Forget 60fps next gen. Y'all need to see this!

Avatar image for goldenelementxl
GoldenElementXL

3499

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1  Edited By GoldenElementXL
Member since 2016 • 3499 Posts

So i decided to make the next big step in PC gaming. And bruh...

Y'all have got to see this!

Now 60fps feels like hot garbage. And just when consoles were catching up, too...

What the hell have I been doing this whole time?!?!?!?!

Avatar image for drlostrib
DrLostRib

5109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#2 DrLostRib
Member since 2017 • 5109 Posts

5-way navigation joystick?!? GTFO of here, what a waste of money. The human eye can only see 3-way joysticks

Avatar image for deactivated-5d78760d7d740
deactivated-5d78760d7d740

16386

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#3 deactivated-5d78760d7d740
Member since 2009 • 16386 Posts

Yup, now try getting used to 100+ fps then stepping back down to 30fps for console exclusives. It's pretty jarring during the transition period.

Avatar image for rzxv04
rzxv04

686

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 10

#4 rzxv04
Member since 2018 • 686 Posts

Maybe one day.

Perhaps with how things are slowing down on the h/w side of things. That 2080Ti will last about 2 generations.

Avatar image for that_old_guy
That_Old_Guy

1236

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#5 That_Old_Guy
Member since 2018 • 1236 Posts

I like my 65 Inch OLED more. 60 FPS? Shiiiiit...see that shit in HDR on an OLED....change your life, bro.

Avatar image for goldenelementxl
GoldenElementXL

3499

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 GoldenElementXL
Member since 2016 • 3499 Posts

@that_old_guy said:

I like my 65 Inch OLED more. 60 FPS? Shiiiiit...see that shit in HDR on an OLED....change your life, bro.

I have a 85", 65" and 2 55" 4K HDR TV's. I know all about it. 144fps might be a bigger deal than HDR in all honesty when games are involved. Movies are another thing, but gaming needs frames!

Avatar image for that_old_guy
That_Old_Guy

1236

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#7  Edited By That_Old_Guy
Member since 2018 • 1236 Posts

@goldenelementxl: 2 different types of graphic whores we are. I like the shiny objects you like the need for speed, lol.

Avatar image for npiet1
npiet1

2581

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#8 npiet1
Member since 2018 • 2581 Posts

@XVision84: it's the reason I don't really want to go 100+ fps. but I also prefer pretty over smooth. I just wish I could have the best of both worlds.

Avatar image for ellos
ellos

2088

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9  Edited By ellos
Member since 2015 • 2088 Posts

Pffff but its not.... its not True 4k.

Avatar image for BassMan
BassMan

10765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 126

User Lists: 0

#10  Edited By BassMan  Online
Member since 2002 • 10765 Posts

Where have you been the last 5 years? I bought the first 1440p/144hz G-Sync monitor (Asus ROG Swift PG278Q) when it came out in 2014.

Now you know why I always bitch about how shit 30fps is. Once you get used to a high refresh rate, it is painful to go back and play console exclusives at 30fps. Anyway, welcome to high quality gaming. Next step is Ultrawide. :)

Avatar image for PCgameruk
PCgameruk

2273

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 PCgameruk
Member since 2012 • 2273 Posts

Consoles are literately unplayable after going 144hz. Used to just get the exclusives but its like a slideshow and they add tons of motion blur to try and hide it... All this next gen talk and still stuck in the stone age...

Avatar image for gameofthering
gameofthering

11281

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#12 gameofthering
Member since 2004 • 11281 Posts

I bought myself a 120Hz monitor back in 2012 for 3D vision, but ended up enjoying far more due to the high refresh rate.

Avatar image for mandzilla
mandzilla

4230

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#13 mandzilla  Moderator
Member since 2017 • 4230 Posts

Congratulations on your purchases OP, hope you are enjoying. You should give Three Kindoms a go if you like RTS.

Avatar image for ezekiel43
Ezekiel43

1909

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#14 Ezekiel43
Member since 2017 • 1909 Posts

@that_old_guy said:

I like my 65 Inch OLED more. 60 FPS? Shiiiiit...see that shit in HDR on an OLED....change your life, bro.

Same. I prefer my 64 inch 4K HDR 5.1.2 surround system over a monitor. I only wish I could comfortably play with my mouse and keyboard on the sofa. Can't have it all.

Avatar image for davillain-
DaVillain-

38642

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#15  Edited By DaVillain-  Moderator
Member since 2014 • 38642 Posts
@BassMan said:

Where have you been the last 5 years? I bought the first 1440p/144hz G-Sync monitor (Asus ROG Swift PG278Q) when it came out in 2014.

Now you know why I always bitch about how shit 30fps is. Once you get used to a high refresh rate, it is painful to go back and play console exclusives at 30fps. Anyway, welcome to high quality gaming. Next step is Ultrawide. :)

I came late to 144Hz myself. Once you go 144Hz, you'll never go back to 60fps. Not saying 60fps is bad by any means, 144Hz just feels so milky good :)

As for Ultrawide, it's not my gig. (I'm still old school)

Wealth & Glory to the PC gamers!

Avatar image for i_p_daily
I_P_Daily

12906

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#16 I_P_Daily
Member since 2015 • 12906 Posts

@goldenelementxl: And yet all you will be doing is playing a cartoon looking game in Fortnite lol.

Avatar image for Gatygun
Gatygun

1637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17  Edited By Gatygun
Member since 2010 • 1637 Posts

Yea bought a few years 180hz screen with gsync. When frames hit 100+ fps. Everything is so butter smooth, no tearing, stuttering or jarring visuals.

It's great.

Gratz on your new gear.

Avatar image for pyro1245
pyro1245

5393

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#18 pyro1245  Online
Member since 2003 • 5393 Posts
@i_p_daily said:

@goldenelementxl: And yet all you will be doing is playing a cartoon looking game in Fortnite lol.

Who cares what he wants to play? The point is he will be playing it at glorious 144fps.

Avatar image for fedor
Fedor

5455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 Fedor
Member since 2015 • 5455 Posts

@i_p_daily: Well Fortnite benefits greatly from higher frames so it should be pretty nice.

Avatar image for davillain-
DaVillain-

38642

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#20  Edited By DaVillain-  Moderator
Member since 2014 • 38642 Posts
@i_p_daily said:

@goldenelementxl: And yet all you will be doing is playing a cartoon looking game in Fortnite lol.

You are aware the higher the framerates in games like Fortnite or PUBG, the better it makes the gameplay smooth right? GoldenElementXL is gonna have fun either way.

Anyhow, you sound bitter.

Avatar image for lebanese_boy
lebanese_boy

15147

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#21 lebanese_boy
Member since 2003 • 15147 Posts

Welcome to the masterrace (J/K) and congrats on your purchase. I myself don't want to go over 60 fps, it's good enough for me and I fear that it would make anything less than that unplayable to me :(

Avatar image for ajstyles
AJStyles

1160

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#22 AJStyles
Member since 2018 • 1160 Posts

lol at people who can’t play games because of FPS.

I have no problem playing 30 or 60fps games. As long as it’s not under 30, I feel great.

Avatar image for doomnukem3d
DoomNukem3D

396

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#23 DoomNukem3D
Member since 2019 • 396 Posts

I'm glad I dont care much about framerate.

Avatar image for Random_Matt
Random_Matt

4381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#24 Random_Matt
Member since 2013 • 4381 Posts

Really? You have never had a 144Hz display?

Avatar image for Ant_17
Ant_17

12935

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#25 Ant_17
Member since 2005 • 12935 Posts

Neat, boxes and gifs.

Avatar image for PernicioEnigma
PernicioEnigma

6134

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26  Edited By PernicioEnigma
Member since 2010 • 6134 Posts

Yeah it's hard to go back to 60fps when you've become accustomed to 100+ hz refresh rates. I played a base Xbone at a friends house for the first time in years, and the frame rate and input lag was horrendous to the point it made me slightly nauseous. I played RDR2, and whilst the game looked beautiful, the second you moved the camera the screen turned into a blurred mess of stuttering frames. Hard to believe people play games like this for long periods.

Avatar image for PernicioEnigma
PernicioEnigma

6134

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 PernicioEnigma
Member since 2010 • 6134 Posts

@ajstyles said:

lol at people who can’t play games because of FPS.

I have no problem playing 30 or 60fps games. As long as it’s not under 30, I feel great.

It's not so much that they can't, they just don't want to. If you have only ever really played 30fps games (with the occasional 60) then it might sound strange, but if you've been playing all of your games at 60+ FPS on a high refresh monitor for months/years and you go back to a 30FPS game it's an incredibly jarring experience.

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

54046

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#28 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 54046 Posts

I like my TV for 4K 60hz, for games that can run it, and 1440p at 120fps.

Avatar image for FireEmblem_Man
FireEmblem_Man

19854

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#29  Edited By FireEmblem_Man
Member since 2004 • 19854 Posts

Already jumped on 144Mhz before the TC!

Avatar image for Juub1990
Juub1990

8761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 Juub1990
Member since 2013 • 8761 Posts

Man people are such bullshit artists. It's easy to go from 120fps to 60fps mostly because at 1440p, almost no modern game can be run at 120fps with a single card let alone 144fps. The difference is also nowhere near as pronounced as the one between 30 and 60fps. I have a 120Hz G-Sync monitor and 120fps is honestly something I can do without. As long as the frame rate remains at 60+ I'm happy. 30fps is something I want nothing of. The best perk is the frame rate smoothing and complete lack of screen tearing.

If you expect to be blown away by 120fps alone, prepared to be disappointed.

Avatar image for BassMan
BassMan

10765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 126

User Lists: 0

#31  Edited By BassMan  Online
Member since 2002 • 10765 Posts
@Juub1990 said:

Man people are such bullshit artists. It's easy to go from 120fps to 60fps mostly because at 1440p, almost no modern game can be run at 120fps with a single card let alone 144fps. The difference is also nowhere near as pronounced as the one between 30 and 60fps. I have a 120Hz G-Sync monitor and 120fps is honestly something I can do without. As long as the frame rate remains at 60+ I'm happy. 30fps is something I want nothing of. The best perk is the frame rate smoothing and complete lack of screen tearing.

If you expect to be blown away by 120fps alone, prepared to be disappointed.

Do you not play shooters regularly? The difference between a 60hz monitor and a 120/144hz monitor is substantial. It feels much smoother, less blur, less input lag, and more responsive in general. Many FPS games can be played at high frame rates and any fluctuations will be handled by G-Sync. A single 2080 Ti will easily handle that monitor. 60fps is still good for third person action adventure games or traditional controller games, but every game gets better with higher frame rate. Even just basic Windows use is improved by a high refresh rate.

Avatar image for Juub1990
Juub1990

8761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 Juub1990
Member since 2013 • 8761 Posts
@BassMan said:

Do you not play shooters regularly? The difference between a 60hz monitor and a 120/144hz monitor is substantial. It feels much smoother, less blur, less input lag, and more responsive in general. Many FPS games can be played at high frame rates and any fluctuations will be handled by G-Sync. A single 2080 Ti will easily handle that monitor. 60fps is good for third person action adventure games though.

Yes I do and it's a load of exaggeration. 120fps feels nicer and smoother. Hilariously, where it benefits the most is actually the mouse smoothness on Windows. Otherwise you can do without. Unlike 60fps+ which for me is non-negotiable. I straight up dropped games for being stuck at 30fps. Never happened because a game couldn't run at 120 and I doubt many people care all that much about that too.

Avatar image for BassMan
BassMan

10765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 126

User Lists: 0

#33 BassMan  Online
Member since 2002 • 10765 Posts

@Juub1990: I disagree about the exaggeration. I no longer like to play shooters at 60fps. Any game where you are using mouse controls and constantly moving the view benefits greatly from high refresh rate. Nobody is saying 120fps or bust either. 60fps+ is still good for many games.

Avatar image for dxmcat
dxmcat

2792

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 dxmcat
Member since 2007 • 2792 Posts

I would vomit playing a FPS game at 30fps.

Plenty of other games I play at 60 tho happily, Like ones that are not FPS games :D

Avatar image for Pedro
Pedro

35716

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 64

User Lists: 0

#35 Pedro
Member since 2002 • 35716 Posts

Playing games at less than 600FPS is simply unplayable. :)

Avatar image for AdobeArtist
AdobeArtist

25171

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#36 AdobeArtist  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 25171 Posts

60 fps is just the new 30 fps.

Avatar image for phbz
phbz

4721

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 54

User Lists: 0

#37 phbz
Member since 2009 • 4721 Posts

I don't know, I like games to look nice and be fluid but at the same time I've been playing games for so long that I really don't care that much when they don't. And it always rubs me the wrong way this yuppie thing of "omg I bought this thing, now I can't believe how people enjoy that other thing I was bragging about yesterday".

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

28255

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#38  Edited By ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 28255 Posts

@rzxv04 said:

Maybe one day.

Perhaps with how things are slowing down on the h/w side of things. That 2080Ti will last about 2 generations.

Watch for Nvidia's 7nm slaughter.

Hint:

RTX 2080 (TU-104) decoupled six GPC/six geometry-raster engines with 64 ROPS, 10.67 ROPS per geometry-raster engines. This designed rivals Pascal GP102. Each GPC block contains at least a geometry-raster engine.

VS

Titan RTX (TU102)'s six GPC/six geometry-raster engines with 96 ROPS, 16 ROPS per geometry-raster engines ratio design.

RTX 2070 (Turing TU106)'s four GPC/four geometry-raster engines with 64 ROPS, 16 ROPS per geometry-raster engines ratio design.

GTX 1080(Pascal GP104)'s four GPC/four geometry-raster engines with 64 ROPS, 16 ROPS per geometry-raster engines ratio design.

Titan XP (Pascal GP102)'s six GPC/six geometry-raster engines with 96 ROPS, 16 ROPS per geometry-raster engines ratio design.

Expect nine geometry-raster engines with 96 ROPS to replace TU102's six geometry-raster engines with 96 ROPS design. Expected 50 percent performance increase for 7 nm RTX 2080 Ti replacement. RTX 2080's design has the groundwork for new GPU scaling.

Avatar image for i_p_daily
I_P_Daily

12906

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#39 I_P_Daily
Member since 2015 • 12906 Posts

@davillain-: @fedor: @pyro1245: It doesn't matter how many frames you can play a turd at its still a turd.

Avatar image for horgen
Horgen

121396

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#40 Horgen  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 121396 Posts

@BassMan said:

Where have you been the last 5 years? I bought the first 1440p/144hz G-Sync monitor (Asus ROG Swift PG278Q) when it came out in 2014.

Now you know why I always bitch about how shit 30fps is. Once you get used to a high refresh rate, it is painful to go back and play console exclusives at 30fps. Anyway, welcome to high quality gaming. Next step is Ultrawide. :)

The 100+ FPS really depends on the game you are playing though. I have mostly tested GTA V and the difference wasn't that major. Sure it is smooth with well above the 60 fps I had before.

I need a stronger CPU though. I think my RTX2080 is being limited.

Avatar image for pc_rocks
PC_Rocks

2614

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#41  Edited By PC_Rocks
Member since 2018 • 2614 Posts

@ajstyles said:

lol at people who can’t play games because of FPS.

I have no problem playing 30 or 60fps games. As long as it’s not under 30, I feel great.

That means almost all console games whether exclusive or multiplat. They all drops below 30 at certain points.

Avatar image for gtx021
gtx021

349

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 gtx021
Member since 2013 • 349 Posts

pc master race = RTX 2080TI,9900K $$$$$ rig.

pc peasant = RTX 2080,9900 non k,,

Avatar image for Yams1980
Yams1980

3635

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#43 Yams1980
Member since 2006 • 3635 Posts

A consoles like 500 dollars at most. You spent over 1200 dollars on a gpu. Can't compare anything when the graphics card alone is more than 2 or 3 times the cost of a console, not to mention all the other parts in a PC required to make one.

Avatar image for davillain-
DaVillain-

38642

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#44 DaVillain-  Moderator
Member since 2014 • 38642 Posts
@Yams1980 said:

A consoles like 500 dollars at most. You spent over 1200 dollars on a gpu. Can't compare anything when the graphics card alone is more than 2 or 3 times the cost of a console, not to mention all the other parts in a PC required to make one.

I own a RTX 2070 and I'm totally happy with it. No need to spend over a grand GPU unless it's gaming in 4K/60fps only. 1440p/144Hz is were it's at for me.

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

54046

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#45  Edited By lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 54046 Posts

@gtx021 said:

pc master race = RTX 2080TI,9900K $$$$$ rig.

pc peasant = RTX 2080,9900 non k,,

Your posts are borderline special ed lol.