First image from Call of Duty 2014! - IGN

  • 111 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for uninspiredcup
#51 Posted by uninspiredcup (25633 posts) -

@gpuking said:

DOn't know about the rest but the character's face absolutely shits on BF4 or Crysis3's.

My freind, the deliberate hard half tones are to hide the fact it doesn't look too great. To trick people such as yourself, not in the know.

Crysis 3 wins.

Avatar image for Opus_Rea-333
#52 Edited by Opus_Rea-333 (1238 posts) -

@Heil68 said:

Will PS4 have the best console version this year too?

Yea seems like it, but really it will be almost the same. Xbox One owners get their DLC content first.

Avatar image for _Matt_
#53 Posted by _Matt_ (10438 posts) -

@uninspiredcup said:

@gpuking said:

DOn't know about the rest but the character's face absolutely shits on BF4 or Crysis3's.

My freind, the deliberate hard half tones are to hide the fact it doesn't look too great. To trick people such as yourself, not in the know.

Crysis 3 wins.

Aye.

What is most worrying, is that they decided to tease their new game with a face that looks so mediocre. If this is the best thing they can show about the game currently... it doesn't bode well.

Avatar image for Bishop1310
#54 Posted by Bishop1310 (1274 posts) -

yay more modern warefare bull shit with flying robots and remote controlled dogs..

this series fucking sucks now

Avatar image for youngmurk911
#55 Edited by youngmurk911 (3895 posts) -

@ReadingRainbow4: real talk though

Avatar image for jsmoke03
#56 Posted by jsmoke03 (13696 posts) -

cod has never pushed the boundary of graphics. i dont know why they were content with 10 year old graphics engines. they should hire carmack to build them a new game engine. its been downhill since cod 4

Avatar image for lbjkurono23
#57 Edited by lbjkurono23 (12544 posts) -

@Heil68 said:

Will PS4 have the best console version this year too?

Of course it will! the ps4 is superior, but you knew that you cow.

Avatar image for Heil68
#58 Edited by Heil68 (57914 posts) -

@lbjkurono23 said:

@Heil68 said:

Will PS4 have the best console version this year too?

Of course it will! the ps4 is superior, but you knew that you cow.

So should we just acknowledge that the PS4 will always have the superior mulit plats????

Avatar image for Terrencec06
#59 Posted by Terrencec06 (4015 posts) -

doubt this is a new engine.

Avatar image for brimmul777
#60 Edited by brimmul777 (3436 posts) -

@Bigboi500 said:

Yay... more... Call of Duty... ... ...

Yup,that's what the gaming world needs.....Another Call of Duty.I would be alot more interested in an image of maybe Battlefield 5 or Halo 5 gameplay.Getting sick of Call of Duty.

Avatar image for o0squishy0o
#61 Edited by o0squishy0o (2792 posts) -

Its actually quite depressing to think that another modern warefare type game is on the way. I mean sure I dislike COD games, but I feel sorry for the dev team who must be sick of this. Can't we get a COD WW1 or something? Also add in destruction since DICE have been going backwards on destruction with Bad Company 2 being their best effort so far.

Avatar image for Sushiglutton
#62 Edited by Sushiglutton (6834 posts) -

If that's how the characters will look just imagine the fish AI :o!

Avatar image for lbjkurono23
#63 Posted by lbjkurono23 (12544 posts) -

@Heil68 said:

@lbjkurono23 said:

@Heil68 said:

Will PS4 have the best console version this year too?

Of course it will! the ps4 is superior, but you knew that you cow.

So should we just acknowledge that the PS4 will always have the superior mulit plats????

That's a given, not one single game in the x1 looks the part compared to the ps4. What more proof do you want?

Avatar image for 001011000101101
#64 Edited by 001011000101101 (4395 posts) -

Awesome picture. The look in his eye screams war to me and judging from prior COD games that's actually a really good thing. Many of them have war in their stories, so I'd say that is fitting.

It's extremely realistic looking that's for sure. It makes me wonder: Where will games go next? With graphics like these there are pretty much no limits! You can go to war in the jungle, in a city, in the desert! Everywhere! I hope the rest of the game will be as realistic as this. War games just can't get realistic enough for me. I want to play as a soldier who gets critically wounded and then you have to live the rest of his life as a vegetable. Just kidding of course. Or not. But seriously, this is seriously impressive. I love how gaming has evolved over the last few years. We are now seeing stories that are bigger and better than ever before. The innovation never stops and this picture is proof of that! I wonder who the enemy will be in this? Russians? Middle eastern people? The Chinese? The possibilities are endless.

Me and my gamer friends always sleep outside of Gamestop before a big game like this is coming out. We love building up hype for big releases like this. Headshot no-scope for the win LOL. I once got a perk that enabled me to shoot faster and my clan was just so jelly. EPIC FAIL. Good thing they were on my side. Don't mess with me when I have my perks on, bro. I play to win!

Avatar image for XboxStache
#65 Posted by XboxStache (1530 posts) -

@_Matt_ said:

@R4gn4r0k said:

@_Matt_ said:

@SNIPER4321 said:

if COD were PC exclusive. it would not release yearly. and we wouldnot have 10 COD games as of now.

it would have years development cycle. and we would be waiting for COD5 to come out and take decent PC advantage. it would have lean and peak, no regen health like COD1 and UO.

Ahhhh lean and peak.... health kits...

But nah, seriously, it's not the consoles that did this to CoD, it was the mass market and Halo that did this to CoD, the platform(s) it's on is irrelevant.

Are you hyped for Wolfenstein Sniper? No regen health, sneaky peaks, and all the weapons you want.

Yep, that's my point. Its popularity kills any creativity and its not a good thing for the graphics either.

I'm very hyped for Wolfenstein: The New Order. Looks like pure fun !

Agreed.

Wolfenstein looks like it is the perfect blend of new and old shooters; but I bet it will receive low scores from critics for not being mainstream enough. The journalism is as much at fault as the popularity.

Stfu! Wolfenstein will indeed suck. Lone wolf missions (where's the realism? Oh, you mean the realism that COD brought to the console market while shitty games like MOH had "you vs 300 nazis"), all the weapons you can pick up...yeah, because that's realistic. I'm sure a soldier could run a mile with 10 weapons plus ammo, plus med packs....then you have the supernatural power bullshit that Wolfenstein does which is beyond stupid. Wolfenstein could've been a great series if just because of atmosphere and sound alone, but they weren't thinking ahead.

I think COD's done a fantastic job of evolving gameplay. We got Javelins, drones, better graphics, some RTS elements, RPG elements, commandeering vehicles and aircraft, new weapons, great story, Dogs, Sharks (the first time the shark attacked me in Ghosts I was like wtf) and as always "tactical teamwork". Enjoy your stupid Wolfenstein...which literally has nothing appealing about it. You may as well be playing the premium version of Painkiller lmaooooooo.

Avatar image for _Matt_
#66 Posted by _Matt_ (10438 posts) -

@XboxStache said:

@_Matt_ said:

@R4gn4r0k said:

@_Matt_ said:

@SNIPER4321 said:

if COD were PC exclusive. it would not release yearly. and we wouldnot have 10 COD games as of now.

it would have years development cycle. and we would be waiting for COD5 to come out and take decent PC advantage. it would have lean and peak, no regen health like COD1 and UO.

Ahhhh lean and peak.... health kits...

But nah, seriously, it's not the consoles that did this to CoD, it was the mass market and Halo that did this to CoD, the platform(s) it's on is irrelevant.

Are you hyped for Wolfenstein Sniper? No regen health, sneaky peaks, and all the weapons you want.

Yep, that's my point. Its popularity kills any creativity and its not a good thing for the graphics either.

I'm very hyped for Wolfenstein: The New Order. Looks like pure fun !

Agreed.

Wolfenstein looks like it is the perfect blend of new and old shooters; but I bet it will receive low scores from critics for not being mainstream enough. The journalism is as much at fault as the popularity.

Stfu! Wolfenstein will indeed suck. Lone wolf missions (where's the realism? Oh, you mean the realism that COD brought to the console market while shitty games like MOH had "you vs 300 nazis"), all the weapons you can pick up...yeah, because that's realistic. I'm sure a soldier could run a mile with 10 weapons plus ammo, plus med packs....then you have the supernatural power bullshit that Wolfenstein does which is beyond stupid. Wolfenstein could've been a great series if just because of atmosphere and sound alone, but they weren't thinking ahead.

I think COD's done a fantastic job of evolving gameplay. We got Javelins, drones, better graphics, some RTS elements, RPG elements, commandeering vehicles and aircraft, new weapons, great story, Dogs, Sharks (the first time the shark attacked me in Ghosts I was like wtf) and as always "tactical teamwork". Enjoy your stupid Wolfenstein...which literally has nothing appealing about it. You may as well be playing the premium version of Painkiller lmaooooooo.

Oh I'm sorry, have I rustled your jimmies? Or are you just a poor troll?

Someone believing that CoD is 'realistic' is either completely delusional... or a kid... or on some crazy substance...

Though I think more likely you're just a terrible troll.

Avatar image for commonfate
#67 Posted by commonfate (13320 posts) -

The only thing more rehashed than CoD is all the hate it garners.

Avatar image for XboxStache
#68 Edited by XboxStache (1530 posts) -

@001011000101101: That was my impression of it as well. The face brings me back to Modern Warfare 1. :)

Avatar image for R4gn4r0k
#69 Posted by R4gn4r0k (27406 posts) -

@_Matt_ said:

@XboxStache said:

Stfu! Wolfenstein will indeed suck. Lone wolf missions (where's the realism? Oh, you mean the realism that COD brought to the console market while shitty games like MOH had "you vs 300 nazis"), all the weapons you can pick up...yeah, because that's realistic. I'm sure a soldier could run a mile with 10 weapons plus ammo, plus med packs....then you have the supernatural power bullshit that Wolfenstein does which is beyond stupid. Wolfenstein could've been a great series if just because of atmosphere and sound alone, but they weren't thinking ahead.

I think COD's done a fantastic job of evolving gameplay. We got Javelins, drones, better graphics, some RTS elements, RPG elements, commandeering vehicles and aircraft, new weapons, great story, Dogs, Sharks (the first time the shark attacked me in Ghosts I was like wtf) and as always "tactical teamwork". Enjoy your stupid Wolfenstein...which literally has nothing appealing about it. You may as well be playing the premium version of Painkiller lmaooooooo.

Oh I'm sorry, have I rustled your jimmies? Or are you just a poor troll?

Someone believing that CoD is 'realistic' is either completely delusional... or a kid... or on some crazy substance...

Though I think more likely you're just a terrible troll.

Hey, the man knows Painkiller, I'll give him that :P

Avatar image for XboxStache
#70 Posted by XboxStache (1530 posts) -

@_Matt_: You're such a dweeb, bro. Figures someone like yourself with a "ha-yoooj" ego would like a game like Wolfenstein. lol. I'll bet you believe it's real too. Do yourself a favor and go to the hardcore paintball ranges, then play Wolfenflop lol.

I can name a million FPS's better than Wolf. Arma, Cod, Bad company, Operation Flashpoint, heck, even the last MOH and that game sucked..

Avatar image for PAL360
#71 Edited by PAL360 (28859 posts) -

Call of Duty 2014? Its sad when we start saying the name of a game, followed by the year lol

Im sick of modern war shooters, anyway. Change the engine and go back to WWII setting, and i may give CoD another try..

Avatar image for _Matt_
#72 Posted by _Matt_ (10438 posts) -

@R4gn4r0k said:

@_Matt_ said:

@XboxStache said:

Stfu! Wolfenstein will indeed suck. Lone wolf missions (where's the realism? Oh, you mean the realism that COD brought to the console market while shitty games like MOH had "you vs 300 nazis"), all the weapons you can pick up...yeah, because that's realistic. I'm sure a soldier could run a mile with 10 weapons plus ammo, plus med packs....then you have the supernatural power bullshit that Wolfenstein does which is beyond stupid. Wolfenstein could've been a great series if just because of atmosphere and sound alone, but they weren't thinking ahead.

I think COD's done a fantastic job of evolving gameplay. We got Javelins, drones, better graphics, some RTS elements, RPG elements, commandeering vehicles and aircraft, new weapons, great story, Dogs, Sharks (the first time the shark attacked me in Ghosts I was like wtf) and as always "tactical teamwork". Enjoy your stupid Wolfenstein...which literally has nothing appealing about it. You may as well be playing the premium version of Painkiller lmaooooooo.

Oh I'm sorry, have I rustled your jimmies? Or are you just a poor troll?

Someone believing that CoD is 'realistic' is either completely delusional... or a kid... or on some crazy substance...

Though I think more likely you're just a terrible troll.

Hey, the man knows Painkiller, I'll give him that :P

True enough. :P

Avatar image for deactivated-59b71619573a1
#73 Posted by deactivated-59b71619573a1 (38222 posts) -

"Call of Duty: Allergy Warfare. Evil nose no bounds"

Avatar image for _Matt_
#74 Posted by _Matt_ (10438 posts) -

@XboxStache said:

@_Matt_: You're such a dweeb, bro. Figures someone like yourself with a "ha-yoooj" ego would like a game like Wolfenstein. lol. I'll bet you believe it's real too. Do yourself a favor and go to the hardcore paintball ranges, then play Wolfenflop lol.

I can name a million FPS's better than Wolf. Arma, Cod, Bad company, Operation Flashpoint, heck, even the last MOH and that game sucked..

Aaaand you answered my question perfectly there, thanks :) .

@PAL360 said:

Call of Duty 2014? Its sad when we start saying the name of a game, followed by the year lol

Im sick of modern war shooters, anyway. Go back to WWII setting and i may give CoD another try..

Yeah I'm a bit fed up of modern war shooters too, would love to see a new WWII setting for CoD.

Avatar image for R4gn4r0k
#75 Posted by R4gn4r0k (27406 posts) -

@XboxStache said:

@_Matt_: You're such a dweeb, bro. Figures someone like yourself with a "ha-yoooj" ego would like a game like Wolfenstein. lol. I'll bet you believe it's real too. Do yourself a favor and go to the hardcore paintball ranges, then play Wolfenflop lol.

I can name a million FPS's better than Wolf. Arma, Cod, Bad company, Operation Flashpoint, heck, even the last MOH and that game sucked..

Thing is he never claimed Wolfenstein to be realistic.

You did with COD though, lol

Avatar image for _Matt_
#76 Posted by _Matt_ (10438 posts) -

@seanmcloughlin said:

"Call of Duty: Allergy Warfare. Evil nose no bounds"

Dude that sounds awesome, sinus up for that day 1!

Avatar image for intotheminx
#77 Posted by intotheminx (2582 posts) -

Didn't Ghosts come out not long ago? If so, why in the world are we talking about the next installment already? That image is nothing special. Looks like something taken from a 360 game.

Avatar image for Kaze_no_Mirai
#80 Posted by Kaze_no_Mirai (11763 posts) -

Definitely a big step from the latest CoD games but still not really impressive, I'll probably end up renting it. I don't mind some mindless arcadey shooting once in a while.

Avatar image for Bread_or_Decide
#81 Posted by Bread_or_Decide (24923 posts) -

Look at that gameplay!

Avatar image for XboxStache
#82 Edited by XboxStache (1530 posts) -

@_Matt_: No. But I'm sure your mama would like a hug....from me.

You're a fucking meat patty, dude. Stfu. I'm fucking flaggin' you.

Avatar image for finalstar2007
#83 Posted by finalstar2007 (27920 posts) -

Interested i am.

Avatar image for Cyberdot
#84 Edited by Cyberdot (3928 posts) -

There is nothing impressive about that character model. We all have seen this before, looks like something that PS3 and X360 can render easily.

Avatar image for Cyberdot
#85 Posted by Cyberdot (3928 posts) -
@SNIPER4321 said:

@R4gn4r0k said:

Did anyone else notice this:

 But then again, why should they provide nice graphics when millions of people buy it no matter what.
But then again, why should they provide nice graphics when millions of people buy it no matter what.

What a surprise, another lazy COD. Crysis 1 has better looking character models and that game is 7(!) years old.

Welcome to 2007 Call of Duty

its kinda sad that 7 years old game still looks better than most games these days. show how consoles are holding us back. this 7 year old was on only graphics king but gameplay king too when it was out

i really hope ID soft will take full PC advantage on Doom 4.

Yeah, I'd get pissed if Doom 4 is disadvantaged by consoles. It shouldn't be on consoles after all, really.

Avatar image for SonySoldier-_-
#86 Posted by SonySoldier-_- (1186 posts) -

All three COD devs will have three years each for development time, as opposed to two years prior. Will the extra year of development time help make COD games any better?

Avatar image for Cranler
#87 Posted by Cranler (8809 posts) -

@lbjkurono23 said:

@Heil68 said:

Will PS4 have the best console version this year too?

Of course it will! the ps4 is superior, but you knew that you cow.

If PS 4 version of Ghosts is so superior why did Sony have Digital Foundry remove the multiplayer performance analysis from youtube?

Avatar image for SonySoldier-_-
#89 Edited by SonySoldier-_- (1186 posts) -

@intotheminx said:

Didn't Ghosts come out not long ago? If so, why in the world are we talking about the next installment already? That image is nothing special. Looks like something taken from a 360 game.

A new COD game comes out every November. There's InifitnyWard, Treyarch, and Sledgehammer taking turns in 3 year cycles.

Avatar image for Kevlar101
#90 Posted by Kevlar101 (6316 posts) -

I am willing to bet money that this will be Modern Warfare 4.

God damn. Just kill it already....

Avatar image for IgGy621985
#91 Posted by IgGy621985 (5449 posts) -

So it looks like Crysis 1.

Avatar image for Heil68
#92 Posted by Heil68 (57914 posts) -

@Cranler said:

@lbjkurono23 said:

@Heil68 said:

Will PS4 have the best console version this year too?

Of course it will! the ps4 is superior, but you knew that you cow.

If PS 4 version of Ghosts is so superior why did Sony have Digital Foundry remove the multiplayer performance analysis from youtube?

Didn't want to make lems go ballistic and that gesture by itself falls within the Live, Learn and Love philosophy that SONY practices.

Avatar image for musicalmac
#93 Posted by musicalmac (24894 posts) -

It's not something exploding, which is a change of pace. Um, but I'm left underwhelmed by this picture of a face. It's pretty good, but pretty good is pretty boring.

Avatar image for intotheminx
#94 Posted by intotheminx (2582 posts) -

@SonySoldier-_- said:

@intotheminx said:

Didn't Ghosts come out not long ago? If so, why in the world are we talking about the next installment already? That image is nothing special. Looks like something taken from a 360 game.

A new COD game comes out every November. There's InifitnyWard, Treyarch, and Sledgehammer taking turns in 3 year cycles.

What? I thought there was only infinityward and Treyarch. I've never heard of Sledgehammer lol. I'm gonna have to google em. Still yet this is overwhelming for fans, no?

Avatar image for Nengo_Flow
#95 Posted by Nengo_Flow (10644 posts) -

Call of Duty to have soldiers?

Any who gives a **** about COD?

But i do wnat to see what and how they improve now that the said that the move their lead developing platform to the PS4.

Avatar image for princessgomez92
#96 Edited by PrincessGomez92 (5122 posts) -

@Nengo_Flow said:

Call of Duty to have soldiers?

Any who gives a **** about COD?

But i do wnat to see what and how they improve now that the said that the move their lead developing platform to the PS4.

I think the millions that keep buying CoD "give a ****".

Avatar image for AcidTango
#97 Posted by AcidTango (1360 posts) -

The game will sell well no matter what. But seriously though enough with the fucking Modern War shit. The series needs to take a long break and get some new ideas but as long as they are selling as they do they will continue this way.

Avatar image for VERTIGO47
#99 Posted by VERTIGO47 (6954 posts) -

@XboxStache said:

@_Matt_ said:

@R4gn4r0k said:

@_Matt_ said:

@SNIPER4321 said:

if COD were PC exclusive. it would not release yearly. and we wouldnot have 10 COD games as of now.

it would have years development cycle. and we would be waiting for COD5 to come out and take decent PC advantage. it would have lean and peak, no regen health like COD1 and UO.

Ahhhh lean and peak.... health kits...

But nah, seriously, it's not the consoles that did this to CoD, it was the mass market and Halo that did this to CoD, the platform(s) it's on is irrelevant.

Are you hyped for Wolfenstein Sniper? No regen health, sneaky peaks, and all the weapons you want.

Yep, that's my point. Its popularity kills any creativity and its not a good thing for the graphics either.

I'm very hyped for Wolfenstein: The New Order. Looks like pure fun !

Agreed.

Wolfenstein looks like it is the perfect blend of new and old shooters; but I bet it will receive low scores from critics for not being mainstream enough. The journalism is as much at fault as the popularity.

Stfu! Wolfenstein will indeed suck. Lone wolf missions (where's the realism? Oh, you mean the realism that COD brought to the console market while shitty games like MOH had "you vs 300 nazis"), all the weapons you can pick up...yeah, because that's realistic. I'm sure a soldier could run a mile with 10 weapons plus ammo, plus med packs....then you have the supernatural power bullshit that Wolfenstein does which is beyond stupid. Wolfenstein could've been a great series if just because of atmosphere and sound alone, but they weren't thinking ahead.

I think COD's done a fantastic job of evolving gameplay. We got Javelins, drones, better graphics, some RTS elements, RPG elements, commandeering vehicles and aircraft, new weapons, great story, Dogs, Sharks (the first time the shark attacked me in Ghosts I was like wtf) and as always "tactical teamwork". Enjoy your stupid Wolfenstein...which literally has nothing appealing about it. You may as well be playing the premium version of Painkiller lmaooooooo.

LOL, go take your ADHD pills kiddo.

Wolfenstein was NEVER about realism, numb nuts. Totally different breed of FPS. If you're calling COD realistic, with lightning rapid fire shootouts, regenerative health, without any fire select and having auto-aim on, you need to get your ass kicked by a few Marines. LOL

Avatar image for jamejame
#100 Edited by jamejame (10621 posts) -

Love CoD. Can't wait. Much bigger fan of Battlefield, but CoD has the arcade-shooting gallery action down to a tee, and anyone who denies that the series is fun, even if it isn't their cup of tea, is a bandwagonner.