DF: World's most powerful console struggles to run PUBG!!!

Avatar image for loco145
#1 Posted by loco145 (11959 posts) -

Those jaguars!

Avatar image for tigerbalm
#2 Edited by Tigerbalm (868 posts) -

In before: Xbox Fanatics, "PATCHES!"

Avatar image for quadknight
#3 Edited by QuadKnight (10066 posts) -

😂😂😂😂 Uncompromised 12 fps!

"Feel the true powah!" TLHBO!

Avatar image for Shewgenja
#4 Edited by Shewgenja (19524 posts) -

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!

What a game changer! CINEMATIC MULTIPLAYER!

Avatar image for creepywelps
#5 Edited by Creepywelps (2153 posts) -

Oh.... Oh my...

Avatar image for quadknight
#6 Posted by QuadKnight (10066 posts) -

Lems are avoiding this thread like the plague. 😂 Isn't this supposed to be the main system seller for XboneX this holiday?

Avatar image for Shewgenja
#7 Posted by Shewgenja (19524 posts) -

Now we are experiencing TRUE POWER!

Avatar image for drlostrib
#8 Posted by DrLostRib (3651 posts) -

@Shewgenja said:

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!

What a game changer! CINEMATIC MULTIPLAYER!

wut?

Avatar image for joshrmeyer
#9 Edited by JoshRMeyer (9218 posts) -

Don't understand the hype for this game. It must be super fun because it has nothing else going for it.

Avatar image for cainetao11
#10 Posted by cainetao11 (33504 posts) -

Ran better last night than it does on my PS4 pro lmao

Avatar image for mastershake575
#11 Posted by mastershake575 (8497 posts) -

PUBG is very CPU intense and that's the one thing the X lacks (it's barely mid tier by 2009 standards). Ram and GPU are good but the CPU is complete trash

Avatar image for jackamomo
#12 Edited by Jackamomo (362 posts) -

@Shewgenja: I checked out the specs. Whilst they are higher. By a percentage point, it's like 4-5% more 'power'.

Avatar image for cainetao11
#13 Edited by cainetao11 (33504 posts) -

@joshrmeyer: Don't understand the hype for this game. It must be super fun because it has nothing else going for it."

Lol have you been playing video games for their emotional string pulling merits thus far?

Avatar image for Sgt_Crow
#14 Posted by Sgt_Crow (5556 posts) -

It’s not even fun to pick on Lems anymore. MS is making it too easy.

Avatar image for creepywelps
#15 Posted by Creepywelps (2153 posts) -

@cainetao11: it runs better than this on potato PC's.

Avatar image for cainetao11
#16 Posted by cainetao11 (33504 posts) -

@creepywelps: I experienced none of that last night during 4 hours playing. But knock yourself out, ill keep playing.

Avatar image for Jag85
#17 Edited by Jag85 (11377 posts) -

@mastershake575 said:

PUBG is very CPU intense and that's the one thing the X lacks (it's barely mid tier by 2009 standards). Ram and GPU are good but the CPU is complete trash

To make it run well on the X, it would need to be re-programmed and optimized for the GPU. But Christmas might already be gone by the time that happens. The X needs PUBG as a killer app for Christmas, so Microsoft rushed it.

Avatar image for creepywelps
#18 Edited by Creepywelps (2153 posts) -

@cainetao11: I will too, just on PC. Happy you didn't have any issue tho.

Avatar image for mastershake575
#19 Edited by mastershake575 (8497 posts) -
@Jag85 said:

To make it run well on the X, it would need to be re-programmed and optimized for the GPU. But Christmas might already be gone by the time that happens. The X needs PUBG as a killer app for Christmas, so Microsoft rushed it.

You can only optimize it so much when the CPU is that weak. In a large open world with 100 players and tons of action, CPU is NOT something you want to skimp on. They'll patch it to make it less choppy but there not gonna perform any miracles with what they have.

Avatar image for PCgameruk
#20 Posted by PCgameruk (2011 posts) -

@cainetao11 said:

@creepywelps: I experienced none of that last night during 4 hours playing. But knock yourself out, ill keep playing.

Take those fanboy goggles off and you might experience it.

Avatar image for joshrmeyer
#21 Posted by JoshRMeyer (9218 posts) -

@cainetao11: Huh? I said it must be fun. The graphics suck. The game is buggy and laggy.

Avatar image for 04dcarraher
#22 Edited by 04dcarraher (22916 posts) -

@Jag85 said:
@mastershake575 said:

PUBG is very CPU intense and that's the one thing the X lacks (it's barely mid tier by 2009 standards). Ram and GPU are good but the CPU is complete trash

To make it run well on the X, it would need to be re-programmed and optimized for the GPU.

Not going to happen, the few tasks you could throw onto the gpu instead can not make up the lack of processing power the cpu has. The devs have already made the game gpu bound as much as possible by making the game run at 4k. Fact is that cpu can not keep up with all the draw calls for the gpu and handle all the data concerning player locations and actions on the map. The game relies on brute processing power and not correctly using an even load balancing along all cores/threads aka proper multithreading.

The game still has alot of work to be done.

Avatar image for X_CAPCOM_X
#23 Posted by X_CAPCOM_X (7787 posts) -

that game has shitty optimization in the first place. I'm not surprised that it is gonna run shitty on consoles.

Avatar image for creepywelps
#24 Posted by Creepywelps (2153 posts) -

@joshrmeyer: and apparently it runs like complete shit

Avatar image for drlostrib
#25 Posted by DrLostRib (3651 posts) -

Should not be surprising to anyone who saw it or played it on PC

Avatar image for jtothamtothap
#26 Posted by JtoThaMtoThaP (827 posts) -

We've seen better, run better. Thank goodness all you cows can play this on the PC!

Avatar image for quadknight
#27 Edited by QuadKnight (10066 posts) -

@jtothamtothap: I’ve seen potato PCs run this game better than the XboneX. The problem here is the shitty Jaguar CPU which is i3 garbage-tier level.

Avatar image for Xabiss
#28 Edited by Xabiss (1567 posts) -

Simple answer. Early access and it will get better over time.

Avatar image for phbz
#29 Posted by phbz (2441 posts) -

Imagine it running on the PS Protato.

I'm sure the game will be patched before full release but I don't expect it to even come close of reaching 30fps on the beginning of each match.

Avatar image for creepywelps
#30 Posted by Creepywelps (2153 posts) -

@quadknight: any i3 from the last 5 or so years shits all over these jaguars.

Avatar image for xhawk27
#31 Posted by xhawk27 (10349 posts) -

On the PS4 Pro it would run at 4fps!

Avatar image for quadknight
#32 Posted by QuadKnight (10066 posts) -

@creepywelps: 😂 You’re right.

Avatar image for RR360DD
#33 Posted by RR360DD (13831 posts) -

Game that looks like ass runs like ass because it was rushed out (even for an early access game)

I'm shocked

Avatar image for BassMan
#34 Posted by BassMan (7950 posts) -

LOL @ consoles

Avatar image for cainetao11
#35 Posted by cainetao11 (33504 posts) -

@joshrmeyer: Just trying to stir crap up. Meant no harm.

Avatar image for jtothamtothap
#36 Posted by JtoThaMtoThaP (827 posts) -

@quadknight said:

@jtothamtothap: I’ve seen potato PCs run this game better than he XboneX. The problem here is true shitty Jaguar which is i3 garbage tier.

What does that make the PS4 Pro's CPU? lol it would fare must worse on your console of choice.

Avatar image for FLOPPAGE_50
#37 Posted by FLOPPAGE_50 (4430 posts) -

Funny how cows and hermits in this thread suddenly ignore optimization.

People with GTX 970s+ also have issues with this game, just read their forums/reddit.

Avatar image for xhawk27
#38 Posted by xhawk27 (10349 posts) -

The Xbox One X CPU is better in native DX12 games.

Avatar image for FLOPPAGE_50
#39 Posted by FLOPPAGE_50 (4430 posts) -

@drlostrib said:

Should not be surprising to anyone who saw it or played it on PC

Pretty much this.

All you gotta do is try playing on your PC or read their forums, This thread also proves many of you cows haven't touched this game on PC.


Optimization on PC is also bad. Got this from opening their forums for just a few seconds.

my specs are gtx 1080, 16gb of ram, 2tb hard drive, 1tb of ssd, core i7 and I run around 40-60fps of the very low settings. There is no way you could run this game with the recommended steam settings. I can run any game for example (battlefield one, mortal kombat) on max settings so I should be able to run this game on ultra or high settings. I have tried launch options:-USEALLAVAILABLECORES -sm4 -d3d10 -malloc=system -lowmemory, I have also tried editing gameusersettings, finally I have also used NVIDIA Control Panel to try to fix the fps (none with any success)

Fps Adv On Very Low Settings

Spawn 40-50fps / With Rain 30-45fps

City 35-55fps / City With Rain 30-50fps

In building 50-65fps / In Building With Rain 45-60fps

Open Land 50-60fps / Open Land With Rain 45-60fps

I have FPS peaks where I would go to about 90fps for a few min (depending where I am) then drop back down to 50, or I would have lag drops to about 30fps

Avatar image for quadknight
#40 Edited by QuadKnight (10066 posts) -

@jtothamtothap: It probably would but the difference is Sony isn’t hyping the PS4 Pro as a “Beast” and PUBG isn’t some coveted timed exclusive “marquee” title on the the PS4. 😂 Get rekt lems!

Avatar image for cainetao11
#41 Posted by cainetao11 (33504 posts) -

@PCgameruk: Take off your own and accept i didn't. I had to get that because DF did? I live in Brookly, NY. Come on over and play with me.

Avatar image for reduc_ab_
#42 Posted by Reduc_Ab_ (5563 posts) -

World's Most Powerful CPU Gimped Console.

Avatar image for kuu2
#43 Posted by kuu2 (10423 posts) -

Early access game and Cows laughing at a game that doesn't run on their system at all.

Avatar image for creepywelps
#44 Edited by Creepywelps (2153 posts) -

@FLOPPAGE_50: Wife has a 970 and a 6600k... Easily hits 60+fps, Soooo....

Avatar image for FLOPPAGE_50
#45 Edited by FLOPPAGE_50 (4430 posts) -

@creepywelps said:

@FLOPPAGE_50: Wife has a 970 and a 6600k... Easily hits 60+fps, Soooo....

That's not what Optimization means breh.

I know people with a 960-980 who are struggling with this game too, again go read their forums/reddit.

Avatar image for Heil68
#46 Edited by Heil68 (57942 posts) -

ahahahahaha...HAHAHAAHAH

@quadknight said:

😂😂😂😂 Uncompromised 12 fps!

"Feel the true powah!" TLHBO!

Avatar image for FLOPPAGE_50
#47 Posted by FLOPPAGE_50 (4430 posts) -

@kuu2 said:

Early access game and Cows laughing at a game that doesn't run on their system at all.

Well the usual cows need their daily circle jerk to ease their insecurities

Avatar image for howmakewood
#48 Edited by Howmakewood (4965 posts) -

It's a cpu heavy game that doesn't utilize more than 4 threads so not exactly shocking results, for example i3 8100 beats every Ryzen in the game

And no unless the engine sees fundamental changes the performance wont get much better

Avatar image for kingtito
#49 Posted by kingtito (9174 posts) -

@quadknight said:

@jtothamtothap: It probably would but the difference is Sony isn’t hyping the PS4 Pro as a “Beast” and PUBG isn’t some coveted timed exclusive “marquee” title on the the PS4. 😂 Get rekt lems!

They're not huh? Might want to open your eyes and ears quack. That's exactly what Sony was doing prior to launch AND the X1X reveal. After that, there really was no need seeing as the X1X shits all over it.

Avatar image for Pedro
#50 Posted by Pedro (29036 posts) -

The the game looks awful and performs awful. What the hell is happening behind the scenes of this game?