owned cow? It's an opinion I have. You do know what an opinion is right? I doubt it since you seem to think your opinion == fact most of the time

Because your dumb opinion would been exposed as how dumb it was. The bad thing is that you will be crying with the next review in the same way because you lemmings never learn.

Opinions are sometimes wrong cow or else they'd be called facts. You should know since most of your opinions are about as asinine as your defense of Sony anytime anyone says anything even remotely negative. Takes one to know one son?

I never said you made this hype threads, but that you have created hype threads, reading comprehension dav get some.

Opinions are not wrong but they can certainly be dumb like yours.

@i_p_daily: Then direct to Zero_epyon if you required further assistance my console gaming friend :)

Sorry kid but YOUR opinions, which you claim to be fact, are often wrong AND stupid. Check yo self before you wreck yo self son

Delayed so that the game has time to meet @Zero_epyon hype thread.... Very suspicious.

No you asked why everyone was waiting for GS score, in which I replied you've created hype threads before an know why everyone HERE is waiting for GS score.

Maybe you should see someone who can help you follow a simple conversation :(

If the game is released to the public unfinished and missing features thats how it should be reviewed. End of.

Makes sense to you, I and everyone else except the cows. Their excuse is that it's trying something different therefore it should be treated differently lol.

Completely ridiculous, should GS have waited until a year after launch to review SFV considering they havent fully released the full game? Or wait until the master cheif collection was sorted? or how about only reviewing only 'game of the year' editions?

Cows and their daft logic.

Anyway 75 on metacritic, but knowing GS will over overscore it

A lot of people returning this game after realising its incomplete. Not good

This^^

This is why the PS2 era was the best, developers had no option to patch the game at a later date so they had to do it all before release which led to less issues and more complete games on release day.

Source?