Funny How this game hasn't gotten a single review yet

MAG(MASSIVE AKTIONE GAME!!!) The reason I bring this up is because I remember when Socom was about to release about an equal time frame from release it had jno reviews and the reason being is because reviewers had to play it after it came out because the servers were supposed to be fixed by then and looked how terribly it flopped, simply because it had soo many unbelievable technical problems. Anyone else have a feeling the same crap will happen here with MAG? Floppy Mc Flop

MODERATOR'S NOTE: Removed the derogatory use of the term 'gay'

I see what your saying, and unless they learned to wait for the servers to settle down, it'll probably happen again.

So you want a review for a game that is online only before the servers are up? What are they going to review the box or the loading screen? cause they won't get past that. And why even mention your orientation?(GAYME)

So you want a review for a game that is online only before the servers are up? What are they going to review the box or the loading screen? cause they won't get past that. And why even mention that you like men?illegalimigrant

So you want a review for a game that is online only before the servers are up? What are they going to review the box or the loading screen? cause they won't get past that. And why even mention your orientation?(GAYME)

illegalimigrant

[QUOTE="illegalimigrant"]

So you want a review for a game that is online only before the servers are up? What are they going to review the box or the loading screen? cause they won't get past that. And why even mention your orientation?(GAYME)

CleanNJerk

[QUOTE="CleanNJerk"][QUOTE="illegalimigrant"]

So you want a review for a game that is online only before the servers are up? What are they going to review the box or the loading screen? cause they won't get past that. And why even mention your orientation?(GAYME)

illegalimigrant

The word gay isn't a synonym for stupid.

[QUOTE="CleanNJerk"][QUOTE="illegalimigrant"]

So you want a review for a game that is online only before the servers are up? What are they going to review the box or the loading screen? cause they won't get past that. And why even mention your orientation?(GAYME)

illegalimigrant

don't you know? The Massively overhyped games get Reviews first.

Thats normally not a good sign because they probably put an embargo on it saying you cant review it until its in stores, so people might just buy it blindly since there are no reviews up

MAG(MASSIVE AKTIONE GAYME!!!) The reason I bring this up is because I remember when Socom was about to release about an equal time frame from release it had jno reviews and the reason being is because reviewers had to play it after it came out because the servers were supposed to be fixed by then and looked how terribly it flopped, simply because it had soo many unbelievable technical problems. Anyone else have a feeling the same crap will happen here with MAG? Floppy Mc FlopCleanNJerk

I had suspisions but thanks for cl;arifying and coming outta the closet :P

don't you know? The Massively overhyped games get Reviews first.

LegatoSkyheart

Mostly everyone suspects MAG will do poorly anyways.Stevo_the_gamer

just like they thought killzone 2 was gonna do bad and uncharted 2

Thats normally not a good sign because they probably put an embargo on it saying you cant review it until its in stores, so people might just buy it blindly since there are no reviews up

walkerctranger

Good thing Socom Confron was handed to Slant Six while Zipper Made MAG.

[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"]Mostly everyone suspects MAG will do poorly anyways.drakecool1

just like they thought killzone 2 was gonna do bad and uncharted 2

MAG(MASSIVE AKTIONE GAYME!!!) The reason I bring this up is because I remember when Socom was about to release about an equal time frame from release it had jno reviews and the reason being is because reviewers had to play it after it came out because the servers were supposed to be fixed by then and looked how terribly it flopped, simply because it had soo many unbelievable technical problems. Anyone else have a feeling the same crap will happen here with MAG? Floppy Mc FlopCleanNJerk

Apparently you have no idea that they had a massive stress test/open beta earlier in the month.

Funny how people who don't know anything about a game always claim it's going to flop.

Jeff Rubenstein writes - "Reviews can't be written until the game is actually out. I mean, you can't pass pre-release judgment on a game whose major, industry-leading feature (256 players in a single battle) can't be tested until release day."

[QUOTE="CleanNJerk"]MAG(MASSIVE AKTIONE GAYME!!!) The reason I bring this up is because I remember when Socom was about to release about an equal time frame from release it had jno reviews and the reason being is because reviewers had to play it after it came out because the servers were supposed to be fixed by then and looked how terribly it flopped, simply because it had soo many unbelievable technical problems. Anyone else have a feeling the same crap will happen here with MAG? Floppy Mc Flopairshocker

Apparently you have no idea that they had a massive stress test/open beta earlier in the month.

Funny how people who don't know anything about a game always claim it's going to flop.

[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"]Mostly everyone suspects MAG will do poorly anyways.drakecool1

just like they thought killzone 2 was gonna do bad and uncharted 2

MAG(MASSIVE AKTIONE GAYME!!!) The reason I bring this up is because I remember when Socom was about to release about an equal time frame from release it had jno reviews and the reason being is because reviewers had to play it after it came out because the servers were supposed to be fixed by then and looked how terribly it flopped, simply because it had soo many unbelievable technical problems. Anyone else have a feeling the same crap will happen here with MAG? Floppy Mc FlopCleanNJerk

for the vigintillionth time(yes its a number followed by 63 digits)

mag is being hyoped low so if it performs low than its not a flop

if u want a flop look at hype for twilight princess and look at score that was a flop as it was AAAA hyped

[QUOTE="drakecool1"]

[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"]Mostly everyone suspects MAG will do poorly anyways.Stevo_the_gamer

just like they thought killzone 2 was gonna do bad and uncharted 2

halo wars was hyped AA and it didn't even get an A, Dragon Age was hyped AA and got AAA look at batman that was hyped A because of all the bad batman games and it got AAA

if i made a game, and i new it was bad.. i wouldnt give it to the reviews.. i would tell them that they would have to wait till its out to buy it and review it..
case closed

for the vigintillionth time(yes its a number followed by 63 digits)

mag is being hyoped low so if it performs low than its not a flop

if u want a flop look at hype for twilight princess and look at score that was a flop as it was AAAA hyped

[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"]Mostly everyone suspects MAG will do poorly anyways.drakecool1

just like they thought killzone 2 was gonna do bad and uncharted 2

No. Most people thought those games would do well.

if i made a game, and i new it was bad.. i wouldnt give it to the reviews.. i would tell them that they would have to wait till its out to buy it and review it..
case closed

iamshivy

[QUOTE="CleanNJerk"]MAG(MASSIVE AKTIONE GAYME!!!) The reason I bring this up is because I remember when Socom was about to release about an equal time frame from release it had jno reviews and the reason being is because reviewers had to play it after it came out because the servers were supposed to be fixed by then and looked how terribly it flopped, simply because it had soo many unbelievable technical problems. Anyone else have a feeling the same crap will happen here with MAG? Floppy Mc Flopjalexbrown

[QUOTE="iamshivy"]

if i made a game, and i new it was bad.. i wouldnt give it to the reviews.. i would tell them that they would have to wait till its out to buy it and review it..
case closed

CleanNJerk

Offical servers dont go up untill tomarrow(monday), how can reviewers review a game that's biggest selling point is 256 player battles when there wont be any players on the servers untill monday, and even then there wont be enough to have multiple 256 player games.

[QUOTE="CleanNJerk"][QUOTE="iamshivy"]

if i made a game, and i new it was bad.. i wouldnt give it to the reviews.. i would tell them that they would have to wait till its out to buy it and review it..
case closed

illegalimigrant

The game has something to it that looks really good graphic-wise....is it the lighting?

The game has something to it that looks really good graphic-wise....is it the lighting?

AmayaPapaya

[QUOTE="AmayaPapaya"]

The game has something to it that looks really good graphic-wise....is it the lighting?

jalexbrown

Hey thats in the wrong thread. I must of mixed up tabs....ooops.

The main feature of MAG is it's online play, the servers aren't even up yet so how would they be able to give it a review without experiencing the games main selling point?

[QUOTE="jalexbrown"][QUOTE="AmayaPapaya"]

The game has something to it that looks really good graphic-wise....is it the lighting?

AmayaPapaya

Hey thats in the wrong thread. I must of mixed up tabs....ooops.

First off. MAG hasn't been released yet and reviewing a game off the beta is not only a very stupid thing to do but it is also very unprofessional. Especially since the game will launch with more skills, weapons, armor, levels, faces, voices, options, more features, a more polished game pretty much.

Secondly. The servers do not go online until release day, and even on release day no one will be able to get into a 256 player room for awhile since every starts off at level 1 and it takes a while to work your way up.

Now, there is ABSOLUTELY no reason to bash MAG at all. Te graphics are fine, not CODMW2 or Killzone 2 but it's a trade off that was needed for the larger scale, which is the game's selling point. The game does not have "stiff" combat, what you are experiencing is the lack of auto aim. The game does not have "ps2" graphics, no PS2 game could run MAG, and in some areas the game looks REALLY good.

MAG is pretty much being hyped AA. if it gets a lower score than that it's pretty much the reviewers saying "it's not COD, therefor it's bad"